* [PATCH] cxl: Configure the PSL for dual port CAPI on Naples
@ 2016-03-15 14:26 Philippe Bergheaud
2016-03-16 1:15 ` Michael Neuling
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Bergheaud @ 2016-03-15 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: imunsie, mikey, Philippe Bergheaud
Naples CPUs have two CAPI ports. Configure the PSL to route data to
the port corresponding to the PHB index.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Bergheaud <felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
index 0c6c17a1..3db0a0b 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
@@ -340,12 +340,15 @@ static void dump_afu_descriptor(struct cxl_afu *afu)
#undef show_reg
}
+#define CPU_IS_NAPLES() (cur_cpu_spec->pvr_value == 0x004c0000)
+
static int init_implementation_adapter_regs(struct cxl *adapter, struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct device_node *np;
const __be32 *prop;
u64 psl_dsnctl;
u64 chipid;
+ u64 phb_index;
if (!(np = pnv_pci_get_phb_node(dev)))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -355,10 +358,20 @@ static int init_implementation_adapter_regs(struct cxl *adapter, struct pci_dev
if (!np)
return -ENODEV;
chipid = be32_to_cpup(prop);
- of_node_put(np);
/* Tell PSL where to route data to */
psl_dsnctl = 0x02E8900002000000ULL | (chipid << (63-5));
+ if (CPU_IS_NAPLES()) {
+ prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,phb-index", NULL);
+ if (!prop) {
+ of_node_put(np);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ phb_index = be32_to_cpup(prop);
+ psl_dsnctl |= (phb_index << (63-11));
+ }
+ of_node_put(np);
+
cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_DSNDCTL, psl_dsnctl);
cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_RESLCKTO, 0x20000000200ULL);
/* snoop write mask */
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cxl: Configure the PSL for dual port CAPI on Naples
2016-03-15 14:26 [PATCH] cxl: Configure the PSL for dual port CAPI on Naples Philippe Bergheaud
@ 2016-03-16 1:15 ` Michael Neuling
2016-03-16 8:49 ` Philippe Bergheaud
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Neuling @ 2016-03-16 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Bergheaud, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: imunsie
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:26 +0100, Philippe Bergheaud wrote:
> Naples CPUs have two CAPI ports. =20
Naples is an internal name, don't use that. Use POWER8NVL is the name
we use in the kernel.
alsi, it's a "chip" that has two CAPI ports, not the CPU.
> Configure the PSL to route data to
> the port corresponding to the PHB index.
Isn't this capp unit in reality, not phb index?
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Bergheaud <felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
> index 0c6c17a1..3db0a0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -340,12 +340,15 @@ static void dump_afu_descriptor(struct cxl_afu
> *afu)
> #undef show_reg
> }
> =20
> +#define CPU_IS_NAPLES() (cur_cpu_spec->pvr_value =3D=3D 0x004c0000)
Use pvr_version_is(PVR_POWER8NVL))
> +
> static int init_implementation_adapter_regs(struct cxl *adapter,
> struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> const __be32 *prop;
> u64 psl_dsnctl;
> u64 chipid;
> + u64 phb_index;
> =20
> if (!(np =3D pnv_pci_get_phb_node(dev)))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -355,10 +358,20 @@ static int
> init_implementation_adapter_regs(struct cxl *adapter, struct pci_dev
> if (!np)
> return -ENODEV;
> chipid =3D be32_to_cpup(prop);
> - of_node_put(np);
> =20
> /* Tell PSL where to route data to */
> psl_dsnctl =3D 0x02E8900002000000ULL | (chipid << (63-5));
> + if (CPU_IS_NAPLES()) {
> + prop =3D of_get_property(np, "ibm,phb-index", NULL);
> + if (!prop) {
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + phb_index =3D be32_to_cpup(prop);
> + psl_dsnctl |=3D (phb_index << (63-11));
Looking at the psl docs, cappunitid in the dsndctl is bits 6 to 13. So
why 11 here?
Can you abstract this better and make it clear what's happening? Try
something like this:
int capp_unit()
{
if (!pvr_version_is(PVR_POWER8NVL))
/* For chips other than POWER8NVL, we only have CAPP 0
* irrespective of which PHB is used */
return 0;
/* For POWER8NVL, assume CAPP 0 is attached to PHB0 and=20
* CAPP 1 is attached to PHB1*/
prop =3D of_get_property(np, "ibm,phb-index", NULL);
if (!prop) {
of_node_put(np);
return -ENODEV;
}
return be32_to_cpup(prop);
}
Then you can do something like (although you need to fix the error
case)
psl_dsnctl |=3D (capp_unit(p) << (63-13));
Mikey
> + }
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_DSNDCTL, psl_dsnctl);
> cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_RESLCKTO, 0x20000000200ULL);
> /* snoop write mask */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cxl: Configure the PSL for dual port CAPI on Naples
2016-03-16 1:15 ` Michael Neuling
@ 2016-03-16 8:49 ` Philippe Bergheaud
2016-03-16 8:55 ` Michael Neuling
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Bergheaud @ 2016-03-16 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Neuling; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, imunsie
Michael Neuling wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:26 +0100, Philippe Bergheaud wrote:
>
>>Naples CPUs have two CAPI ports.
>
>
> Naples is an internal name, don't use that. Use POWER8NVL is the name
> we use in the kernel.
>
> alsi, it's a "chip" that has two CAPI ports, not the CPU.
>
OK, I will rephrase.
>
>>Configure the PSL to route data to
>>the port corresponding to the PHB index.
>
>
> Isn't this capp unit in reality, not phb index?
>
Yes, I meant capp unit port.
>
>>Signed-off-by: Philippe Bergheaud <felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>> drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
>>index 0c6c17a1..3db0a0b 100644
>>--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
>>+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
>>@@ -340,12 +340,15 @@ static void dump_afu_descriptor(struct cxl_afu
>>*afu)
>> #undef show_reg
>> }
>>
>>+#define CPU_IS_NAPLES() (cur_cpu_spec->pvr_value == 0x004c0000)
>
>
> Use pvr_version_is(PVR_POWER8NVL))
>
OK.
>
>>+
>> static int init_implementation_adapter_regs(struct cxl *adapter,
>>struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> const __be32 *prop;
>> u64 psl_dsnctl;
>> u64 chipid;
>>+ u64 phb_index;
>>
>> if (!(np = pnv_pci_get_phb_node(dev)))
>> return -ENODEV;
>>@@ -355,10 +358,20 @@ static int
>>init_implementation_adapter_regs(struct cxl *adapter, struct pci_dev
>> if (!np)
>> return -ENODEV;
>> chipid = be32_to_cpup(prop);
>>- of_node_put(np);
>>
>> /* Tell PSL where to route data to */
>> psl_dsnctl = 0x02E8900002000000ULL | (chipid << (63-5));
>>+ if (CPU_IS_NAPLES()) {
>>+ prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,phb-index", NULL);
>>+ if (!prop) {
>>+ of_node_put(np);
>>+ return -ENODEV;
>>+ }
>>+ phb_index = be32_to_cpup(prop);
>>+ psl_dsnctl |= (phb_index << (63-11));
>
>
> Looking at the psl docs, cappunitid in the dsndctl is bits 6 to 13. So
> why 11 here?
>
Because on POWER8NVL, dsndctl bit 11 == phb_index == cappunitid.
Bits 6-10 and 12-13 do not change between POWER8 and POWER8NVL.
> Can you abstract this better and make it clear what's happening? Try
> something like this:
>
> int capp_unit()
> {
>
> if (!pvr_version_is(PVR_POWER8NVL))
> /* For chips other than POWER8NVL, we only have CAPP 0
> * irrespective of which PHB is used */
> return 0;
>
> /* For POWER8NVL, assume CAPP 0 is attached to PHB0 and
> * CAPP 1 is attached to PHB1*/
> prop = of_get_property(np, "ibm,phb-index", NULL);
> if (!prop) {
> of_node_put(np);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> return be32_to_cpup(prop);
> }
>
> Then you can do something like (although you need to fix the error
> case)
> psl_dsnctl |= (capp_unit(p) << (63-13));
>
> Mikey
>
OK. I will. Thank you.
Philippe
>
>>+ }
>>+ of_node_put(np);
>>+
>> cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_DSNDCTL, psl_dsnctl);
>> cxl_p1_write(adapter, CXL_PSL_RESLCKTO, 0x20000000200ULL);
>> /* snoop write mask */
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cxl: Configure the PSL for dual port CAPI on Naples
2016-03-16 8:49 ` Philippe Bergheaud
@ 2016-03-16 8:55 ` Michael Neuling
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Neuling @ 2016-03-16 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Bergheaud; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, imunsie
> > > + psl_dsnctl |=3D (phb_index << (63-11));
> >=20
> >=20
> > Looking at the psl docs, cappunitid in the dsndctl is bits 6 to 13.
> > So
> > why 11 here?
> >=20
> Because on POWER8NVL, dsndctl bit 11 =3D=3D phb_index =3D=3D cappunitid.
> Bits 6-10 and 12-13 do not change between POWER8 and POWER8NVL.
OK, can you document that better as what you're doing now is not clear
even when reading the associated docs.
Mikey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-16 8:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-15 14:26 [PATCH] cxl: Configure the PSL for dual port CAPI on Naples Philippe Bergheaud
2016-03-16 1:15 ` Michael Neuling
2016-03-16 8:49 ` Philippe Bergheaud
2016-03-16 8:55 ` Michael Neuling
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.