From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> To: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <tiwai@suse.com> Cc: <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, <patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>, <mihai.serban@nxp.com>, <viorel.suman@nxp.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:03:25 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1490108605-20538-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1490108605-20538-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> WM8960 derives bit clock from sysclock using BCLKDIV[3:0] of R8 clocking register (See WM8960 datasheet, page 71). There are use cases, like this: aplay -Dhw:0,0 -r 48000 -c 1 -f S20_3LE -t raw audio48k20b_3LE1c.pcm where no BCLKDIV applied to sysclock can give us the exact requested bitclk, so driver fails to configure clocking and aplay fails to run. Fix this by relaxing bitclk computation, so that when no exact value can be derived from sysclk pick the closest value greater than expected bitclk. Suggested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> --- Changes since v2: * do not differentiate between relaxed and exact match sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c index 25a4a11..ce159f1 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c @@ -611,6 +611,10 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = { * - lrclk = sysclk / dac_divs * - 10 * bclk = sysclk / bclk_divs * + * If we cannot find an exact match for (sysclk, lrclk, bclk) + * triplet, we relax the bclk such that bclk is chosen as the + * closest available frequency greater than expected bclk. + * * @wm8960_priv: wm8960 codec private data * @mclk: MCLK used to derive sysclk * @sysclk_idx: sysclk_divs index for found sysclk @@ -618,8 +622,9 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = { * @bclk_idx: bclk_divs index for found bclk * * Returns: - * -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found - * 0, in case an exact (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) match is found + * -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found + * >=0, in case we could derive bclk and lrclk from sysclk using + * (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) dividers */ static int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, @@ -627,7 +632,10 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, { int sysclk, bclk, lrclk; int i, j, k; - int diff; + int diff, closest = mclk; + + /* marker for no match */ + *bclk_idx = -1; bclk = wm8960->bclk; lrclk = wm8960->lrclk; @@ -648,6 +656,12 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, *bclk_idx = k; break; } + if (diff > 0 && closest > diff) { + *sysclk_idx = i; + *dac_idx = j; + *bclk_idx = k; + closest = diff; + } } if (k != ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs)) break; @@ -655,11 +669,7 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, if (j != ARRAY_SIZE(dac_divs)) break; } - - if (i != ARRAY_SIZE(sysclk_divs)) - return 0; - - return -1; + return *bclk_idx; } static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) @@ -703,7 +713,7 @@ static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_PLL) { ret = wm8960_configure_sysclk(wm8960, freq_out, &i, &j, &k); - if (ret == 0) { + if (ret >= 0) { goto configure_clock; } else if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_AUTO) { dev_err(codec->dev, "failed to configure clock\n"); -- 2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com Cc: shengjiu.wang@freescale.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viorel.suman@nxp.com, mihai.serban@nxp.com, ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:03:25 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1490108605-20538-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1490108605-20538-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> WM8960 derives bit clock from sysclock using BCLKDIV[3:0] of R8 clocking register (See WM8960 datasheet, page 71). There are use cases, like this: aplay -Dhw:0,0 -r 48000 -c 1 -f S20_3LE -t raw audio48k20b_3LE1c.pcm where no BCLKDIV applied to sysclock can give us the exact requested bitclk, so driver fails to configure clocking and aplay fails to run. Fix this by relaxing bitclk computation, so that when no exact value can be derived from sysclk pick the closest value greater than expected bitclk. Suggested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> --- Changes since v2: * do not differentiate between relaxed and exact match sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c index 25a4a11..ce159f1 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c @@ -611,6 +611,10 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = { * - lrclk = sysclk / dac_divs * - 10 * bclk = sysclk / bclk_divs * + * If we cannot find an exact match for (sysclk, lrclk, bclk) + * triplet, we relax the bclk such that bclk is chosen as the + * closest available frequency greater than expected bclk. + * * @wm8960_priv: wm8960 codec private data * @mclk: MCLK used to derive sysclk * @sysclk_idx: sysclk_divs index for found sysclk @@ -618,8 +622,9 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = { * @bclk_idx: bclk_divs index for found bclk * * Returns: - * -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found - * 0, in case an exact (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) match is found + * -1, in case no sysclk frequency available found + * >=0, in case we could derive bclk and lrclk from sysclk using + * (@sysclk_idx, @dac_idx, @bclk_idx) dividers */ static int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, @@ -627,7 +632,10 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, { int sysclk, bclk, lrclk; int i, j, k; - int diff; + int diff, closest = mclk; + + /* marker for no match */ + *bclk_idx = -1; bclk = wm8960->bclk; lrclk = wm8960->lrclk; @@ -648,6 +656,12 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, *bclk_idx = k; break; } + if (diff > 0 && closest > diff) { + *sysclk_idx = i; + *dac_idx = j; + *bclk_idx = k; + closest = diff; + } } if (k != ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs)) break; @@ -655,11 +669,7 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk, if (j != ARRAY_SIZE(dac_divs)) break; } - - if (i != ARRAY_SIZE(sysclk_divs)) - return 0; - - return -1; + return *bclk_idx; } static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) @@ -703,7 +713,7 @@ static int wm8960_configure_clocking(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_PLL) { ret = wm8960_configure_sysclk(wm8960, freq_out, &i, &j, &k); - if (ret == 0) { + if (ret >= 0) { goto configure_clock; } else if (wm8960->clk_id != WM8960_SYSCLK_AUTO) { dev_err(codec->dev, "failed to configure clock\n"); -- 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 15:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-03-21 15:03 [PATCH v3 0/2] wm8960: Relax bit clock computation Daniel Baluta 2017-03-21 15:03 ` Daniel Baluta 2017-03-21 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Refactor sysclk freq search Daniel Baluta 2017-03-21 15:03 ` Daniel Baluta 2017-03-21 15:03 ` Daniel Baluta [this message] 2017-03-21 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation Daniel Baluta 2017-03-21 16:39 ` Charles Keepax 2017-03-21 16:39 ` Charles Keepax 2017-03-24 19:15 ` Applied "ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation" to the asoc tree Mark Brown 2017-03-24 19:15 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1490108605-20538-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com \ --to=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \ --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mihai.serban@nxp.com \ --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \ --cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \ --cc=tiwai@suse.com \ --cc=viorel.suman@nxp.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.