* [PATCH] apt-package: use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib
@ 2017-02-17 18:28 Saul Wold
2017-02-17 20:40 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2017-02-17 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core, richard.purdie
Fixes ssue when building with x32
+ install -m 0644 /srv/sdc/builds/poky/10698/tmp/work/corei7-64-pokymllib64-linux/lib64-apt/1.2.12-r0/apt-1.2.12/debian/apt.systemd.daily /srv/sdc/builds/poky/10698/tmp/work/corei7-64-pokymllib64-linux/lib64-apt/1.2.12-r0/image/usr/lib/apt/
install: target '/srv/sdc/builds/poky/10698/tmp/work/corei7-64-pokymllib64-linux/lib64-apt/1.2.12-r0/image/usr/lib/apt/' is not a directory: No such file or directory
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-package.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-package.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-package.inc
index 839d58e..7ebde38 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-package.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-package.inc
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ do_install () {
install -m 0644 include/apt-pkg/*.h ${D}${includedir}/apt-pkg/
install -d ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
- install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt.systemd.daily ${D}/usr/lib/apt/
+ install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt.systemd.daily ${D}${libdir}/apt/
install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt-daily.service ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt-daily.timer ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/cron.daily/
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apt-package: use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib
2017-02-17 18:28 [PATCH] apt-package: use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib Saul Wold
@ 2017-02-17 20:40 ` Burton, Ross
2017-02-20 7:21 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-02-17 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]
On 17 February 2017 at 18:28, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> - install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt.systemd.daily ${D}/usr/lib/apt/
> + install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt.systemd.daily ${D}${libdir}/apt/
> install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt-daily.service
> ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
> install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt-daily.timer
> ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
>
The apt-daily.service unit is what fires the apt.systemd.daily script:
$ cat debian/apt-daily.service
...
ExecStart=/usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily
If you're going to change the install location of the script then the unit
needs to be fixed.
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1421 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apt-package: use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib
2017-02-17 20:40 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2017-02-20 7:21 ` Saul Wold
2017-02-20 20:55 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2017-02-20 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: OE-core
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 20:40 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 17 February 2017 at 18:28, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > - install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt.systemd.daily
> > ${D}/usr/lib/apt/
> > + install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt.systemd.daily
> > ${D}${libdir}/apt/
> > install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt-daily.service
> > ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
> > install -m 0644 ${S}/debian/apt-daily.timer
> > ${D}${systemd_unitdir}/system/
> >
>
> The apt-daily.service unit is what fires the apt.systemd.daily
> script:
>
> $ cat debian/apt-daily.service
> ...
> ExecStart=/usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily
>
> If you're going to change the install location of the script then the
> unit needs to be fixed.
>
Hmm, since this is a script would it make more sense to have this
install create the "usr/lib" directory? I am wondering is this will
bullocks up a single root solution or a different non-standard libdir?
Sau!
> Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] apt-package: use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib
2017-02-20 7:21 ` Saul Wold
@ 2017-02-20 20:55 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-02-20 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 412 bytes --]
On 20 February 2017 at 07:21, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hmm, since this is a script would it make more sense to have this
> install create the "usr/lib" directory? I am wondering is this will
> bullocks up a single root solution or a different non-standard libdir?
>
/usr/lib will most likely exist, but if I were writing the patch I'd be
sedding the right path into the unit.
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-20 20:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-17 18:28 [PATCH] apt-package: use ${libdir} instead of /usr/lib Saul Wold
2017-02-17 20:40 ` Burton, Ross
2017-02-20 7:21 ` Saul Wold
2017-02-20 20:55 ` Burton, Ross
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.