All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
@ 2016-06-30 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-06-30 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-efi, catalin.marinas, mark.rutland, matt
  Cc: leif.lindholm, Ard Biesheuvel

Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
[yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---

This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.

 drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
@@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
 	.mmlist			= LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
+
+static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = {
+	.mm		= &efi_mm,
+	.markers	= (struct addr_marker[]){
+		{ 0,		"UEFI runtime start" },
+		{ TASK_SIZE_64,	"UEFI runtime end" }
+	},
+	.base_addr	= 0,
+};
+
+static int __init ptdump_init(void)
+{
+	return ptdump_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
+}
+device_initcall(ptdump_init);
+
+#endif
+
 static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
 {
 	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
@ 2016-06-30 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-06-30 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
[yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---

This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.

 drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
@@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
 	.mmlist			= LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
+
+static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = {
+	.mm		= &efi_mm,
+	.markers	= (struct addr_marker[]){
+		{ 0,		"UEFI runtime start" },
+		{ TASK_SIZE_64,	"UEFI runtime end" }
+	},
+	.base_addr	= 0,
+};
+
+static int __init ptdump_init(void)
+{
+	return ptdump_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
+}
+device_initcall(ptdump_init);
+
+#endif
+
 static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
 {
 	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
  2016-06-30 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2016-06-30 14:09     ` Mark Rutland
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2016-06-30 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ard Biesheuvel
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8,
	matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io,
	leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
> page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
> [yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> 
> This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
> entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.

It's probably worth noting that this is based on the arm64 for-next/core
branch. I don't know if/how we can orgnise branches for merging this.

>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
>  	.mmlist			= LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64

If you use CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP for the moment, then we won't have some
unused structs lying around when the feature is unused.

Otherwise, I agree that this is a useful debuging feature. FWIW, either
way:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

Thanks,
Mark.

> +#include <asm/ptdump.h>
> +
> +static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = {
> +	.mm		= &efi_mm,
> +	.markers	= (struct addr_marker[]){
> +		{ 0,		"UEFI runtime start" },
> +		{ TASK_SIZE_64,	"UEFI runtime end" }
> +	},
> +	.base_addr	= 0,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ptdump_init(void)
> +{
> +	return ptdump_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
> +}
> +device_initcall(ptdump_init);
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
>  {
>  	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
@ 2016-06-30 14:09     ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2016-06-30 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
> page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
> [yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
> entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.

It's probably worth noting that this is based on the arm64 for-next/core
branch. I don't know if/how we can orgnise branches for merging this.

>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
>  	.mmlist			= LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64

If you use CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP for the moment, then we won't have some
unused structs lying around when the feature is unused.

Otherwise, I agree that this is a useful debuging feature. FWIW, either
way:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> +#include <asm/ptdump.h>
> +
> +static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = {
> +	.mm		= &efi_mm,
> +	.markers	= (struct addr_marker[]){
> +		{ 0,		"UEFI runtime start" },
> +		{ TASK_SIZE_64,	"UEFI runtime end" }
> +	},
> +	.base_addr	= 0,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ptdump_init(void)
> +{
> +	return ptdump_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
> +}
> +device_initcall(ptdump_init);
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
>  {
>  	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
  2016-06-30 14:09     ` Mark Rutland
@ 2016-07-01 13:18       ` Ard Biesheuvel
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-07-01 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Catalin Marinas, Matt Fleming,
	Leif Lindholm

On 30 June 2016 at 16:09, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
>> page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
>> [yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
>> entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.
>
> It's probably worth noting that this is based on the arm64 for-next/core
> branch. I don't know if/how we can orgnise branches for merging this.
>

There's no rush, so Matt can take it for v4.9 I suppose?

>>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
>>       .mmlist                 = LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
>>  };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>
> If you use CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP for the moment, then we won't have some
> unused structs lying around when the feature is unused.
>

I can change that

> Otherwise, I agree that this is a useful debuging feature. FWIW, either
> way:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
>

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables
@ 2016-07-01 13:18       ` Ard Biesheuvel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2016-07-01 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 30 June 2016 at 16:09, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Register the debugfs node 'efi_page_tables' to allow the UEFI runtime
>> page tables to be inspected. Note that ARM does not have 'asm/ptdump.h'
>> [yet] so for now, this is arm64 only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch could be helpful in assessing the series 'arm64: avoid block
>> entries that we need to split later' that I sent out yesterday.
>
> It's probably worth noting that this is based on the arm64 for-next/core
> branch. I don't know if/how we can orgnise branches for merging this.
>

There's no rush, so Matt can take it for v4.9 I suppose?

>>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> index 17ccf0a8787a..4197a1da013d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
>>       .mmlist                 = LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
>>  };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>
> If you use CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP for the moment, then we won't have some
> unused structs lying around when the feature is unused.
>

I can change that

> Otherwise, I agree that this is a useful debuging feature. FWIW, either
> way:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-01 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-30 10:01 [PATCH] efi: arm64: add debugfs node to dump UEFI runtime page tables Ard Biesheuvel
2016-06-30 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found] ` <1467280906-31158-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-30 14:09   ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-30 14:09     ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-01 13:18     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-01 13:18       ` Ard Biesheuvel

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.