* [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
@ 2016-08-18 5:48 Wang Xin
2016-08-18 11:33 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Wang Xin @ 2016-08-18 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xin <wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
.../gdk-pixbuf/{gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb => gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/{gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb => gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb} (96%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb
similarity index 96%
rename from meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb
rename to meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb
index c24ec12..5e1fdae 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNOME_MIRROR}/${BPN}/${MAJ_VER}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
file://fatal-loader.patch \
"
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "63cb19f92cf7709ccf44bbb6fe1ff70c"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "d55e5b383ee219bd0e23bf6ed4427d56a7db5379729a6e3e0a0e0eba9a8d8879"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "e9dc096280aaa1a7c4252af12df81476"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "ab4cdba365426685db049eca35e35147fe350b927cc68e469d54799c64d0cb23"
inherit autotools pkgconfig gettext pixbufcache ptest-gnome upstream-version-is-even gobject-introspection
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-18 5:48 [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3 Wang Xin
@ 2016-08-18 11:33 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-18 17:58 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2016-08-18 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang Xin; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 223 bytes --]
On 18 August 2016 at 06:48, Wang Xin <wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
wrote:
> Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3.
>
2.35.x is a development release, so stick with 2.34.x until 2.36.0 is
available.
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 639 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-18 11:33 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2016-08-18 17:58 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-18 18:11 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-19 7:51 ` Wang, Xin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-18 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 627 bytes --]
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 August 2016 at 06:48, Wang Xin <wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com <mailto:wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
> Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3.
>
> 2.35.x is a development release, so stick with 2.34.x until 2.36.0 is available.
perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ?
>
> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1748 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-18 17:58 ` Khem Raj
@ 2016-08-18 18:11 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-19 12:41 ` Alexander Kanavin
2016-08-19 7:51 ` Wang, Xin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2016-08-18 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]
On 18 August 2016 at 18:58, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ?
>
It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says
up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite there being 2.35.3.
These upgrades have been done without reference to the tooling we've got.
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 905 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-18 17:58 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-18 18:11 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2016-08-19 7:51 ` Wang, Xin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Xin @ 2016-08-19 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj, Burton, Ross; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 920 bytes --]
There is no 2.36.x, so stick with 2.34.x.
From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 1:58 AM
To: Burton, Ross
Cc: Wang, Xin/王 鑫; OE-core
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com<mailto:ross.burton@intel.com>> wrote:
On 18 August 2016 at 06:48, Wang Xin <wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com<mailto:wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3.
2.35.x is a development release, so stick with 2.34.x until 2.36.0 is available.
perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ?
Ross
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org<mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4648 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-18 18:11 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2016-08-19 12:41 ` Alexander Kanavin
2016-08-19 16:52 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2016-08-19 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 08/18/2016 09:11 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 18 August 2016 at 18:58, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ?
>
>
> It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says
> up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite there being 2.35.3.
>
> These upgrades have been done without reference to the tooling we've got.
Also the recipe itself inherits upstream-version-is-even class - that
means odd versions are development snapshots and should be ignored.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-19 12:41 ` Alexander Kanavin
@ 2016-08-19 16:52 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-22 15:20 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-23 12:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Kanavin; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1026 bytes --]
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/18/2016 09:11 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>
>> On 18 August 2016 at 18:58, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
>> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ?
>>
>>
>> It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says
>> up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite there being 2.35.3.
>>
>> These upgrades have been done without reference to the tooling we've got.
>
> Also the recipe itself inherits upstream-version-is-even class - that means odd versions are development snapshots and should be ignored.
good point, will this class give me some sort of parsing error, if I try to update to odd version ?
>
> Alex
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-19 16:52 ` Khem Raj
@ 2016-08-22 15:20 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-22 15:46 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-23 12:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2016-08-22 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 516 bytes --]
On 19 August 2016 at 17:52, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> good point, will this class give me some sort of parsing error, if I try
> to update to odd version ?
>
No it simply sets the variables so that the recipe reporting service won't
propose an upgrade to a development release.
There may be a good reason for the upgrade to a development release (for
example if you're developing a system and are tracking an upstream
development series), so aborting the build would be overkill.
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1013 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-22 15:20 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2016-08-22 15:46 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-22 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ross Burton; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 654 bytes --]
On Aug 22, 2016 8:20 AM, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 August 2016 at 17:52, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> good point, will this class give me some sort of parsing error, if I try
to update to odd version ?
>
>
> No it simply sets the variables so that the recipe reporting service
won't propose an upgrade to a development release.
>
> There may be a good reason for the upgrade to a development release (for
example if you're developing a system and are tracking an upstream
development series), so aborting the build would be overkill.
A parsing note or warning would not hurt imo
>
> Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 908 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3
2016-08-19 16:52 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-22 15:20 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2016-08-23 12:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2016-08-23 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: openembedded-core
On 08/19/2016 07:52 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>>> It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says
>>> up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite there being 2.35.3.
>>>
>>> These upgrades have been done without reference to the tooling we've got.
>>
>> Also the recipe itself inherits upstream-version-is-even class - that means odd versions are development snapshots and should be ignored.
>
> good point, will this class give me some sort of parsing error, if I try to update to odd version ?
Not at the moment, but if you can suggest how this could be done, I'll
add it (perhaps as a warning though).
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-23 12:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-18 5:48 [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3 Wang Xin
2016-08-18 11:33 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-18 17:58 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-18 18:11 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-19 12:41 ` Alexander Kanavin
2016-08-19 16:52 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-22 15:20 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-22 15:46 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-23 12:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2016-08-19 7:51 ` Wang, Xin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.