All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <walken@google.com>, <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	<kirill@shutemov.name>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<npiggin@gmail.com>, <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:18:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489479542-27030-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)

I checked if crossrelease feature works well on my qemu-i386 machine.
There's no problem at all to work on mine. But I wonder if it's still
true on other machines. Especially, on large system. Could you let me
know if it doesn't work on yours or if crossrelease feature is useful?

-----8<-----

Change from v5
	- force XHLOCKS_SIZE to be power of 2 and simplify code
	- remove nmi check
	- separate an optimization using prev_gen_id with a full changelog
	- separate non(multi)-acquisition handling with a full changelog
	- replace vmalloc with kmallock(GFP_KERNEL) for xhlocks
	- select PROVE_LOCKING when choosing CROSSRELEASE
	- clean serveral code (e.g. loose some ifdefferies)
	- enhance several comments and changelogs

Change from v4
	- rebase on vanilla v4.9 tag
	- re-name pend_lock(plock) to hist_lock(xhlock)
	- allow overwriting ring buffer for hist_lock
	- unwind ring buffer instead of tagging id for each irq
	- introduce lockdep_map_cross embedding cross_lock
	- make each work of workqueue distinguishable
	- enhance comments
	(I will update the document at the next spin.)

Change from v3
	- reviced document

Change from v2
	- rebase on vanilla v4.7 tag
	- move lockdep data for page lock from struct page to page_ext
	- allocate plocks buffer via vmalloc instead of in struct task
	- enhanced comments and document
	- optimize performance
	- make reporting function crossrelease-aware

Change from v1
	- enhanced the document
	- removed save_stack_trace() optimizing patch
	- made this based on the seperated save_stack_trace patchset
	  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1182242.html

Can we detect deadlocks below with original lockdep?

Example 1)

	PROCESS X	PROCESS Y
	--------------	--------------
	mutext_lock A
			lock_page B
	lock_page B
			mutext_lock A // DEADLOCK
	unlock_page B
			mutext_unlock A
	mutex_unlock A
			unlock_page B

where A and B are different lock classes.

No, we cannot.

Example 2)

	PROCESS X	PROCESS Y	PROCESS Z
	--------------	--------------	--------------
			mutex_lock A
	lock_page B
			lock_page B
					mutext_lock A // DEADLOCK
					mutext_unlock A
					unlock_page B
					(B was held by PROCESS X)
			unlock_page B
			mutex_unlock A

where A and B are different lock classes.

No, we cannot.

Example 3)

	PROCESS X	PROCESS Y
	--------------	--------------
			mutex_lock A
	mutex_lock A
			wait_for_complete B // DEADLOCK
	mutex_unlock A
	complete B
			mutex_unlock A

where A is a lock class and B is a completion variable.

No, we cannot.

Not only lock operations, but also any operations causing to wait or
spin for something can cause deadlock unless it's eventually *released*
by someone. The important point here is that the waiting or spinning
must be *released* by someone.

Using crossrelease feature, we can check dependency and detect deadlock
possibility not only for typical lock, but also for lock_page(),
wait_for_xxx() and so on, which might be released in any context.

See the last patch including the document for more information.

Byungchul Park (15):
  lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache()
  lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes
  lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value
  lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace
  lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
  lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock
  lockdep: Avoid adding redundant direct links of crosslocks
  lockdep: Fix incorrect condition to print bug msgs for
    MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS
  lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease
  lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions
  pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space
  lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks
  lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked
  lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext
  lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation

 Documentation/locking/crossrelease.txt | 874 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/completion.h             | 118 ++++-
 include/linux/irqflags.h               |  24 +-
 include/linux/lockdep.h                | 147 +++++-
 include/linux/mm_types.h               |   4 +
 include/linux/page-flags.h             |  43 +-
 include/linux/page_ext.h               |   4 +
 include/linux/pagemap.h                | 125 ++++-
 include/linux/sched.h                  |   8 +
 kernel/exit.c                          |   1 +
 kernel/fork.c                          |   3 +
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c               | 789 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/completion.c              |  54 +-
 kernel/workqueue.c                     |   1 +
 lib/Kconfig.debug                      |  29 ++
 mm/filemap.c                           |  73 ++-
 mm/page_ext.c                          |   4 +
 17 files changed, 2149 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/locking/crossrelease.txt

-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	kirill@shutemov.name, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:18:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489479542-27030-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)

I checked if crossrelease feature works well on my qemu-i386 machine.
There's no problem at all to work on mine. But I wonder if it's still
true on other machines. Especially, on large system. Could you let me
know if it doesn't work on yours or if crossrelease feature is useful?

-----8<-----

Change from v5
	- force XHLOCKS_SIZE to be power of 2 and simplify code
	- remove nmi check
	- separate an optimization using prev_gen_id with a full changelog
	- separate non(multi)-acquisition handling with a full changelog
	- replace vmalloc with kmallock(GFP_KERNEL) for xhlocks
	- select PROVE_LOCKING when choosing CROSSRELEASE
	- clean serveral code (e.g. loose some ifdefferies)
	- enhance several comments and changelogs

Change from v4
	- rebase on vanilla v4.9 tag
	- re-name pend_lock(plock) to hist_lock(xhlock)
	- allow overwriting ring buffer for hist_lock
	- unwind ring buffer instead of tagging id for each irq
	- introduce lockdep_map_cross embedding cross_lock
	- make each work of workqueue distinguishable
	- enhance comments
	(I will update the document at the next spin.)

Change from v3
	- reviced document

Change from v2
	- rebase on vanilla v4.7 tag
	- move lockdep data for page lock from struct page to page_ext
	- allocate plocks buffer via vmalloc instead of in struct task
	- enhanced comments and document
	- optimize performance
	- make reporting function crossrelease-aware

Change from v1
	- enhanced the document
	- removed save_stack_trace() optimizing patch
	- made this based on the seperated save_stack_trace patchset
	  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1182242.html

Can we detect deadlocks below with original lockdep?

Example 1)

	PROCESS X	PROCESS Y
	--------------	--------------
	mutext_lock A
			lock_page B
	lock_page B
			mutext_lock A // DEADLOCK
	unlock_page B
			mutext_unlock A
	mutex_unlock A
			unlock_page B

where A and B are different lock classes.

No, we cannot.

Example 2)

	PROCESS X	PROCESS Y	PROCESS Z
	--------------	--------------	--------------
			mutex_lock A
	lock_page B
			lock_page B
					mutext_lock A // DEADLOCK
					mutext_unlock A
					unlock_page B
					(B was held by PROCESS X)
			unlock_page B
			mutex_unlock A

where A and B are different lock classes.

No, we cannot.

Example 3)

	PROCESS X	PROCESS Y
	--------------	--------------
			mutex_lock A
	mutex_lock A
			wait_for_complete B // DEADLOCK
	mutex_unlock A
	complete B
			mutex_unlock A

where A is a lock class and B is a completion variable.

No, we cannot.

Not only lock operations, but also any operations causing to wait or
spin for something can cause deadlock unless it's eventually *released*
by someone. The important point here is that the waiting or spinning
must be *released* by someone.

Using crossrelease feature, we can check dependency and detect deadlock
possibility not only for typical lock, but also for lock_page(),
wait_for_xxx() and so on, which might be released in any context.

See the last patch including the document for more information.

Byungchul Park (15):
  lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache()
  lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes
  lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value
  lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace
  lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
  lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock
  lockdep: Avoid adding redundant direct links of crosslocks
  lockdep: Fix incorrect condition to print bug msgs for
    MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS
  lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease
  lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions
  pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space
  lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks
  lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked
  lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext
  lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation

 Documentation/locking/crossrelease.txt | 874 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/completion.h             | 118 ++++-
 include/linux/irqflags.h               |  24 +-
 include/linux/lockdep.h                | 147 +++++-
 include/linux/mm_types.h               |   4 +
 include/linux/page-flags.h             |  43 +-
 include/linux/page_ext.h               |   4 +
 include/linux/pagemap.h                | 125 ++++-
 include/linux/sched.h                  |   8 +
 kernel/exit.c                          |   1 +
 kernel/fork.c                          |   3 +
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c               | 789 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/completion.c              |  54 +-
 kernel/workqueue.c                     |   1 +
 lib/Kconfig.debug                      |  29 ++
 mm/filemap.c                           |  73 ++-
 mm/page_ext.c                          |   4 +
 17 files changed, 2149 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/locking/crossrelease.txt

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14  8:18 Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-19 14:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-19 14:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24  5:11     ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-24  5:11       ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-24 10:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24 10:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25  5:40         ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-25  5:40           ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-16 14:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-16 14:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-18  6:22             ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-18  6:22               ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-19 15:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-19 15:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24  4:36     ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-24  4:36       ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-19 17:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-19 17:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24  3:04     ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-24  3:04       ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-24  9:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24  9:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25  6:59         ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-25  6:59           ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-19 17:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-19 17:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-24  3:13     ` Byungchul Park
2017-04-24  3:13       ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-19  8:07   ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-19  8:07     ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-19 10:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-19 10:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-19 10:56       ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-19 10:56         ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 06/15] lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] lockdep: Avoid adding redundant direct links of crosslocks Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] lockdep: Fix incorrect condition to print bug msgs for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:18   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:19 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:19   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:19 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:19   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:19 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park
2017-03-14  8:19   ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1489479542-27030-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.