All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations
@ 2015-12-30  7:44 P J P
  2015-12-30  7:44 ` P J P
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: P J P @ 2015-12-30  7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: QEMU Developers; +Cc: Jason Wang, Prasad J Pandit, Ling Liu

From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>

Hello,

An OOB r/w issue in ne2000 device emulation was reported by Mr Ling Liu, CC'd
here. The issue occurs while doing ne2000 ioport r/w operations, due to
incorrect array bounds checks.

Below is a proposed (tested)patch to fix this issue. Does it look okay?

Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit (1):
  net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations

 hw/net/ne2000.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--
2.4.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations
  2015-12-30  7:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations P J P
@ 2015-12-30  7:44 ` P J P
  2015-12-31  3:10   ` Jason Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: P J P @ 2015-12-30  7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: QEMU Developers; +Cc: Jason Wang, Prasad J Pandit, Ling Liu

From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>

While doing ioport r/w oprations, ne2000 device emulation suffers
from OOB r/w error. Update respective array bounds check to avoid
OOB access.

Reported-by: Ling Liu <liuling-it@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
---
 hw/net/ne2000.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/net/ne2000.c b/hw/net/ne2000.c
index 010f9ef..42e4804 100644
--- a/hw/net/ne2000.c
+++ b/hw/net/ne2000.c
@@ -447,9 +447,10 @@ static uint32_t ne2000_ioport_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
 static inline void ne2000_mem_writeb(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr,
                                      uint32_t val)
 {
-    if (addr < 32 ||
-        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
-        s->mem[addr] = val;
+    if (addr < 32
+        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
+            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint8_t))) {
+        s->mem[addr] = (uint8_t)val;
     }
 }
 
@@ -457,8 +458,9 @@ static inline void ne2000_mem_writew(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr,
                                      uint32_t val)
 {
     addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
-    if (addr < 32 ||
-        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
+    if (addr < 32
+        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
+            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint16_t))) {
         *(uint16_t *)(s->mem + addr) = cpu_to_le16(val);
     }
 }
@@ -467,17 +469,19 @@ static inline void ne2000_mem_writel(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr,
                                      uint32_t val)
 {
     addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
-    if (addr < 32 ||
-        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
+    if (addr < 32
+        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
+            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint32_t))) {
         stl_le_p(s->mem + addr, val);
     }
 }
 
 static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readb(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
 {
-    if (addr < 32 ||
-        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
-        return s->mem[addr];
+    if (addr < 32
+        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
+            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint8_t))) {
+        return (uint8_t)s->mem[addr];
     } else {
         return 0xff;
     }
@@ -486,8 +490,9 @@ static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readb(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
 static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readw(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
 {
     addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
-    if (addr < 32 ||
-        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
+    if (addr < 32
+        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
+            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint16_t))) {
         return le16_to_cpu(*(uint16_t *)(s->mem + addr));
     } else {
         return 0xffff;
@@ -497,8 +502,9 @@ static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readw(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
 static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readl(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
 {
     addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
-    if (addr < 32 ||
-        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
+    if (addr < 32
+        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
+            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint32_t))) {
         return ldl_le_p(s->mem + addr);
     } else {
         return 0xffffffff;
-- 
2.4.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations
  2015-12-30  7:44 ` P J P
@ 2015-12-31  3:10   ` Jason Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2015-12-31  3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: P J P, QEMU Developers; +Cc: Prasad J Pandit, Ling Liu



On 12/30/2015 03:44 PM, P J P wrote:
> From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
>
> While doing ioport r/w oprations, ne2000 device emulation suffers
> from OOB r/w error. Update respective array bounds check to avoid
> OOB access.
>
> Reported-by: Ling Liu <liuling-it@360.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
> ---
>  hw/net/ne2000.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/ne2000.c b/hw/net/ne2000.c
> index 010f9ef..42e4804 100644
> --- a/hw/net/ne2000.c
> +++ b/hw/net/ne2000.c
> @@ -447,9 +447,10 @@ static uint32_t ne2000_ioport_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
>  static inline void ne2000_mem_writeb(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr,
>                                       uint32_t val)
>  {
> -    if (addr < 32 ||
> -        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> -        s->mem[addr] = val;
> +    if (addr < 32
> +        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> +            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint8_t))) {

Patch makes sense just the check looks odd. I'd prefer something like:

uint8_t data = val;

if (... || addr + sizeof(data) <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE)

Thanks


> +        s->mem[addr] = (uint8_t)val;
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -457,8 +458,9 @@ static inline void ne2000_mem_writew(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr,
>                                       uint32_t val)
>  {
>      addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
> -    if (addr < 32 ||
> -        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> +    if (addr < 32
> +        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> +            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint16_t))) {
>          *(uint16_t *)(s->mem + addr) = cpu_to_le16(val);
>      }
>  }
> @@ -467,17 +469,19 @@ static inline void ne2000_mem_writel(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr,
>                                       uint32_t val)
>  {
>      addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
> -    if (addr < 32 ||
> -        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> +    if (addr < 32
> +        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> +            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint32_t))) {
>          stl_le_p(s->mem + addr, val);
>      }
>  }
>  
>  static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readb(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
>  {
> -    if (addr < 32 ||
> -        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> -        return s->mem[addr];
> +    if (addr < 32
> +        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> +            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint8_t))) {
> +        return (uint8_t)s->mem[addr];
>      } else {
>          return 0xff;
>      }
> @@ -486,8 +490,9 @@ static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readb(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
>  static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readw(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
>  {
>      addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
> -    if (addr < 32 ||
> -        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> +    if (addr < 32
> +        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> +            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint16_t))) {
>          return le16_to_cpu(*(uint16_t *)(s->mem + addr));
>      } else {
>          return 0xffff;
> @@ -497,8 +502,9 @@ static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readw(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
>  static inline uint32_t ne2000_mem_readl(NE2000State *s, uint32_t addr)
>  {
>      addr &= ~1; /* XXX: check exact behaviour if not even */
> -    if (addr < 32 ||
> -        (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START && addr < NE2000_MEM_SIZE)) {
> +    if (addr < 32
> +        || (addr >= NE2000_PMEM_START
> +            && addr <= NE2000_MEM_SIZE - sizeof(uint32_t))) {
>          return ldl_le_p(s->mem + addr);
>      } else {
>          return 0xffffffff;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-31  3:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-30  7:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: ne2000: fix bounds check in ioport operations P J P
2015-12-30  7:44 ` P J P
2015-12-31  3:10   ` Jason Wang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.