All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>,
	Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
	Dmitry Pervushin <dpervushin@gmail.com>,
	Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 1/4] irqchip: gic: Optimize locking in gic_raise_softirq
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:52:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450644757-18734-2-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450644757-18734-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>

Currently gic_raise_softirq() is locked using irq_controller_lock.
This lock is primarily used to make register read-modify-write sequences
atomic but gic_raise_softirq() uses it instead to ensure that the
big.LITTLE migration logic can figure out when it is safe to migrate
interrupts between physical cores.

This is sub-optimal in closely related ways:

1. No locking at all is required on systems where the b.L switcher is
   not configured.

2. Finer grain locking can be used on systems where the b.L switcher is
   present.

This patch resolves both of the above by introducing a separate finer
grain lock and providing conditionally compiled inlines to lock/unlock
it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index abf2ffaed392..0c4635ea308d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
 
 /*
+ * This lock is used by the big.LITTLE migration code to ensure no IPIs
+ * can be pended on the old core after the map has been updated.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(cpu_map_migration_lock);
+
+static inline void gic_migration_lock(unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_map_migration_lock, *flags);
+}
+
+static inline void gic_migration_unlock(unsigned long flags)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_map_migration_lock, flags);
+}
+#else
+static inline void gic_migration_lock(unsigned long *flags) {}
+static inline void gic_migration_unlock(unsigned long flags) {}
+#endif
+
+/*
  * The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match
  * the logical CPU numbering.  Let's use a mapping as returned
  * by the GIC itself.
@@ -763,7 +784,7 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long flags, map = 0;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
+	gic_migration_lock(&flags);
 
 	/* Convert our logical CPU mask into a physical one. */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
@@ -778,7 +799,7 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 	/* this always happens on GIC0 */
 	writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
 
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
+	gic_migration_unlock(flags);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -849,8 +870,17 @@ void gic_migrate_target(unsigned int new_cpu_id)
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
 
-	/* Update the target interface for this logical CPU */
+	/*
+	 * Update the target interface for this logical CPU
+	 *
+	 * From the point we release the cpu_map_migration_lock any new
+	 * SGIs will be pended on the new cpu which makes the set of SGIs
+	 * pending on the old cpu static. That means we can defer the
+	 * migration until after we have released the irq_controller_lock.
+	 */
+	raw_spin_lock(&cpu_map_migration_lock);
 	gic_cpu_map[cpu] = 1 << new_cpu_id;
+	raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_map_migration_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Find all the peripheral interrupts targetting the current
-- 
2.5.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 1/4] irqchip: gic: Optimize locking in gic_raise_softirq
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:52:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450644757-18734-2-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450644757-18734-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>

Currently gic_raise_softirq() is locked using irq_controller_lock.
This lock is primarily used to make register read-modify-write sequences
atomic but gic_raise_softirq() uses it instead to ensure that the
big.LITTLE migration logic can figure out when it is safe to migrate
interrupts between physical cores.

This is sub-optimal in closely related ways:

1. No locking at all is required on systems where the b.L switcher is
   not configured.

2. Finer grain locking can be used on systems where the b.L switcher is
   present.

This patch resolves both of the above by introducing a separate finer
grain lock and providing conditionally compiled inlines to lock/unlock
it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index abf2ffaed392..0c4635ea308d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
 
 /*
+ * This lock is used by the big.LITTLE migration code to ensure no IPIs
+ * can be pended on the old core after the map has been updated.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(cpu_map_migration_lock);
+
+static inline void gic_migration_lock(unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_map_migration_lock, *flags);
+}
+
+static inline void gic_migration_unlock(unsigned long flags)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_map_migration_lock, flags);
+}
+#else
+static inline void gic_migration_lock(unsigned long *flags) {}
+static inline void gic_migration_unlock(unsigned long flags) {}
+#endif
+
+/*
  * The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match
  * the logical CPU numbering.  Let's use a mapping as returned
  * by the GIC itself.
@@ -763,7 +784,7 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long flags, map = 0;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
+	gic_migration_lock(&flags);
 
 	/* Convert our logical CPU mask into a physical one. */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
@@ -778,7 +799,7 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 	/* this always happens on GIC0 */
 	writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
 
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_controller_lock, flags);
+	gic_migration_unlock(flags);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -849,8 +870,17 @@ void gic_migrate_target(unsigned int new_cpu_id)
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
 
-	/* Update the target interface for this logical CPU */
+	/*
+	 * Update the target interface for this logical CPU
+	 *
+	 * From the point we release the cpu_map_migration_lock any new
+	 * SGIs will be pended on the new cpu which makes the set of SGIs
+	 * pending on the old cpu static. That means we can defer the
+	 * migration until after we have released the irq_controller_lock.
+	 */
+	raw_spin_lock(&cpu_map_migration_lock);
 	gic_cpu_map[cpu] = 1 << new_cpu_id;
+	raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_map_migration_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * Find all the peripheral interrupts targetting the current
-- 
2.5.0

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-20 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-20 20:52 [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 0/4] irq/arm: Use FIQ for NMI backtrace (when possible) Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 20:52 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 20:52 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2015-12-20 20:52   ` [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 1/4] irqchip: gic: Optimize locking in gic_raise_softirq Daniel Thompson
2016-01-07 14:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-07 14:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-20 20:52 ` [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 2/4] irqchip: gic: Make gic_raise_softirq FIQ-safe Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 20:52   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-01-07 14:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-07 14:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-20 20:52 ` [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 3/4] irqchip: gic: Introduce plumbing for IPI FIQ Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 20:52   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-01-07 17:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-07 17:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-11 12:02     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-01-11 12:02       ` Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 20:52 ` [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 4/4] ARM: Allow IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE to exploit FIQ Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 20:52   ` Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 22:12   ` kbuild test robot
2015-12-20 22:12     ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-04 10:00     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-01-04 10:00       ` Daniel Thompson
2015-12-20 22:52   ` kbuild test robot
2015-12-20 22:52     ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-04 10:05     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-01-04 10:05       ` Daniel Thompson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450644757-18734-2-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
    --cc=dpervushin@gmail.com \
    --cc=drake@endlessm.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim@krieglstein.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.