* Patch "samples/seccomp: fix 64-bit comparison macros" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
@ 2017-03-08 15:40 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2017-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: idolf, gregkh, james.l.morris, keescook, sroettger; +Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
samples/seccomp: fix 64-bit comparison macros
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
samples-seccomp-fix-64-bit-comparison-macros.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 916cafdc95843fb9af5fd5f83ca499d75473d107 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Svensson <idolf@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:32:39 -0800
Subject: samples/seccomp: fix 64-bit comparison macros
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mathias Svensson <idolf@google.com>
commit 916cafdc95843fb9af5fd5f83ca499d75473d107 upstream.
There were some bugs in the JNE64 and JLT64 comparision macros. This fixes
them, improves comments, and cleans up the file while we are at it.
Reported-by: Stephen Röttger <sroettger@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Svensson <idolf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
--- a/samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h
+++ b/samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ union arg64 {
#define ARG_32(idx) \
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, LO_ARG(idx))
-/* Loads hi into A and lo in X */
+/* Loads lo into M[0] and hi into M[1] and A */
#define ARG_64(idx) \
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, LO_ARG(idx)), \
BPF_STMT(BPF_ST, 0), /* lo -> M[0] */ \
@@ -153,88 +153,107 @@ union arg64 {
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (value), 1, 0), \
jt
-/* Checks the lo, then swaps to check the hi. A=lo,X=hi */
+#define JA32(value, jt) \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JSET+BPF_K, (value), 0, 1), \
+ jt
+
+#define JGE32(value, jt) \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (value), 0, 1), \
+ jt
+
+#define JGT32(value, jt) \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (value), 0, 1), \
+ jt
+
+#define JLE32(value, jt) \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (value), 1, 0), \
+ jt
+
+#define JLT32(value, jt) \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (value), 1, 0), \
+ jt
+
+/*
+ * All the JXX64 checks assume lo is saved in M[0] and hi is saved in both
+ * A and M[1]. This invariant is kept by restoring A if necessary.
+ */
#define JEQ64(lo, hi, jt) \
+ /* if (hi != arg.hi) goto NOMATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 5), \
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
+ /* if (lo != arg.lo) goto NOMATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (lo), 0, 2), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
#define JNE64(lo, hi, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 5, 0), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
+ /* if (hi != arg.hi) goto MATCH; */ \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 3), \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), \
+ /* if (lo != arg.lo) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (lo), 2, 0), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
-
-#define JA32(value, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JSET+BPF_K, (value), 0, 1), \
- jt
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
#define JA64(lo, hi, jt) \
+ /* if (hi & arg.hi) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JSET+BPF_K, (hi), 3, 0), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), \
+ /* if (lo & arg.lo) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JSET+BPF_K, (lo), 0, 2), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
-
-#define JGE32(value, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (value), 0, 1), \
- jt
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
-#define JLT32(value, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (value), 1, 0), \
- jt
-
-/* Shortcut checking if hi > arg.hi. */
#define JGE64(lo, hi, jt) \
+ /* if (hi > arg.hi) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (hi), 4, 0), \
+ /* if (hi != arg.hi) goto NOMATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 5), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), \
+ /* if (lo >= arg.lo) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (lo), 0, 2), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
-
-#define JLT64(lo, hi, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 4), \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 5), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (lo), 2, 0), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
- jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
-
-#define JGT32(value, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (value), 0, 1), \
- jt
-
-#define JLE32(value, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (value), 1, 0), \
- jt
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
-/* Check hi > args.hi first, then do the GE checking */
#define JGT64(lo, hi, jt) \
+ /* if (hi > arg.hi) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (hi), 4, 0), \
+ /* if (hi != arg.hi) goto NOMATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 5), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), \
+ /* if (lo > arg.lo) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (lo), 0, 2), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
#define JLE64(lo, hi, jt) \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (hi), 6, 0), \
- BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 3), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), /* swap in lo */ \
+ /* if (hi < arg.hi) goto MATCH; */ \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 4), \
+ /* if (hi != arg.hi) goto NOMATCH; */ \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 5), \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), \
+ /* if (lo <= arg.lo) goto MATCH; */ \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGT+BPF_K, (lo), 2, 0), \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), /* passed: swap hi back in */ \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
+ jt, \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
+
+#define JLT64(lo, hi, jt) \
+ /* if (hi < arg.hi) goto MATCH; */ \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 4), \
+ /* if (hi != arg.hi) goto NOMATCH; */ \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (hi), 0, 5), \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 0), \
+ /* if (lo < arg.lo) goto MATCH; */ \
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JGE+BPF_K, (lo), 2, 0), \
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1), \
jt, \
- BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1) /* failed: swap hi back in */
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_MEM, 1)
#define LOAD_SYSCALL_NR \
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, \
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from idolf@google.com are
queue-4.9/samples-seccomp-fix-64-bit-comparison-macros.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-03-08 15:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-08 15:40 Patch "samples/seccomp: fix 64-bit comparison macros" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.