From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:44:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485877498.6360.115.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpXiQMH1zMJM6sYFNUySUYjaHnLZ3T2d34GwCMQ9u6RkwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 22:19 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> The context is process context (TX path before hitting qdisc), and
> BH is not disabled, so in_interrupt() doesn't catch it. Hmm, this
> makes me thinking maybe we really need to disable BH in this
> case for nf_hook()? But it is called in RX path too, and BH is
> already disabled there.
ipt_do_table() and similar netfilter entry points disable BH.
Maybe it is done too late.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-31 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-27 21:15 net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Dmitry Vyukov
2017-01-27 23:22 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-27 23:30 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-27 23:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-28 1:00 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-28 1:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-31 6:19 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-31 15:44 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2017-02-01 20:51 ` Cong Wang
2017-02-01 21:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-02-01 21:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-02-01 23:29 ` Cong Wang
2017-02-01 23:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-02-01 23:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-02-02 18:01 ` Cong Wang
2017-02-02 18:31 ` [PATCH net] net: use a work queue to defer net_disable_timestamp() work Eric Dumazet
2017-02-03 21:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485877498.6360.115.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.