All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>,
	"Li, Susie" <susie.li@intel.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:46:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445589989.5117.19.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F00ADFD36C@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2094 bytes --]

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 08:35 +0000, Wu, Feng wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> > > > > On 23.10.15 at 04:12, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > Kindly ping ...
> > 
> > I can understand that you want to get this to make progress, but as
> > said a number of times before (in variouw contexts) - as long as
> > Intel
> > contributors in general and Intel maintainers in particular won't
> > become more active in reviewing patches, I don't think you can
> > expect the few of us to carry the load of reviewing all these large
> > series that have been submitted by Intel during the last couple of
> > months.
> 
> Yes, this is a large series, but most of them have been reviewed,
> right?
> And thanks to your review efforts on them. Now I think the remaining
> review effort will need be put to patch
> "[PATCH v8 15/17] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling",
> which was understand discussion among you, George, Dario, and me
> during the last couple of weeks, since the memory is still fresh, why
> not continue to review it? 
>
I'll have a look ASAP, probably today.

However, "why not continue to review it", I think Jan put down quite
some sensible arguments for it. Also, as he said, there is no chance
that we _don't_ continue to review the series, it's just a matter of
priorities, which are influenced by a lot of factors.

> And I think maybe it is more efficient to do
> it now.
> 
Hey, everyone of us has his own workflow, and his own definitions of
what's "more efficient". :-)

Given the timing, I think it's after all fine that you "Kindly ping"
this series... Just don't get too far with that! :-D :-D

Anyway, and jokes apart, as said, I was already planning to have a look
at this soon.

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-23  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12  8:54 [PATCH v8 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] VT-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design Feng Wu
2015-10-12 10:41   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-13  0:53     ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-29 15:56   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] Add cmpxchg16b support for x86-64 Feng Wu
2015-10-13 15:29   ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-14  5:57     ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-14  9:05       ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-14  9:29         ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-14  9:45           ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-14 10:03             ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-14 10:21               ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-14 10:25                 ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] iommu: Add iommu_intpost to control VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] vt-d: VT-d Posted-Interrupts feature detection Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] vmx: Extend struct pi_desc to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] vmx: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] vmx: Initialize VT-d Posted-Interrupts Descriptor Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] VT-d: Remove pointless casts Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 11/17] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] x86: move some APIC related macros to apicdef.h Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:54 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] Update IRTE according to guest interrupt config changes Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:55 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] vmx: Properly handle notification event when vCPU is running Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:55 ` [PATCH v8 15/17] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling Feng Wu
2015-10-26 14:39   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-27  5:19     ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-27  9:51       ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-28  1:50         ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-28  2:58         ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-28  9:03           ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-28 16:36             ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-29  5:39               ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-29  9:26                 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-29 14:07                   ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-27 12:16       ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-28  2:40         ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-27 12:22   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-12  8:55 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] VT-d: Dump the posted format IRTE Feng Wu
2015-10-12  8:55 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] Add a command line parameter for VT-d posted-interrupts Feng Wu
2015-10-23  2:12 ` [PATCH v8 00/17] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Wu, Feng
2015-10-23  8:13   ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-23  8:35     ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-23  8:46       ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2015-10-23  8:52         ` Wu, Feng
2015-10-29 10:51 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-29 14:05   ` Wu, Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1445589989.5117.19.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
    --cc=susie.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.