All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache
@ 2016-01-25 22:05 Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

This patch speeds up extent_node shrinker by introducing linked list.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h         |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index ccd5c63..18311ff 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ static struct extent_node *__attach_extent_node(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 		return NULL;
 
 	en->ei = *ei;
+	en->et = et;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&en->list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&en->vlist);
 
 	rb_link_node(&en->rb_node, parent, p);
 	rb_insert_color(&en->rb_node, &et->root);
@@ -129,7 +131,7 @@ static struct extent_node *__init_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 }
 
 static unsigned int __free_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-					struct extent_tree *et, bool free_all)
+					struct extent_tree *et)
 {
 	struct rb_node *node, *next;
 	struct extent_node *en;
@@ -137,17 +139,19 @@ static unsigned int __free_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 
 	node = rb_first(&et->root);
 	while (node) {
+		bool need_free = false;
+
 		next = rb_next(node);
 		en = rb_entry(node, struct extent_node, rb_node);
 
-		if (free_all) {
-			spin_lock(&sbi->extent_lock);
-			if (!list_empty(&en->list))
-				list_del_init(&en->list);
-			spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
+		spin_lock(&sbi->extent_lock);
+		if (!list_empty(&en->list)) {
+			list_del_init(&en->list);
+			need_free = true;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
 
-		if (free_all || list_empty(&en->list)) {
+		if (need_free) {
 			__detach_extent_node(sbi, et, en);
 			kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, en);
 		}
@@ -438,6 +442,7 @@ static unsigned int f2fs_update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
 	while (en && en->ei.fofs < end) {
 		unsigned int org_end;
 		int parts = 0;	/* # of parts current extent split into */
+		bool need_free = false;
 
 		next_en = en1 = NULL;
 
@@ -493,14 +498,16 @@ static unsigned int f2fs_update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
 
 		/* update in global extent list */
 		spin_lock(&sbi->extent_lock);
-		if (!parts && !list_empty(&en->list))
+		if (!parts && !list_empty(&en->list)) {
 			list_del(&en->list);
+			need_free = true;
+		}
 		if (en1)
 			list_add_tail(&en1->list, &sbi->extent_list);
 		spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
 
 		/* release extent node */
-		if (!parts)
+		if (!parts && need_free)
 			kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, en);
 
 		en = next_en;
@@ -509,6 +516,7 @@ static unsigned int f2fs_update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
 	/* 3. update extent in extent cache */
 	if (blkaddr) {
 		struct extent_node *den = NULL;
+		bool need_free = false;
 
 		set_extent_info(&ei, fofs, blkaddr, len);
 		en1 = __try_merge_extent_node(sbi, et, &ei, &den,
@@ -532,16 +540,18 @@ static unsigned int f2fs_update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
 			else
 				list_move_tail(&en1->list, &sbi->extent_list);
 		}
-		if (den && !list_empty(&den->list))
+		if (den && !list_empty(&den->list)) {
 			list_del(&den->list);
+			need_free = true;
+		}
 		spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
 
-		if (den)
+		if (den && need_free)
 			kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, den);
 	}
 
 	if (is_inode_flag_set(F2FS_I(inode), FI_NO_EXTENT))
-		__free_extent_tree(sbi, et, true);
+		__free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
 
 	write_unlock(&et->lock);
 
@@ -550,14 +560,12 @@ static unsigned int f2fs_update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
 
 unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
 {
-	struct extent_tree *treevec[EXT_TREE_VEC_SIZE];
 	struct extent_tree *et, *next;
 	struct extent_node *en, *tmp;
-	unsigned long ino = F2FS_ROOT_INO(sbi);
-	unsigned int found;
 	unsigned int node_cnt = 0, tree_cnt = 0;
 	int remained;
 	bool do_free = false;
+	LIST_HEAD(victim_list);
 
 	if (!test_opt(sbi, EXTENT_CACHE))
 		return 0;
@@ -572,7 +580,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(et, next, &sbi->zombie_list, list) {
 		if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
 			write_lock(&et->lock);
-			node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et, true);
+			node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
 			write_unlock(&et->lock);
 		}
 
@@ -600,6 +608,8 @@ free_node:
 		if (!remained--)
 			break;
 		list_del_init(&en->list);
+		list_add_tail(&en->vlist, &victim_list);
+		tree_cnt++;
 		do_free = true;
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
@@ -607,31 +617,13 @@ free_node:
 	if (do_free == false)
 		goto unlock_out;
 
-	/*
-	 * reset ino for searching victims from beginning of global extent tree.
-	 */
-	ino = F2FS_ROOT_INO(sbi);
-
-	while ((found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&sbi->extent_tree_root,
-				(void **)treevec, ino, EXT_TREE_VEC_SIZE))) {
-		unsigned i;
-
-		ino = treevec[found - 1]->ino + 1;
-		for (i = 0; i < found; i++) {
-			struct extent_tree *et = treevec[i];
-
-			if (!atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
-				continue;
-
-			if (write_trylock(&et->lock)) {
-				node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et, false);
-				write_unlock(&et->lock);
-			}
-
-			if (node_cnt + tree_cnt >= nr_shrink)
-				goto unlock_out;
-		}
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(en, tmp, &victim_list, vlist) {
+		write_lock(&en->et->lock);
+		__detach_extent_node(sbi, en->et, en);
+		write_unlock(&en->et->lock);
+		kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, en);
 	}
+
 unlock_out:
 	up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
 out:
@@ -650,7 +642,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)
 		return 0;
 
 	write_lock(&et->lock);
-	node_cnt = __free_extent_tree(sbi, et, true);
+	node_cnt = __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
 	write_unlock(&et->lock);
 
 	return node_cnt;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index c4e723b..0bbbfed 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -353,7 +353,9 @@ struct extent_info {
 struct extent_node {
 	struct rb_node rb_node;		/* rb node located in rb-tree */
 	struct list_head list;		/* node in global extent list of sbi */
+	struct list_head vlist;		/* node in victim extent list */
 	struct extent_info ei;		/* extent info */
+	struct extent_tree *et;		/* extent tree pointer */
 };
 
 struct extent_tree {
-- 
2.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: give scheduling point in shrinking path
  2016-01-25 22:05 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

It needs to give a chance to be rescheduled while shrinking slab entries.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 18311ff..af53503 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -593,6 +593,8 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
 
 		if (node_cnt + tree_cnt >= nr_shrink)
 			goto unlock_out;
+
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 	up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
 
@@ -622,6 +624,7 @@ free_node:
 		__detach_extent_node(sbi, en->et, en);
 		write_unlock(&en->et->lock);
 		kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, en);
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 
 unlock_out:
-- 
2.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: give scheduling point in shrinking path
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

It needs to give a chance to be rescheduled while shrinking slab entries.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 18311ff..af53503 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -593,6 +593,8 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
 
 		if (node_cnt + tree_cnt >= nr_shrink)
 			goto unlock_out;
+
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 	up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
 
@@ -622,6 +624,7 @@ free_node:
 		__detach_extent_node(sbi, en->et, en);
 		write_unlock(&en->et->lock);
 		kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, en);
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 
 unlock_out:
-- 
2.6.3


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/6] f2fs: do f2fs_balance_fs when block is allocated
  2016-01-25 22:05 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

We should consider data block allocation to trigger f2fs_balance_fs.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index f057ada..89a37ba 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int __allocate_data_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 	struct dnode_of_data dn;
 	u64 start = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(offset);
 	u64 len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(count);
-	bool allocated;
+	bool allocated = false;
 	u64 end_offset;
 	int err = 0;
 
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int __allocate_data_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 		f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 		f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
 
-		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 	}
 	return err;
 
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ sync_out:
 	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 out:
 	f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
-	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ get_next:
 	if (dn.ofs_in_node >= end_offset) {
 		if (allocated)
 			sync_inode_page(&dn);
-		allocated = false;
 		f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 
 		if (create) {
 			f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
-			f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+			f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 			f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
 		}
+		allocated = false;
 
 		set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
 		err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, pgofs, mode);
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ put_out:
 unlock_out:
 	if (create) {
 		f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
-		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 	}
 out:
 	trace_f2fs_map_blocks(inode, map, err);
-- 
2.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/6] f2fs: do f2fs_balance_fs when block is allocated
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

We should consider data block allocation to trigger f2fs_balance_fs.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index f057ada..89a37ba 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int __allocate_data_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 	struct dnode_of_data dn;
 	u64 start = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(offset);
 	u64 len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(count);
-	bool allocated;
+	bool allocated = false;
 	u64 end_offset;
 	int err = 0;
 
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int __allocate_data_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 		f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 		f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
 
-		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 	}
 	return err;
 
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ sync_out:
 	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 out:
 	f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
-	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -688,14 +688,14 @@ get_next:
 	if (dn.ofs_in_node >= end_offset) {
 		if (allocated)
 			sync_inode_page(&dn);
-		allocated = false;
 		f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 
 		if (create) {
 			f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
-			f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+			f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 			f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
 		}
+		allocated = false;
 
 		set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
 		err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, pgofs, mode);
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ put_out:
 unlock_out:
 	if (create) {
 		f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
-		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
+		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, allocated);
 	}
 out:
 	trace_f2fs_map_blocks(inode, map, err);
-- 
2.6.3


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
  2016-01-25 22:05 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

The sceanrio is:
1. create fully node blocks
2. flush node blocks
3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again
4. flush node blocks redundantly

So, this patch tries to flush inline_data when flushing node blocks.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c   |  1 +
 fs/f2fs/inline.c |  2 ++
 fs/f2fs/node.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/f2fs/node.h   | 15 +++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 89a37ba..260c0eb 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ restart:
 		if (pos + len <= MAX_INLINE_DATA) {
 			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
 			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
+			set_inline_node(ipage);
 			sync_inode_page(&dn);
 		} else {
 			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index 8df13e5..fc4d298 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ no_update:
 
 	/* clear inline data and flag after data writeback */
 	truncate_inline_inode(dn->inode_page, 0);
+	clear_inline_node(dn->inode_page);
 clear_out:
 	stat_dec_inline_inode(dn->inode);
 	f2fs_clear_inline_inode(dn->inode);
@@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
 
 	sync_inode_page(&dn);
+	clear_inline_node(dn.inode_page);
 	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 23b800d..94a6755 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1154,6 +1154,37 @@ void sync_inode_page(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
 	dn->node_changed = ret ? true: false;
 }
 
+static void flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
+{
+	struct inode *inode;
+	struct page *page;
+
+	/* should flush inline_data before evict_inode */
+	inode = ilookup(sbi->sb, ino);
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	page = pagecache_get_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, FGP_LOCK|FGP_NOWAIT, 0);
+	if (!page)
+		goto iput_out;
+
+	if (!PageUptodate(page))
+		goto page_out;
+
+	if (!PageDirty(page))
+		goto page_out;
+
+	if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
+		goto page_out;
+
+	if (!f2fs_write_inline_data(inode, page))
+		inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
+page_out:
+	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
+iput_out:
+	iput(inode);
+}
+
 int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
 					struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
@@ -1221,6 +1252,14 @@ continue_unlock:
 				goto continue_unlock;
 			}
 
+			/* flush inline_data */
+			if (!ino && is_inline_node(page)) {
+				clear_inline_node(page);
+				unlock_page(page);
+				flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
 				goto continue_unlock;
 
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
index 23bd992..1f4f9d4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
@@ -379,6 +379,21 @@ static inline int is_node(struct page *page, int type)
 #define is_fsync_dnode(page)	is_node(page, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
 #define is_dent_dnode(page)	is_node(page, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
 
+static inline int is_inline_node(struct page *page)
+{
+	return PageChecked(page);
+}
+
+static inline void set_inline_node(struct page *page)
+{
+	SetPageChecked(page);
+}
+
+static inline void clear_inline_node(struct page *page)
+{
+	ClearPageChecked(page);
+}
+
 static inline void set_cold_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 {
 	struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
-- 
2.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

The sceanrio is:
1. create fully node blocks
2. flush node blocks
3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again
4. flush node blocks redundantly

So, this patch tries to flush inline_data when flushing node blocks.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c   |  1 +
 fs/f2fs/inline.c |  2 ++
 fs/f2fs/node.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/f2fs/node.h   | 15 +++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 89a37ba..260c0eb 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ restart:
 		if (pos + len <= MAX_INLINE_DATA) {
 			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
 			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
+			set_inline_node(ipage);
 			sync_inode_page(&dn);
 		} else {
 			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index 8df13e5..fc4d298 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ no_update:
 
 	/* clear inline data and flag after data writeback */
 	truncate_inline_inode(dn->inode_page, 0);
+	clear_inline_node(dn->inode_page);
 clear_out:
 	stat_dec_inline_inode(dn->inode);
 	f2fs_clear_inline_inode(dn->inode);
@@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
 
 	sync_inode_page(&dn);
+	clear_inline_node(dn.inode_page);
 	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 23b800d..94a6755 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1154,6 +1154,37 @@ void sync_inode_page(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
 	dn->node_changed = ret ? true: false;
 }
 
+static void flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
+{
+	struct inode *inode;
+	struct page *page;
+
+	/* should flush inline_data before evict_inode */
+	inode = ilookup(sbi->sb, ino);
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	page = pagecache_get_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, FGP_LOCK|FGP_NOWAIT, 0);
+	if (!page)
+		goto iput_out;
+
+	if (!PageUptodate(page))
+		goto page_out;
+
+	if (!PageDirty(page))
+		goto page_out;
+
+	if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
+		goto page_out;
+
+	if (!f2fs_write_inline_data(inode, page))
+		inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
+page_out:
+	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
+iput_out:
+	iput(inode);
+}
+
 int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
 					struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
@@ -1221,6 +1252,14 @@ continue_unlock:
 				goto continue_unlock;
 			}
 
+			/* flush inline_data */
+			if (!ino && is_inline_node(page)) {
+				clear_inline_node(page);
+				unlock_page(page);
+				flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
 				goto continue_unlock;
 
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
index 23bd992..1f4f9d4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
@@ -379,6 +379,21 @@ static inline int is_node(struct page *page, int type)
 #define is_fsync_dnode(page)	is_node(page, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
 #define is_dent_dnode(page)	is_node(page, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
 
+static inline int is_inline_node(struct page *page)
+{
+	return PageChecked(page);
+}
+
+static inline void set_inline_node(struct page *page)
+{
+	SetPageChecked(page);
+}
+
+static inline void clear_inline_node(struct page *page)
+{
+	ClearPageChecked(page);
+}
+
 static inline void set_cold_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 {
 	struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
-- 
2.6.3


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/6] f2fs: don't need to sync node page at every time
  2016-01-25 22:05 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-25 22:05 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

In write_end, we don't need to sync inode page at every time.
Instead, we can expect f2fs_write_inode will update later.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 260c0eb..a6a6f08 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1627,7 +1627,6 @@ static int f2fs_write_end(struct file *file,
 	if (pos + copied > i_size_read(inode)) {
 		i_size_write(inode, pos + copied);
 		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
-		update_inode_page(inode);
 	}
 
 	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
-- 
2.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6/6] f2fs: avoid needless sync_inode_page when reading inline_data
  2016-01-25 22:05 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

In write_begin, if there is an inline_data, f2fs loads it into 0'th data page.
Since it's the read path, we don't need to sync its inode page.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a6a6f08..4e992bf 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1464,7 +1464,6 @@ restart:
 			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
 			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
 			set_inline_node(ipage);
-			sync_inode_page(&dn);
 		} else {
 			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
 			if (err)
-- 
2.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6/6] f2fs: avoid needless sync_inode_page when reading inline_data
@ 2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

In write_begin, if there is an inline_data, f2fs loads it into 0'th data page.
Since it's the read path, we don't need to sync its inode page.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a6a6f08..4e992bf 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1464,7 +1464,6 @@ restart:
 			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
 			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
 			set_inline_node(ipage);
-			sync_inode_page(&dn);
 		} else {
 			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
 			if (err)
-- 
2.6.3


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
  2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-26  5:41     ` Chao Yu
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-01-26  5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 6:05 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
> 
> The sceanrio is:
> 1. create fully node blocks
> 2. flush node blocks
> 3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again
> 4. flush node blocks redundantly
> 
> So, this patch tries to flush inline_data when flushing node blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c   |  1 +
>  fs/f2fs/inline.c |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/node.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/f2fs/node.h   | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 89a37ba..260c0eb 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ restart:
>  		if (pos + len <= MAX_INLINE_DATA) {
>  			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
>  			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> +			set_inline_node(ipage);
>  			sync_inode_page(&dn);
>  		} else {
>  			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> index 8df13e5..fc4d298 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ no_update:
> 
>  	/* clear inline data and flag after data writeback */
>  	truncate_inline_inode(dn->inode_page, 0);
> +	clear_inline_node(dn->inode_page);
>  clear_out:
>  	stat_dec_inline_inode(dn->inode);
>  	f2fs_clear_inline_inode(dn->inode);
> @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>  	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> 
>  	sync_inode_page(&dn);
> +	clear_inline_node(dn.inode_page);
>  	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 23b800d..94a6755 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,37 @@ void sync_inode_page(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
>  	dn->node_changed = ret ? true: false;
>  }
> 
> +static void flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	/* should flush inline_data before evict_inode */
> +	inode = ilookup(sbi->sb, ino);
> +	if (!inode)
> +		return;
> +
> +	page = pagecache_get_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, FGP_LOCK|FGP_NOWAIT, 0);
> +	if (!page)
> +		goto iput_out;
> +
> +	if (!PageUptodate(page))
> +		goto page_out;
> +
> +	if (!PageDirty(page))
> +		goto page_out;
> +
> +	if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> +		goto page_out;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_write_inline_data(inode, page))

better to redirty the page when fail except -EAGAIN?

> +		inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> +page_out:
> +	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> +iput_out:
> +	iput(inode);
> +}
> +
>  int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
>  					struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
> @@ -1221,6 +1252,14 @@ continue_unlock:
>  				goto continue_unlock;
>  			}
> 
> +			/* flush inline_data */
> +			if (!ino && is_inline_node(page)) {
> +				clear_inline_node(page);

Should clear after flushed inline data? otherwise if we failed to flush
inline data, we will lose the change to flush it before node flush.

Thanks,

> +				unlock_page(page);
> +				flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
>  			if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
>  				goto continue_unlock;
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> index 23bd992..1f4f9d4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> @@ -379,6 +379,21 @@ static inline int is_node(struct page *page, int type)
>  #define is_fsync_dnode(page)	is_node(page, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
>  #define is_dent_dnode(page)	is_node(page, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
> 
> +static inline int is_inline_node(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	return PageChecked(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_inline_node(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	SetPageChecked(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clear_inline_node(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	ClearPageChecked(page);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void set_cold_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> --
> 2.6.3
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
@ 2016-01-26  5:41     ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-01-26  5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 6:05 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
> 
> The sceanrio is:
> 1. create fully node blocks
> 2. flush node blocks
> 3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again
> 4. flush node blocks redundantly
> 
> So, this patch tries to flush inline_data when flushing node blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c   |  1 +
>  fs/f2fs/inline.c |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/node.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/f2fs/node.h   | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 89a37ba..260c0eb 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ restart:
>  		if (pos + len <= MAX_INLINE_DATA) {
>  			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
>  			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> +			set_inline_node(ipage);
>  			sync_inode_page(&dn);
>  		} else {
>  			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> index 8df13e5..fc4d298 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ no_update:
> 
>  	/* clear inline data and flag after data writeback */
>  	truncate_inline_inode(dn->inode_page, 0);
> +	clear_inline_node(dn->inode_page);
>  clear_out:
>  	stat_dec_inline_inode(dn->inode);
>  	f2fs_clear_inline_inode(dn->inode);
> @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>  	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> 
>  	sync_inode_page(&dn);
> +	clear_inline_node(dn.inode_page);
>  	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 23b800d..94a6755 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,37 @@ void sync_inode_page(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
>  	dn->node_changed = ret ? true: false;
>  }
> 
> +static void flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	/* should flush inline_data before evict_inode */
> +	inode = ilookup(sbi->sb, ino);
> +	if (!inode)
> +		return;
> +
> +	page = pagecache_get_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, FGP_LOCK|FGP_NOWAIT, 0);
> +	if (!page)
> +		goto iput_out;
> +
> +	if (!PageUptodate(page))
> +		goto page_out;
> +
> +	if (!PageDirty(page))
> +		goto page_out;
> +
> +	if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> +		goto page_out;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_write_inline_data(inode, page))

better to redirty the page when fail except -EAGAIN?

> +		inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> +page_out:
> +	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> +iput_out:
> +	iput(inode);
> +}
> +
>  int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
>  					struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
> @@ -1221,6 +1252,14 @@ continue_unlock:
>  				goto continue_unlock;
>  			}
> 
> +			/* flush inline_data */
> +			if (!ino && is_inline_node(page)) {
> +				clear_inline_node(page);

Should clear after flushed inline data? otherwise if we failed to flush
inline data, we will lose the change to flush it before node flush.

Thanks,

> +				unlock_page(page);
> +				flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
>  			if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
>  				goto continue_unlock;
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> index 23bd992..1f4f9d4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> @@ -379,6 +379,21 @@ static inline int is_node(struct page *page, int type)
>  #define is_fsync_dnode(page)	is_node(page, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
>  #define is_dent_dnode(page)	is_node(page, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
> 
> +static inline int is_inline_node(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	return PageChecked(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_inline_node(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	SetPageChecked(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clear_inline_node(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	ClearPageChecked(page);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void set_cold_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> --
> 2.6.3
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
  2016-01-26  5:41     ` Chao Yu
  (?)
@ 2016-01-26 18:48     ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-01-27  6:28       ` Chao Yu
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-01-26 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel

Hi Chao,

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:41:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 6:05 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
> > 
> > The sceanrio is:
> > 1. create fully node blocks
> > 2. flush node blocks
> > 3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again
> > 4. flush node blocks redundantly
> > 
> > So, this patch tries to flush inline_data when flushing node blocks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/data.c   |  1 +
> >  fs/f2fs/inline.c |  2 ++
> >  fs/f2fs/node.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/f2fs/node.h   | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 89a37ba..260c0eb 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ restart:
> >  		if (pos + len <= MAX_INLINE_DATA) {
> >  			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
> >  			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> > +			set_inline_node(ipage);
> >  			sync_inode_page(&dn);
> >  		} else {
> >  			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > index 8df13e5..fc4d298 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ no_update:
> > 
> >  	/* clear inline data and flag after data writeback */
> >  	truncate_inline_inode(dn->inode_page, 0);
> > +	clear_inline_node(dn->inode_page);
> >  clear_out:
> >  	stat_dec_inline_inode(dn->inode);
> >  	f2fs_clear_inline_inode(dn->inode);
> > @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> >  	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> > 
> >  	sync_inode_page(&dn);
> > +	clear_inline_node(dn.inode_page);
> >  	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index 23b800d..94a6755 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1154,6 +1154,37 @@ void sync_inode_page(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
> >  	dn->node_changed = ret ? true: false;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static void flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> > +{
> > +	struct inode *inode;
> > +	struct page *page;
> > +
> > +	/* should flush inline_data before evict_inode */
> > +	inode = ilookup(sbi->sb, ino);
> > +	if (!inode)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	page = pagecache_get_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, FGP_LOCK|FGP_NOWAIT, 0);
> > +	if (!page)
> > +		goto iput_out;
> > +
> > +	if (!PageUptodate(page))
> > +		goto page_out;
> > +
> > +	if (!PageDirty(page))
> > +		goto page_out;
> > +
> > +	if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> > +		goto page_out;
> > +
> > +	if (!f2fs_write_inline_data(inode, page))
> 
> better to redirty the page when fail except -EAGAIN?

Agreed.

> 
> > +		inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> > +page_out:
> > +	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> > +iput_out:
> > +	iput(inode);
> > +}
> > +
> >  int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
> >  					struct writeback_control *wbc)
> >  {
> > @@ -1221,6 +1252,14 @@ continue_unlock:
> >  				goto continue_unlock;
> >  			}
> > 
> > +			/* flush inline_data */
> > +			if (!ino && is_inline_node(page)) {
> > +				clear_inline_node(page);
> 
> Should clear after flushed inline data? otherwise if we failed to flush
> inline data, we will lose the change to flush it before node flush.

My intention was just letting it go and flush by ->writepage later.
So, the above set_page_dirty() would handle this, right?

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > +				unlock_page(page);
> > +				flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +
> >  			if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> >  				goto continue_unlock;
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> > index 23bd992..1f4f9d4 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> > @@ -379,6 +379,21 @@ static inline int is_node(struct page *page, int type)
> >  #define is_fsync_dnode(page)	is_node(page, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
> >  #define is_dent_dnode(page)	is_node(page, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
> > 
> > +static inline int is_inline_node(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	return PageChecked(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void set_inline_node(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	SetPageChecked(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void clear_inline_node(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	ClearPageChecked(page);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline void set_cold_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> >  {
> >  	struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > --
> > 2.6.3
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
  2016-01-26 18:48     ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-01-27  6:28       ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-01-27  6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:48 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:41:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 6:05 AM
> > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data
> > >
> > > The sceanrio is:
> > > 1. create fully node blocks
> > > 2. flush node blocks
> > > 3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again
> > > 4. flush node blocks redundantly
> > >
> > > So, this patch tries to flush inline_data when flushing node blocks.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/f2fs/data.c   |  1 +
> > >  fs/f2fs/inline.c |  2 ++
> > >  fs/f2fs/node.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  fs/f2fs/node.h   | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > index 89a37ba..260c0eb 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > @@ -1463,6 +1463,7 @@ restart:
> > >  		if (pos + len <= MAX_INLINE_DATA) {
> > >  			read_inline_data(page, ipage);
> > >  			set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> > > +			set_inline_node(ipage);
> > >  			sync_inode_page(&dn);
> > >  		} else {
> > >  			err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > > index 8df13e5..fc4d298 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> > > @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ no_update:
> > >
> > >  	/* clear inline data and flag after data writeback */
> > >  	truncate_inline_inode(dn->inode_page, 0);
> > > +	clear_inline_node(dn->inode_page);
> > >  clear_out:
> > >  	stat_dec_inline_inode(dn->inode);
> > >  	f2fs_clear_inline_inode(dn->inode);
> > > @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> > >  	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> > >
> > >  	sync_inode_page(&dn);
> > > +	clear_inline_node(dn.inode_page);
> > >  	f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > index 23b800d..94a6755 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > @@ -1154,6 +1154,37 @@ void sync_inode_page(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
> > >  	dn->node_changed = ret ? true: false;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static void flush_inline_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct inode *inode;
> > > +	struct page *page;
> > > +
> > > +	/* should flush inline_data before evict_inode */
> > > +	inode = ilookup(sbi->sb, ino);
> > > +	if (!inode)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	page = pagecache_get_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, FGP_LOCK|FGP_NOWAIT, 0);
> > > +	if (!page)
> > > +		goto iput_out;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!PageUptodate(page))
> > > +		goto page_out;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!PageDirty(page))
> > > +		goto page_out;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> > > +		goto page_out;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!f2fs_write_inline_data(inode, page))
> >
> > better to redirty the page when fail except -EAGAIN?
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> >
> > > +		inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> > > +page_out:
> > > +	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> > > +iput_out:
> > > +	iput(inode);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
> > >  					struct writeback_control *wbc)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1221,6 +1252,14 @@ continue_unlock:
> > >  				goto continue_unlock;
> > >  			}
> > >
> > > +			/* flush inline_data */
> > > +			if (!ino && is_inline_node(page)) {
> > > +				clear_inline_node(page);
> >
> > Should clear after flushed inline data? otherwise if we failed to flush
> > inline data, we will lose the change to flush it before node flush.
> 
> My intention was just letting it go and flush by ->writepage later.

Hmm.. since it's rare scenario, so it's OK to me.

> So, the above set_page_dirty() would handle this, right?

Yes.

Please add
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > > +				unlock_page(page);
> > > +				flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page));
> > > +				continue;
> > > +			}
> > > +
> > >  			if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
> > >  				goto continue_unlock;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> > > index 23bd992..1f4f9d4 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> > > @@ -379,6 +379,21 @@ static inline int is_node(struct page *page, int type)
> > >  #define is_fsync_dnode(page)	is_node(page, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
> > >  #define is_dent_dnode(page)	is_node(page, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
> > >
> > > +static inline int is_inline_node(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > +	return PageChecked(page);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void set_inline_node(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > +	SetPageChecked(page);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void clear_inline_node(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > +	ClearPageChecked(page);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static inline void set_cold_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct f2fs_node *rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > --
> > > 2.6.3
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-27  6:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-25 22:05 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent_node cache Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: give scheduling point in shrinking path Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] f2fs: do f2fs_balance_fs when block is allocated Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-26  5:41   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-01-26  5:41     ` Chao Yu
2016-01-26 18:48     ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-27  6:28       ` Chao Yu
2016-01-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] f2fs: don't need to sync node page at every time Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] f2fs: avoid needless sync_inode_page when reading inline_data Jaegeuk Kim
2016-01-25 22:05   ` Jaegeuk Kim

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.