* [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload
@ 2015-12-17 1:32 yu.dai
2015-12-18 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: yu.dai @ 2015-12-17 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
The device struct_mutex needs to be held before releasing any GEM
objects allocated by GuC.
Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 625272f4..4748651 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -631,10 +631,10 @@ void intel_guc_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
+ mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
drm_gem_object_unreference(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj->base);
guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload
2015-12-17 1:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload yu.dai
@ 2015-12-18 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-18 20:06 ` Yu Dai
2015-12-18 20:38 ` [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a potential issue " yu.dai
2015-12-19 9:20 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2015-12-18 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yu.dai, intel-gfx
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, yu.dai@intel.com wrote:
> From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
>
> The device struct_mutex needs to be held before releasing any GEM
> objects allocated by GuC.
This is indeed so, but your patch subject needs to say it fixes an
actual bug rather than a "warning message problem" which makes one think
it's benign.
Also, if you see a warning splat in dmesg, please include that in the
commit message when you fix it. It's *much* easier to match bug reports
with fixes when you have that.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index 625272f4..4748651 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -631,10 +631,10 @@ void intel_guc_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
>
> + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
> i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
> drm_gem_object_unreference(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj->base);
> guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload
2015-12-18 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2015-12-18 20:06 ` Yu Dai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yu Dai @ 2015-12-18 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx
On 12/18/2015 01:55 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, yu.dai@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
> >
> > The device struct_mutex needs to be held before releasing any GEM
> > objects allocated by GuC.
>
> This is indeed so, but your patch subject needs to say it fixes an
> actual bug rather than a "warning message problem" which makes one think
> it's benign.
>
> Also, if you see a warning splat in dmesg, please include that in the
> commit message when you fix it. It's *much* easier to match bug reports
> with fixes when you have that.
>
I will change subject to something like "Fix a potential issue ..." and
with a warning message log in comment.
Thanks,
Alex
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > index 625272f4..4748651 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > @@ -631,10 +631,10 @@ void intel_guc_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
> >
> > + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
> > i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
> > drm_gem_object_unreference(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj->base);
> > guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a potential issue during driver unload
2015-12-17 1:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload yu.dai
2015-12-18 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2015-12-18 20:38 ` yu.dai
2015-12-21 12:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-19 9:20 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: yu.dai @ 2015-12-18 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
The device struct_mutex needs to be held before releasing any GEM
objects allocated by GuC.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1575 at include/drm/drm_gem.h:217 gem_release_guc_obj+0x5f/0x70 [i915]()
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff813c8b64>] dump_stack+0x44/0x60
[<ffffffff8107d642>] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xc0
[<ffffffff8107d78a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffffc02369ef>] gem_release_guc_obj+0x5f/0x70 [i915]
[<ffffffffc02380ba>] i915_guc_submission_fini+0x1a/0x70 [i915]
[<ffffffffc0235d09>] intel_guc_ucode_fini+0x29/0xa0 [i915]
[<ffffffffc029595d>] i915_driver_unload+0x14d/0x290 [i915]
[<ffffffffc00912a9>] drm_dev_unregister+0x29/0xb0 [drm]
[<ffffffffc00919d3>] drm_put_dev+0x23/0x60 [drm]
[<ffffffffc01d51b5>] i915_pci_remove+0x15/0x20 [i915]
[<ffffffff81419b49>] pci_device_remove+0x39/0xc0
[<ffffffff81527f51>] __device_release_driver+0xa1/0x150
[<ffffffff81528a85>] driver_detach+0xb5/0xc0
[<ffffffff815279b5>] bus_remove_driver+0x55/0xd0
[<ffffffff8152921c>] driver_unregister+0x2c/0x50
[<ffffffff814181e9>] pci_unregister_driver+0x29/0x90
[<ffffffffc0093174>] drm_pci_exit+0x94/0xb0 [drm]
[<ffffffffc02960c4>] i915_exit+0x20/0xf5c [i915]
[<ffffffff81102bc5>] SyS_delete_module+0x1b5/0x210
[<ffffffff817fc2b6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x75
---[ end trace f711c4eb63588bb7 ]---
v1: Add backtrace log.
Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 625272f4..4748651 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -631,10 +631,10 @@ void intel_guc_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
+ mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
drm_gem_object_unreference(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj->base);
guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT
2015-12-17 1:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload yu.dai
2015-12-18 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-18 20:38 ` [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a potential issue " yu.dai
@ 2015-12-19 9:20 ` Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2015-12-19 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yu.dai; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Summary ==
Built on 7cdc548e77f503593b83a1c5d58f4dcc862c17e2 drm-intel-nightly: 2015y-12m-18d-19h-26m-21s UTC integration manifest
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i5k-2)
dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-brixbox)
dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc)
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-x220t)
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc)
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (snb-dellxps)
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i7k-2)
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (snb-x220t)
Test kms_setmode:
Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-dellxps)
bdw-nuci7 total:135 pass:125 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:9
bdw-ultra total:132 pass:124 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:6
byt-nuc total:135 pass:120 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
hsw-brixbox total:135 pass:127 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:7
hsw-gt2 total:135 pass:130 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:4
ilk-hp8440p total:135 pass:100 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35
ivb-t430s total:135 pass:127 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:6
skl-i5k-2 total:135 pass:123 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:8
skl-i7k-2 total:135 pass:123 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:8
snb-dellxps total:135 pass:121 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
snb-x220t total:135 pass:121 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:11
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_727/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a potential issue during driver unload
2015-12-18 20:38 ` [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a potential issue " yu.dai
@ 2015-12-21 12:03 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-12-21 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yu.dai; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:38:59PM -0800, yu.dai@intel.com wrote:
> From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
>
> The device struct_mutex needs to be held before releasing any GEM
> objects allocated by GuC.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1575 at include/drm/drm_gem.h:217 gem_release_guc_obj+0x5f/0x70 [i915]()
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff813c8b64>] dump_stack+0x44/0x60
> [<ffffffff8107d642>] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8107d78a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [<ffffffffc02369ef>] gem_release_guc_obj+0x5f/0x70 [i915]
> [<ffffffffc02380ba>] i915_guc_submission_fini+0x1a/0x70 [i915]
> [<ffffffffc0235d09>] intel_guc_ucode_fini+0x29/0xa0 [i915]
> [<ffffffffc029595d>] i915_driver_unload+0x14d/0x290 [i915]
> [<ffffffffc00912a9>] drm_dev_unregister+0x29/0xb0 [drm]
> [<ffffffffc00919d3>] drm_put_dev+0x23/0x60 [drm]
> [<ffffffffc01d51b5>] i915_pci_remove+0x15/0x20 [i915]
> [<ffffffff81419b49>] pci_device_remove+0x39/0xc0
> [<ffffffff81527f51>] __device_release_driver+0xa1/0x150
> [<ffffffff81528a85>] driver_detach+0xb5/0xc0
> [<ffffffff815279b5>] bus_remove_driver+0x55/0xd0
> [<ffffffff8152921c>] driver_unregister+0x2c/0x50
> [<ffffffff814181e9>] pci_unregister_driver+0x29/0x90
> [<ffffffffc0093174>] drm_pci_exit+0x94/0xb0 [drm]
> [<ffffffffc02960c4>] i915_exit+0x20/0xf5c [i915]
> [<ffffffff81102bc5>] SyS_delete_module+0x1b5/0x210
> [<ffffffff817fc2b6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x75
> ---[ end trace f711c4eb63588bb7 ]---
>
> v1: Add backtrace log.
>
When resending a patch, please add everyone who commented on the previous
patch to the Cc: list here.
Thanks, Daniel
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index 625272f4..4748651 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -631,10 +631,10 @@ void intel_guc_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
>
> + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
> i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
> drm_gem_object_unreference(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj->base);
> guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-21 12:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-17 1:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix a warning message problem during driver unload yu.dai
2015-12-18 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-18 20:06 ` Yu Dai
2015-12-18 20:38 ` [PATCH v1] drm/i915/guc: Fix a potential issue " yu.dai
2015-12-21 12:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-19 9:20 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.