[OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Richard Purdie]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2077 bytes --]

Current Dev Position: YP 2.1 M3
Next Deadline: YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) February 29, 2016
 
SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandero
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
 
Key Status/Updates:
* 2.1 Feature Freeze is upon us. If there is any feature you want to 
  see in 2.1 which isn't going to make the deadline, talk to RP.
* We plan to release 2.1 M2 despite the sato glib issue, granting an
  exception for the high bug and then  concentrate on 2.1 M3.
* 2.1 M3 build won't happen until sato glib issue resolved.
* Also planning to merge the gobject-introspection changes 
* Pseudo connection issue appears to be addressed with increased retry 
  numbers. Tests ongoing.
* We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to 
  meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
* We're considering a bump in the minimum git version requirements 
  due to the requirements of various pieces of project tooling.
* We're rebuilding jethro 2.0.1 due to the glibc security issue, now 
  at -rc7.
 
Key YP 2.1 Dates:
YP 2.1 M2 Target release date is February 12, 2016 (Will slip a few
weeks.)
YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) date is February 29, 2016 noon GMT
YP 2.1 M3 Target release date is March 18, 2016
YP 2.1 M4 / Final Cutoff: March 28, 2016 noon GMT - Stabilization only
milestone.
YP 2.1 Final Release Target: April 29, 2016
 
Key Status Links for YP:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.1_Status
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Schedule
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Features
 
Tracking Metrics:
            WDD 2565 (last week 2585)
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html)
 
[If anyone has suggestions for other information you’d like to see on
this weekly status update, let us know!]
 
Thanks,
 
Richard-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Yocto Project Status WW09

[Richard Purdie]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2077 bytes --]

Current Dev Position: YP 2.1 M3
Next Deadline: YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) February 29, 2016
 
SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandero
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
 
Key Status/Updates:
* 2.1 Feature Freeze is upon us. If there is any feature you want to 
  see in 2.1 which isn't going to make the deadline, talk to RP.
* We plan to release 2.1 M2 despite the sato glib issue, granting an
  exception for the high bug and then  concentrate on 2.1 M3.
* 2.1 M3 build won't happen until sato glib issue resolved.
* Also planning to merge the gobject-introspection changes 
* Pseudo connection issue appears to be addressed with increased retry 
  numbers. Tests ongoing.
* We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to 
  meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
* We're considering a bump in the minimum git version requirements 
  due to the requirements of various pieces of project tooling.
* We're rebuilding jethro 2.0.1 due to the glibc security issue, now 
  at -rc7.
 
Key YP 2.1 Dates:
YP 2.1 M2 Target release date is February 12, 2016 (Will slip a few
weeks.)
YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) date is February 29, 2016 noon GMT
YP 2.1 M3 Target release date is March 18, 2016
YP 2.1 M4 / Final Cutoff: March 28, 2016 noon GMT - Stabilization only
milestone.
YP 2.1 Final Release Target: April 29, 2016
 
Key Status Links for YP:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.1_Status
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Schedule
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Features
 
Tracking Metrics:
            WDD 2565 (last week 2585)
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html)
 
[If anyone has suggestions for other information you’d like to see on
this weekly status update, let us know!]
 
Thanks,
 
Richard-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Philip Balister]

On 02/26/2016 12:36 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Current Dev Position: YP 2.1 M3
> Next Deadline: YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) February 29, 2016
>  
> SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandero
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
>  
> Key Status/Updates:
> * 2.1 Feature Freeze is upon us. If there is any feature you want to 
>   see in 2.1 which isn't going to make the deadline, talk to RP.
> * We plan to release 2.1 M2 despite the sato glib issue, granting an
>   exception for the high bug and then  concentrate on 2.1 M3.
> * 2.1 M3 build won't happen until sato glib issue resolved.
> * Also planning to merge the gobject-introspection changes 
> * Pseudo connection issue appears to be addressed with increased retry 
>   numbers. Tests ongoing.
> * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to 
>   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.

Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
important lessons here?

Philip

> * We're considering a bump in the minimum git version requirements 
>   due to the requirements of various pieces of project tooling.
> * We're rebuilding jethro 2.0.1 due to the glibc security issue, now 
>   at -rc7.
>  
> Key YP 2.1 Dates:
> YP 2.1 M2 Target release date is February 12, 2016 (Will slip a few
> weeks.)
> YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) date is February 29, 2016 noon GMT
> YP 2.1 M3 Target release date is March 18, 2016
> YP 2.1 M4 / Final Cutoff: March 28, 2016 noon GMT - Stabilization only
> milestone.
> YP 2.1 Final Release Target: April 29, 2016
>  
> Key Status Links for YP:
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.1_Status
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Schedule
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Features
>  
> Tracking Metrics:
>             WDD 2565 (last week 2585)
> (https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html)
>  
> [If anyone has suggestions for other information you’d like to see on
> this weekly status update, let us know!]
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: Yocto Project Status WW09

[Philip Balister]

On 02/26/2016 12:36 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Current Dev Position: YP 2.1 M3
> Next Deadline: YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) February 29, 2016
>  
> SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandero
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
>  
> Key Status/Updates:
> * 2.1 Feature Freeze is upon us. If there is any feature you want to 
>   see in 2.1 which isn't going to make the deadline, talk to RP.
> * We plan to release 2.1 M2 despite the sato glib issue, granting an
>   exception for the high bug and then  concentrate on 2.1 M3.
> * 2.1 M3 build won't happen until sato glib issue resolved.
> * Also planning to merge the gobject-introspection changes 
> * Pseudo connection issue appears to be addressed with increased retry 
>   numbers. Tests ongoing.
> * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to 
>   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.

Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
important lessons here?

Philip

> * We're considering a bump in the minimum git version requirements 
>   due to the requirements of various pieces of project tooling.
> * We're rebuilding jethro 2.0.1 due to the glibc security issue, now 
>   at -rc7.
>  
> Key YP 2.1 Dates:
> YP 2.1 M2 Target release date is February 12, 2016 (Will slip a few
> weeks.)
> YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) date is February 29, 2016 noon GMT
> YP 2.1 M3 Target release date is March 18, 2016
> YP 2.1 M4 / Final Cutoff: March 28, 2016 noon GMT - Stabilization only
> milestone.
> YP 2.1 Final Release Target: April 29, 2016
>  
> Key Status Links for YP:
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.1_Status
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Schedule
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.1_Features
>  
> Tracking Metrics:
>             WDD 2565 (last week 2585)
> (https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html)
>  
> [If anyone has suggestions for other information you’d like to see on
> this weekly status update, let us know!]
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 13:45 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 12:36 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Current Dev Position: YP 2.1 M3
> > Next Deadline: YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) February 29, 2016
> >  
> > SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandero
> > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
> >  
> > Key Status/Updates:
> > * 2.1 Feature Freeze is upon us. If there is any feature you want
> > to 
> >   see in 2.1 which isn't going to make the deadline, talk to RP.
> > * We plan to release 2.1 M2 despite the sato glib issue, granting
> > an
> >   exception for the high bug and then  concentrate on 2.1 M3.
> > * 2.1 M3 build won't happen until sato glib issue resolved.
> > * Also planning to merge the gobject-introspection changes 
> > * Pseudo connection issue appears to be addressed with increased
> > retry 
> >   numbers. Tests ongoing.
> > * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
> >   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
> 
> Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
> important lessons here?

The key lesson is our current "migration" code in OE-Core sucks and I
have some patches in progress which rewrite pieces of it in a way that
makes it more useful. I'm therefore trying to make some positives from
it.

That said, I haven't found a way to make this work without leaving a
dummy layer.conf in the old location since a missing layer.conf file is
fatal to bitbake very early on before any migration code triggers.

More should become clear when I post the patches, I've been holding off
that until I actually manage a patch set that works on the
autobuilder...

Patches should be out over the weekend (in time for the freeze).

Cheers,

Richard

Re: Yocto Project Status WW09

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 13:45 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 12:36 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Current Dev Position: YP 2.1 M3
> > Next Deadline: YP 2.1 M3 Cutoff (Feature Freeze) February 29, 2016
> >  
> > SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandero
> > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
> >  
> > Key Status/Updates:
> > * 2.1 Feature Freeze is upon us. If there is any feature you want
> > to 
> >   see in 2.1 which isn't going to make the deadline, talk to RP.
> > * We plan to release 2.1 M2 despite the sato glib issue, granting
> > an
> >   exception for the high bug and then  concentrate on 2.1 M3.
> > * 2.1 M3 build won't happen until sato glib issue resolved.
> > * Also planning to merge the gobject-introspection changes 
> > * Pseudo connection issue appears to be addressed with increased
> > retry 
> >   numbers. Tests ongoing.
> > * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
> >   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
> 
> Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
> important lessons here?

The key lesson is our current "migration" code in OE-Core sucks and I
have some patches in progress which rewrite pieces of it in a way that
makes it more useful. I'm therefore trying to make some positives from
it.

That said, I haven't found a way to make this work without leaving a
dummy layer.conf in the old location since a missing layer.conf file is
fatal to bitbake very early on before any migration code triggers.

More should become clear when I post the patches, I've been holding off
that until I actually manage a patch set that works on the
autobuilder...

Patches should be out over the weekend (in time for the freeze).

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Rudolf J Streif]

> > > 
> > > * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
> > > 
> > >   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
> > 
> > Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
> > important lessons here?
> 
> The key lesson is our current "migration" code in OE-Core sucks and I
> have some patches in progress which rewrite pieces of it in a way that
> makes it more useful. I'm therefore trying to make some positives from
> it.
> 
> That said, I haven't found a way to make this work without leaving a
> dummy layer.conf in the old location since a missing layer.conf file is
> fatal to bitbake very early on before any migration code triggers.
> 
> More should become clear when I post the patches, I've been holding off
> that until I actually manage a patch set that works on the
> autobuilder...
> 
> Patches should be out over the weekend (in time for the freeze).

Sounds like a lot of work and potential for breaking things with little added 
value other than a more consistent naming. What was the rationale for making 
the change, if I may ask?

Thanks,
:rjs

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Rudolf J Streif]

> > > 
> > > * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
> > > 
> > >   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
> > 
> > Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
> > important lessons here?
> 
> The key lesson is our current "migration" code in OE-Core sucks and I
> have some patches in progress which rewrite pieces of it in a way that
> makes it more useful. I'm therefore trying to make some positives from
> it.
> 
> That said, I haven't found a way to make this work without leaving a
> dummy layer.conf in the old location since a missing layer.conf file is
> fatal to bitbake very early on before any migration code triggers.
> 
> More should become clear when I post the patches, I've been holding off
> that until I actually manage a patch set that works on the
> autobuilder...
> 
> Patches should be out over the weekend (in time for the freeze).

Sounds like a lot of work and potential for breaking things with little added 
value other than a more consistent naming. What was the rationale for making 
the change, if I may ask?

Thanks,
:rjs

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Philip Balister]

On 02/26/2016 02:52 PM, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
>>>>
>>>>   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
>>> important lessons here?
>>
>> The key lesson is our current "migration" code in OE-Core sucks and I
>> have some patches in progress which rewrite pieces of it in a way that
>> makes it more useful. I'm therefore trying to make some positives from
>> it.
>>
>> That said, I haven't found a way to make this work without leaving a
>> dummy layer.conf in the old location since a missing layer.conf file is
>> fatal to bitbake very early on before any migration code triggers.
>>
>> More should become clear when I post the patches, I've been holding off
>> that until I actually manage a patch set that works on the
>> autobuilder...
>>
>> Patches should be out over the weekend (in time for the freeze).
> 
> Sounds like a lot of work and potential for breaking things with little added 
> value other than a more consistent naming. What was the rationale for making 
> the change, if I may ask?

Consistent naming :) It does it make it much easier to explain what the
meta-yocto layer is for. This has been one source of a great deal of
confusion about how all the pieces come together.

I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing
what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work.

Philip

> 
> Thanks,
> :rjs
> 
> 

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Philip Balister]

On 02/26/2016 02:52 PM, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
>>>>
>>>>   meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any
>>> important lessons here?
>>
>> The key lesson is our current "migration" code in OE-Core sucks and I
>> have some patches in progress which rewrite pieces of it in a way that
>> makes it more useful. I'm therefore trying to make some positives from
>> it.
>>
>> That said, I haven't found a way to make this work without leaving a
>> dummy layer.conf in the old location since a missing layer.conf file is
>> fatal to bitbake very early on before any migration code triggers.
>>
>> More should become clear when I post the patches, I've been holding off
>> that until I actually manage a patch set that works on the
>> autobuilder...
>>
>> Patches should be out over the weekend (in time for the freeze).
> 
> Sounds like a lot of work and potential for breaking things with little added 
> value other than a more consistent naming. What was the rationale for making 
> the change, if I may ask?

Consistent naming :) It does it make it much easier to explain what the
meta-yocto layer is for. This has been one source of a great deal of
confusion about how all the pieces come together.

I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing
what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work.

Philip

> 
> Thanks,
> :rjs
> 
> 

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Burton, Ross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 474 bytes --]

On 26 February 2016 at 20:16, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote:

> I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing
> what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work.
>

The moral of the story is don't rename layers if you want to maintain a
semblance of migration.  Renaming meta-yocto to meta-poky means the
bblayers.conf is invalid, so the migration code can't run because bitbake
aborts too early.

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 892 bytes --]

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Burton, Ross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 474 bytes --]

On 26 February 2016 at 20:16, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote:

> I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing
> what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work.
>

The moral of the story is don't rename layers if you want to maintain a
semblance of migration.  Renaming meta-yocto to meta-poky means the
bblayers.conf is invalid, so the migration code can't run because bitbake
aborts too early.

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 892 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Christopher Larson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

This is the sort of case where it'd be nice if bitbake provided a plugin
mechanism, pure python, no metadata parsing. Something to think about in
the long term..
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:59 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:

>
> On 26 February 2016 at 20:16, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote:
>
>> I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing
>> what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work.
>>
>
> The moral of the story is don't rename layers if you want to maintain a
> semblance of migration.  Renaming meta-yocto to meta-poky means the
> bblayers.conf is invalid, so the migration code can't run because bitbake
> aborts too early.
>
> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1812 bytes --]

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Christopher Larson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

This is the sort of case where it'd be nice if bitbake provided a plugin
mechanism, pure python, no metadata parsing. Something to think about in
the long term..
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:59 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:

>
> On 26 February 2016 at 20:16, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote:
>
>> I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing
>> what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work.
>>
>
> The moral of the story is don't rename layers if you want to maintain a
> semblance of migration.  Renaming meta-yocto to meta-poky means the
> bblayers.conf is invalid, so the migration code can't run because bitbake
> aborts too early.
>
> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1812 bytes --]

FW: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW09

[Barros Pena, Belen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 472 bytes --]


On 26/02/2016 18:36, "openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org on
behalf of Richard Purdie"
<openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org on behalf of
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>* We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to
>  meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(.

Just wondering: will this cause us any trouble, apart from the changes
needed to the json files?

Cheers

Belén


[-- Attachment #2: ATT00003.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 195 bytes --]

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
\r

[-- Attachment #3: ATT00004.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 194 bytes --]

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core