From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, bhelgaas@google.com, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, linux@rainbow-software.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com Cc: net147@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V5 3/3] ACPI: pci_link: Include PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for ISA IRQs Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:32 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1477283492-26657-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1477283492-26657-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> Commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements") replaced the addition of PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING in acpi_pci_link_allocate() with an addition in acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(), but f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") removed the use of acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs. Therefore, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING is missing from ISA IRQs used by interrupt links. Include that penalty by adding it in the acpi_pci_link_allocate() path. Fixes: f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> --- drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c index 74bf96e..bc3d914 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c @@ -608,6 +608,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link) acpi_device_bid(link->device)); return -ENODEV; } else { + if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS) + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] += + PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING; + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n", acpi_device_name(link->device), acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active); -- 1.9.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH V5 3/3] ACPI: pci_link: Include PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for ISA IRQs Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:32 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1477283492-26657-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1477283492-26657-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> Commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements") replaced the addition of PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING in acpi_pci_link_allocate() with an addition in acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(), but f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") removed the use of acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs. Therefore, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING is missing from ISA IRQs used by interrupt links. Include that penalty by adding it in the acpi_pci_link_allocate() path. Fixes: f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> --- drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c index 74bf96e..bc3d914 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c @@ -608,6 +608,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link) acpi_device_bid(link->device)); return -ENODEV; } else { + if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS) + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] += + PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING; + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n", acpi_device_name(link->device), acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active); -- 1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 4:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-10-24 4:31 [PATCH V5 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: " Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:31 ` Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] ACPI: pci_link: penalize SCI correctly Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:31 ` Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-10-24 4:31 ` Sinan Kaya [this message] 2016-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] ACPI: pci_link: Include PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for ISA IRQs Sinan Kaya 2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu 2016-10-26 18:34 ` Sinan Kaya 2016-10-26 18:34 ` Sinan Kaya 2016-10-27 10:31 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Rafael J. Wysocki 2016-10-27 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2016-10-27 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1477283492-26657-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \ --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \ --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \ --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \ --cc=jcm@redhat.com \ --cc=lenb@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \ --cc=net147@gmail.com \ --cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \ --cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.