All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
To: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	<patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>, <mihai.serban@nxp.com>,
	<viorel.suman@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:03:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490108605-20538-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490108605-20538-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com>

WM8960 derives bit clock from sysclock using BCLKDIV[3:0] of R8
clocking register (See WM8960 datasheet, page 71).

There are use cases, like this:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -r 48000 -c 1 -f S20_3LE -t raw audio48k20b_3LE1c.pcm

where no BCLKDIV applied to sysclock can give us the exact requested
bitclk, so driver fails to configure clocking and aplay fails to run.

Fix this by relaxing bitclk computation, so that when no exact value
can be derived from sysclk pick the closest value greater than
expected bitclk.

Suggested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
---
Changes since v2:
	* do not differentiate between relaxed and exact match

 sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
index 25a4a11..ce159f1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
@@ -611,6 +611,10 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = {
  *		- lrclk      = sysclk / dac_divs
  *		- 10 * bclk  = sysclk / bclk_divs
  *
+ *	If we cannot find an exact match for (sysclk, lrclk, bclk)
+ *	triplet, we relax the bclk such that bclk is chosen as the
+ *	closest available frequency greater than expected bclk.
+ *
  * @wm8960_priv: wm8960 codec private data
  * @mclk: MCLK used to derive sysclk
  * @sysclk_idx: sysclk_divs index for found sysclk
@@ -618,8 +622,9 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = {
  * @bclk_idx: bclk_divs index for found bclk
  *
  * Returns:
- * -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found
- *  0, in case an exact (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) match is found
+ *  -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found
+ * >=0, in case we could derive bclk and lrclk from sysclk using
+ *      (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) dividers
  */
 static
 int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
@@ -627,7 +632,10 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 {
 	int sysclk, bclk, lrclk;
 	int i, j, k;
-	int diff;
+	int diff, closest = mclk;
+
+	/* marker for no match */
+	*bclk_idx = -1;
 
 	bclk = wm8960->bclk;
 	lrclk = wm8960->lrclk;
@@ -648,6 +656,12 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 					*bclk_idx = k;
 					break;
 				}
+				if (diff > 0 && closest > diff) {
+					*sysclk_idx = i;
+					*dac_idx = j;
+					*bclk_idx = k;
+					closest = diff;
+				}
 			}
 			if (k != ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs))
 				break;
@@ -655,11 +669,7 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 		if (j != ARRAY_SIZE(dac_divs))
 			break;
 	}
-
-	if (i != ARRAY_SIZE(sysclk_divs))
-		return 0;
-
-	return -1;
+	return *bclk_idx;
 }
 
 static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
@@ -703,7 +713,7 @@ static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
 
 	if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_PLL) {
 		ret = wm8960_configure_sysclk(wm8960, freq_out, &i, &j, &k);
-		if (ret == 0) {
+		if (ret >= 0) {
 			goto configure_clock;
 		} else if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_AUTO) {
 			dev_err(codec->dev, "failed to configure clock\n");
-- 
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com
Cc: shengjiu.wang@freescale.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viorel.suman@nxp.com, mihai.serban@nxp.com,
	ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:03:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490108605-20538-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490108605-20538-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com>

WM8960 derives bit clock from sysclock using BCLKDIV[3:0] of R8
clocking register (See WM8960 datasheet, page 71).

There are use cases, like this:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -r 48000 -c 1 -f S20_3LE -t raw audio48k20b_3LE1c.pcm

where no BCLKDIV applied to sysclock can give us the exact requested
bitclk, so driver fails to configure clocking and aplay fails to run.

Fix this by relaxing bitclk computation, so that when no exact value
can be derived from sysclk pick the closest value greater than
expected bitclk.

Suggested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
---
Changes since v2:
	* do not differentiate between relaxed and exact match

 sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
index 25a4a11..ce159f1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
@@ -611,6 +611,10 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = {
  *		- lrclk      = sysclk / dac_divs
  *		- 10 * bclk  = sysclk / bclk_divs
  *
+ *	If we cannot find an exact match for (sysclk, lrclk, bclk)
+ *	triplet, we relax the bclk such that bclk is chosen as the
+ *	closest available frequency greater than expected bclk.
+ *
  * @wm8960_priv: wm8960 codec private data
  * @mclk: MCLK used to derive sysclk
  * @sysclk_idx: sysclk_divs index for found sysclk
@@ -618,8 +622,9 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = {
  * @bclk_idx: bclk_divs index for found bclk
  *
  * Returns:
- * -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found
- *  0, in case an exact (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) match is found
+ *  -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found
+ * >=0, in case we could derive bclk and lrclk from sysclk using
+ *      (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) dividers
  */
 static
 int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
@@ -627,7 +632,10 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 {
 	int sysclk, bclk, lrclk;
 	int i, j, k;
-	int diff;
+	int diff, closest = mclk;
+
+	/* marker for no match */
+	*bclk_idx = -1;
 
 	bclk = wm8960->bclk;
 	lrclk = wm8960->lrclk;
@@ -648,6 +656,12 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 					*bclk_idx = k;
 					break;
 				}
+				if (diff > 0 && closest > diff) {
+					*sysclk_idx = i;
+					*dac_idx = j;
+					*bclk_idx = k;
+					closest = diff;
+				}
 			}
 			if (k != ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs))
 				break;
@@ -655,11 +669,7 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 		if (j != ARRAY_SIZE(dac_divs))
 			break;
 	}
-
-	if (i != ARRAY_SIZE(sysclk_divs))
-		return 0;
-
-	return -1;
+	return *bclk_idx;
 }
 
 static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
@@ -703,7 +713,7 @@ static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
 
 	if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_PLL) {
 		ret = wm8960_configure_sysclk(wm8960, freq_out, &i, &j, &k);
-		if (ret == 0) {
+		if (ret >= 0) {
 			goto configure_clock;
 		} else if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_AUTO) {
 			dev_err(codec->dev, "failed to configure clock\n");
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-21 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-21 15:03 [PATCH v3 0/2] wm8960: Relax bit clock computation Daniel Baluta
2017-03-21 15:03 ` Daniel Baluta
2017-03-21 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Refactor sysclk freq search Daniel Baluta
2017-03-21 15:03   ` Daniel Baluta
2017-03-21 15:03 ` Daniel Baluta [this message]
2017-03-21 15:03   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation Daniel Baluta
2017-03-21 16:39   ` Charles Keepax
2017-03-21 16:39     ` Charles Keepax
2017-03-24 19:15   ` Applied "ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-03-24 19:15     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1490108605-20538-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
    --to=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mihai.serban@nxp.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=viorel.suman@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.