All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 01/23] clocksource: sh_cmt: compute rate before registration again
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:51:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473533513.19464.3.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609101416420.32361@nanos>

On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 14:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>	if (foo)
> 		bar(foo->something, foo->somemore, foo->other,
> 		    CONST);)
> 	else
> 		rab();
> 
> 
> Is NOT. Simply because the pattern of a 'if ()' condition without braces
> suggests a single line statement to follow. Then the reading flow stops
> because there is more than one line. While:

> 	if (foo) {
> 		bar(foo->something, foo->somemore, foo->other,
> 		    CONST);)
> 	} else {
> 		rab();
> 	}

While I mostly agree, CodingStyle says:

------------------------------------------------------

Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.

	if (condition)
		action();

and

	if (condition)
		do_this();
	else
		do_that();

------------------------------------------------------

Perhaps that should be "with single line statements" instead.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-10 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 20:00 [RFC v6 00/23] adapt clockevents frequencies to mono clock Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 01/23] clocksource: sh_cmt: compute rate before registration again Nicolai Stange
2016-09-10 12:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-10 18:51     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-09-10 19:11     ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 02/23] clocksource: sh_tmu: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 03/23] clocksource: em_sti: split clock prepare and enable steps Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 04/23] clocksource: em_sti: compute rate before registration Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 05/23] clocksource: h8300_timer8: don't reset rate in ->set_state_oneshot() Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 06/23] clockevents: make clockevents_config() static Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 07/23] many clockevent drivers: set ->min_delta_ticks and ->max_delta_ticks Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 08/23] arch/s390/kernel/time: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 09/23] arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 10/23] arch/tile/kernel/time: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 11/23] clockevents: always initialize ->min_delta_ns and ->max_delta_ns Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 12/23] many clockevent drivers: don't set " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 13/23] clockevents: introduce CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_NO_ADJUST flag Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 14/23] clockevents: decouple ->max_delta_ns from ->max_delta_ticks Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 15/23] clockevents: do comparison of delta against minimum in terms of cycles Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 16/23] clockevents: clockevents_program_min_delta(): don't set ->next_event Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 17/23] clockevents: use ->min_delta_ticks_adjusted to program minimum delta Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 18/23] clockevents: min delta increment: calculate min_delta_ns from ticks Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 19/23] timer_list: print_tickdevice(): calculate ->min_delta_ns dynamically Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 20/23] clockevents: purge ->min_delta_ns Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 21/23] clockevents: initial support for mono to raw time conversion Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 22/23] clockevents: make setting of ->mult and ->mult_adjusted atomic Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 23/23] timekeeping: inform clockevents about freq adjustments Nicolai Stange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473533513.19464.3.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.