All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH] md/raid10: refactor some codes from raid10_write_request
@ 2017-03-13  9:23 Guoqing Jiang
  2017-03-14 16:48 ` Shaohua Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guoqing Jiang @ 2017-03-13  9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid; +Cc: shli, neilb, Guoqing Jiang

Previously, we clone both bio and repl_bio in raid10_write_request,
then add the cloned bio to plug->pending or conf->pending_bio_list
based on plug or not, and most of the logics are same for the two
conditions.

So introduce handle_clonebio (a better name is welcome) for it, and
use replacement parameter to distinguish the difference. No functional
changes in the patch.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
---
Another reason for it is to improve the readability of code, but
I didn't touch raid10 before so this is labeled as RFC.

 drivers/md/raid10.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index b1b1f982a722..02d8eff8d26e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1188,18 +1188,81 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
 	return;
 }
 
-static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
-				 struct r10bio *r10_bio)
+static void handle_clonebio(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio,
+			    struct bio *bio, int i, int replacement,
+			    int max_sectors)
 {
-	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
-	int i;
 	const int op = bio_op(bio);
 	const unsigned long do_sync = (bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC);
 	const unsigned long do_fua = (bio->bi_opf & REQ_FUA);
 	unsigned long flags;
-	struct md_rdev *blocked_rdev;
 	struct blk_plug_cb *cb;
 	struct raid10_plug_cb *plug = NULL;
+	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
+	struct md_rdev *rdev;
+	int devnum = r10_bio->devs[i].devnum;
+	struct bio *mbio;
+
+	if (replacement) {
+		rdev = conf->mirrors[devnum].replacement;
+		if (rdev == NULL) {
+			/* Replacement just got moved to main 'rdev' */
+			smp_mb();
+			rdev = conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev;
+		}
+	} else
+		rdev = conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev;
+
+	mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev->bio_set);
+	bio_trim(mbio, r10_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, max_sectors);
+	if (replacement)
+		r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio = mbio;
+	else
+		r10_bio->devs[i].bio = mbio;
+
+	mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= (r10_bio->devs[i].addr +
+				   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev));
+	mbio->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
+	mbio->bi_end_io	= raid10_end_write_request;
+	bio_set_op_attrs(mbio, op, do_sync | do_fua);
+	if (!replacement && test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev->flags)
+			 && enough(conf, devnum))
+		mbio->bi_opf |= MD_FAILFAST;
+	mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
+
+	if (conf->mddev->gendisk)
+		trace_block_bio_remap(bdev_get_queue(mbio->bi_bdev),
+				      mbio, disk_devt(conf->mddev->gendisk),
+				      r10_bio->sector);
+	/* flush_pending_writes() needs access to the rdev so...*/
+	mbio->bi_bdev = (void *)rdev;
+
+	atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
+
+	cb = blk_check_plugged(raid10_unplug, mddev, sizeof(*plug));
+	if (cb)
+		plug = container_of(cb, struct raid10_plug_cb, cb);
+	else
+		plug = NULL;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+	if (plug) {
+		bio_list_add(&plug->pending, mbio);
+		plug->pending_cnt++;
+	} else {
+		bio_list_add(&conf->pending_bio_list, mbio);
+		conf->pending_count++;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+	if (!plug)
+		md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
+}
+
+static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
+				 struct r10bio *r10_bio)
+{
+	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
+	int i;
+	struct md_rdev *blocked_rdev;
 	sector_t sectors;
 	int sectors_handled;
 	int max_sectors;
@@ -1402,101 +1465,10 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
 	bitmap_startwrite(mddev->bitmap, r10_bio->sector, r10_bio->sectors, 0);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < conf->copies; i++) {
-		struct bio *mbio;
-		int d = r10_bio->devs[i].devnum;
-		if (r10_bio->devs[i].bio) {
-			struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev;
-			mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev->bio_set);
-			bio_trim(mbio, r10_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
-				 max_sectors);
-			r10_bio->devs[i].bio = mbio;
-
-			mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= (r10_bio->devs[i].addr+
-					   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev));
-			mbio->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
-			mbio->bi_end_io	= raid10_end_write_request;
-			bio_set_op_attrs(mbio, op, do_sync | do_fua);
-			if (test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[d].rdev->flags) &&
-			    enough(conf, d))
-				mbio->bi_opf |= MD_FAILFAST;
-			mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
-
-			if (conf->mddev->gendisk)
-				trace_block_bio_remap(bdev_get_queue(mbio->bi_bdev),
-						      mbio, disk_devt(conf->mddev->gendisk),
-						      r10_bio->sector);
-			/* flush_pending_writes() needs access to the rdev so...*/
-			mbio->bi_bdev = (void*)rdev;
-
-			atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
-
-			cb = blk_check_plugged(raid10_unplug, mddev,
-					       sizeof(*plug));
-			if (cb)
-				plug = container_of(cb, struct raid10_plug_cb,
-						    cb);
-			else
-				plug = NULL;
-			spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
-			if (plug) {
-				bio_list_add(&plug->pending, mbio);
-				plug->pending_cnt++;
-			} else {
-				bio_list_add(&conf->pending_bio_list, mbio);
-				conf->pending_count++;
-			}
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
-			if (!plug)
-				md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
-		}
-
-		if (r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio) {
-			struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[d].replacement;
-			if (rdev == NULL) {
-				/* Replacement just got moved to main 'rdev' */
-				smp_mb();
-				rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev;
-			}
-			mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev->bio_set);
-			bio_trim(mbio, r10_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
-				 max_sectors);
-			r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio = mbio;
-
-			mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= (r10_bio->devs[i].addr +
-					   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev));
-			mbio->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
-			mbio->bi_end_io	= raid10_end_write_request;
-			bio_set_op_attrs(mbio, op, do_sync | do_fua);
-			mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
-
-			if (conf->mddev->gendisk)
-				trace_block_bio_remap(bdev_get_queue(mbio->bi_bdev),
-						      mbio, disk_devt(conf->mddev->gendisk),
-						      r10_bio->sector);
-			/* flush_pending_writes() needs access to the rdev so...*/
-			mbio->bi_bdev = (void*)rdev;
-
-			atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
-
-			cb = blk_check_plugged(raid10_unplug, mddev,
-					       sizeof(*plug));
-			if (cb)
-				plug = container_of(cb, struct raid10_plug_cb,
-						    cb);
-			else
-				plug = NULL;
-			spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
-			if (plug) {
-				bio_list_add(&plug->pending, mbio);
-				plug->pending_cnt++;
-			} else {
-				bio_list_add(&conf->pending_bio_list, mbio);
-				conf->pending_count++;
-			}
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
-			if (!plug)
-				md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
-		}
+		if (r10_bio->devs[i].bio)
+			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 0, max_sectors);
+		if (r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio)
+			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 1, max_sectors);
 	}
 
 	/* Don't remove the bias on 'remaining' (one_write_done) until
-- 
2.6.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] md/raid10: refactor some codes from raid10_write_request
  2017-03-13  9:23 [RFC PATCH] md/raid10: refactor some codes from raid10_write_request Guoqing Jiang
@ 2017-03-14 16:48 ` Shaohua Li
  2017-03-15  3:02   ` Guoqing Jiang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2017-03-14 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guoqing Jiang; +Cc: linux-raid, shli, neilb

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:23:59PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Previously, we clone both bio and repl_bio in raid10_write_request,
> then add the cloned bio to plug->pending or conf->pending_bio_list
> based on plug or not, and most of the logics are same for the two
> conditions.
> 
> So introduce handle_clonebio (a better name is welcome) for it, and
> use replacement parameter to distinguish the difference. No functional
> changes in the patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
> ---
> Another reason for it is to improve the readability of code, but
> I didn't touch raid10 before so this is labeled as RFC.
> 
>  drivers/md/raid10.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index b1b1f982a722..02d8eff8d26e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -1188,18 +1188,81 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> -static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> -				 struct r10bio *r10_bio)
> +static void handle_clonebio(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio,
> +			    struct bio *bio, int i, int replacement,
> +			    int max_sectors)

Maybe raid10_write_one_disk? Please replace 'i' with a meaningful name and
change to 'boo' for replacement.

>  {
> -	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
> -	int i;
>  	const int op = bio_op(bio);
>  	const unsigned long do_sync = (bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC);
>  	const unsigned long do_fua = (bio->bi_opf & REQ_FUA);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	struct md_rdev *blocked_rdev;
>  	struct blk_plug_cb *cb;
>  	struct raid10_plug_cb *plug = NULL;
> +	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
> +	struct md_rdev *rdev;
> +	int devnum = r10_bio->devs[i].devnum;
> +	struct bio *mbio;
> +
> +	if (replacement) {
> +		rdev = conf->mirrors[devnum].replacement;
> +		if (rdev == NULL) {
> +			/* Replacement just got moved to main 'rdev' */
> +			smp_mb();
> +			rdev = conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev;
> +		}
> +	} else
> +		rdev = conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev;
> +
> +	mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev->bio_set);
> +	bio_trim(mbio, r10_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, max_sectors);
> +	if (replacement)
> +		r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio = mbio;
> +	else
> +		r10_bio->devs[i].bio = mbio;
> +
> +	mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= (r10_bio->devs[i].addr +
> +				   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev));
> +	mbio->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
> +	mbio->bi_end_io	= raid10_end_write_request;
> +	bio_set_op_attrs(mbio, op, do_sync | do_fua);
> +	if (!replacement && test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev->flags)
> +			 && enough(conf, devnum))
> +		mbio->bi_opf |= MD_FAILFAST;
> +	mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
> +
> +	if (conf->mddev->gendisk)
> +		trace_block_bio_remap(bdev_get_queue(mbio->bi_bdev),
> +				      mbio, disk_devt(conf->mddev->gendisk),
> +				      r10_bio->sector);
> +	/* flush_pending_writes() needs access to the rdev so...*/
> +	mbio->bi_bdev = (void *)rdev;
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
> +
> +	cb = blk_check_plugged(raid10_unplug, mddev, sizeof(*plug));
> +	if (cb)
> +		plug = container_of(cb, struct raid10_plug_cb, cb);
> +	else
> +		plug = NULL;
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> +	if (plug) {
> +		bio_list_add(&plug->pending, mbio);
> +		plug->pending_cnt++;
> +	} else {
> +		bio_list_add(&conf->pending_bio_list, mbio);
> +		conf->pending_count++;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> +	if (!plug)
> +		md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> +}
> +
> +static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> +				 struct r10bio *r10_bio)
> +{
> +	struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private;
> +	int i;
> +	struct md_rdev *blocked_rdev;
>  	sector_t sectors;
>  	int sectors_handled;
>  	int max_sectors;
> @@ -1402,101 +1465,10 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>  	bitmap_startwrite(mddev->bitmap, r10_bio->sector, r10_bio->sectors, 0);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < conf->copies; i++) {
> -		struct bio *mbio;
> -		int d = r10_bio->devs[i].devnum;
> -		if (r10_bio->devs[i].bio) {
> -			struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev;
> -			mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev->bio_set);
> -			bio_trim(mbio, r10_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> -				 max_sectors);
> -			r10_bio->devs[i].bio = mbio;
> -
> -			mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= (r10_bio->devs[i].addr+
> -					   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev));
> -			mbio->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
> -			mbio->bi_end_io	= raid10_end_write_request;
> -			bio_set_op_attrs(mbio, op, do_sync | do_fua);
> -			if (test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[d].rdev->flags) &&
> -			    enough(conf, d))
> -				mbio->bi_opf |= MD_FAILFAST;
> -			mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
> -
> -			if (conf->mddev->gendisk)
> -				trace_block_bio_remap(bdev_get_queue(mbio->bi_bdev),
> -						      mbio, disk_devt(conf->mddev->gendisk),
> -						      r10_bio->sector);
> -			/* flush_pending_writes() needs access to the rdev so...*/
> -			mbio->bi_bdev = (void*)rdev;
> -
> -			atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
> -
> -			cb = blk_check_plugged(raid10_unplug, mddev,
> -					       sizeof(*plug));
> -			if (cb)
> -				plug = container_of(cb, struct raid10_plug_cb,
> -						    cb);
> -			else
> -				plug = NULL;
> -			spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> -			if (plug) {
> -				bio_list_add(&plug->pending, mbio);
> -				plug->pending_cnt++;
> -			} else {
> -				bio_list_add(&conf->pending_bio_list, mbio);
> -				conf->pending_count++;
> -			}
> -			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> -			if (!plug)
> -				md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> -		}
> -
> -		if (r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio) {
> -			struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[d].replacement;
> -			if (rdev == NULL) {
> -				/* Replacement just got moved to main 'rdev' */
> -				smp_mb();
> -				rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev;
> -			}
> -			mbio = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev->bio_set);
> -			bio_trim(mbio, r10_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> -				 max_sectors);
> -			r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio = mbio;
> -
> -			mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= (r10_bio->devs[i].addr +
> -					   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev));
> -			mbio->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
> -			mbio->bi_end_io	= raid10_end_write_request;
> -			bio_set_op_attrs(mbio, op, do_sync | do_fua);
> -			mbio->bi_private = r10_bio;
> -
> -			if (conf->mddev->gendisk)
> -				trace_block_bio_remap(bdev_get_queue(mbio->bi_bdev),
> -						      mbio, disk_devt(conf->mddev->gendisk),
> -						      r10_bio->sector);
> -			/* flush_pending_writes() needs access to the rdev so...*/
> -			mbio->bi_bdev = (void*)rdev;
> -
> -			atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
> -
> -			cb = blk_check_plugged(raid10_unplug, mddev,
> -					       sizeof(*plug));
> -			if (cb)
> -				plug = container_of(cb, struct raid10_plug_cb,
> -						    cb);
> -			else
> -				plug = NULL;
> -			spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> -			if (plug) {
> -				bio_list_add(&plug->pending, mbio);
> -				plug->pending_cnt++;
> -			} else {
> -				bio_list_add(&conf->pending_bio_list, mbio);
> -				conf->pending_count++;
> -			}
> -			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
> -			if (!plug)
> -				md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> -		}
> +		if (r10_bio->devs[i].bio)
> +			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 0, max_sectors);
> +		if (r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio)
> +			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 1, max_sectors);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Don't remove the bias on 'remaining' (one_write_done) until
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] md/raid10: refactor some codes from raid10_write_request
  2017-03-14 16:48 ` Shaohua Li
@ 2017-03-15  3:02   ` Guoqing Jiang
  2017-03-15 22:46     ` Shaohua Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guoqing Jiang @ 2017-03-15  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shaohua Li; +Cc: linux-raid, shli, neilb



On 03/15/2017 12:48 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:23:59PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>> Previously, we clone both bio and repl_bio in raid10_write_request,
>> then add the cloned bio to plug->pending or conf->pending_bio_list
>> based on plug or not, and most of the logics are same for the two
>> conditions.
>>
>> So introduce handle_clonebio (a better name is welcome) for it, and
>> use replacement parameter to distinguish the difference. No functional
>> changes in the patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Another reason for it is to improve the readability of code, but
>> I didn't touch raid10 before so this is labeled as RFC.
>>
>>   drivers/md/raid10.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> index b1b1f982a722..02d8eff8d26e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> @@ -1188,18 +1188,81 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>>   	return;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> -				 struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> +static void handle_clonebio(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio,
>> +			    struct bio *bio, int i, int replacement,
>> +			    int max_sectors)
> Maybe raid10_write_one_disk?

Thanks for review, I will use it unless a better name is found.

>   Please replace 'i' with a meaningful name and
> change to 'boo' for replacement.

Ok, I would replace 'i' with 'n_copy', what is the meaning of 'boo'?
IMO, replacement fits better here, thanks.

+		if (r10_bio->devs[i].bio)
+			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 0, max_sectors);
+		if (r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio)
+			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 1, max_sectors);



Regards,
Guoqing



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] md/raid10: refactor some codes from raid10_write_request
  2017-03-15  3:02   ` Guoqing Jiang
@ 2017-03-15 22:46     ` Shaohua Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2017-03-15 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guoqing Jiang; +Cc: linux-raid, shli, neilb

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:02:44AM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/15/2017 12:48 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:23:59PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> > > Previously, we clone both bio and repl_bio in raid10_write_request,
> > > then add the cloned bio to plug->pending or conf->pending_bio_list
> > > based on plug or not, and most of the logics are same for the two
> > > conditions.
> > > 
> > > So introduce handle_clonebio (a better name is welcome) for it, and
> > > use replacement parameter to distinguish the difference. No functional
> > > changes in the patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
> > > ---
> > > Another reason for it is to improve the readability of code, but
> > > I didn't touch raid10 before so this is labeled as RFC.
> > > 
> > >   drivers/md/raid10.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> > >   1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > > index b1b1f982a722..02d8eff8d26e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> > > @@ -1188,18 +1188,81 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> > >   	return;
> > >   }
> > > -static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> > > -				 struct r10bio *r10_bio)
> > > +static void handle_clonebio(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio,
> > > +			    struct bio *bio, int i, int replacement,
> > > +			    int max_sectors)
> > Maybe raid10_write_one_disk?
> 
> Thanks for review, I will use it unless a better name is found.
> 
> >   Please replace 'i' with a meaningful name and
> > change to 'boo' for replacement.
> 
> Ok, I would replace 'i' with 'n_copy', what is the meaning of 'boo'?
> IMO, replacement fits better here, thanks.

sorry, I mean 'bool'
 
> +		if (r10_bio->devs[i].bio)
> +			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 0, max_sectors);
> +		if (r10_bio->devs[i].repl_bio)
> +			handle_clonebio(mddev, r10_bio, bio, i, 1, max_sectors);
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Guoqing
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-15 22:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-13  9:23 [RFC PATCH] md/raid10: refactor some codes from raid10_write_request Guoqing Jiang
2017-03-14 16:48 ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-15  3:02   ` Guoqing Jiang
2017-03-15 22:46     ` Shaohua Li

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.