* [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
@ 2017-02-28 20:30 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2017-02-28 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-arm-kernel, linux-serial,
Christopher Covington, manoj.iyer, dann.frazier
For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/acpi/spcr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
index 2b5d0fa..2051a8c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static bool qdf2400_erratum_44_present(struct acpi_table_header *h)
return true;
if (!memcmp(h->oem_table_id, "QDF2400 ", ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
- h->oem_revision == 0)
+ h->oem_revision == 1)
return true;
return false;
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
@ 2017-02-28 20:30 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2017-02-28 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/acpi/spcr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
index 2b5d0fa..2051a8c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static bool qdf2400_erratum_44_present(struct acpi_table_header *h)
return true;
if (!memcmp(h->oem_table_id, "QDF2400 ", ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
- h->oem_revision == 0)
+ h->oem_revision == 1)
return true;
return false;
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
2017-02-28 20:30 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2017-03-13 4:19 ` Timur Tabi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2017-03-13 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: dann.frazier, manoj.iyer, linux-serial, linux-arm-kernel,
Christopher Covington
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
>
> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
>
> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it
up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
@ 2017-03-13 4:19 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2017-03-13 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
>
> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
>
> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it
up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
2017-03-13 4:19 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2017-03-22 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2017-03-22 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Dann Frazier, Manoj Iyer, linux-serial, linux-arm-kernel,
Christopher Covington
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
>> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
>>
>> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
>>
>> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
>
> Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it
> up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you.
Ok, how about 4.11-rc4?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
@ 2017-03-22 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2017-03-22 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
>> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
>>
>> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
>>
>> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
>
> Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it
> up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you.
Ok, how about 4.11-rc4?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
2017-03-22 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2017-03-22 15:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-03-22 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timur Tabi
Cc: Dann Frazier, Manoj Iyer, linux-serial, linux-arm-kernel,
Christopher Covington
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
> >> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
> >>
> >> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> >
> > Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it
> > up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you.
>
> Ok, how about 4.11-rc4?
It's in the queue in tty-linus, right? If so, that should make it into
4.11-final.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision
@ 2017-03-22 15:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-03-22 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44,
> >> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0.
> >>
> >> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit")
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> >
> > Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it
> > up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you.
>
> Ok, how about 4.11-rc4?
It's in the queue in tty-linus, right? If so, that should make it into
4.11-final.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-22 15:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-28 20:30 [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision Timur Tabi
2017-02-28 20:30 ` Timur Tabi
2017-03-13 4:19 ` Timur Tabi
2017-03-13 4:19 ` Timur Tabi
2017-03-22 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
2017-03-22 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
2017-03-22 15:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-22 15:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.