* [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission
@ 2016-08-11 11:14 Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-11 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Various downgrading, upgrading, or general reorganisation of the
messages emitted by the GuC code. Mostly:
* "can't happen" cases (inconsistencies/misconfiguration) are ERRORs
* recoverable (ignored) errors are downgraded to WARNINGs
* important auxiliary messages about failure or mode change are NOTICEs
* anything else (messages for developer rather than sysadmin) is DEBUG
v4:
Resend with added cover letter
Dave Gordon (4):
drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
drm/i915/guc: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 +++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++-------------
include/drm/drmP.h | 26 ++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
2016-08-11 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
@ 2016-08-11 11:14 ` Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-11 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin, dri-devel, Dave Gordon
We had only DRM_INFO() and DRM_ERROR(), whereas the underlying printk()
provides several other useful intermediate levels such as NOTICE and
WARNING. So this patch fills out the set by providing both regular and
once-only macros for each of the levels INFO, NOTICE, and WARNING, using
a common underlying macro that does all the token-pasting.
DRM_ERROR is unchanged, as it's not just a printk wrapper.
v2:
Fix whitespace, missing ## (Eric Engestrom)
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
include/drm/drmP.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h
index 856c174..c9f168a 100644
--- a/include/drm/drmP.h
+++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
@@ -163,6 +163,26 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
/** \name Macros to make printk easier */
/*@{*/
+#define _DRM_PRINTK(once, level, fmt, ...) \
+ do { \
+ printk##once(KERN_##level "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define DRM_INFO(fmt, ...) \
+ _DRM_PRINTK(, INFO, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_NOTE(fmt, ...) \
+ _DRM_PRINTK(, NOTICE, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_WARN(fmt, ...) \
+ _DRM_PRINTK(, WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+#define DRM_INFO_ONCE(fmt, ...) \
+ _DRM_PRINTK(_once, INFO, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_NOTE_ONCE(fmt, ...) \
+ _DRM_PRINTK(_once, NOTICE, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define DRM_WARN_ONCE(fmt, ...) \
+ _DRM_PRINTK(_once, WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
/**
* Error output.
*
@@ -188,12 +208,6 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
drm_err(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
})
-#define DRM_INFO(fmt, ...) \
- printk(KERN_INFO "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
-#define DRM_INFO_ONCE(fmt, ...) \
- printk_once(KERN_INFO "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
/**
* Debug output.
*
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
2016-08-11 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
@ 2016-08-11 11:14 ` Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-11 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Where we're going to continue regardless of the problem, rather than
fail, then the message should be a WARNing rather than an ERROR.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 6831321..d43625f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -114,10 +114,8 @@ static int host2guc_action(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 *data, u32 len)
if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT)
ret = -EIO;
- DRM_ERROR("GUC: host2guc action 0x%X failed. ret=%d "
- "status=0x%08X response=0x%08X\n",
- data[0], ret, status,
- I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)));
+ DRM_WARN("Action 0x%X failed; ret=%d status=0x%08X response=0x%08X\n",
+ data[0], ret, status, I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)));
dev_priv->guc.action_fail += 1;
dev_priv->guc.action_err = ret;
@@ -556,8 +554,8 @@ static int guc_ring_doorbell(struct i915_guc_client *gc)
if (db_ret.db_status == GUC_DOORBELL_DISABLED)
break;
- DRM_ERROR("Cookie mismatch. Expected %d, returned %d\n",
- db_cmp.cookie, db_ret.cookie);
+ DRM_WARN("Cookie mismatch. Expected %d, found %d\n",
+ db_cmp.cookie, db_ret.cookie);
/* update the cookie to newly read cookie from GuC */
db_cmp.cookie = db_ret.cookie;
@@ -745,8 +743,8 @@ static void guc_init_doorbell_hw(struct intel_guc *guc)
/* Restore to original value */
err = guc_update_doorbell_id(guc, client, db_id);
if (err)
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to restore doorbell to %d, err %d\n",
- db_id, err);
+ DRM_WARN("Failed to restore doorbell to %d, err %d\n",
+ db_id, err);
/* Read back & verify all doorbell registers */
for (i = 0; i < GUC_MAX_DOORBELLS; ++i)
@@ -834,8 +832,6 @@ static void guc_init_doorbell_hw(struct intel_guc *guc)
return client;
err:
- DRM_ERROR("FAILED to create priority %u GuC client!\n", priority);
-
guc_client_free(dev_priv, client);
return NULL;
}
@@ -1015,7 +1011,7 @@ int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
GUC_CTX_PRIORITY_KMD_NORMAL,
dev_priv->kernel_context);
if (!client) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to create execbuf guc_client\n");
+ DRM_ERROR("Failed to create normal GuC client!\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
2016-08-11 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
@ 2016-08-11 11:14 ` Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11 Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 12:01 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission (rev2) Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-11 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Some downgraded from DRM_ERROR() to DRM_WARN() or DRM_NOTE(),
a few upgraded from DRM_INFO() to DRM_NOTE() or DRM_WARN(),
and one eliminated completely.
v2: different permutation of levels :)
v3: convert a couple of "this shouldn't happen" messages to WARN()
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 3763e30..d9cbc26 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -140,12 +140,14 @@ static u32 get_gttype(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
static u32 get_core_family(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- switch (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen) {
+ u32 gen = INTEL_GEN(dev_priv);
+
+ switch (gen) {
case 9:
return GFXCORE_FAMILY_GEN9;
default:
- DRM_ERROR("GUC: unsupported core family\n");
+ WARN(1, "GEN%d does not support GuC operation!\n", gen);
return GFXCORE_FAMILY_UNKNOWN;
}
}
@@ -435,7 +437,7 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
goto fail;
} else if (*fw_path == '\0') {
/* Device has a GuC but we don't know what f/w to load? */
- DRM_INFO("No GuC firmware known for this platform\n");
+ WARN(1, "No GuC firmware known for this platform!\n");
err = -ENODEV;
goto fail;
}
@@ -473,10 +475,8 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
* that the state and timing are fairly predictable
*/
err = i915_reset_guc(dev_priv);
- if (err) {
- DRM_ERROR("GuC reset failed: %d\n", err);
+ if (err)
goto fail;
- }
err = guc_ucode_xfer(dev_priv);
if (!err)
@@ -534,15 +534,15 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
else if (err == 0)
DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load skipped\n");
else if (ret != -EIO)
- DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
+ DRM_NOTE("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
else
- DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
+ DRM_WARN("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
if (i915.enable_guc_submission) {
if (fw_path == NULL)
DRM_INFO("GuC submission without firmware not supported\n");
if (ret == 0)
- DRM_INFO("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
+ DRM_NOTE("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
else
DRM_ERROR("GuC init failed: %d\n", ret);
}
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
/* Check the size of the blob before examining buffer contents */
if (fw->size < sizeof(struct guc_css_header)) {
- DRM_ERROR("Firmware header is missing\n");
+ DRM_NOTE("Firmware header is missing\n");
goto fail;
}
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
css->key_size_dw - css->exponent_size_dw) * sizeof(u32);
if (guc_fw->header_size != sizeof(struct guc_css_header)) {
- DRM_ERROR("CSS header definition mismatch\n");
+ DRM_NOTE("CSS header definition mismatch\n");
goto fail;
}
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
/* now RSA */
if (css->key_size_dw != UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT) {
- DRM_ERROR("RSA key size is bad\n");
+ DRM_NOTE("RSA key size is bad\n");
goto fail;
}
guc_fw->rsa_offset = guc_fw->ucode_offset + guc_fw->ucode_size;
@@ -604,14 +604,14 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
/* At least, it should have header, uCode and RSA. Size of all three. */
size = guc_fw->header_size + guc_fw->ucode_size + guc_fw->rsa_size;
if (fw->size < size) {
- DRM_ERROR("Missing firmware components\n");
+ DRM_NOTE("Missing firmware components\n");
goto fail;
}
/* Header and uCode will be loaded to WOPCM. Size of the two. */
size = guc_fw->header_size + guc_fw->ucode_size;
if (size > guc_wopcm_size(to_i915(dev))) {
- DRM_ERROR("Firmware is too large to fit in WOPCM\n");
+ DRM_NOTE("Firmware is too large to fit in WOPCM\n");
goto fail;
}
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
if (guc_fw->guc_fw_major_found != guc_fw->guc_fw_major_wanted ||
guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_found < guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_wanted) {
- DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
+ DRM_NOTE("GuC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
guc_fw->guc_fw_major_found, guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_found,
guc_fw->guc_fw_major_wanted, guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_wanted);
err = -ENOEXEC;
@@ -656,10 +656,10 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
return;
fail:
+ DRM_WARN("Failed to fetch valid GuC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
+ guc_fw->guc_fw_path, err);
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GuC fw fetch status FAIL; err %d, fw %p, obj %p\n",
err, fw, guc_fw->guc_fw_obj);
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to fetch GuC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
- guc_fw->guc_fw_path, err);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
obj = guc_fw->guc_fw_obj;
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/4] NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11
2016-08-11 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
@ 2016-08-11 11:14 ` Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 12:01 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission (rev2) Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-11 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Update GuC firmware version to 8.11, and re-enable GuC loading and
submission by default on suitable platforms, since it's Intel's
Plan of Record that GuC submission shall be used where available.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
index 768ad89..02419a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ struct i915_params i915 __read_mostly = {
.verbose_state_checks = 1,
.nuclear_pageflip = 0,
.edp_vswing = 0,
- .enable_guc_loading = 0,
- .enable_guc_submission = 0,
+ .enable_guc_loading = -1,
+ .enable_guc_submission = -1,
.guc_log_level = -1,
.enable_dp_mst = true,
.inject_load_failure = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index d9cbc26..de8b8cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@
#define I915_SKL_GUC_UCODE "i915/skl_guc_ver6_1.bin"
MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_SKL_GUC_UCODE);
+#define I915_SKL_GUC_UCODE_NEXT "i915/skl_guc_ver8.bin"
+MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_SKL_GUC_UCODE_NEXT);
+
#define I915_BXT_GUC_UCODE "i915/bxt_guc_ver8_7.bin"
MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_BXT_GUC_UCODE);
@@ -696,6 +699,10 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev)
if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)) {
fw_path = NULL;
} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
+ fw_path = I915_SKL_GUC_UCODE_NEXT;
+ guc_fw->guc_fw_major_wanted = 8;
+ guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_wanted = 11;
+ } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
fw_path = I915_SKL_GUC_UCODE;
guc_fw->guc_fw_major_wanted = 6;
guc_fw->guc_fw_minor_wanted = 1;
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission (rev2)
2016-08-11 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11 Dave Gordon
@ 2016-08-11 12:01 ` Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-08-11 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Gordon; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10918/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Applying: drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
Applying: drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
Applying: drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
Applying: NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Patch failed at 0004 NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11
The copy of the patch that failed is found in: .git/rebase-apply/patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission
@ 2016-08-18 17:17 Dave Gordon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-18 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Various downgrading, upgrading, or general reorganisation of the
messages emitted by the GuC code. As general principles:
* "can't happen" cases (inconsistencies/misconfiguration) are ERRORs
* recoverable (ignored) errors are downgraded to WARNINGs
* important auxiliary messages about failure or mode change are NOTICEs
* anything else (messages for developer rather than sysadmin) is DEBUG
v4:
Resend with added cover letter
Dave Gordon (4):
drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
drm/i915/guc: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 ++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 38 +++++++++++++++---------------
include/drm/drmP.h | 26 +++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission
@ 2016-08-11 17:00 Dave Gordon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-11 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Various downgrading, upgrading, or general reorganisation of the
messages emitted by the GuC code. As general principles:
* "can't happen" cases (inconsistencies/misconfiguration) are ERRORs
* recoverable (ignored) errors are downgraded to WARNINGs
* important auxiliary messages about failure or mode change are NOTICEs
* anything else (messages for developer rather than sysadmin) is DEBUG
v4:
Resend with added cover letter
Dave Gordon (4):
drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
drm/i915/guc: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 ++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 38 +++++++++++++++---------------
include/drm/drmP.h | 26 +++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission
@ 2016-08-10 15:13 Dave Gordon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Gordon @ 2016-08-10 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Various downgrading, upgrading, or general reorganisation of the
messages emitted by the GuC code. Mostly:
* "can't happen" cases (inconsistencies/misconfiguration) are ERRORs
* recoverable (ignored) errors are downgraded to WARNINGs
* important auxiliary messages about failure or mode change are NOTICEs
* anything else (messages for developer rather than sysadmin) is DEBUG
v4:
Resend with added cover letter :)
Dave Gordon (4):
drm: extra printk() wrapper macros
drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN()
drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels
drm/i915/guc: re-enable GuC loading and submission by default
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 ++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 34 +++++++++++++++---------------
include/drm/drmP.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++------
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-18 17:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-11 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: extra printk() wrapper macros Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11 Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 12:01 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission (rev2) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-18 17:17 [PATCH v4 0/4] Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission Dave Gordon
2016-08-11 17:00 Dave Gordon
2016-08-10 15:13 Dave Gordon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.