All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Patch "mm/hugetlb.c: use the right pte val for compare in hugetlb_cow" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
@ 2017-01-09 15:27 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2017-01-09 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aneesh.kumar, akpm, gregkh, hillf.zj, jstancek, kirill.shutemov,
	mike.kravetz, mpe, scottwood, torvalds
  Cc: stable, stable-commits


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    mm/hugetlb.c: use the right pte val for compare in hugetlb_cow

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     mm-hugetlb.c-use-the-right-pte-val-for-compare-in-hugetlb_cow.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 3999f52e3198e76607446ab1a4610c1ddc406c56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:41:56 -0800
Subject: mm/hugetlb.c: use the right pte val for compare in hugetlb_cow

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 3999f52e3198e76607446ab1a4610c1ddc406c56 upstream.

We cannot use the pte value used in set_pte_at for pte_same comparison,
because archs like ppc64, filter/add new pte flag in set_pte_at.
Instead fetch the pte value inside hugetlb_cow.  We are comparing pte
value to make sure the pte didn't change since we dropped the page table
lock.  hugetlb_cow get called with page table lock held, and we can take
a copy of the pte value before we drop the page table lock.

With hugetlbfs, we optimize the MAP_PRIVATE write fault path with no
previous mapping (huge_pte_none entries), by forcing a cow in the fault
path.  This avoid take an addition fault to covert a read-only mapping
to read/write.  Here we were comparing a recently instantiated pte (via
set_pte_at) to the pte values from linux page table.  As explained above
on ppc64 such pte_same check returned wrong result, resulting in us
taking an additional fault on ppc64.

Fixes: 6a119eae942c ("powerpc/mm: Add a _PAGE_PTE bit")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161018154245.18023-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/hugetlb.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3450,15 +3450,17 @@ static void unmap_ref_private(struct mm_
  * Keep the pte_same checks anyway to make transition from the mutex easier.
  */
 static int hugetlb_cow(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-			unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte,
-			struct page *pagecache_page, spinlock_t *ptl)
+		       unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep,
+		       struct page *pagecache_page, spinlock_t *ptl)
 {
+	pte_t pte;
 	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
 	struct page *old_page, *new_page;
 	int ret = 0, outside_reserve = 0;
 	unsigned long mmun_start;	/* For mmu_notifiers */
 	unsigned long mmun_end;		/* For mmu_notifiers */
 
+	pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
 	old_page = pte_page(pte);
 
 retry_avoidcopy:
@@ -3733,7 +3735,7 @@ retry:
 	hugetlb_count_add(pages_per_huge_page(h), mm);
 	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
 		/* Optimization, do the COW without a second fault */
-		ret = hugetlb_cow(mm, vma, address, ptep, new_pte, page, ptl);
+		ret = hugetlb_cow(mm, vma, address, ptep, page, ptl);
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(ptl);
@@ -3888,8 +3890,8 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
 		if (!huge_pte_write(entry)) {
-			ret = hugetlb_cow(mm, vma, address, ptep, entry,
-					pagecache_page, ptl);
+			ret = hugetlb_cow(mm, vma, address, ptep,
+					  pagecache_page, ptl);
 			goto out_put_page;
 		}
 		entry = huge_pte_mkdirty(entry);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com are

queue-4.9/mm-hugetlb.c-use-the-right-pte-val-for-compare-in-hugetlb_cow.patch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-01-09 15:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-09 15:27 Patch "mm/hugetlb.c: use the right pte val for compare in hugetlb_cow" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.