[PATCH V6 0/6] rtc: max77686: make max77686 rtc driver as IP driver

[PATCH V6 0/6] rtc: max77686: make max77686 rtc driver as IP driver

[Laxman Dewangan]

Based on discussion on patch series of MAX77620 when adding separate
driver for max77620 RTC, it is discussed to reuse the max77686 driver
for all CHips MAX77802, MAX77686 and MAX77620. For this, the rtc-max77686
need to make as IP driver independent of their MFD parent driver.

This series makes the rtc-max77686 as independent driver from its 
parent. Required information is passed through the device parent
which is generic and does not depends on any max77686 specific
header ifnromation.

CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Changes from V1: 
- Added reviewed/tested by tag which we got from V1.
- Remove changes from Kconfig.
- Maintain all register definition in max77686 private header and remove
  the movement to rtc driver.
- Taken care of all comments on V1 from Krzysztof and Javier.

Changes from V2: 
- Fix the issue of crash in unbind.

Changes from V3: 
- Fix suspend-resume after unbind/bind by unmapping virq in remove callback.

Changes from V5: 
- Abandon the addition of new API in regmap-irq and add dispose of virq
  in regmap_del_irq_chip().

Laxman Dewangan (6):
  regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain
  rtc: max77686: fix checkpatch error
  rtc: max77686: use rtc regmap to access RTC registers
  rtc: max77686: avoid reference of parent device info multiple places
  mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client
  rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally

 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c     |  21 ++++
 drivers/mfd/max77686.c               |  86 +-------------
 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c           | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h |   3 -
 4 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 0/6] rtc: max77686: make max77686 rtc driver as IP driver

[Laxman Dewangan]

Based on discussion on patch series of MAX77620 when adding separate
driver for max77620 RTC, it is discussed to reuse the max77686 driver
for all CHips MAX77802, MAX77686 and MAX77620. For this, the rtc-max77686
need to make as IP driver independent of their MFD parent driver.

This series makes the rtc-max77686 as independent driver from its 
parent. Required information is passed through the device parent
which is generic and does not depends on any max77686 specific
header ifnromation.

CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Changes from V1: 
- Added reviewed/tested by tag which we got from V1.
- Remove changes from Kconfig.
- Maintain all register definition in max77686 private header and remove
  the movement to rtc driver.
- Taken care of all comments on V1 from Krzysztof and Javier.

Changes from V2: 
- Fix the issue of crash in unbind.

Changes from V3: 
- Fix suspend-resume after unbind/bind by unmapping virq in remove callback.

Changes from V5: 
- Abandon the addition of new API in regmap-irq and add dispose of virq
  in regmap_del_irq_chip().

Laxman Dewangan (6):
  regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain
  rtc: max77686: fix checkpatch error
  rtc: max77686: use rtc regmap to access RTC registers
  rtc: max77686: avoid reference of parent device info multiple places
  mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client
  rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally

 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c     |  21 ++++
 drivers/mfd/max77686.c               |  86 +-------------
 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c           | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h |   3 -
 4 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Laxman Dewangan]

It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
in regmap_del_irq_chip();

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>

---
This is new in series. Earlier patch for adding APIs to dispose
virq via regmap is abandon and this patch took place.
The dispose of virw is added in regmap_del_irq_chip().

 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index 9b0d202..7e1e9e8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -655,13 +655,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_add_irq_chip);
  *
  * @irq: Primary IRQ for the device
  * @d:   regmap_irq_chip_data allocated by regmap_add_irq_chip()
+ *
+ * This function also dispose all mapped irq on chip.
  */
 void regmap_del_irq_chip(int irq, struct regmap_irq_chip_data *d)
 {
+	unsigned int virq;
+	int hwirq;
+
 	if (!d)
 		return;
 
 	free_irq(irq, d);
+
+	/* Dispose all virtual irq from irq domain before removing it */
+	for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < d->chip->num_irqs; hwirq++) {
+		/* Ignore hwirq if holes in the IRQ list */
+		if (!d->chip->irqs[hwirq].mask)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Find the virtual irq of hwirq on chip and if it is
+		 * there then dispose it
+		 */
+		virq = irq_find_mapping(d->domain, hwirq);
+		if (virq)
+			irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
+	}
+
 	irq_domain_remove(d->domain);
 	kfree(d->type_buf);
 	kfree(d->type_buf_def);
-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Laxman Dewangan]

It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
in regmap_del_irq_chip();

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>

---
This is new in series. Earlier patch for adding APIs to dispose
virq via regmap is abandon and this patch took place.
The dispose of virw is added in regmap_del_irq_chip().

 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index 9b0d202..7e1e9e8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -655,13 +655,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_add_irq_chip);
  *
  * @irq: Primary IRQ for the device
  * @d:   regmap_irq_chip_data allocated by regmap_add_irq_chip()
+ *
+ * This function also dispose all mapped irq on chip.
  */
 void regmap_del_irq_chip(int irq, struct regmap_irq_chip_data *d)
 {
+	unsigned int virq;
+	int hwirq;
+
 	if (!d)
 		return;
 
 	free_irq(irq, d);
+
+	/* Dispose all virtual irq from irq domain before removing it */
+	for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < d->chip->num_irqs; hwirq++) {
+		/* Ignore hwirq if holes in the IRQ list */
+		if (!d->chip->irqs[hwirq].mask)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Find the virtual irq of hwirq on chip and if it is
+		 * there then dispose it
+		 */
+		virq = irq_find_mapping(d->domain, hwirq);
+		if (virq)
+			irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
+	}
+
 	irq_domain_remove(d->domain);
 	kfree(d->type_buf);
 	kfree(d->type_buf_def);
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH V6 2/6] rtc: max77686: fix checkpatch error

[Laxman Dewangan]

Fix following check patch error in rtc-max77686 driver:
- Alignment should match open parenthesis.
- braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement.
- Prefer using the BIT macro

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
None, added reviewed/tested by.

Changes from V1:
None

Changes from V1:
None, become 2nd on series.

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 188593d..253cf12 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -24,20 +24,20 @@
 
 /* RTC Control Register */
 #define BCD_EN_SHIFT			0
-#define BCD_EN_MASK			(1 << BCD_EN_SHIFT)
+#define BCD_EN_MASK			BIT(BCD_EN_SHIFT)
 #define MODEL24_SHIFT			1
-#define MODEL24_MASK			(1 << MODEL24_SHIFT)
+#define MODEL24_MASK			BIT(MODEL24_SHIFT)
 /* RTC Update Register1 */
 #define RTC_UDR_SHIFT			0
-#define RTC_UDR_MASK			(1 << RTC_UDR_SHIFT)
+#define RTC_UDR_MASK			BIT(RTC_UDR_SHIFT)
 #define RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT			4
-#define RTC_RBUDR_MASK			(1 << RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT)
+#define RTC_RBUDR_MASK			BIT(RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT)
 /* RTC Hour register */
 #define HOUR_PM_SHIFT			6
-#define HOUR_PM_MASK			(1 << HOUR_PM_SHIFT)
+#define HOUR_PM_MASK			BIT(HOUR_PM_SHIFT)
 /* RTC Alarm Enable */
 #define ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT		7
-#define ALARM_ENABLE_MASK		(1 << ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT)
+#define ALARM_ENABLE_MASK		BIT(ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT)
 
 #define REG_RTC_NONE			0xdeadbeef
 
@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ static void max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(u8 *data, struct rtc_time *tm,
 
 	tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_SEC] & mask;
 	tm->tm_min = data[RTC_MIN] & mask;
-	if (info->rtc_24hr_mode)
+	if (info->rtc_24hr_mode) {
 		tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_HOUR] & 0x1f;
-	else {
+	} else {
 		tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_HOUR] & 0x0f;
 		if (data[RTC_HOUR] & HOUR_PM_MASK)
 			tm->tm_hour += 12;
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_tm_to_data(struct rtc_time *tm, u8 *data,
 }
 
 static int max77686_rtc_update(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
-	enum MAX77686_RTC_OP op)
+			       enum MAX77686_RTC_OP op)
 {
 	int ret;
 	unsigned int data;
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ out:
 }
 
 static int max77686_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev,
-					unsigned int enabled)
+					 unsigned int enabled)
 {
 	struct max77686_rtc_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int ret;
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct max77686_rtc_info),
-				GFP_KERNEL);
+			    GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -662,7 +662,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, info->virq, NULL,
-				max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0, "rtc-alarm1", info);
+					max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
+					"rtc-alarm1", info);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
 			info->virq, ret);
-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 2/6] rtc: max77686: fix checkpatch error

[Laxman Dewangan]

Fix following check patch error in rtc-max77686 driver:
- Alignment should match open parenthesis.
- braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement.
- Prefer using the BIT macro

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
None, added reviewed/tested by.

Changes from V1:
None

Changes from V1:
None, become 2nd on series.

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 188593d..253cf12 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -24,20 +24,20 @@
 
 /* RTC Control Register */
 #define BCD_EN_SHIFT			0
-#define BCD_EN_MASK			(1 << BCD_EN_SHIFT)
+#define BCD_EN_MASK			BIT(BCD_EN_SHIFT)
 #define MODEL24_SHIFT			1
-#define MODEL24_MASK			(1 << MODEL24_SHIFT)
+#define MODEL24_MASK			BIT(MODEL24_SHIFT)
 /* RTC Update Register1 */
 #define RTC_UDR_SHIFT			0
-#define RTC_UDR_MASK			(1 << RTC_UDR_SHIFT)
+#define RTC_UDR_MASK			BIT(RTC_UDR_SHIFT)
 #define RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT			4
-#define RTC_RBUDR_MASK			(1 << RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT)
+#define RTC_RBUDR_MASK			BIT(RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT)
 /* RTC Hour register */
 #define HOUR_PM_SHIFT			6
-#define HOUR_PM_MASK			(1 << HOUR_PM_SHIFT)
+#define HOUR_PM_MASK			BIT(HOUR_PM_SHIFT)
 /* RTC Alarm Enable */
 #define ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT		7
-#define ALARM_ENABLE_MASK		(1 << ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT)
+#define ALARM_ENABLE_MASK		BIT(ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT)
 
 #define REG_RTC_NONE			0xdeadbeef
 
@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ static void max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(u8 *data, struct rtc_time *tm,
 
 	tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_SEC] & mask;
 	tm->tm_min = data[RTC_MIN] & mask;
-	if (info->rtc_24hr_mode)
+	if (info->rtc_24hr_mode) {
 		tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_HOUR] & 0x1f;
-	else {
+	} else {
 		tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_HOUR] & 0x0f;
 		if (data[RTC_HOUR] & HOUR_PM_MASK)
 			tm->tm_hour += 12;
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_tm_to_data(struct rtc_time *tm, u8 *data,
 }
 
 static int max77686_rtc_update(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
-	enum MAX77686_RTC_OP op)
+			       enum MAX77686_RTC_OP op)
 {
 	int ret;
 	unsigned int data;
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ out:
 }
 
 static int max77686_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev,
-					unsigned int enabled)
+					 unsigned int enabled)
 {
 	struct max77686_rtc_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	int ret;
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct max77686_rtc_info),
-				GFP_KERNEL);
+			    GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -662,7 +662,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, info->virq, NULL,
-				max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0, "rtc-alarm1", info);
+					max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
+					"rtc-alarm1", info);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
 			info->virq, ret);
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH V6 3/6] rtc: max77686: use rtc regmap to access RTC registers

[Laxman Dewangan]

rtc_regmap should be used to access all RTC registers instead
of parent regmap regardless of what chip or property have it.

This makes the register access uniform and extendible for other
chips.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
None, added reviewed/tested by.

Changes from V2:
None

Changes from V3:
None, become 3rd on series.

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 253cf12..11f74ed 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->regmap,
+		ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
 				  map[REG_RTC_AE1], &val);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev,
@@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
+		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+				   map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
 	} else {
 		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
 				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
@@ -471,7 +472,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (info->drv_data->alarm_enable_reg) {
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
+		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
 				   MAX77802_ALARM_ENABLE_VALUE);
 	} else {
 		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 3/6] rtc: max77686: use rtc regmap to access RTC registers

[Laxman Dewangan]

rtc_regmap should be used to access all RTC registers instead
of parent regmap regardless of what chip or property have it.

This makes the register access uniform and extendible for other
chips.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
None, added reviewed/tested by.

Changes from V2:
None

Changes from V3:
None, become 3rd on series.

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 253cf12..11f74ed 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->regmap,
+		ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
 				  map[REG_RTC_AE1], &val);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev,
@@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
+		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+				   map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
 	} else {
 		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
 				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
@@ -471,7 +472,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (info->drv_data->alarm_enable_reg) {
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
+		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
 				   MAX77802_ALARM_ENABLE_VALUE);
 	} else {
 		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH V6 4/6] rtc: max77686: avoid reference of parent device info multiple places

[Laxman Dewangan]

Get rid of referring parent device info for register access
all the places by making regmap as part of max77686 rtc
device info. This will also remove the need of storing parent
device info in max77686 rtc device info as this is no more required.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
None, added reviewed/tested by.

Changes form V2:
- Fix typo in description.

Changes form V3:
- None, become 4ths in series.

Changes from V4:
None

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 11f74ed..ab1f2cd 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ struct max77686_rtc_driver_data {
 
 struct max77686_rtc_info {
 	struct device		*dev;
-	struct max77686_dev	*max77686;
 	struct i2c_client	*rtc;
 	struct rtc_device	*rtc_dev;
 	struct mutex		lock;
 
 	struct regmap		*regmap;
+	struct regmap		*rtc_regmap;
 
 	const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *drv_data;
 
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_update(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
 	else
 		data = 1 << RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT;
 
-	ret = regmap_update_bits(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(info->rtc_regmap,
 				 info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_UPDATE0],
 				 data, data);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap,
 			       info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
 			       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 
 	mutex_lock(&info->lock);
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap,
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-			       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+			       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
@@ -370,8 +370,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				  map[REG_RTC_AE1], &val);
+		ret = regmap_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1], &val);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev,
 				"fail to read alarm enable(%d)\n", ret);
@@ -390,7 +389,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	}
 
 	alrm->pending = 0;
-	ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->regmap, MAX77686_REG_STATUS2, &val);
+	ret = regmap_read(info->regmap, MAX77686_REG_STATUS2, &val);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read status2 reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
@@ -426,12 +425,10 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				   map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
+		ret = regmap_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
 	} else {
-		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+				       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 			goto out;
@@ -442,9 +439,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++)
 			data[i] &= ~ALARM_ENABLE_MASK;
 
-		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-					map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-					ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+					data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	}
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -472,12 +468,11 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (info->drv_data->alarm_enable_reg) {
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
+		ret = regmap_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
 				   MAX77802_ALARM_ENABLE_VALUE);
 	} else {
-		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+				       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 			goto out;
@@ -496,9 +491,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		if (data[RTC_DATE] & 0x1f)
 			data[RTC_DATE] |= (1 << ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT);
 
-		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-					map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-					ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+					data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	}
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -527,7 +521,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap,
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 
@@ -593,7 +587,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 
 	info->rtc_24hr_mode = 1;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap,
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_CONTROLM],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -619,13 +613,13 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	mutex_init(&info->lock);
 	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
-	info->max77686 = max77686;
 	info->rtc = max77686->rtc;
 	info->drv_data = (const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *)
 		id->driver_data;
 
-	if (!info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr)
-		info->max77686->rtc_regmap = info->max77686->regmap;
+	info->regmap = max77686->regmap;
+	info->rtc_regmap = (info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr) ?
+			    max77686->rtc_regmap : info->regmap;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
 
-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 4/6] rtc: max77686: avoid reference of parent device info multiple places

[Laxman Dewangan]

Get rid of referring parent device info for register access
all the places by making regmap as part of max77686 rtc
device info. This will also remove the need of storing parent
device info in max77686 rtc device info as this is no more required.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
None, added reviewed/tested by.

Changes form V2:
- Fix typo in description.

Changes form V3:
- None, become 4ths in series.

Changes from V4:
None

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 11f74ed..ab1f2cd 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ struct max77686_rtc_driver_data {
 
 struct max77686_rtc_info {
 	struct device		*dev;
-	struct max77686_dev	*max77686;
 	struct i2c_client	*rtc;
 	struct rtc_device	*rtc_dev;
 	struct mutex		lock;
 
 	struct regmap		*regmap;
+	struct regmap		*rtc_regmap;
 
 	const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *drv_data;
 
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_update(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
 	else
 		data = 1 << RTC_RBUDR_SHIFT;
 
-	ret = regmap_update_bits(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(info->rtc_regmap,
 				 info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_UPDATE0],
 				 data, data);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap,
 			       info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
 			       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 
 	mutex_lock(&info->lock);
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap,
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-			       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+			       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
@@ -370,8 +370,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				  map[REG_RTC_AE1], &val);
+		ret = regmap_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1], &val);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev,
 				"fail to read alarm enable(%d)\n", ret);
@@ -390,7 +389,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	}
 
 	alrm->pending = 0;
-	ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->regmap, MAX77686_REG_STATUS2, &val);
+	ret = regmap_read(info->regmap, MAX77686_REG_STATUS2, &val);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read status2 reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
@@ -426,12 +425,10 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				   map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
+		ret = regmap_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1], 0);
 	} else {
-		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+				       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 			goto out;
@@ -442,9 +439,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++)
 			data[i] &= ~ALARM_ENABLE_MASK;
 
-		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-					map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-					ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+					data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	}
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -472,12 +468,11 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (info->drv_data->alarm_enable_reg) {
-		ret = regmap_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
+		ret = regmap_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_RTC_AE1],
 				   MAX77802_ALARM_ENABLE_VALUE);
 	} else {
-		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+				       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 			goto out;
@@ -496,9 +491,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 		if (data[RTC_DATE] & 0x1f)
 			data[RTC_DATE] |= (1 << ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT);
 
-		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
-					map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
-					ARRAY_SIZE(data));
+		ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap, map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
+					data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	}
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -527,7 +521,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap,
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_ALARM1_SEC],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 
@@ -593,7 +587,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 
 	info->rtc_24hr_mode = 1;
 
-	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->rtc_regmap,
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_CONTROLM],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -619,13 +613,13 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	mutex_init(&info->lock);
 	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
-	info->max77686 = max77686;
 	info->rtc = max77686->rtc;
 	info->drv_data = (const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *)
 		id->driver_data;
 
-	if (!info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr)
-		info->max77686->rtc_regmap = info->max77686->regmap;
+	info->regmap = max77686->regmap;
+	info->rtc_regmap = (info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr) ?
+			    max77686->rtc_regmap : info->regmap;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
 
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH V6 5/6] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client

[Laxman Dewangan]

There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
the register of this IP block.

As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
to set client data for rtc i2c client.

Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
This is new in this series based on review comment from V1.

Changes from V2:
- Rephrase description.
- Added reviewed by.

Changes from V3:
- None, become 5th on series.

Changes from V4:
None

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
index d959ebb..bda6fd7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
@@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 				"Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-		i2c_set_clientdata(max77686->rtc, max77686);
 
 		max77686->rtc_regmap =
 			devm_regmap_init_i2c(max77686->rtc,
-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 5/6] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client

[Laxman Dewangan]

There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
the register of this IP block.

As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
to set client data for rtc i2c client.

Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
This is new in this series based on review comment from V1.

Changes from V2:
- Rephrase description.
- Added reviewed by.

Changes from V3:
- None, become 5th on series.

Changes from V4:
None

Changes from V5:
None

 drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
index d959ebb..bda6fd7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
@@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 				"Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-		i2c_set_clientdata(max77686->rtc, max77686);
 
 		max77686->rtc_regmap =
 			devm_regmap_init_i2c(max77686->rtc,
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH V6 6/6] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally

[Laxman Dewangan]

To make RTC block of MAX77686/MAX77802 as independent driver,
move the registration of i2c device, regmap for register access
and irq_chip for interrupt support inside the RTC driver.
Removed the same initialisation from MFD driver.

Having this change will allow to reuse this driver for different
PMIC/devices from Maxim Semiconductor if they kept same RTC IP on
different PMIC. Some of examples as PMIC MAX77620, MAX20024 where
same RTC IP used and hence driver for these chips will use this
driver only for RTC support.

Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
- Remove changes from Kconfig.
- Maintain all register definition in max77686 private header and remove
  the movement to rtc driver.
- Taken care of all comments on V1 from Krzysztof and Javier.

Changes from V2:
- Taken care of missed sequence for removing the resource.
- Fix the crash when doing unbind by using requested_threaded_irq()
  instead of demv_requested_threaded_irq().

Changes from V3:
- Fix the issue of suspend-resume with unbind/bind by unmapping the
  virq.

Changes from V4:
- Dispose mapped irq in error path in probe

Changes from V5:
- Remove the new APIs from regmap as functionality added to dispose the
  virq inside the regmap_del_irq_chip().

 drivers/mfd/max77686.c               |  85 +-------------------
 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c           | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h |   3 -
 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
index bda6fd7..98ecd13 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
@@ -35,8 +35,6 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
-#define I2C_ADDR_RTC	(0x0C >> 1)
-
 static const struct mfd_cell max77686_devs[] = {
 	{ .name = "max77686-pmic", },
 	{ .name = "max77686-rtc", },
@@ -116,11 +114,6 @@ static const struct regmap_config max77686_regmap_config = {
 	.val_bits = 8,
 };
 
-static const struct regmap_config max77686_rtc_regmap_config = {
-	.reg_bits = 8,
-	.val_bits = 8,
-};
-
 static const struct regmap_config max77802_regmap_config = {
 	.reg_bits = 8,
 	.val_bits = 8,
@@ -156,25 +149,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_irq_chip = {
 	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_irqs),
 };
 
-static const struct regmap_irq max77686_rtc_irqs[] = {
-	/* RTC interrupts */
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK, },
-};
-
-static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_rtc_irq_chip = {
-	.name			= "max77686-rtc",
-	.status_base		= MAX77686_RTC_INT,
-	.mask_base		= MAX77686_RTC_INTM,
-	.num_regs		= 1,
-	.irqs			= max77686_rtc_irqs,
-	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
-};
-
 static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_irq_chip = {
 	.name			= "max77802-pmic",
 	.status_base		= MAX77802_REG_INT1,
@@ -184,15 +158,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_irq_chip = {
 	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_irqs),
 };
 
-static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_rtc_irq_chip = {
-	.name			= "max77802-rtc",
-	.status_base		= MAX77802_RTC_INT,
-	.mask_base		= MAX77802_RTC_INTM,
-	.num_regs		= 1,
-	.irqs			= max77686_rtc_irqs, /* same masks as 77686 */
-	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
-};
-
 static const struct of_device_id max77686_pmic_dt_match[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "maxim,max77686",
@@ -214,8 +179,6 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 	int ret = 0;
 	const struct regmap_config *config;
 	const struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
-	const struct regmap_irq_chip *rtc_irq_chip;
-	struct regmap **rtc_regmap;
 	const struct mfd_cell *cells;
 	int n_devs;
 
@@ -242,15 +205,11 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
 		config = &max77686_regmap_config;
 		irq_chip = &max77686_irq_chip;
-		rtc_irq_chip = &max77686_rtc_irq_chip;
-		rtc_regmap = &max77686->rtc_regmap;
 		cells =  max77686_devs;
 		n_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_devs);
 	} else {
 		config = &max77802_regmap_config;
 		irq_chip = &max77802_irq_chip;
-		rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip;
-		rtc_regmap = &max77686->regmap;
 		cells =  max77802_devs;
 		n_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77802_devs);
 	}
@@ -270,59 +229,25 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
-		max77686->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_RTC);
-		if (!max77686->rtc) {
-			dev_err(max77686->dev,
-				"Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
-
-		max77686->rtc_regmap =
-			devm_regmap_init_i2c(max77686->rtc,
-					     &max77686_rtc_regmap_config);
-		if (IS_ERR(max77686->rtc_regmap)) {
-			ret = PTR_ERR(max77686->rtc_regmap);
-			dev_err(max77686->dev,
-				"failed to allocate RTC regmap: %d\n",
-				ret);
-			goto err_unregister_i2c;
-		}
-	}
-
 	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(max77686->regmap, max77686->irq,
 				  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
 				  IRQF_SHARED, 0, irq_chip,
 				  &max77686->irq_data);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add PMIC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_unregister_i2c;
-	}
-
-	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(*rtc_regmap, max77686->irq,
-				  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
-				  IRQF_SHARED, 0, rtc_irq_chip,
-				  &max77686->rtc_irq_data);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add RTC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_del_irqc;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = mfd_add_devices(max77686->dev, -1, cells, n_devs, NULL, 0, NULL);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add MFD devices: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_del_rtc_irqc;
+		goto err_del_irqc;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
 
-err_del_rtc_irqc:
-	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
 err_del_irqc:
 	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
-err_unregister_i2c:
-	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
-		i2c_unregister_device(max77686->rtc);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -333,12 +258,8 @@ static int max77686_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
 
 	mfd_remove_devices(max77686->dev);
 
-	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
 	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
 
-	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
-		i2c_unregister_device(max77686->rtc);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index ab1f2cd..45d6396 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  *
  */
 
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/rtc.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -22,6 +23,9 @@
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 
+#define MAX77686_I2C_ADDR_RTC		(0x0C >> 1)
+#define MAX77686_INVALID_I2C_ADDR	(-1)
+
 /* RTC Control Register */
 #define BCD_EN_SHIFT			0
 #define BCD_EN_MASK			BIT(BCD_EN_SHIFT)
@@ -68,8 +72,10 @@ struct max77686_rtc_driver_data {
 	const unsigned int	*map;
 	/* Has a separate alarm enable register? */
 	bool			alarm_enable_reg;
-	/* Has a separate I2C regmap for the RTC? */
-	bool			separate_i2c_addr;
+	/* I2C address for RTC block */
+	int			rtc_i2c_addr;
+	/* RTC IRQ CHIP for regmap */
+	const struct regmap_irq_chip *rtc_irq_chip;
 };
 
 struct max77686_rtc_info {
@@ -82,7 +88,9 @@ struct max77686_rtc_info {
 	struct regmap		*rtc_regmap;
 
 	const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *drv_data;
+	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *rtc_irq_data;
 
+	int rtc_irq;
 	int virq;
 	int rtc_24hr_mode;
 };
@@ -153,12 +161,32 @@ static const unsigned int max77686_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
 	[REG_RTC_AE1]	     = REG_RTC_NONE,
 };
 
+static const struct regmap_irq max77686_rtc_irqs[] = {
+	/* RTC interrupts */
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK, },
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_rtc_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "max77686-rtc",
+	.status_base	= MAX77686_RTC_INT,
+	.mask_base	= MAX77686_RTC_INTM,
+	.num_regs	= 1,
+	.irqs		= max77686_rtc_irqs,
+	.num_irqs	= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
+};
+
 static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data max77686_drv_data = {
 	.delay = 16000,
 	.mask  = 0x7f,
 	.map   = max77686_map,
 	.alarm_enable_reg  = false,
-	.separate_i2c_addr = true,
+	.rtc_i2c_addr = MAX77686_I2C_ADDR_RTC,
+	.rtc_irq_chip = &max77686_rtc_irq_chip,
 };
 
 static const unsigned int max77802_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
@@ -190,12 +218,22 @@ static const unsigned int max77802_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
 	[REG_RTC_AE1]	     = MAX77802_RTC_AE1,
 };
 
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_rtc_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "max77802-rtc",
+	.status_base	= MAX77802_RTC_INT,
+	.mask_base	= MAX77802_RTC_INTM,
+	.num_regs	= 1,
+	.irqs		= max77686_rtc_irqs, /* same masks as 77686 */
+	.num_irqs	= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
+};
+
 static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data max77802_drv_data = {
 	.delay = 200,
 	.mask  = 0xff,
 	.map   = max77802_map,
 	.alarm_enable_reg  = true,
-	.separate_i2c_addr = false,
+	.rtc_i2c_addr = MAX77686_INVALID_I2C_ADDR,
+	.rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip,
 };
 
 static void max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(u8 *data, struct rtc_time *tm,
@@ -599,9 +637,65 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static const struct regmap_config max77686_rtc_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits = 8,
+	.val_bits = 8,
+};
+
+static int max77686_init_rtc_regmap(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
+{
+	struct device *parent = info->dev->parent;
+	struct i2c_client *parent_i2c = to_i2c_client(parent);
+	int ret;
+
+	info->rtc_irq = parent_i2c->irq;
+
+	info->regmap = dev_get_regmap(parent, NULL);
+	if (!info->regmap) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to get rtc regmap\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	if (info->drv_data->rtc_i2c_addr == MAX77686_INVALID_I2C_ADDR) {
+		info->rtc_regmap = info->regmap;
+		goto add_rtc_irq;
+	}
+
+	info->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(parent_i2c->adapter,
+				  info->drv_data->rtc_i2c_addr);
+	if (!info->rtc) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	info->rtc_regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(info->rtc,
+						&max77686_rtc_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_regmap)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_regmap);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to allocate RTC regmap: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err_unregister_i2c;
+	}
+
+add_rtc_irq:
+	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(info->rtc_regmap, info->rtc_irq,
+				  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
+				  IRQF_SHARED, 0, info->drv_data->rtc_irq_chip,
+				  &info->rtc_irq_data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to add RTC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err_unregister_i2c;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_unregister_i2c:
+	if (info->rtc)
+		i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct max77686_dev *max77686 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 	struct max77686_rtc_info *info;
 	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
 	int ret;
@@ -613,18 +707,16 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	mutex_init(&info->lock);
 	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
-	info->rtc = max77686->rtc;
 	info->drv_data = (const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *)
 		id->driver_data;
 
-	info->regmap = max77686->regmap;
-	info->rtc_regmap = (info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr) ?
-			    max77686->rtc_regmap : info->regmap;
+	ret = max77686_init_rtc_regmap(info);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
 
 	ret = max77686_rtc_init_reg(info);
-
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to initialize RTC reg:%d\n", ret);
 		goto err_rtc;
@@ -643,30 +735,43 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_rtc;
 	}
 
-	if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No RTC regmap IRQ chip\n");
-		goto err_rtc;
-	}
-
-	info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(max77686->rtc_irq_data,
+	info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(info->rtc_irq_data,
 					 MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA1);
 	if (!info->virq) {
 		ret = -ENXIO;
 		goto err_rtc;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, info->virq, NULL,
-					max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
-					"rtc-alarm1", info);
-	if (ret < 0)
+	ret = request_threaded_irq(info->virq, NULL, max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
+				   "rtc-alarm1", info);
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
 			info->virq, ret);
+		goto err_rtc;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 
 err_rtc:
+	regmap_del_irq_chip(info->rtc_irq, info->rtc_irq_data);
+	if (info->rtc)
+		i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int max77686_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct max77686_rtc_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	free_irq(info->virq, info);
+	regmap_del_irq_chip(info->rtc_irq, info->rtc_irq_data);
+	if (info->rtc)
+		i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int max77686_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -707,6 +812,7 @@ static struct platform_driver max77686_rtc_driver = {
 		.pm	= &max77686_rtc_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe		= max77686_rtc_probe,
+	.remove		= max77686_rtc_remove,
 	.id_table	= rtc_id,
 };
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h b/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
index f504349..643dae7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
@@ -437,14 +437,11 @@ enum max77686_irq {
 struct max77686_dev {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct i2c_client *i2c; /* 0xcc / PMIC, Battery Control, and FLASH */
-	struct i2c_client *rtc; /* slave addr 0x0c */
 
 	unsigned long type;
 
 	struct regmap *regmap;		/* regmap for mfd */
-	struct regmap *rtc_regmap;	/* regmap for rtc */
 	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
-	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *rtc_irq_data;
 
 	int irq;
 	struct mutex irqlock;
-- 
2.1.4

[rtc-linux] [PATCH V6 6/6] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally

[Laxman Dewangan]

To make RTC block of MAX77686/MAX77802 as independent driver,
move the registration of i2c device, regmap for register access
and irq_chip for interrupt support inside the RTC driver.
Removed the same initialisation from MFD driver.

Having this change will allow to reuse this driver for different
PMIC/devices from Maxim Semiconductor if they kept same RTC IP on
different PMIC. Some of examples as PMIC MAX77620, MAX20024 where
same RTC IP used and hence driver for these chips will use this
driver only for RTC support.

Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
Changes from V1:
- Remove changes from Kconfig.
- Maintain all register definition in max77686 private header and remove
  the movement to rtc driver.
- Taken care of all comments on V1 from Krzysztof and Javier.

Changes from V2:
- Taken care of missed sequence for removing the resource.
- Fix the crash when doing unbind by using requested_threaded_irq()
  instead of demv_requested_threaded_irq().

Changes from V3:
- Fix the issue of suspend-resume with unbind/bind by unmapping the
  virq.

Changes from V4:
- Dispose mapped irq in error path in probe

Changes from V5:
- Remove the new APIs from regmap as functionality added to dispose the
  virq inside the regmap_del_irq_chip().

 drivers/mfd/max77686.c               |  85 +-------------------
 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c           | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h |   3 -
 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
index bda6fd7..98ecd13 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
@@ -35,8 +35,6 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
-#define I2C_ADDR_RTC	(0x0C >> 1)
-
 static const struct mfd_cell max77686_devs[] = {
 	{ .name = "max77686-pmic", },
 	{ .name = "max77686-rtc", },
@@ -116,11 +114,6 @@ static const struct regmap_config max77686_regmap_config = {
 	.val_bits = 8,
 };
 
-static const struct regmap_config max77686_rtc_regmap_config = {
-	.reg_bits = 8,
-	.val_bits = 8,
-};
-
 static const struct regmap_config max77802_regmap_config = {
 	.reg_bits = 8,
 	.val_bits = 8,
@@ -156,25 +149,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_irq_chip = {
 	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_irqs),
 };
 
-static const struct regmap_irq max77686_rtc_irqs[] = {
-	/* RTC interrupts */
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK, },
-	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK, },
-};
-
-static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_rtc_irq_chip = {
-	.name			= "max77686-rtc",
-	.status_base		= MAX77686_RTC_INT,
-	.mask_base		= MAX77686_RTC_INTM,
-	.num_regs		= 1,
-	.irqs			= max77686_rtc_irqs,
-	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
-};
-
 static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_irq_chip = {
 	.name			= "max77802-pmic",
 	.status_base		= MAX77802_REG_INT1,
@@ -184,15 +158,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_irq_chip = {
 	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_irqs),
 };
 
-static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_rtc_irq_chip = {
-	.name			= "max77802-rtc",
-	.status_base		= MAX77802_RTC_INT,
-	.mask_base		= MAX77802_RTC_INTM,
-	.num_regs		= 1,
-	.irqs			= max77686_rtc_irqs, /* same masks as 77686 */
-	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
-};
-
 static const struct of_device_id max77686_pmic_dt_match[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "maxim,max77686",
@@ -214,8 +179,6 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 	int ret = 0;
 	const struct regmap_config *config;
 	const struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
-	const struct regmap_irq_chip *rtc_irq_chip;
-	struct regmap **rtc_regmap;
 	const struct mfd_cell *cells;
 	int n_devs;
 
@@ -242,15 +205,11 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
 		config = &max77686_regmap_config;
 		irq_chip = &max77686_irq_chip;
-		rtc_irq_chip = &max77686_rtc_irq_chip;
-		rtc_regmap = &max77686->rtc_regmap;
 		cells =  max77686_devs;
 		n_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_devs);
 	} else {
 		config = &max77802_regmap_config;
 		irq_chip = &max77802_irq_chip;
-		rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip;
-		rtc_regmap = &max77686->regmap;
 		cells =  max77802_devs;
 		n_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77802_devs);
 	}
@@ -270,59 +229,25 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
-		max77686->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_RTC);
-		if (!max77686->rtc) {
-			dev_err(max77686->dev,
-				"Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
-
-		max77686->rtc_regmap =
-			devm_regmap_init_i2c(max77686->rtc,
-					     &max77686_rtc_regmap_config);
-		if (IS_ERR(max77686->rtc_regmap)) {
-			ret = PTR_ERR(max77686->rtc_regmap);
-			dev_err(max77686->dev,
-				"failed to allocate RTC regmap: %d\n",
-				ret);
-			goto err_unregister_i2c;
-		}
-	}
-
 	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(max77686->regmap, max77686->irq,
 				  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
 				  IRQF_SHARED, 0, irq_chip,
 				  &max77686->irq_data);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add PMIC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_unregister_i2c;
-	}
-
-	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(*rtc_regmap, max77686->irq,
-				  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
-				  IRQF_SHARED, 0, rtc_irq_chip,
-				  &max77686->rtc_irq_data);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add RTC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_del_irqc;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = mfd_add_devices(max77686->dev, -1, cells, n_devs, NULL, 0, NULL);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add MFD devices: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_del_rtc_irqc;
+		goto err_del_irqc;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
 
-err_del_rtc_irqc:
-	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
 err_del_irqc:
 	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
-err_unregister_i2c:
-	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
-		i2c_unregister_device(max77686->rtc);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -333,12 +258,8 @@ static int max77686_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
 
 	mfd_remove_devices(max77686->dev);
 
-	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
 	regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
 
-	if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
-		i2c_unregister_device(max77686->rtc);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index ab1f2cd..45d6396 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  *
  */
 
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/rtc.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -22,6 +23,9 @@
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 
+#define MAX77686_I2C_ADDR_RTC		(0x0C >> 1)
+#define MAX77686_INVALID_I2C_ADDR	(-1)
+
 /* RTC Control Register */
 #define BCD_EN_SHIFT			0
 #define BCD_EN_MASK			BIT(BCD_EN_SHIFT)
@@ -68,8 +72,10 @@ struct max77686_rtc_driver_data {
 	const unsigned int	*map;
 	/* Has a separate alarm enable register? */
 	bool			alarm_enable_reg;
-	/* Has a separate I2C regmap for the RTC? */
-	bool			separate_i2c_addr;
+	/* I2C address for RTC block */
+	int			rtc_i2c_addr;
+	/* RTC IRQ CHIP for regmap */
+	const struct regmap_irq_chip *rtc_irq_chip;
 };
 
 struct max77686_rtc_info {
@@ -82,7 +88,9 @@ struct max77686_rtc_info {
 	struct regmap		*rtc_regmap;
 
 	const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *drv_data;
+	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *rtc_irq_data;
 
+	int rtc_irq;
 	int virq;
 	int rtc_24hr_mode;
 };
@@ -153,12 +161,32 @@ static const unsigned int max77686_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
 	[REG_RTC_AE1]	     = REG_RTC_NONE,
 };
 
+static const struct regmap_irq max77686_rtc_irqs[] = {
+	/* RTC interrupts */
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK, },
+	{ .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK, },
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_rtc_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "max77686-rtc",
+	.status_base	= MAX77686_RTC_INT,
+	.mask_base	= MAX77686_RTC_INTM,
+	.num_regs	= 1,
+	.irqs		= max77686_rtc_irqs,
+	.num_irqs	= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
+};
+
 static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data max77686_drv_data = {
 	.delay = 16000,
 	.mask  = 0x7f,
 	.map   = max77686_map,
 	.alarm_enable_reg  = false,
-	.separate_i2c_addr = true,
+	.rtc_i2c_addr = MAX77686_I2C_ADDR_RTC,
+	.rtc_irq_chip = &max77686_rtc_irq_chip,
 };
 
 static const unsigned int max77802_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
@@ -190,12 +218,22 @@ static const unsigned int max77802_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
 	[REG_RTC_AE1]	     = MAX77802_RTC_AE1,
 };
 
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_rtc_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "max77802-rtc",
+	.status_base	= MAX77802_RTC_INT,
+	.mask_base	= MAX77802_RTC_INTM,
+	.num_regs	= 1,
+	.irqs		= max77686_rtc_irqs, /* same masks as 77686 */
+	.num_irqs	= ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
+};
+
 static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data max77802_drv_data = {
 	.delay = 200,
 	.mask  = 0xff,
 	.map   = max77802_map,
 	.alarm_enable_reg  = true,
-	.separate_i2c_addr = false,
+	.rtc_i2c_addr = MAX77686_INVALID_I2C_ADDR,
+	.rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip,
 };
 
 static void max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(u8 *data, struct rtc_time *tm,
@@ -599,9 +637,65 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static const struct regmap_config max77686_rtc_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits = 8,
+	.val_bits = 8,
+};
+
+static int max77686_init_rtc_regmap(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
+{
+	struct device *parent = info->dev->parent;
+	struct i2c_client *parent_i2c = to_i2c_client(parent);
+	int ret;
+
+	info->rtc_irq = parent_i2c->irq;
+
+	info->regmap = dev_get_regmap(parent, NULL);
+	if (!info->regmap) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to get rtc regmap\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	if (info->drv_data->rtc_i2c_addr == MAX77686_INVALID_I2C_ADDR) {
+		info->rtc_regmap = info->regmap;
+		goto add_rtc_irq;
+	}
+
+	info->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(parent_i2c->adapter,
+				  info->drv_data->rtc_i2c_addr);
+	if (!info->rtc) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	info->rtc_regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(info->rtc,
+						&max77686_rtc_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_regmap)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_regmap);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to allocate RTC regmap: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err_unregister_i2c;
+	}
+
+add_rtc_irq:
+	ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(info->rtc_regmap, info->rtc_irq,
+				  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
+				  IRQF_SHARED, 0, info->drv_data->rtc_irq_chip,
+				  &info->rtc_irq_data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to add RTC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err_unregister_i2c;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_unregister_i2c:
+	if (info->rtc)
+		i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct max77686_dev *max77686 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 	struct max77686_rtc_info *info;
 	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
 	int ret;
@@ -613,18 +707,16 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	mutex_init(&info->lock);
 	info->dev = &pdev->dev;
-	info->rtc = max77686->rtc;
 	info->drv_data = (const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *)
 		id->driver_data;
 
-	info->regmap = max77686->regmap;
-	info->rtc_regmap = (info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr) ?
-			    max77686->rtc_regmap : info->regmap;
+	ret = max77686_init_rtc_regmap(info);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
 
 	ret = max77686_rtc_init_reg(info);
-
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to initialize RTC reg:%d\n", ret);
 		goto err_rtc;
@@ -643,30 +735,43 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_rtc;
 	}
 
-	if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No RTC regmap IRQ chip\n");
-		goto err_rtc;
-	}
-
-	info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(max77686->rtc_irq_data,
+	info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(info->rtc_irq_data,
 					 MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA1);
 	if (!info->virq) {
 		ret = -ENXIO;
 		goto err_rtc;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, info->virq, NULL,
-					max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
-					"rtc-alarm1", info);
-	if (ret < 0)
+	ret = request_threaded_irq(info->virq, NULL, max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
+				   "rtc-alarm1", info);
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
 			info->virq, ret);
+		goto err_rtc;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 
 err_rtc:
+	regmap_del_irq_chip(info->rtc_irq, info->rtc_irq_data);
+	if (info->rtc)
+		i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int max77686_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct max77686_rtc_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	free_irq(info->virq, info);
+	regmap_del_irq_chip(info->rtc_irq, info->rtc_irq_data);
+	if (info->rtc)
+		i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int max77686_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -707,6 +812,7 @@ static struct platform_driver max77686_rtc_driver = {
 		.pm	= &max77686_rtc_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe		= max77686_rtc_probe,
+	.remove		= max77686_rtc_remove,
 	.id_table	= rtc_id,
 };
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h b/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
index f504349..643dae7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
@@ -437,14 +437,11 @@ enum max77686_irq {
 struct max77686_dev {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct i2c_client *i2c; /* 0xcc / PMIC, Battery Control, and FLASH */
-	struct i2c_client *rtc; /* slave addr 0x0c */
 
 	unsigned long type;
 
 	struct regmap *regmap;		/* regmap for mfd */
-	struct regmap *rtc_regmap;	/* regmap for rtc */
 	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
-	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *rtc_irq_data;
 
 	int irq;
 	struct mutex irqlock;
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>

I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.

Your patch 6/6 does not introduce a regression since the bug already
exists in the MFD driver, it just makes it more noticeable since it
is easier to unbind the max77686 RTC driver than the MFD one.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>

I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.

Your patch 6/6 does not introduce a regression since the bug already
exists in the MFD driver, it just makes it more noticeable since it
is easier to unbind the max77686 RTC driver than the MFD one.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 06:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Laxman,
>
> On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
>> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
>> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
>> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>
>
> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>
> Your patch 6/6 does not introduce a regression since the bug already
> exists in the MFD driver, it just makes it more noticeable since it
> is easier to unbind the max77686 RTC driver than the MFD one.


If we dont have fix then rtc unbind/bind creates issue on S2R. Although 
it was issue on tot but the issue visible with my patch only.

So if you test my 2 to 6 without 1, you will see issue.

So to avoid bisect issue in functionality wise, this should go on 
sequence. This is my view.

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 06:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Laxman,
>
> On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
>> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
>> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
>> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>
>
> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>
> Your patch 6/6 does not introduce a regression since the bug already
> exists in the MFD driver, it just makes it more noticeable since it
> is easier to unbind the max77686 RTC driver than the MFD one.


If we dont have fix then rtc unbind/bind creates issue on S2R. Although 
it was issue on tot but the issue visible with my patch only.

So if you test my 2 to 6 without 1, you will see issue.

So to avoid bisect issue in functionality wise, this should go on 
sequence. This is my view.


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 10:58 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 06:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Laxman,
>>
>> On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
>>> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
>>> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
>>> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>>
>> Your patch 6/6 does not introduce a regression since the bug already
>> exists in the MFD driver, it just makes it more noticeable since it
>> is easier to unbind the max77686 RTC driver than the MFD one.
>
>
> If we dont have fix then rtc unbind/bind creates issue on S2R. Although it was issue on tot but the issue visible with my patch only.
>
> So if you test my 2 to 6 without 1, you will see issue.
>

Yes I know that but my point is that this will also happen in mainline if
the MFD device is unbind. Is just that it's harder to do so since at least
in the Chromebooks the regulators are used for the panel and backlight so
you will need a serial console.
  
> So to avoid bisect issue in functionality wise, this should go on sequence. This is my view.
>

The problem with patch series touching different subsystems is that the
maintainers have to agree on how to handle the possible conflicts so it
is easier for them if you split the patches and post them separately if
the are really no dependencies.

My view is that this fixes a regmap-irq core bug that is present in all
the drivers using regmap-irq that remove the IRQ chip after mapping IRQs
so it's really not related to your RTC series.

But of course I'm not a subsystem maintainer so is up to Alexandre and
Mark to decide that. I was just giving my opinion.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 10:58 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 06:57 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Laxman,
>>
>> On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
>>> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
>>> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
>>> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>>
>> Your patch 6/6 does not introduce a regression since the bug already
>> exists in the MFD driver, it just makes it more noticeable since it
>> is easier to unbind the max77686 RTC driver than the MFD one.
>
>
> If we dont have fix then rtc unbind/bind creates issue on S2R. Although it was issue on tot but the issue visible with my patch only.
>
> So if you test my 2 to 6 without 1, you will see issue.
>

Yes I know that but my point is that this will also happen in mainline if
the MFD device is unbind. Is just that it's harder to do so since at least
in the Chromebooks the regulators are used for the panel and backlight so
you will need a serial console.
  
> So to avoid bisect issue in functionality wise, this should go on sequence. This is my view.
>

The problem with patch series touching different subsystems is that the
maintainers have to agree on how to handle the possible conflicts so it
is easier for them if you split the patches and post them separately if
the are really no dependencies.

My view is that this fixes a regmap-irq core bug that is present in all
the drivers using regmap-irq that remove the IRQ chip after mapping IRQs
so it's really not related to your RTC series.

But of course I'm not a subsystem maintainer so is up to Alexandre and
Mark to decide that. I was just giving my opinion.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>

The patch looks good to me and I've also tested on an Exynos5800
Peach Pi Chromebook that S2R works correctly after the RTC dev
was unbind so the bug is gone with this version of your series.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 09:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
> created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
> Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
> in regmap_del_irq_chip();
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>

The patch looks good to me and I've also tested on an Exynos5800
Peach Pi Chromebook that S2R works correctly after the RTC dev
was unbind so the bug is gone with this version of your series.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>

Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>

Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.

Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 873 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.

Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 12:05 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>>
>
> Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?
>

You will need to re-spin anyways since patch 6/6 does not apply
cleanly anymore on top of rtc-next as we talked before.

So make your v7 to only include patches 2-6 and post 1/6 as a
separate patch so Mark can pick it through the regmap tree.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Laxman,

On 02/09/2016 12:05 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>>
>
> Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?
>

You will need to re-spin anyways since patch 6/6 does not apply
cleanly anymore on top of rtc-next as we talked before.

So make your v7 to only include patches 2-6 and post 1/6 as a
separate patch so Mark can pick it through the regmap tree.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Applied "regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain" to the regmap tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

has been applied to the regmap tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 46189518d73080f4e4ea269a3b0f4b8583f486bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:58:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

It is require to dispose all virtual irq of hwirq on chip
created on given irq domain before removing this irq domain.
Hence dispose all mapped irqs before deleting the irq domains
in regmap_del_irq_chip();

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index 9b0d202414d0..7e1e9e86c70b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -655,13 +655,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_add_irq_chip);
  *
  * @irq: Primary IRQ for the device
  * @d:   regmap_irq_chip_data allocated by regmap_add_irq_chip()
+ *
+ * This function also dispose all mapped irq on chip.
  */
 void regmap_del_irq_chip(int irq, struct regmap_irq_chip_data *d)
 {
+	unsigned int virq;
+	int hwirq;
+
 	if (!d)
 		return;
 
 	free_irq(irq, d);
+
+	/* Dispose all virtual irq from irq domain before removing it */
+	for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < d->chip->num_irqs; hwirq++) {
+		/* Ignore hwirq if holes in the IRQ list */
+		if (!d->chip->irqs[hwirq].mask)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Find the virtual irq of hwirq on chip and if it is
+		 * there then dispose it
+		 */
+		virq = irq_find_mapping(d->domain, hwirq);
+		if (virq)
+			irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
+	}
+
 	irq_domain_remove(d->domain);
 	kfree(d->type_buf);
 	kfree(d->type_buf_def);
-- 
2.7.0.rc3