From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] libnvdimm, pmem: clarify the write+clear_poison+write flow Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 19:40:47 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <146068804768.24085.7722589204633361307.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com> (raw) The ACPI specification does not specify the state of data after a clear poison operation. Potential future libnvdimm bus implementations for other architectures also might not specify or disagree on the state of data after clear poison. Clarify why we write twice. Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --- drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c index c6befaa9c708..d9a0dbc2d023 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c @@ -86,6 +86,20 @@ static int pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page, flush_dcache_page(page); } } else { + /* + * Note that we write the data both before and after + * clearing poison. The write before clear poison + * handles situations where the latest written data is + * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks + * the address range as valid without changing the data. + * In this case application software can assume that an + * interrupted write will either return the new good + * data or an error. + * + * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an + * indeterminate state we need to perform the write + * after clear poison. + */ flush_dcache_page(page); memcpy_to_pmem(pmem_addr, mem + off, len); if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) { _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> To: linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] libnvdimm, pmem: clarify the write+clear_poison+write flow Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 19:40:47 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <146068804768.24085.7722589204633361307.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com> (raw) The ACPI specification does not specify the state of data after a clear poison operation. Potential future libnvdimm bus implementations for other architectures also might not specify or disagree on the state of data after clear poison. Clarify why we write twice. Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --- drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c index c6befaa9c708..d9a0dbc2d023 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c @@ -86,6 +86,20 @@ static int pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page, flush_dcache_page(page); } } else { + /* + * Note that we write the data both before and after + * clearing poison. The write before clear poison + * handles situations where the latest written data is + * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks + * the address range as valid without changing the data. + * In this case application software can assume that an + * interrupted write will either return the new good + * data or an error. + * + * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an + * indeterminate state we need to perform the write + * after clear poison. + */ flush_dcache_page(page); memcpy_to_pmem(pmem_addr, mem + off, len); if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 2:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-04-15 2:40 Dan Williams [this message] 2016-04-15 2:40 ` [PATCH] libnvdimm, pmem: clarify the write+clear_poison+write flow Dan Williams 2016-04-15 7:11 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2016-04-15 7:11 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2016-04-15 12:32 ` Jeff Moyer 2016-04-15 16:58 ` Verma, Vishal L 2016-04-15 16:58 ` Verma, Vishal L
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=146068804768.24085.7722589204633361307.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com \ --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.