All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: take the prepare lock out of clk_core_set_parent
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:35:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496050533.7514.9.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149573849978.52617.292626696549937056@resonance>

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:54 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2017-05-21 14:59:48)
> > 
> > Rework set_parent core function so it can be called when the prepare lock
> > is already held by the caller.
> > 
> > This rework is done to ease the integration of the "protected" clock
> > functionality.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
> 
> Applied to clk-next-protect for testing.
> 

Noted, I'll base the v3 on top of this branch

> Regards,
> Mike
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/clk.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index fc58c52a26b4..f5c371532509 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -1787,7 +1787,8 @@ bool clk_has_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk
> > *parent)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_has_parent);
> >  
> > -static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core
> > *parent)
> > +static int clk_core_set_parent_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> > +                                     struct clk_core *parent)
> >  {
> >         int ret = 0;
> >         int p_index = 0;
> > @@ -1796,23 +1797,16 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core
> > *core, struct clk_core *parent)
> >         if (!core)
> >                 return 0;
> >  
> > -       /* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
> > -       clk_prepare_lock();
> > -
> >         if (core->parent == parent)
> > -               goto out;
> > +               return 0;
> >  
> >         /* verify ops for for multi-parent clks */
> > -       if ((core->num_parents > 1) && (!core->ops->set_parent)) {
> > -               ret = -ENOSYS;
> > -               goto out;
> > -       }
> > +       if ((core->num_parents > 1) && (!core->ops->set_parent))
> > +               return -ENOSYS;
> >  
> >         /* check that we are allowed to re-parent if the clock is in use */
> > -       if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && core->prepare_count) {
> > -               ret = -EBUSY;
> > -               goto out;
> > -       }
> > +       if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && core->prepare_count)
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> >  
> >         /* try finding the new parent index */
> >         if (parent) {
> > @@ -1820,8 +1814,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> >                 if (p_index < 0) {
> >                         pr_debug("%s: clk %s can not be parent of clk %s\n",
> >                                         __func__, parent->name, core->name);
> > -                       ret = p_index;
> > -                       goto out;
> > +                       return p_index;
> >                 }
> >                 p_rate = parent->rate;
> >         }
> > @@ -1831,7 +1824,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> >  
> >         /* abort if a driver objects */
> >         if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
> > -               goto out;
> > +               return ret;
> >  
> >         /* do the re-parent */
> >         ret = __clk_set_parent(core, parent, p_index);
> > @@ -1844,9 +1837,6 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> >                 __clk_recalc_accuracies(core);
> >         }
> >  
> > -out:
> > -       clk_prepare_unlock();
> > -
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1869,10 +1859,17 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core
> > *core, struct clk_core *parent)
> >   */
> >  int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
> >  {
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> >         if (!clk)
> >                 return 0;
> >  
> > -       return clk_core_set_parent(clk->core, parent ? parent->core : NULL);
> > +       clk_prepare_lock();
> > +       ret = clk_core_set_parent_nolock(clk->core,
> > +                                        parent ? parent->core : NULL);
> > +       clk_prepare_unlock();
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_set_parent);
> >  
> > @@ -2753,7 +2750,7 @@ void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
> >                 /* Reparent all children to the orphan list. */
> >                 hlist_for_each_entry_safe(child, t, &clk->core->children,
> >                                           child_node)
> > -                       clk_core_set_parent(child, NULL);
> > +                       clk_core_set_parent_nolock(child, NULL);
> >         }
> >  
> >         hlist_del_init(&clk->core->child_node);
> > -- 
> > 2.9.4
> > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: take the prepare lock out of clk_core_set_parent
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:35:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496050533.7514.9.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149573849978.52617.292626696549937056@resonance>

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:54 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2017-05-21 14:59:48)
> > 
> > Rework set_parent core function so it can be called when the prepare lock
> > is already held by the caller.
> > 
> > This rework is done to ease the integration of the "protected" clock
> > functionality.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
> 
> Applied to clk-next-protect for testing.
> 

Noted, I'll base the v3 on top of this branch

> Regards,
> Mike
> 
> > ---
> > ?drivers/clk/clk.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > ?1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index fc58c52a26b4..f5c371532509 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -1787,7 +1787,8 @@ bool clk_has_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk
> > *parent)
> > ?}
> > ?EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_has_parent);
> > ?
> > -static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core
> > *parent)
> > +static int clk_core_set_parent_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> > +?????????????????????????????????????struct clk_core *parent)
> > ?{
> > ????????int ret = 0;
> > ????????int p_index = 0;
> > @@ -1796,23 +1797,16 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core
> > *core, struct clk_core *parent)
> > ????????if (!core)
> > ????????????????return 0;
> > ?
> > -???????/* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
> > -???????clk_prepare_lock();
> > -
> > ????????if (core->parent == parent)
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > +???????????????return 0;
> > ?
> > ????????/* verify ops for for multi-parent clks */
> > -???????if ((core->num_parents > 1) && (!core->ops->set_parent)) {
> > -???????????????ret = -ENOSYS;
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > -???????}
> > +???????if ((core->num_parents > 1) && (!core->ops->set_parent))
> > +???????????????return -ENOSYS;
> > ?
> > ????????/* check that we are allowed to re-parent if the clock is in use */
> > -???????if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && core->prepare_count) {
> > -???????????????ret = -EBUSY;
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > -???????}
> > +???????if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && core->prepare_count)
> > +???????????????return -EBUSY;
> > ?
> > ????????/* try finding the new parent index */
> > ????????if (parent) {
> > @@ -1820,8 +1814,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> > ????????????????if (p_index < 0) {
> > ????????????????????????pr_debug("%s: clk %s can not be parent of clk %s\n",
> > ????????????????????????????????????????__func__, parent->name, core->name);
> > -???????????????????????ret = p_index;
> > -???????????????????????goto out;
> > +???????????????????????return p_index;
> > ????????????????}
> > ????????????????p_rate = parent->rate;
> > ????????}
> > @@ -1831,7 +1824,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> > ?
> > ????????/* abort if a driver objects */
> > ????????if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > +???????????????return ret;
> > ?
> > ????????/* do the re-parent */
> > ????????ret = __clk_set_parent(core, parent, p_index);
> > @@ -1844,9 +1837,6 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> > ????????????????__clk_recalc_accuracies(core);
> > ????????}
> > ?
> > -out:
> > -???????clk_prepare_unlock();
> > -
> > ????????return ret;
> > ?}
> > ?
> > @@ -1869,10 +1859,17 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core
> > *core, struct clk_core *parent)
> > ? */
> > ?int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
> > ?{
> > +???????int ret;
> > +
> > ????????if (!clk)
> > ????????????????return 0;
> > ?
> > -???????return clk_core_set_parent(clk->core, parent ? parent->core : NULL);
> > +???????clk_prepare_lock();
> > +???????ret = clk_core_set_parent_nolock(clk->core,
> > +????????????????????????????????????????parent ? parent->core : NULL);
> > +???????clk_prepare_unlock();
> > +
> > +???????return ret;
> > ?}
> > ?EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_set_parent);
> > ?
> > @@ -2753,7 +2750,7 @@ void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
> > ????????????????/* Reparent all children to the orphan list. */
> > ????????????????hlist_for_each_entry_safe(child, t, &clk->core->children,
> > ??????????????????????????????????????????child_node)
> > -???????????????????????clk_core_set_parent(child, NULL);
> > +???????????????????????clk_core_set_parent_nolock(child, NULL);
> > ????????}
> > ?
> > ????????hlist_del_init(&clk->core->child_node);
> > --?
> > 2.9.4
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-29  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-21 21:59 [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: implement clock rate protection mechanism Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: take the prepare lock out of clk_core_set_parent Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 18:54   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-25 18:54     ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-29  9:35     ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2017-05-29  9:35       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] clk: add clk_core_set_phase_nolock function Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-23  9:35   ` Adriana Reus
2017-05-23  9:35     ` Adriana Reus
2017-05-23  9:48     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-23  9:48       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 18:58       ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-25 18:58         ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] clk: rework calls to round and determine rate callbacks Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 20:13   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-25 20:13     ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] clk: use round rate to bail out early in set_rate Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 20:20   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-25 20:20     ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-29  9:12     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-29  9:12       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] clk: add support for clock protection Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 20:58   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-25 20:58     ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-29  9:15     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-29  9:15       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] clk: add clk_set_rate_protect Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] clk: rollback set_rate_range changes on failure Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] clk: cosmetic changes to clk_summary debugfs entry Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] clk: fix incorrect usage of ENOSYS Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] clk: fix CLK_SET_RATE_GATE with clock rate protection Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-23 13:42   ` Adriana Reus
2017-05-23 13:42     ` Adriana Reus
2017-05-23 15:09     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-23 15:09       ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] clk: move CLK_SET_RATE_GATE protection from prepare to enable Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-29  9:17   ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-29  9:17     ` Jerome Brunet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496050533.7514.9.camel@baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.