From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi, nfit: support "map failed" dimms
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:16:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492452970.26622.5.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149218911271.3926.4006907031326342869.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 09:58 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Stop requiring dimms be successfully mapped into a
> system-physical-address range. For provisioning and hardware
> remediation purposes the kernel should account for failed devices in
> sysfs. If possible it should still allow management commands to be
> sent to the device.
>
> Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> Reported-by: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested the "map failed" condition with HPE NVDIMMs.
Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Thanks Dan!
-Toshi
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Knippers, Linda" <linda.knippers@hpe.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi, nfit: support "map failed" dimms
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:16:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492452970.26622.5.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149218911271.3926.4006907031326342869.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 09:58 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Stop requiring dimms be successfully mapped into a
> system-physical-address range. For provisioning and hardware
> remediation purposes the kernel should account for failed devices in
> sysfs. If possible it should still allow management commands to be
> sent to the device.
>
> Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> Reported-by: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested the "map failed" condition with HPE NVDIMMs.
Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Thanks Dan!
-Toshi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>
Cc: "Knippers, Linda" <linda.knippers@hpe.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi, nfit: support "map failed" dimms
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:16:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492452970.26622.5.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149218911271.3926.4006907031326342869.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 09:58 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Stop requiring dimms be successfully mapped into a
> system-physical-address range. For provisioning and hardware
> remediation purposes the kernel should account for failed devices in
> sysfs. If possible it should still allow management commands to be
> sent to the device.
>
> Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> Reported-by: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested the "map failed" condition with HPE NVDIMMs.
Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Thanks Dan!
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-17 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-14 16:58 [PATCH 0/5] libnvdimm: acpi updates and a revert Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "libnvdimm: band aid btt vs clear poison locking" Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] acpi, nfit: add support for acpi 6.1 dimm state flags Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-17 17:28 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-17 17:28 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-17 17:28 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-14 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] tools/testing/nvdimm: test acpi 6.1 health " Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi, nfit: support "map failed" dimms Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-17 18:16 ` Kani, Toshimitsu [this message]
2017-04-17 18:16 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-17 18:16 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-04-14 16:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] acpi, nfit: limit ->flush_probe() to initialization work Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 17:30 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 17:30 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-14 17:30 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492452970.26622.5.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.