[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.

As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
the rpi memory node explicitly.

Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
if this is a problem or not.

It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: arm@kernel.org
---
v2: New patch to avoid needing to add skeleton.dtsi to arch/arm64
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi     | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
index caf2707..e9b47b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 / {
 	memory {
+		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0 0x10000000>;
 	};
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
index b982522..445624a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835-aux.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
-#include "skeleton.dtsi"
 
 /* This include file covers the common peripherals and configuration between
  * bcm2835 and bcm2836 implementations, leaving the CPU configuration to
@@ -13,6 +12,8 @@
 	compatible = "brcm,bcm2835";
 	model = "BCM2835";
 	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <1>;
 
 	chosen {
 		bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttyAMA0";
-- 
2.8.1

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.

As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
the rpi memory node explicitly.

Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
if this is a problem or not.

It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: arm at kernel.org
---
v2: New patch to avoid needing to add skeleton.dtsi to arch/arm64
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi     | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
index caf2707..e9b47b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 / {
 	memory {
+		device_type = "memory";
 		reg = <0 0x10000000>;
 	};
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
index b982522..445624a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835-aux.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
-#include "skeleton.dtsi"
 
 /* This include file covers the common peripherals and configuration between
  * bcm2835 and bcm2836 implementations, leaving the CPU configuration to
@@ -13,6 +12,8 @@
 	compatible = "brcm,bcm2835";
 	model = "BCM2835";
 	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <1>;
 
 	chosen {
 		bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttyAMA0";
-- 
2.8.1

[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: dts: bcm: Use a symlink to R-Pi dtsi files from arch=arm

[Ian Campbell]

The ../../../arm... style cross-references added by commit 9d56c22a7861
("ARM: bcm2835: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3.") do not work in the
context of the split device-tree repository[0] (where the directory
structure differs). As with commit 8ee57b8182c4 ("ARM64: dts: vexpress: Use
a symlink to vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi from arch=arm") use symlinks instead.

[0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: arm@kernel.org
---
v2: No more need for skeleton.dtsi since this was cleaned up in the previous
    patch
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi          | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts       | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi              | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi              | 1 +
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 120000 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
 create mode 120000 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
 create mode 120000 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
new file mode 120000
index 0000000..3937b77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
index 6f47dd2..7841b72 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /dts-v1/;
 #include "bcm2837.dtsi"
-#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
-#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
+#include "bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
+#include "bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
 
 / {
 	compatible = "raspberrypi,3-model-b", "brcm,bcm2837";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
index f2a31d0..8216bbb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi"
+#include "bcm283x.dtsi"
 
 / {
 	compatible = "brcm,bcm2836";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
new file mode 120000
index 0000000..dca7c05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
new file mode 120000
index 0000000..5f54e4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.8.1

[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: dts: bcm: Use a symlink to R-Pi dtsi files from arch=arm

[Ian Campbell]

The ../../../arm... style cross-references added by commit 9d56c22a7861
("ARM: bcm2835: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3.") do not work in the
context of the split device-tree repository[0] (where the directory
structure differs). As with commit 8ee57b8182c4 ("ARM64: dts: vexpress: Use
a symlink to vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi from arch=arm") use symlinks instead.

[0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: arm at kernel.org
---
v2: No more need for skeleton.dtsi since this was cleaned up in the previous
    patch
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi          | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts       | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi              | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi              | 1 +
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 120000 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
 create mode 120000 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
 create mode 120000 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
new file mode 120000
index 0000000..3937b77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
index 6f47dd2..7841b72 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /dts-v1/;
 #include "bcm2837.dtsi"
-#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
-#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
+#include "bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
+#include "bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
 
 / {
 	compatible = "raspberrypi,3-model-b", "brcm,bcm2837";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
index f2a31d0..8216bbb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi"
+#include "bcm283x.dtsi"
 
 / {
 	compatible = "brcm,bcm2836";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
new file mode 120000
index 0000000..dca7c05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
new file mode 120000
index 0000000..5f54e4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.8.1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
> broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
> not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
> kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.
> 
> As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
> the rpi memory node explicitly.
> 
> Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
> bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
> if this is a problem or not.
> 
> It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
> and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
> I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this looks
generally like the right thing. So FWIW:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> index caf2707..e9b47b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  
>  / {
>  	memory {
> +		device_type = "memory";
>  		reg = <0 0x10000000>;
>  	};
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> index b982522..445624a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835-aux.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> -#include "skeleton.dtsi"
>  
>  /* This include file covers the common peripherals and configuration between
>   * bcm2835 and bcm2836 implementations, leaving the CPU configuration to
> @@ -13,6 +12,8 @@
>  	compatible = "brcm,bcm2835";
>  	model = "BCM2835";
>  	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>  
>  	chosen {
>  		bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttyAMA0";
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
> broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
> not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
> kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.
> 
> As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
> the rpi memory node explicitly.
> 
> Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
> bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
> if this is a problem or not.
> 
> It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
> and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
> I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this looks
generally like the right thing. So FWIW:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> index caf2707..e9b47b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  
>  / {
>  	memory {
> +		device_type = "memory";
>  		reg = <0 0x10000000>;
>  	};
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> index b982522..445624a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835-aux.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> -#include "skeleton.dtsi"
>  
>  /* This include file covers the common peripherals and configuration between
>   * bcm2835 and bcm2836 implementations, leaving the CPU configuration to
> @@ -13,6 +12,8 @@
>  	compatible = "brcm,bcm2835";
>  	model = "BCM2835";
>  	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>  
>  	chosen {
>  		bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttyAMA0";
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
> broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
> not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
> kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.
> 
> As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
> the rpi memory node explicitly.
> 
> Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
> bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
> if this is a problem or not.
> 
> It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
> and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
> I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this looks
generally like the right thing. So FWIW:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> index caf2707..e9b47b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  
>  / {
>  	memory {
> +		device_type = "memory";
>  		reg = <0 0x10000000>;
>  	};
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> index b982522..445624a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm2835-aux.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> -#include "skeleton.dtsi"
>  
>  /* This include file covers the common peripherals and configuration between
>   * bcm2835 and bcm2836 implementations, leaving the CPU configuration to
> @@ -13,6 +12,8 @@
>  	compatible = "brcm,bcm2835";
>  	model = "BCM2835";
>  	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>  
>  	chosen {
>  		bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttyAMA0";
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: dts: bcm: Use a symlink to R-Pi dtsi files from arch=arm

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The ../../../arm... style cross-references added by commit 9d56c22a7861
> ("ARM: bcm2835: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3.") do not work in the
> context of the split device-tree repository[0] (where the directory
> structure differs). As with commit 8ee57b8182c4 ("ARM64: dts: vexpress: Use
> a symlink to vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi from arch=arm") use symlinks instead.
> 
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

As this matches what we did in 8ee57b8182c4, and no longer involves
raising skeletons back from the dead:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..3937b77
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> index 6f47dd2..7841b72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /dts-v1/;
>  #include "bcm2837.dtsi"
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "raspberrypi,3-model-b", "brcm,bcm2837";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> index f2a31d0..8216bbb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm283x.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "brcm,bcm2836";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..dca7c05
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..5f54e4c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: dts: bcm: Use a symlink to R-Pi dtsi files from arch=arm

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The ../../../arm... style cross-references added by commit 9d56c22a7861
> ("ARM: bcm2835: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3.") do not work in the
> context of the split device-tree repository[0] (where the directory
> structure differs). As with commit 8ee57b8182c4 ("ARM64: dts: vexpress: Use
> a symlink to vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi from arch=arm") use symlinks instead.
> 
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

As this matches what we did in 8ee57b8182c4, and no longer involves
raising skeletons back from the dead:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..3937b77
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> index 6f47dd2..7841b72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /dts-v1/;
>  #include "bcm2837.dtsi"
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "raspberrypi,3-model-b", "brcm,bcm2837";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> index f2a31d0..8216bbb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm283x.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "brcm,bcm2836";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..dca7c05
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..5f54e4c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 

[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: dts: bcm: Use a symlink to R-Pi dtsi files from arch=arm

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The ../../../arm... style cross-references added by commit 9d56c22a7861
> ("ARM: bcm2835: Add devicetree for the Raspberry Pi 3.") do not work in the
> context of the split device-tree repository[0] (where the directory
> structure differs). As with commit 8ee57b8182c4 ("ARM64: dts: vexpress: Use
> a symlink to vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi from arch=arm") use symlinks instead.
> 
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>

As this matches what we did in 8ee57b8182c4, and no longer involves
raising skeletons back from the dead:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..3937b77
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> index 6f47dd2..7841b72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /dts-v1/;
>  #include "bcm2837.dtsi"
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm2835-rpi.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "raspberrypi,3-model-b", "brcm,bcm2837";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> index f2a31d0..8216bbb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -#include "../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi"
> +#include "bcm283x.dtsi"
>  
>  / {
>  	compatible = "brcm,bcm2836";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..dca7c05
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-smsc9514.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000..5f54e4c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm283x.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../../../../arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi
> \ No newline at end of file
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Stefan Wahren]

Hi Ian,

> Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> hat am 3. August 2016 um 16:12 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
> broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
> not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
> kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.
> 
> As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
> the rpi memory node explicitly.
> 
> Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
> bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
> if this is a problem or not.
> 
> It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
> and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
> I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.

i tested this patch with a Raspberry Pi Model B successfully.

Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Stefan Wahren]

Hi Ian,

> Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> hat am 3. August 2016 um 16:12 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
> broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
> not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
> kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.
> 
> As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
> the rpi memory node explicitly.
> 
> Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
> bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
> if this is a problem or not.
> 
> It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
> and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
> I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.

i tested this patch with a Raspberry Pi Model B successfully.

Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> 
> I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this looks
> generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks (and Stefan too).

I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.

Ian.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this looks
> generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

Thanks (and Stefan too).

I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.

Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> 
> I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this looks
> generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks (and Stefan too).

I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.

Ian.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > 
> > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> > 
> > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> looks
> > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks (and Stefan too).
> 
> I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.

This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?

Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
(via arm@k.o)?

Ian

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > 
> > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> looks
> > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Thanks (and Stefan too).
> 
> I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.

This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?

Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
(via arm@k.o)?

Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >?
> > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> >?
> > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> looks
> > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> >?
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks (and Stefan too).
> 
> I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.

This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?

Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
(via arm at k.o)?

Ian

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Mark Rutland]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > 
> > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> > > 
> > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > looks
> > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > 
> > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > 
> > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> 
> This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> 
> Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> (via arm@k.o)?

That's the right place.

The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

Thanks,
Mark.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Mark Rutland]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > 
> > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
> > > 
> > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > looks
> > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > 
> > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> 
> This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> 
> Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> (via arm@k.o)?

That's the right place.

The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Mark Rutland]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > >?
> > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> > >?
> > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > looks
> > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > >?
> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > 
> > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > 
> > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> 
> This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> 
> Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> (via arm at k.o)?

That's the right place.

The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

Thanks,
Mark.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:23:49 AM CEST Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> > > > 
> > > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > > looks
> > > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > > 
> > > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> > 
> > This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> > the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> > 
> > Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> > (via arm@k.o)?
> 
> That's the right place.
> 
> The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
> accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
> Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
and will get to it eventually.

We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
or send a ping on IRC.

The easiest way for us is when things get funnelled through the
platform maintainers that handle all the other patches, but I
can see how that may be annoying for a patch like this.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:23:49 AM CEST Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> > > > 
> > > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > > looks
> > > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > > 
> > > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> > 
> > This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> > the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> > 
> > Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> > (via arm@k.o)?
> 
> That's the right place.
> 
> The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
> accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
> Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
and will get to it eventually.

We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
or send a ping on IRC.

The easiest way for us is when things get funnelled through the
platform maintainers that handle all the other patches, but I
can see how that may be annoying for a patch like this.

	Arnd

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:23:49 AM CEST Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> > > > 
> > > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > > looks
> > > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > > 
> > > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> > 
> > This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> > the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> > 
> > Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> > (via arm at k.o)?
> 
> That's the right place.
> 
> The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
> accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
> Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
and will get to it eventually.

We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
or send a ping on IRC.

The easiest way for us is when things get funnelled through the
platform maintainers that handle all the other patches, but I
can see how that may be annoying for a patch like this.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
> and will get to it eventually.

Is it still on your TODO or should I do...

> We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
> or send a ping on IRC.

... one of these?

It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
device-tree.git tag will build.

Thanks,
Ian.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
> and will get to it eventually.

Is it still on your TODO or should I do...

> We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
> or send a ping on IRC.

... one of these?

It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
device-tree.git tag will build.

Thanks,
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
> and will get to it eventually.

Is it still on your TODO or should I do...

> We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
> or send a ping on IRC.

... one of these?

It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
device-tree.git tag will build.

Thanks,
Ian.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday, September 9, 2016 3:45:56 PM CEST Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> > messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
> > and will get to it eventually.
> 
> Is it still on your TODO or should I do...
>
> > We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> > from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> > be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
> > or send a ping on IRC.
> 
> ... one of these?
> 
> It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
> device-tree.git tag will build.

Oh, it ended  up in my v4.9-todo folder, not 4.8, I misunderstood
the urgency, sorry.

I've applied it to the fixes branch now.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday, September 9, 2016 3:45:56 PM CEST Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> > messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
> > and will get to it eventually.
> 
> Is it still on your TODO or should I do...
>
> > We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> > from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> > be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
> > or send a ping on IRC.
> 
> ... one of these?
> 
> It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
> device-tree.git tag will build.

Oh, it ended  up in my v4.9-todo folder, not 4.8, I misunderstood
the urgency, sorry.

I've applied it to the fixes branch now.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday, September 9, 2016 3:45:56 PM CEST Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> > messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
> > and will get to it eventually.
> 
> Is it still on your TODO or should I do...
>
> > We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> > from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> > be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
> > or send a ping on IRC.
> 
> ... one of these?
> 
> It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
> device-tree.git tag will build.

Oh, it ended  up in my v4.9-todo folder, not 4.8, I misunderstood
the urgency, sorry.

I've applied it to the fixes branch now.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, September 9, 2016 3:45:56 PM CEST Ian Campbell wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > 
> > > I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> > > messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO
> > > folder
> > > and will get to it eventually.
> > 
> > Is it still on your TODO or should I do...
> > 
> > > 
> > > We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> > > from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> > > be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the
> > > subject
> > > or send a ping on IRC.
> > 
> > ... one of these?
> > 
> > It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
> > device-tree.git tag will build.
> 
> Oh, it ended  up in my v4.9-todo folder, not 4.8, I misunderstood
> the urgency, sorry.

No worries.

> I've applied it to the fixes branch now.

Thank you!

Ian.

[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

[Ian Campbell]

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, September 9, 2016 3:45:56 PM CEST Ian Campbell wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 12:09 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > 
> > > I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
> > > messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO
> > > folder
> > > and will get to it eventually.
> > 
> > Is it still on your TODO or should I do...
> > 
> > > 
> > > We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
> > > from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
> > > be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the
> > > subject
> > > or send a ping on IRC.
> > 
> > ... one of these?
> > 
> > It'd be great to get this fixed in v4.8 so that the corresponding
> > device-tree.git tag will build.
> 
> Oh, it ended??up in my v4.9-todo folder, not 4.8, I misunderstood
> the urgency, sorry.

No worries.

> I've applied it to the fixes branch now.

Thank you!

Ian.