[PATCH v2 1/3] Bluetooth: Move memset closer to where it's needed

[PATCH v2 1/3] Bluetooth: Move memset closer to where it's needed

[Johan Hedberg]

From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

Minor fix to not do the memset until the variable it clears is
actually used.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
index 32575b49f4a0..7264025dc781 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
@@ -726,14 +726,14 @@ static void hci_req_add_le_create_conn(struct hci_request *req,
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hdev;
 	u8 own_addr_type;
 
-	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
-
 	/* Update random address, but set require_privacy to false so
 	 * that we never connect with an non-resolvable address.
 	 */
 	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, &own_addr_type))
 		return;
 
+	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
+
 	/* Set window to be the same value as the interval to enable
 	 * continuous scanning.
 	 */
-- 
2.5.0

[PATCH v2 2/3] Bluetooth: Fix adding discoverable to adv instance flags

[Johan Hedberg]

From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

When lookup up the advertising instance flags for the default
advertising instance (0) the discoverable flag should be filled in
based on the HCI_DISCOVERABLE flag.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
index c78ee2dc9323..77be344efd18 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
@@ -866,6 +866,9 @@ static u32 get_adv_instance_flags(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance)
 		if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ADVERTISING_CONNECTABLE))
 			flags |= MGMT_ADV_FLAG_CONNECTABLE;
 
+		if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_DISCOVERABLE))
+			flags |= MGMT_ADV_FLAG_DISCOV;
+
 		return flags;
 	}
 
-- 
2.5.0

[PATCH v2 3/3] Bluetooth: Add support for limited privacy mode

[Johan Hedberg]

From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

Introduce a limited privacy mode indicated by value 0x02 to the mgmt
Set Privacy command.

With value 0x02 the kernel will use privacy mode with a resolvable
private address. In case the controller is bondable and discoverable
the identity address will be used.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
---
 include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  1 +
 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c    | 13 ++++++++++--
 net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 net/bluetooth/hci_request.h |  2 +-
 net/bluetooth/mgmt.c        | 20 ++++++++++++++++--
 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
index 339ea57be423..5d38d980b89d 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
@@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ enum {
 	HCI_SC_ENABLED,
 	HCI_SC_ONLY,
 	HCI_PRIVACY,
+	HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY,
 	HCI_RPA_EXPIRED,
 	HCI_RPA_RESOLVING,
 	HCI_HS_ENABLED,
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
index 7264025dc781..bf9f8a801a2e 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
@@ -719,6 +719,13 @@ done:
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
 }
 
+static bool conn_use_rpa(struct hci_conn *conn)
+{
+	struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hdev;
+
+	return hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_PRIVACY);
+}
+
 static void hci_req_add_le_create_conn(struct hci_request *req,
 				       struct hci_conn *conn)
 {
@@ -729,7 +736,8 @@ static void hci_req_add_le_create_conn(struct hci_request *req,
 	/* Update random address, but set require_privacy to false so
 	 * that we never connect with an non-resolvable address.
 	 */
-	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, &own_addr_type))
+	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, conn_use_rpa(conn),
+				      &own_addr_type))
 		return;
 
 	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
@@ -774,7 +782,8 @@ static void hci_req_directed_advertising(struct hci_request *req,
 	/* Set require_privacy to false so that the remote device has a
 	 * chance of identifying us.
 	 */
-	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, &own_addr_type) < 0)
+	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, conn_use_rpa(conn),
+				      &own_addr_type) < 0)
 		return;
 
 	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
index 77be344efd18..95a545ca9dbc 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
@@ -771,6 +771,11 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
 	return 0x01;
 }
 
+static bool scan_use_rpa(struct hci_dev *hdev)
+{
+	return hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_PRIVACY);
+}
+
 void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
 {
 	struct hci_cp_le_set_scan_param param_cp;
@@ -785,7 +790,8 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
 	 * advertising with our address will be correctly reported
 	 * by the controller.
 	 */
-	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, &own_addr_type))
+	if (hci_update_random_address(req, false, scan_use_rpa(hdev),
+				      &own_addr_type))
 		return;
 
 	/* Adding or removing entries from the white list must
@@ -881,6 +887,29 @@ static u32 get_adv_instance_flags(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance)
 	return adv_instance->flags;
 }
 
+static bool adv_use_rpa(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint32_t flags)
+{
+	/* If privacy is not enabled don't use RPA */
+	if (!hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_PRIVACY))
+		return false;
+
+	/* If basic privacy mode is enabled use RPA */
+	if (!hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY))
+		return true;
+
+	/* If limited privacy mode is enabled don't use RPA if we're
+	 * both discoverable and bondable.
+	 */
+	if ((flags & MGMT_ADV_FLAG_DISCOV) &&
+	    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_BONDABLE))
+		return false;
+
+	/* We're neither bondable nor discoverable in the limited
+	 * privacy mode, therefore use RPA.
+	 */
+	return true;
+}
+
 void __hci_req_enable_advertising(struct hci_request *req)
 {
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
@@ -914,7 +943,9 @@ void __hci_req_enable_advertising(struct hci_request *req)
 	 * advertising is used. In that case it is fine to use a
 	 * non-resolvable private address.
 	 */
-	if (hci_update_random_address(req, !connectable, &own_addr_type) < 0)
+	if (hci_update_random_address(req, !connectable,
+				      adv_use_rpa(hdev, flags),
+				      &own_addr_type) < 0)
 		return;
 
 	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
@@ -1328,7 +1359,7 @@ static void set_random_addr(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *rpa)
 }
 
 int hci_update_random_address(struct hci_request *req, bool require_privacy,
-			      u8 *own_addr_type)
+			      bool use_rpa, u8 *own_addr_type)
 {
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
 	int err;
@@ -1337,7 +1368,7 @@ int hci_update_random_address(struct hci_request *req, bool require_privacy,
 	 * current RPA has expired or there is something else than
 	 * the current RPA in use, then generate a new one.
 	 */
-	if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_PRIVACY)) {
+	if (use_rpa) {
 		int to;
 
 		*own_addr_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM;
@@ -1599,9 +1630,16 @@ static int discoverable_update(struct hci_request *req, unsigned long opt)
 	/* Advertising instances don't use the global discoverable setting, so
 	 * only update AD if advertising was enabled using Set Advertising.
 	 */
-	if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ADVERTISING))
+	if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ADVERTISING)) {
 		__hci_req_update_adv_data(req, 0x00);
 
+		/* Discoverable mode affects the local advertising
+		 * address in limited privacy mode.
+		 */
+		if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY))
+			__hci_req_enable_advertising(req);
+	}
+
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1944,7 +1982,8 @@ static int active_scan(struct hci_request *req, unsigned long opt)
 	 * address (when privacy feature has been enabled) or non-resolvable
 	 * private address.
 	 */
-	err = hci_update_random_address(req, true, &own_addr_type);
+	err = hci_update_random_address(req, true, scan_use_rpa(hdev),
+					&own_addr_type);
 	if (err < 0)
 		own_addr_type = ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC;
 
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.h b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.h
index 64ff8c040d50..b2d044bdc732 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.h
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.h
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static inline void hci_req_update_scan(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 void __hci_req_update_scan(struct hci_request *req);
 
 int hci_update_random_address(struct hci_request *req, bool require_privacy,
-			      u8 *own_addr_type);
+			      bool use_rpa, u8 *own_addr_type);
 
 int hci_abort_conn(struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason);
 void __hci_abort_conn(struct hci_request *req, struct hci_conn *conn,
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
index 5a5089cb6570..2ca355519d79 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
@@ -1382,8 +1382,19 @@ static int set_bondable(struct sock *sk, struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto unlock;
 
-	if (changed)
+	if (changed) {
+		/* In limited privacy mode the change of bondable mode
+		 * may affect the local advertising address.
+		 */
+		if (hdev_is_powered(hdev) &&
+		    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ADVERTISING) &&
+		    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_DISCOVERABLE) &&
+		    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY))
+			queue_work(hdev->req_workqueue,
+				   &hdev->discoverable_update);
+
 		err = new_settings(hdev, sk);
+	}
 
 unlock:
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
@@ -4423,7 +4434,7 @@ static int set_privacy(struct sock *sk, struct hci_dev *hdev, void *cp_data,
 		return mgmt_cmd_status(sk, hdev->id, MGMT_OP_SET_PRIVACY,
 				       MGMT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED);
 
-	if (cp->privacy != 0x00 && cp->privacy != 0x01)
+	if (cp->privacy != 0x00 && cp->privacy != 0x01 && cp->privacy != 0x02)
 		return mgmt_cmd_status(sk, hdev->id, MGMT_OP_SET_PRIVACY,
 				       MGMT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMS);
 
@@ -4442,10 +4453,15 @@ static int set_privacy(struct sock *sk, struct hci_dev *hdev, void *cp_data,
 		changed = !hci_dev_test_and_set_flag(hdev, HCI_PRIVACY);
 		memcpy(hdev->irk, cp->irk, sizeof(hdev->irk));
 		hci_dev_set_flag(hdev, HCI_RPA_EXPIRED);
+		if (cp->privacy == 0x02)
+			hci_dev_set_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY);
+		else
+			hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY);
 	} else {
 		changed = hci_dev_test_and_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_PRIVACY);
 		memset(hdev->irk, 0, sizeof(hdev->irk));
 		hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_RPA_EXPIRED);
+		hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_PRIVACY);
 	}
 
 	err = send_settings_rsp(sk, MGMT_OP_SET_PRIVACY, hdev);
-- 
2.5.0

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Bluetooth: Add support for limited privacy mode

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi Johan,

> Introduce a limited privacy mode indicated by value 0x02 to the mgmt
> Set Privacy command.
> 
> With value 0x02 the kernel will use privacy mode with a resolvable
> private address. In case the controller is bondable and discoverable
> the identity address will be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  1 +
> net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c    | 13 ++++++++++--
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.h |  2 +-
> net/bluetooth/mgmt.c        | 20 ++++++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

all 3 patches have been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel