All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com,
	okaya@codeaurora.org, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com,
	Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Cc: jchandra@broadcom.com, jcm@redhat.com,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	msalter@redhat.com, wangyijing@huawei.com,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
	mw@semihalf.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 14/23] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation.
Date: Thu,  4 Feb 2016 18:28:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454606941-9523-15-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454606941-9523-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>

x86 and ia64 are the only arches that implement pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks
and implement them in the same way. Moreover ARM64 is going to do the same.
So it seems that acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus is generic enough to be default
option for pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks. Also, it is always safe to run
acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus as they have empty stubs for !ACPI case and
return if ACPI has been switched off in run time.

After all we can remove x86 and ia64 pcibios_{add|remove}_bus
implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/ia64/pci/pci.c   | 10 ----------
 arch/x86/pci/common.c | 10 ----------
 drivers/pci/probe.c   |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
index 978d6af..be4c9ef 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
@@ -358,16 +358,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
 	platform_pci_fixup_bus(b);
 }
 
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
 void pcibios_set_master (struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	/* No special bus mastering setup handling */
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
index 2879efc..5aa25f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
@@ -171,16 +171,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
 		pcibios_fixup_device_resources(dev);
 }
 
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
 /*
  * Only use DMI information to set this if nothing was passed
  * on the kernel command line (which was parsed earlier).
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 81dd3a2..ef22a22 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
 #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
@@ -2060,10 +2061,12 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 
 void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
+	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
 }
 
 void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
+	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
 }
 
 struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com,
	okaya@codeaurora.org, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com,
	Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Cc: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com,
	Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
	wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
	jchandra@broadcom.com, jcm@redhat.com,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 14/23] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation.
Date: Thu,  4 Feb 2016 18:28:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454606941-9523-15-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454606941-9523-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>

x86 and ia64 are the only arches that implement pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks
and implement them in the same way. Moreover ARM64 is going to do the same.
So it seems that acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus is generic enough to be default
option for pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks. Also, it is always safe to run
acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus as they have empty stubs for !ACPI case and
return if ACPI has been switched off in run time.

After all we can remove x86 and ia64 pcibios_{add|remove}_bus
implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/ia64/pci/pci.c   | 10 ----------
 arch/x86/pci/common.c | 10 ----------
 drivers/pci/probe.c   |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
index 978d6af..be4c9ef 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
@@ -358,16 +358,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
 	platform_pci_fixup_bus(b);
 }
 
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
 void pcibios_set_master (struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	/* No special bus mastering setup handling */
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
index 2879efc..5aa25f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
@@ -171,16 +171,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
 		pcibios_fixup_device_resources(dev);
 }
 
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
 /*
  * Only use DMI information to set this if nothing was passed
  * on the kernel command line (which was parsed earlier).
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 81dd3a2..ef22a22 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
 #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
@@ -2060,10 +2061,12 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 
 void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
+	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
 }
 
 void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
+	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
 }
 
 struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tn@semihalf.com (Tomasz Nowicki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 14/23] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation.
Date: Thu,  4 Feb 2016 18:28:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454606941-9523-15-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454606941-9523-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>

x86 and ia64 are the only arches that implement pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks
and implement them in the same way. Moreover ARM64 is going to do the same.
So it seems that acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus is generic enough to be default
option for pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks. Also, it is always safe to run
acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus as they have empty stubs for !ACPI case and
return if ACPI has been switched off in run time.

After all we can remove x86 and ia64 pcibios_{add|remove}_bus
implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/ia64/pci/pci.c   | 10 ----------
 arch/x86/pci/common.c | 10 ----------
 drivers/pci/probe.c   |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
index 978d6af..be4c9ef 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
@@ -358,16 +358,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
 	platform_pci_fixup_bus(b);
 }
 
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
 void pcibios_set_master (struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	/* No special bus mastering setup handling */
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
index 2879efc..5aa25f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
@@ -171,16 +171,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b)
 		pcibios_fixup_device_resources(dev);
 }
 
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
-}
-
-void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
-}
-
 /*
  * Only use DMI information to set this if nothing was passed
  * on the kernel command line (which was parsed earlier).
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 81dd3a2..ef22a22 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
 #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
@@ -2060,10 +2061,12 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 
 void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
+	acpi_pci_add_bus(bus);
 }
 
 void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
+	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
 }
 
 struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 17:28 [PATCH V4 00/23] MMCONFIG refactoring and support for ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 01/23] x86, pci: Reorder logic of pci_mmconfig_insert() function Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 02/23] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 03/23] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide generic implementation of MCFG code initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 04/23] x86, pci: mmconfig_{32, 64}.c code refactoring - remove code duplication Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` [PATCH V4 04/23] x86, pci: mmconfig_{32,64}.c " Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 05/23] x86, pci, ecam: mmconfig_64.c becomes default implementation for ECAM driver Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 06/23] XEN / PCI: Remove the dependence on arch x86 when PCI_MMCONFIG=y Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 07/23] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide default RAW ACPI PCI config space accessors Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 08/23] arm64, acpi: Use MCFG and empty PCI config space accessors from mcfg.c file Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 09/23] pci, acpi, ecam: Add flag to indicate whether ECAM region was hot added or not Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 10/23] x86, pci: Cleanup platform specific MCFG data by using ECAM hot_added flag Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 11/23] pci, acpi: Move ACPI host bridge device companion assignment to core code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-09 18:02   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-09 18:02     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-10 21:09     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-10 21:09       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 12/23] x86, ia64, pci: Remove ACPI companion device from platform specific data Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-09 17:28   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-09 17:28     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-10 21:21     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-10 21:21       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 13/23] pci, acpi: Provide generic way to assign bus domain number Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2016-02-04 17:28   ` [PATCH V4 14/23] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 15/23] acpi, mcfg: Implement two calls that might be used to inject/remove MCFG region Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-10 14:06   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-10 14:06     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-12  8:56     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-12  8:56       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 16/23] x86, acpi, pci: Use equivalent function from mcfg.c driver Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 17/23] acpi, mcfg: Add default PCI config accessors implementation and initial support for related quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-29  8:03   ` Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair
2016-02-29  8:03     ` Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair
2016-02-29  8:03     ` Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair
2016-03-02 10:42     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-02 10:42       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-02 10:42       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 18/23] pci, of: Move the PCI I/O space management to PCI core code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 19/23] drivers: pci: add generic code to claim bus resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 20/23] pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller init Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 21/23] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:29 ` [PATCH V4 22/23] arm64, pci, acpi: Assign legacy IRQs once device is enable Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:29   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-11 11:58   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-11 11:58     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-11 17:17     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-11 17:17       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-11 18:39       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-11 18:39         ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-11 18:46     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-11 18:46       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:29 ` [PATCH V4 23/23] arm64, pci, acpi: Start using ACPI based PCI host bridge driver for ARM64 Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:29   ` Tomasz Nowicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454606941-9523-15-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com \
    --to=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.