* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 4:52 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-20 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, Henry Chen Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c index af919b1..998f561 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) + /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { - int ret, irq; + int ret, irq, wdt_src; struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; const struct of_device_id *of_id = @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); + /* + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off + */ + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); -- 1.8.1.1.dirty ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 4:52 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-20 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c index af919b1..998f561 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) + /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { - int ret, irq; + int ret, irq, wdt_src; struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; const struct of_device_id *of_id = @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); + /* + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off + */ + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); -- 1.8.1.1.dirty ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 4:52 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-20 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, Henry Chen Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c index af919b1..998f561 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) + /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { - int ret, irq; + int ret, irq, wdt_src; struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; const struct of_device_id *of_id = @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); + /* + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off + */ + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); -- 1.8.1.1.dirty ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN 2016-01-20 4:52 ` Henry Chen (?) @ 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Daniel Kurtz @ 2016-01-20 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Henry Chen Cc: Matthias Brugger, Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > index af919b1..998f561 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > > +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > + > /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - int ret, irq; > + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > const struct of_device_id *of_id = > @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > + /* > + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > + */ It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is this always true? Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? Perhaps change the comment to: "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" Other than that, this patch is: Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > > -- > 1.8.1.1.dirty > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Daniel Kurtz @ 2016-01-20 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > index af919b1..998f561 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > > +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > + > /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - int ret, irq; > + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > const struct of_device_id *of_id = > @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > + /* > + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > + */ It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is this always true? Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? Perhaps change the comment to: "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" Other than that, this patch is: Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > > -- > 1.8.1.1.dirty > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Daniel Kurtz @ 2016-01-20 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Henry Chen Cc: Matthias Brugger, Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > index af919b1..998f561 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > > +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > + > /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - int ret, irq; > + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > const struct of_device_id *of_id = > @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > + /* > + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > + */ It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is this always true? Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? Perhaps change the comment to: "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" Other than that, this patch is: Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > > -- > 1.8.1.1.dirty > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz (?) @ 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-20 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Kurtz Cc: Matthias Brugger, Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > > monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > > > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > index af919b1..998f561 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > > > > +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > > + > > /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > > #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > > #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > > @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > - int ret, irq; > > + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > const struct of_device_id *of_id = > > @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > > + /* > > + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > > + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > > + */ > > It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is > this always true? > Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? > I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? > What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to set STAUPD. Henry > Perhaps change the comment to: > "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all > devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" > > Other than that, this patch is: > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > > > + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > > pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > > > > -- > > 1.8.1.1.dirty > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-20 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > > monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > > > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > index af919b1..998f561 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > > > > +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > > + > > /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > > #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > > #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > > @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > - int ret, irq; > > + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > const struct of_device_id *of_id = > > @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > > + /* > > + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > > + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > > + */ > > It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is > this always true? > Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? > I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? > What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to set STAUPD. Henry > Perhaps change the comment to: > "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all > devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" > > Other than that, this patch is: > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > > > + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > > pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > > > > -- > > 1.8.1.1.dirty > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-20 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Kurtz Cc: Matthias Brugger, Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > > monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > > > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > index af919b1..998f561 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > > #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > > > > +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > > +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > > + > > /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > > #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > > #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > > @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > > > > static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > - int ret, irq; > > + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > > struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > const struct of_device_id *of_id = > > @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > > - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > > + /* > > + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > > + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > > + */ > > It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is > this always true? > Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? > I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? > What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to set STAUPD. Henry > Perhaps change the comment to: > "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all > devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" > > Other than that, this patch is: > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > > > + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > > + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > > + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > > pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > > > > -- > > 1.8.1.1.dirty > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen (?) @ 2016-01-21 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Matthias Brugger @ 2016-01-21 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Henry Chen, Daniel Kurtz Cc: Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On 20/01/16 12:11, Henry Chen wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: >>> Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout >>> monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> >> >>> --- >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> index af919b1..998f561 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) >>> >>> +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) >>> + >>> /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) >>> @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); >>> >>> static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> - int ret, irq; >>> + int ret, irq, wdt_src; >>> struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; >>> const struct of_device_id *of_id = >>> @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> >>> /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); >>> - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); >>> + /* >>> + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, >>> + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off >>> + */ >> >> It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is >> this always true? >> Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? >> I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? >> What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? > > MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different > with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to > set STAUPD. > I think we already had this discussion once. It seems as if there are different versions of pmic-wrapper. An older version used by mt8135 and e.g. mt6589 and a newer one used by mt8173. So I agree with Daniel that we should check pwrap_is_mt8173 instead. Apart from that the patch looks good. Regards, Matthias > Henry > >> Perhaps change the comment to: >> "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all >> devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" >> > >> Other than that, this patch is: >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> >> >>> + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; >>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); >>> >>> -- >>> 1.8.1.1.dirty >>> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-21 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Matthias Brugger @ 2016-01-21 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 20/01/16 12:11, Henry Chen wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: >>> Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout >>> monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> >> >>> --- >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> index af919b1..998f561 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) >>> >>> +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) >>> + >>> /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) >>> @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); >>> >>> static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> - int ret, irq; >>> + int ret, irq, wdt_src; >>> struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; >>> const struct of_device_id *of_id = >>> @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> >>> /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); >>> - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); >>> + /* >>> + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, >>> + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off >>> + */ >> >> It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is >> this always true? >> Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? >> I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? >> What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? > > MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different > with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to > set STAUPD. > I think we already had this discussion once. It seems as if there are different versions of pmic-wrapper. An older version used by mt8135 and e.g. mt6589 and a newer one used by mt8173. So I agree with Daniel that we should check pwrap_is_mt8173 instead. Apart from that the patch looks good. Regards, Matthias > Henry > >> Perhaps change the comment to: >> "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all >> devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" >> > >> Other than that, this patch is: >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> >> >>> + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; >>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); >>> >>> -- >>> 1.8.1.1.dirty >>> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-21 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Matthias Brugger @ 2016-01-21 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Henry Chen, Daniel Kurtz Cc: Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On 20/01/16 12:11, Henry Chen wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: >>> Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout >>> monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> >> >>> --- >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> index af919b1..998f561 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) >>> >>> +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) >>> + >>> /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) >>> @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); >>> >>> static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> - int ret, irq; >>> + int ret, irq, wdt_src; >>> struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; >>> const struct of_device_id *of_id = >>> @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> >>> /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); >>> - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); >>> + /* >>> + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, >>> + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off >>> + */ >> >> It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is >> this always true? >> Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? >> I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? >> What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? > > MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different > with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to > set STAUPD. > I think we already had this discussion once. It seems as if there are different versions of pmic-wrapper. An older version used by mt8135 and e.g. mt6589 and a newer one used by mt8173. So I agree with Daniel that we should check pwrap_is_mt8173 instead. Apart from that the patch looks good. Regards, Matthias > Henry > >> Perhaps change the comment to: >> "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all >> devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" >> > >> Other than that, this patch is: >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> >> >>> + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; >>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); >>> >>> -- >>> 1.8.1.1.dirty >>> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-21 10:28 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-21 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: Daniel Kurtz, Sascha Hauer, linux-arm-kernel, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 20/01/16 12:11, Henry Chen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > >>> Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > >>> monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > >> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> index af919b1..998f561 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > >>> > >>> +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > >>> + > >>> /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > >>> @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > >>> > >>> static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>> { > >>> - int ret, irq; > >>> + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > >>> struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > >>> const struct of_device_id *of_id = > >>> @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>> > >>> /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > >>> - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > >>> + /* > >>> + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > >>> + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > >>> + */ > >> > >> It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is > >> this always true? > >> Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? > >> I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? > >> What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? > > > > MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different > > with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to > > set STAUPD. > > > > I think we already had this discussion once. It seems as if there are > different versions of pmic-wrapper. An older version used by mt8135 and > e.g. mt6589 and a newer one used by mt8173. > > So I agree with Daniel that we should check pwrap_is_mt8173 instead. > Apart from that the patch looks good. > Ok, I will send a patch to change that, thanks. Henry > Regards, > Matthias > > > Henry > > > >> Perhaps change the comment to: > >> "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all > >> devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" > >> > > > >> Other than that, this patch is: > >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > >> > >>> + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > >>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > >>> > >>> -- > >>> 1.8.1.1.dirty > >>> > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-21 10:28 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-21 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 20/01/16 12:11, Henry Chen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> wrote: > >>> Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > >>> monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> > >> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> index af919b1..998f561 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > >>> > >>> +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > >>> + > >>> /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > >>> @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > >>> > >>> static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>> { > >>> - int ret, irq; > >>> + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > >>> struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > >>> const struct of_device_id *of_id = > >>> @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>> > >>> /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > >>> - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > >>> + /* > >>> + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > >>> + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > >>> + */ > >> > >> It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is > >> this always true? > >> Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? > >> I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? > >> What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? > > > > MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different > > with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to > > set STAUPD. > > > > I think we already had this discussion once. It seems as if there are > different versions of pmic-wrapper. An older version used by mt8135 and > e.g. mt6589 and a newer one used by mt8173. > > So I agree with Daniel that we should check pwrap_is_mt8173 instead. > Apart from that the patch looks good. > Ok, I will send a patch to change that, thanks. Henry > Regards, > Matthias > > > Henry > > > >> Perhaps change the comment to: > >> "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all > >> devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" > >> > > > >> Other than that, this patch is: > >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> > >> > >>> + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > >>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > >>> > >>> -- > >>> 1.8.1.1.dirty > >>> > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN @ 2016-01-21 10:28 ` Henry Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Henry Chen @ 2016-01-21 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: Sascha Hauer, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 20/01/16 12:11, Henry Chen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 02:32 -0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen <henryc.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >>> Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout > >>> monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > >> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> index af919b1..998f561 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > >>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ > >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD (0x9 << 8) > >>> #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ (0xa << 8) > >>> > >>> +/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */ > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG (1 << 25) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE (1 << 20) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE (1 << 6) > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL 0xffffffff > >>> +#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \ > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \ > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE) > >>> + > >>> /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */ > >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE 0xbc00 > >>> #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0) > >>> @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl); > >>> > >>> static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>> { > >>> - int ret, irq; > >>> + int ret, irq, wdt_src; > >>> struct pmic_wrapper *wrp; > >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > >>> const struct of_device_id *of_id = > >>> @@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>> > >>> /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */ > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT); > >>> - pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > >>> + /* > >>> + * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform, > >>> + * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off > >>> + */ > >> > >> It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173. Is > >> this always true? > >> Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too? > >> I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit? > >> What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173? > > > > MT8135 used STAUPD because it have pwrap event pin and it was different > > with mt8173. pwrap event have been removed on mt8173, so it no need to > > set STAUPD. > > > > I think we already had this discussion once. It seems as if there are > different versions of pmic-wrapper. An older version used by mt8135 and > e.g. mt6589 and a newer one used by mt8173. > > So I agree with Daniel that we should check pwrap_is_mt8173 instead. > Apart from that the patch looks good. > Ok, I will send a patch to change that, thanks. Henry > Regards, > Matthias > > > Henry > > > >> Perhaps change the comment to: > >> "This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all > >> devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts" > >> > > > >> Other than that, this patch is: > >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> > >> > >>> + wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ? > >>> + PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD; > >>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN); > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN); > >>> pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN); > >>> > >>> -- > >>> 1.8.1.1.dirty > >>> > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-21 10:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-01-20 4:52 [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN Henry Chen 2016-01-20 4:52 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-20 4:52 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz 2016-01-20 10:32 ` Daniel Kurtz 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-20 11:11 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-21 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger 2016-01-21 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger 2016-01-21 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger 2016-01-21 10:28 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-21 10:28 ` Henry Chen 2016-01-21 10:28 ` Henry Chen
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.