All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
@ 2018-10-04  6:26 ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp, Jan Stancek, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs

Cyril,

The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).

So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
conditions, but not functionality.

The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
also bound together.

To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.

Thanks,
Amir.

Changes since v1:
- Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
- Address review comments from Jan Stancek
- Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
- Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure

Amir Goldstein (5):
  syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
  syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
  syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
  syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
  syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache

 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 ++-----
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 333 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
@ 2018-10-04  6:26 ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Cyril,

The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).

So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
conditions, but not functionality.

The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
also bound together.

To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.

Thanks,
Amir.

Changes since v1:
- Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
- Address review comments from Jan Stancek
- Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
- Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure

Amir Goldstein (5):
  syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
  syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
  syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
  syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
  syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache

 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 ++-----
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 333 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/5] syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
  2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp, Jan Stancek, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs

* Use SPDX-License-Identifier

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c
index f35019488..682b524b3 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c
@@ -1,25 +1,6 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
  * Copyright (C) 2012 Linux Test Project, Inc.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
- * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- *
- * Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it
- * is free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding
- * infringement or the like.  Any license provided herein, whether
- * implied or otherwise, applies only to this software file.  Patent
- * licenses, if any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of
- * this program with other software, or any other product whatsoever.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
- * 02110-1301, USA.
  */
 
 /*
@@ -36,47 +17,36 @@
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include "config.h"
-#include "test.h"
-#include "safe_macros.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
 #include "lapi/syscalls.h"
 
-char *TCID = "readahead01";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
-option_t options[] = {
-	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
-};
-
 #if defined(__NR_readahead)
-static void setup(void);
-static void cleanup(void);
-
 static int check_ret(long expected_ret)
 {
-	if (expected_ret == TEST_RETURN) {
-		tst_resm(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
-			 "returned value = %ld", TEST_RETURN);
+	if (expected_ret == TST_RET) {
+		tst_res(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
+			"returned value = %ld", TST_RET);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	tst_resm(TFAIL, "unexpected failure - "
-		 "returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
-		 TEST_RETURN, expected_ret);
+	tst_res(TFAIL, "unexpected failure - "
+		"returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
+		TST_RET, expected_ret);
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static int check_errno(long expected_errno)
 {
-	if (TEST_ERRNO == expected_errno) {
-		tst_resm(TPASS | TTERRNO, "expected failure");
+	if (TST_ERR == expected_errno) {
+		tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "expected failure");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (TEST_ERRNO == 0)
-		tst_resm(TFAIL, "call succeeded unexpectedly");
+	if (TST_ERR == 0)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "call succeeded unexpectedly");
 	else
-		tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
-			 "expected = %ld : %s, actual",
-			 expected_errno, strerror(expected_errno));
+		tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
+			"expected = %ld : %s, actual",
+			expected_errno, strerror(expected_errno));
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -85,19 +55,17 @@ static void test_bad_fd(void)
 	char tempname[PATH_MAX] = "readahead01_XXXXXX";
 	int fd;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_bad_fd -1");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_bad_fd -1");
 	TEST(readahead(-1, 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EBADF);
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_bad_fd O_WRONLY");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_bad_fd O_WRONLY");
 	fd = mkstemp(tempname);
 	if (fd == -1)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "mkstemp failed");
+		tst_res(TBROK | TERRNO, "mkstemp failed");
 	close(fd);
-	fd = open(tempname, O_WRONLY);
-	if (fd == -1)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to open testfile");
+	fd = SAFE_OPEN(tempname, O_WRONLY);
 	TEST(readahead(fd, 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EBADF);
@@ -109,60 +77,41 @@ static void test_invalid_fd(void)
 {
 	int fd[2];
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd pipe");
-	if (pipe(fd) < 0)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to create pipe");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd pipe");
+	SAFE_PIPE(fd);
 	TEST(readahead(fd[0], 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EINVAL);
 	close(fd[0]);
 	close(fd[1]);
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd socket");
-	fd[0] = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
-	if (fd[0] < 0)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to create socket");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd socket");
+	fd[0] = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
 	TEST(readahead(fd[0], 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EINVAL);
 	close(fd[0]);
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+void test_readahead(void)
 {
-	int lc;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, options, NULL);
-
-	setup();
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-		tst_count = 0;
-		test_bad_fd();
-		test_invalid_fd();
-	}
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
+	test_bad_fd();
+	test_invalid_fd();
 }
 
 static void setup(void)
 {
-	tst_require_root();
-	tst_tmpdir();
-
 	/* check if readahead syscall is supported */
-	ltp_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
-
-	TEST_PAUSE;
+	tst_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
 }
 
-static void cleanup(void)
-{
-	tst_rmdir();
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.needs_root = 1,
+	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.test_all = test_readahead,
+};
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-int main(void)
-{
-	tst_brkm(TCONF, NULL, "System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
-}
+	TST_TEST_TCONF("System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
 #endif
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/5] syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

* Use SPDX-License-Identifier

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c
index f35019488..682b524b3 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c
@@ -1,25 +1,6 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
  * Copyright (C) 2012 Linux Test Project, Inc.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
- * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- *
- * Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it
- * is free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding
- * infringement or the like.  Any license provided herein, whether
- * implied or otherwise, applies only to this software file.  Patent
- * licenses, if any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of
- * this program with other software, or any other product whatsoever.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
- * 02110-1301, USA.
  */
 
 /*
@@ -36,47 +17,36 @@
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include "config.h"
-#include "test.h"
-#include "safe_macros.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
 #include "lapi/syscalls.h"
 
-char *TCID = "readahead01";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
-option_t options[] = {
-	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
-};
-
 #if defined(__NR_readahead)
-static void setup(void);
-static void cleanup(void);
-
 static int check_ret(long expected_ret)
 {
-	if (expected_ret == TEST_RETURN) {
-		tst_resm(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
-			 "returned value = %ld", TEST_RETURN);
+	if (expected_ret == TST_RET) {
+		tst_res(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
+			"returned value = %ld", TST_RET);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	tst_resm(TFAIL, "unexpected failure - "
-		 "returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
-		 TEST_RETURN, expected_ret);
+	tst_res(TFAIL, "unexpected failure - "
+		"returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
+		TST_RET, expected_ret);
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static int check_errno(long expected_errno)
 {
-	if (TEST_ERRNO == expected_errno) {
-		tst_resm(TPASS | TTERRNO, "expected failure");
+	if (TST_ERR == expected_errno) {
+		tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "expected failure");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (TEST_ERRNO == 0)
-		tst_resm(TFAIL, "call succeeded unexpectedly");
+	if (TST_ERR == 0)
+		tst_res(TFAIL, "call succeeded unexpectedly");
 	else
-		tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
-			 "expected = %ld : %s, actual",
-			 expected_errno, strerror(expected_errno));
+		tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
+			"expected = %ld : %s, actual",
+			expected_errno, strerror(expected_errno));
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -85,19 +55,17 @@ static void test_bad_fd(void)
 	char tempname[PATH_MAX] = "readahead01_XXXXXX";
 	int fd;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_bad_fd -1");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_bad_fd -1");
 	TEST(readahead(-1, 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EBADF);
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_bad_fd O_WRONLY");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_bad_fd O_WRONLY");
 	fd = mkstemp(tempname);
 	if (fd == -1)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "mkstemp failed");
+		tst_res(TBROK | TERRNO, "mkstemp failed");
 	close(fd);
-	fd = open(tempname, O_WRONLY);
-	if (fd == -1)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to open testfile");
+	fd = SAFE_OPEN(tempname, O_WRONLY);
 	TEST(readahead(fd, 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EBADF);
@@ -109,60 +77,41 @@ static void test_invalid_fd(void)
 {
 	int fd[2];
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd pipe");
-	if (pipe(fd) < 0)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to create pipe");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd pipe");
+	SAFE_PIPE(fd);
 	TEST(readahead(fd[0], 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EINVAL);
 	close(fd[0]);
 	close(fd[1]);
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd socket");
-	fd[0] = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
-	if (fd[0] < 0)
-		tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to create socket");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "test_invalid_fd socket");
+	fd[0] = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
 	TEST(readahead(fd[0], 0, getpagesize()));
 	check_ret(-1);
 	check_errno(EINVAL);
 	close(fd[0]);
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+void test_readahead(void)
 {
-	int lc;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, options, NULL);
-
-	setup();
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-		tst_count = 0;
-		test_bad_fd();
-		test_invalid_fd();
-	}
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
+	test_bad_fd();
+	test_invalid_fd();
 }
 
 static void setup(void)
 {
-	tst_require_root();
-	tst_tmpdir();
-
 	/* check if readahead syscall is supported */
-	ltp_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
-
-	TEST_PAUSE;
+	tst_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
 }
 
-static void cleanup(void)
-{
-	tst_rmdir();
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.needs_root = 1,
+	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.test_all = test_readahead,
+};
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-int main(void)
-{
-	tst_brkm(TCONF, NULL, "System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
-}
+	TST_TEST_TCONF("System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
 #endif
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/5] syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
  2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp, Jan Stancek, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs

* Use SAFE macros

* Use SPDX-License-Identifier

* No need to cleanup test file from temp dir

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 248 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index c9d92a6a4..c739d3ba2 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -1,25 +1,6 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
  * Copyright (C) 2012 Linux Test Project, Inc.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
- * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- *
- * Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it
- * is free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding
- * infringement or the like.  Any license provided herein, whether
- * implied or otherwise, applies only to this software file.  Patent
- * licenses, if any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of
- * this program with other software, or any other product whatsoever.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
- * 02110-1301, USA.
  */
 
 /*
@@ -43,86 +24,57 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include "config.h"
-#include "test.h"
-#include "safe_macros.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
 #include "lapi/syscalls.h"
 
-char *TCID = "readahead02";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
 #if defined(__NR_readahead)
 static char testfile[PATH_MAX] = "testfile";
 static const char drop_caches_fname[] = "/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches";
 static const char meminfo_fname[] = "/proc/meminfo";
 static size_t testfile_size = 64 * 1024 * 1024;
-static int opt_fsize;
 static char *opt_fsizestr;
 static int pagesize;
-static const char *fs_type;
-static const char *device;
-static int mount_flag;
 
 #define MNTPOINT        "mntpoint"
 #define MIN_SANE_READAHEAD (4u * 1024u)
 
-option_t options[] = {
-	{"s:", &opt_fsize, &opt_fsizestr},
+static const char mntpoint[] = MNTPOINT;
+
+static struct tst_option options[] = {
+	{"s:", &opt_fsizestr, "-s    testfile size (default 64MB)"},
 	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
 };
 
-static void setup(void);
-static void cleanup(void);
-
-static void help(void)
-{
-	printf("  -s x    testfile size (default 64MB)\n");
-}
-
 static int check_ret(long expected_ret)
 {
-	if (expected_ret == TEST_RETURN) {
-		tst_resm(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
-			 "returned value = %ld", TEST_RETURN);
+	if (expected_ret == TST_RET) {
+		tst_res(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
+			"returned value = %ld", TST_RET);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
-		 "returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
-		 TEST_RETURN, expected_ret);
+	tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
+		"returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
+		TST_RET, expected_ret);
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static int has_file(const char *fname, int required)
 {
-	int ret;
 	struct stat buf;
-	ret = stat(fname, &buf);
-	if (ret == -1) {
-		if (errno == ENOENT)
-			if (required)
-				tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "%s not available",
-					 fname);
-			else
-				return 0;
-		else
-			tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "stat %s", fname);
+
+	if (stat(fname, &buf) == -1) {
+		if (errno != ENOENT)
+			tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "stat %s", fname);
+		if (required)
+			tst_brk(TCONF, "%s not available", fname);
+		return 0;
 	}
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static void drop_caches(void)
 {
-	int ret;
-	FILE *f;
-
-	f = fopen(drop_caches_fname, "w");
-	if (f) {
-		ret = fprintf(f, "1");
-		fclose(f);
-		if (ret < 1)
-			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to drop caches");
-	} else {
-		tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to open drop_caches");
-	}
+	SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(drop_caches_fname, "1");
 }
 
 static unsigned long parse_entry(const char *fname, const char *entry)
@@ -161,32 +113,21 @@ static unsigned long get_cached_size(void)
 
 static void create_testfile(void)
 {
-	FILE *f;
+	int fd;
 	char *tmp;
 	size_t i;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "creating test file of size: %zu", testfile_size);
-	tmp = SAFE_MALLOC(cleanup, pagesize);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "creating test file of size: %zu", testfile_size);
+	tmp = SAFE_MALLOC(pagesize);
 
 	/* round to page size */
 	testfile_size = testfile_size & ~((long)pagesize - 1);
 
-	f = fopen(testfile, "w");
-	if (!f) {
-		free(tmp);
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "Failed to create %s",
-			 testfile);
-	}
-
+	fd = SAFE_CREAT(testfile, 0644);
 	for (i = 0; i < testfile_size; i += pagesize)
-		if (fwrite(tmp, pagesize, 1, f) < 1) {
-			free(tmp);
-			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to create %s",
-				 testfile);
-		}
-	fflush(f);
-	fsync(fileno(f));
-	fclose(f);
+		SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, tmp, pagesize);
+	SAFE_FSYNC(fd);
+	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 	free(tmp);
 }
 
@@ -215,13 +156,13 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	off_t offset = 0;
 	struct timeval now;
 
-	fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, fname, O_RDONLY);
+	fd = SAFE_OPEN(fname, O_RDONLY);
 
 	if (do_readahead) {
 		cached_start = get_cached_size();
 		do {
 			TEST(readahead(fd, offset, fsize - offset));
-			if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
+			if (TST_RET != 0) {
 				check_ret(0);
 				break;
 			}
@@ -232,7 +173,7 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 				if (*cached > cached_start) {
 					max_ra_estimate = (1024 *
 						(*cached - cached_start));
-					tst_resm(TINFO, "max ra estimate: %lu",
+					tst_res(TINFO, "max ra estimate: %lu",
 						max_ra_estimate);
 				}
 				max_ra_estimate = MAX(max_ra_estimate,
@@ -242,27 +183,23 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 			i++;
 			offset += max_ra_estimate;
 		} while ((size_t)offset < fsize);
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "readahead calls made: %zu", i);
+		tst_res(TINFO, "readahead calls made: %zu", i);
 		*cached = get_cached_size();
 
 		/* offset of file shouldn't change after readahead */
-		offset = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
-		if (offset == (off_t) - 1)
-			tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "lseek failed");
+		offset = SAFE_LSEEK(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
 		if (offset == 0)
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "offset is still at 0 as expected");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "offset is still at 0 as expected");
 		else
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "offset has changed to: %lu", offset);
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "offset has changed to: %lu", offset);
 	}
 
 	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) == -1)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "gettimeofday failed");
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "gettimeofday failed");
 	time_start_usec = now.tv_sec * 1000000 + now.tv_usec;
 	read_bytes_start = get_bytes_read();
 
-	p = mmap(NULL, fsize, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE, fd, 0);
-	if (p == MAP_FAILED)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "mmap failed");
+	p = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, fsize, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE, fd, 0);
 
 	/* for old kernels, where MAP_POPULATE doesn't work, touch each page */
 	tmp = 0;
@@ -270,20 +207,20 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 		tmp = tmp ^ p[i];
 	/* prevent gcc from optimizing out loop above */
 	if (tmp != 0)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "This line should not be reached");
+		tst_brk(TBROK, "This line should not be reached");
 
 	if (!do_readahead)
 		*cached = get_cached_size();
 
-	SAFE_MUNMAP(cleanup, p, fsize);
+	SAFE_MUNMAP(p, fsize);
 
 	*read_bytes = get_bytes_read() - read_bytes_start;
 	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) == -1)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "gettimeofday failed");
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "gettimeofday failed");
 	time_end_usec = now.tv_sec * 1000000 + now.tv_usec;
 	*usec = time_end_usec - time_start_usec;
 
-	SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, fd);
+	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 }
 
 static void test_readahead(void)
@@ -302,7 +239,7 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	cached_low = get_cached_size();
 	cached_max = cached_max - cached_low;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0)");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0)");
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
 	if (cached > cached_low)
 		cached = cached - cached_low;
@@ -312,7 +249,7 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	sync();
 	drop_caches();
 	cached_low = get_cached_size();
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1)");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1)");
 	read_testfile(1, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes_ra,
 		      &usec_ra, &cached_ra);
 	if (cached_ra > cached_low)
@@ -320,25 +257,25 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	else
 		cached_ra = 0;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) took: %ld usec", usec);
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) took: %ld usec", usec_ra);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) took: %ld usec", usec);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) took: %ld usec", usec_ra);
 	if (has_file(proc_io_fname, 0)) {
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) read: %ld bytes", read_bytes);
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) read: %ld bytes",
-			 read_bytes_ra);
+		tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) read: %ld bytes", read_bytes);
+		tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) read: %ld bytes",
+			read_bytes_ra);
 		/* actual number of read bytes depends on total RAM */
 		if (read_bytes_ra < read_bytes)
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "readahead saved some I/O");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "readahead saved some I/O");
 		else
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "readahead failed to save any I/O");
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "readahead failed to save any I/O");
 	} else {
-		tst_resm(TCONF, "Your system doesn't have /proc/pid/io,"
-			 " unable to determine read bytes during test");
+		tst_res(TCONF, "Your system doesn't have /proc/pid/io,"
+			" unable to determine read bytes during test");
 	}
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "cache can hold at least: %ld kB", cached_max);
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) used cache: %ld kB", cached);
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) used cache: %ld kB", cached_ra);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "cache can hold at least: %ld kB", cached_max);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) used cache: %ld kB", cached);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) used cache: %ld kB", cached_ra);
 
 	if (cached_max * 1024 >= testfile_size) {
 		/*
@@ -346,83 +283,42 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 		 * for readahead should be at least testfile_size/2
 		 */
 		if (cached_ra * 1024 > testfile_size / 2)
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "using cache as expected");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "using cache as expected");
 		else
-			tst_resm(TWARN, "using less cache than expected");
+			tst_res(TWARN, "using less cache than expected");
 	} else {
-		tst_resm(TCONF, "Page cache on your system is too small "
-			 "to hold whole testfile.");
+		tst_res(TCONF, "Page cache on your system is too small "
+			"to hold whole testfile.");
 	}
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
-{
-	int lc;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, options, help);
-
-	if (opt_fsize)
-		testfile_size = atoi(opt_fsizestr);
-
-	setup();
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-		tst_count = 0;
-		test_readahead();
-	}
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
-}
-
 static void setup(void)
 {
-	tst_require_root();
-	tst_tmpdir();
-	TEST_PAUSE;
+	if (opt_fsizestr)
+		testfile_size = SAFE_STRTOL(opt_fsizestr, 1, INT_MAX);
 
 	has_file(drop_caches_fname, 1);
 	has_file(meminfo_fname, 1);
 
 	/* check if readahead is supported */
-	ltp_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
+	tst_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
 
 	pagesize = getpagesize();
 
-	if (tst_fs_type(cleanup, ".") == TST_TMPFS_MAGIC) {
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "TMPFS detected, creating loop device");
-
-		fs_type = tst_dev_fs_type();
-		device = tst_acquire_device(cleanup);
-		if (!device) {
-			tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup,
-				"Failed to obtain block device");
-		}
-
-		tst_mkfs(cleanup, device, fs_type, NULL, NULL);
-
-		SAFE_MKDIR(cleanup, MNTPOINT, 0755);
-		SAFE_MOUNT(cleanup, device, MNTPOINT, fs_type, 0, NULL);
-		mount_flag = 1;
-
-		sprintf(testfile, MNTPOINT"/testfile");
-	}
+	sprintf(testfile, "%s/testfile", mntpoint);
 	create_testfile();
 }
 
-static void cleanup(void)
-{
-	unlink(testfile);
-	if (mount_flag && tst_umount(MNTPOINT) < 0)
-		tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "umount device:%s failed", device);
-
-	if (device)
-		tst_release_device(device);
-
-	tst_rmdir();
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.needs_root = 1,
+	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
+	.mount_device = 1,
+	.mntpoint = mntpoint,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.options = options,
+	.test_all = test_readahead,
+};
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-int main(void)
-{
-	tst_brkm(TCONF, NULL, "System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
-}
+	TST_TEST_TCONF("System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
 #endif
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/5] syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

* Use SAFE macros

* Use SPDX-License-Identifier

* No need to cleanup test file from temp dir

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 248 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index c9d92a6a4..c739d3ba2 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -1,25 +1,6 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
  * Copyright (C) 2012 Linux Test Project, Inc.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
- * License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- *
- * Further, this software is distributed without any warranty that it
- * is free of the rightful claim of any third person regarding
- * infringement or the like.  Any license provided herein, whether
- * implied or otherwise, applies only to this software file.  Patent
- * licenses, if any, provided herein do not apply to combinations of
- * this program with other software, or any other product whatsoever.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
- * 02110-1301, USA.
  */
 
 /*
@@ -43,86 +24,57 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include "config.h"
-#include "test.h"
-#include "safe_macros.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
 #include "lapi/syscalls.h"
 
-char *TCID = "readahead02";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
 #if defined(__NR_readahead)
 static char testfile[PATH_MAX] = "testfile";
 static const char drop_caches_fname[] = "/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches";
 static const char meminfo_fname[] = "/proc/meminfo";
 static size_t testfile_size = 64 * 1024 * 1024;
-static int opt_fsize;
 static char *opt_fsizestr;
 static int pagesize;
-static const char *fs_type;
-static const char *device;
-static int mount_flag;
 
 #define MNTPOINT        "mntpoint"
 #define MIN_SANE_READAHEAD (4u * 1024u)
 
-option_t options[] = {
-	{"s:", &opt_fsize, &opt_fsizestr},
+static const char mntpoint[] = MNTPOINT;
+
+static struct tst_option options[] = {
+	{"s:", &opt_fsizestr, "-s    testfile size (default 64MB)"},
 	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
 };
 
-static void setup(void);
-static void cleanup(void);
-
-static void help(void)
-{
-	printf("  -s x    testfile size (default 64MB)\n");
-}
-
 static int check_ret(long expected_ret)
 {
-	if (expected_ret == TEST_RETURN) {
-		tst_resm(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
-			 "returned value = %ld", TEST_RETURN);
+	if (expected_ret == TST_RET) {
+		tst_res(TPASS, "expected ret success - "
+			"returned value = %ld", TST_RET);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
-		 "returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
-		 TEST_RETURN, expected_ret);
+	tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "unexpected failure - "
+		"returned value = %ld, expected: %ld",
+		TST_RET, expected_ret);
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static int has_file(const char *fname, int required)
 {
-	int ret;
 	struct stat buf;
-	ret = stat(fname, &buf);
-	if (ret == -1) {
-		if (errno == ENOENT)
-			if (required)
-				tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "%s not available",
-					 fname);
-			else
-				return 0;
-		else
-			tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "stat %s", fname);
+
+	if (stat(fname, &buf) == -1) {
+		if (errno != ENOENT)
+			tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "stat %s", fname);
+		if (required)
+			tst_brk(TCONF, "%s not available", fname);
+		return 0;
 	}
 	return 1;
 }
 
 static void drop_caches(void)
 {
-	int ret;
-	FILE *f;
-
-	f = fopen(drop_caches_fname, "w");
-	if (f) {
-		ret = fprintf(f, "1");
-		fclose(f);
-		if (ret < 1)
-			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to drop caches");
-	} else {
-		tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to open drop_caches");
-	}
+	SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(drop_caches_fname, "1");
 }
 
 static unsigned long parse_entry(const char *fname, const char *entry)
@@ -161,32 +113,21 @@ static unsigned long get_cached_size(void)
 
 static void create_testfile(void)
 {
-	FILE *f;
+	int fd;
 	char *tmp;
 	size_t i;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "creating test file of size: %zu", testfile_size);
-	tmp = SAFE_MALLOC(cleanup, pagesize);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "creating test file of size: %zu", testfile_size);
+	tmp = SAFE_MALLOC(pagesize);
 
 	/* round to page size */
 	testfile_size = testfile_size & ~((long)pagesize - 1);
 
-	f = fopen(testfile, "w");
-	if (!f) {
-		free(tmp);
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "Failed to create %s",
-			 testfile);
-	}
-
+	fd = SAFE_CREAT(testfile, 0644);
 	for (i = 0; i < testfile_size; i += pagesize)
-		if (fwrite(tmp, pagesize, 1, f) < 1) {
-			free(tmp);
-			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to create %s",
-				 testfile);
-		}
-	fflush(f);
-	fsync(fileno(f));
-	fclose(f);
+		SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, tmp, pagesize);
+	SAFE_FSYNC(fd);
+	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 	free(tmp);
 }
 
@@ -215,13 +156,13 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	off_t offset = 0;
 	struct timeval now;
 
-	fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, fname, O_RDONLY);
+	fd = SAFE_OPEN(fname, O_RDONLY);
 
 	if (do_readahead) {
 		cached_start = get_cached_size();
 		do {
 			TEST(readahead(fd, offset, fsize - offset));
-			if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
+			if (TST_RET != 0) {
 				check_ret(0);
 				break;
 			}
@@ -232,7 +173,7 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 				if (*cached > cached_start) {
 					max_ra_estimate = (1024 *
 						(*cached - cached_start));
-					tst_resm(TINFO, "max ra estimate: %lu",
+					tst_res(TINFO, "max ra estimate: %lu",
 						max_ra_estimate);
 				}
 				max_ra_estimate = MAX(max_ra_estimate,
@@ -242,27 +183,23 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 			i++;
 			offset += max_ra_estimate;
 		} while ((size_t)offset < fsize);
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "readahead calls made: %zu", i);
+		tst_res(TINFO, "readahead calls made: %zu", i);
 		*cached = get_cached_size();
 
 		/* offset of file shouldn't change after readahead */
-		offset = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
-		if (offset == (off_t) - 1)
-			tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "lseek failed");
+		offset = SAFE_LSEEK(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
 		if (offset == 0)
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "offset is still at 0 as expected");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "offset is still@0 as expected");
 		else
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "offset has changed to: %lu", offset);
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "offset has changed to: %lu", offset);
 	}
 
 	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) == -1)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "gettimeofday failed");
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "gettimeofday failed");
 	time_start_usec = now.tv_sec * 1000000 + now.tv_usec;
 	read_bytes_start = get_bytes_read();
 
-	p = mmap(NULL, fsize, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE, fd, 0);
-	if (p == MAP_FAILED)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "mmap failed");
+	p = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, fsize, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE, fd, 0);
 
 	/* for old kernels, where MAP_POPULATE doesn't work, touch each page */
 	tmp = 0;
@@ -270,20 +207,20 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 		tmp = tmp ^ p[i];
 	/* prevent gcc from optimizing out loop above */
 	if (tmp != 0)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "This line should not be reached");
+		tst_brk(TBROK, "This line should not be reached");
 
 	if (!do_readahead)
 		*cached = get_cached_size();
 
-	SAFE_MUNMAP(cleanup, p, fsize);
+	SAFE_MUNMAP(p, fsize);
 
 	*read_bytes = get_bytes_read() - read_bytes_start;
 	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) == -1)
-		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "gettimeofday failed");
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "gettimeofday failed");
 	time_end_usec = now.tv_sec * 1000000 + now.tv_usec;
 	*usec = time_end_usec - time_start_usec;
 
-	SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, fd);
+	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 }
 
 static void test_readahead(void)
@@ -302,7 +239,7 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	cached_low = get_cached_size();
 	cached_max = cached_max - cached_low;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0)");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0)");
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
 	if (cached > cached_low)
 		cached = cached - cached_low;
@@ -312,7 +249,7 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	sync();
 	drop_caches();
 	cached_low = get_cached_size();
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1)");
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1)");
 	read_testfile(1, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes_ra,
 		      &usec_ra, &cached_ra);
 	if (cached_ra > cached_low)
@@ -320,25 +257,25 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	else
 		cached_ra = 0;
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) took: %ld usec", usec);
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) took: %ld usec", usec_ra);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) took: %ld usec", usec);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) took: %ld usec", usec_ra);
 	if (has_file(proc_io_fname, 0)) {
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) read: %ld bytes", read_bytes);
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) read: %ld bytes",
-			 read_bytes_ra);
+		tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) read: %ld bytes", read_bytes);
+		tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) read: %ld bytes",
+			read_bytes_ra);
 		/* actual number of read bytes depends on total RAM */
 		if (read_bytes_ra < read_bytes)
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "readahead saved some I/O");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "readahead saved some I/O");
 		else
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "readahead failed to save any I/O");
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "readahead failed to save any I/O");
 	} else {
-		tst_resm(TCONF, "Your system doesn't have /proc/pid/io,"
-			 " unable to determine read bytes during test");
+		tst_res(TCONF, "Your system doesn't have /proc/pid/io,"
+			" unable to determine read bytes during test");
 	}
 
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "cache can hold at least: %ld kB", cached_max);
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) used cache: %ld kB", cached);
-	tst_resm(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) used cache: %ld kB", cached_ra);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "cache can hold@least: %ld kB", cached_max);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0) used cache: %ld kB", cached);
+	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1) used cache: %ld kB", cached_ra);
 
 	if (cached_max * 1024 >= testfile_size) {
 		/*
@@ -346,83 +283,42 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 		 * for readahead should be at least testfile_size/2
 		 */
 		if (cached_ra * 1024 > testfile_size / 2)
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "using cache as expected");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "using cache as expected");
 		else
-			tst_resm(TWARN, "using less cache than expected");
+			tst_res(TWARN, "using less cache than expected");
 	} else {
-		tst_resm(TCONF, "Page cache on your system is too small "
-			 "to hold whole testfile.");
+		tst_res(TCONF, "Page cache on your system is too small "
+			"to hold whole testfile.");
 	}
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
-{
-	int lc;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, options, help);
-
-	if (opt_fsize)
-		testfile_size = atoi(opt_fsizestr);
-
-	setup();
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-		tst_count = 0;
-		test_readahead();
-	}
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
-}
-
 static void setup(void)
 {
-	tst_require_root();
-	tst_tmpdir();
-	TEST_PAUSE;
+	if (opt_fsizestr)
+		testfile_size = SAFE_STRTOL(opt_fsizestr, 1, INT_MAX);
 
 	has_file(drop_caches_fname, 1);
 	has_file(meminfo_fname, 1);
 
 	/* check if readahead is supported */
-	ltp_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
+	tst_syscall(__NR_readahead, 0, 0, 0);
 
 	pagesize = getpagesize();
 
-	if (tst_fs_type(cleanup, ".") == TST_TMPFS_MAGIC) {
-		tst_resm(TINFO, "TMPFS detected, creating loop device");
-
-		fs_type = tst_dev_fs_type();
-		device = tst_acquire_device(cleanup);
-		if (!device) {
-			tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup,
-				"Failed to obtain block device");
-		}
-
-		tst_mkfs(cleanup, device, fs_type, NULL, NULL);
-
-		SAFE_MKDIR(cleanup, MNTPOINT, 0755);
-		SAFE_MOUNT(cleanup, device, MNTPOINT, fs_type, 0, NULL);
-		mount_flag = 1;
-
-		sprintf(testfile, MNTPOINT"/testfile");
-	}
+	sprintf(testfile, "%s/testfile", mntpoint);
 	create_testfile();
 }
 
-static void cleanup(void)
-{
-	unlink(testfile);
-	if (mount_flag && tst_umount(MNTPOINT) < 0)
-		tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "umount device:%s failed", device);
-
-	if (device)
-		tst_release_device(device);
-
-	tst_rmdir();
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.needs_root = 1,
+	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
+	.mount_device = 1,
+	.mntpoint = mntpoint,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.options = options,
+	.test_all = test_readahead,
+};
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-int main(void)
-{
-	tst_brkm(TCONF, NULL, "System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
-}
+	TST_TEST_TCONF("System doesn't support __NR_readahead");
 #endif
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/5] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
  2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp, Jan Stancek, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs

Repeat the test case on an overlayfs file.

The new test case is a regression test for kernel commit b833a3660394
("ovl: add ovl_fadvise()") which fixes a regression of readahead() on
an overlay file that was introduced by kernel commit 5b910bd615ba
("ovl: fix GPF in swapfile_activate of file from overlayfs over xfs").

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 61 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index c739d3ba2..158bfc955 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <sys/mount.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/time.h>
@@ -34,8 +35,14 @@ static const char meminfo_fname[] = "/proc/meminfo";
 static size_t testfile_size = 64 * 1024 * 1024;
 static char *opt_fsizestr;
 static int pagesize;
+static unsigned long cached_max;
+static int ovl_mounted;
 
 #define MNTPOINT        "mntpoint"
+#define OVL_LOWER	MNTPOINT"/lower"
+#define OVL_UPPER	MNTPOINT"/upper"
+#define OVL_WORK	MNTPOINT"/work"
+#define OVL_MNT		MNTPOINT"/ovl"
 #define MIN_SANE_READAHEAD (4u * 1024u)
 
 static const char mntpoint[] = MNTPOINT;
@@ -111,12 +118,13 @@ static unsigned long get_cached_size(void)
 	return parse_entry(meminfo_fname, entry);
 }
 
-static void create_testfile(void)
+static void create_testfile(int use_overlay)
 {
 	int fd;
 	char *tmp;
 	size_t i;
 
+	sprintf(testfile, "%s/testfile", use_overlay ? OVL_MNT : MNTPOINT);
 	tst_res(TINFO, "creating test file of size: %zu", testfile_size);
 	tmp = SAFE_MALLOC(pagesize);
 
@@ -223,21 +231,29 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 }
 
-static void test_readahead(void)
+static void test_readahead(unsigned int use_overlay)
 {
 	unsigned long read_bytes, read_bytes_ra;
 	long usec, usec_ra;
-	unsigned long cached_max, cached_low, cached, cached_ra;
+	unsigned long cached_high, cached_low, cached, cached_ra;
 	char proc_io_fname[128];
 	sprintf(proc_io_fname, "/proc/%u/io", getpid());
 
+	if (use_overlay && !ovl_mounted) {
+		tst_res(TCONF,
+			"overlayfs is not configured in this kernel.");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	create_testfile(use_overlay);
+
 	/* find out how much can cache hold if we read whole file */
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
-	cached_max = get_cached_size();
+	cached_high = get_cached_size();
 	sync();
 	drop_caches();
 	cached_low = get_cached_size();
-	cached_max = cached_max - cached_low;
+	cached_max = MAX(cached_max, cached_high - cached_low);
 
 	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0)");
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
@@ -292,6 +308,28 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	}
 }
 
+static void setup_overlay(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Setup an overlay mount with lower dir and file */
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_LOWER, 0755);
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_UPPER, 0755);
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_WORK, 0755);
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_MNT, 0755);
+	ret = mount("overlay", OVL_MNT, "overlay", 0, "lowerdir="OVL_LOWER
+		    ",upperdir="OVL_UPPER",workdir="OVL_WORK);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		if (errno == ENODEV) {
+			tst_res(TINFO,
+				"overlayfs is not configured in this kernel.");
+			return;
+		}
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "overlayfs mount failed");
+	}
+	ovl_mounted = 1;
+}
+
 static void setup(void)
 {
 	if (opt_fsizestr)
@@ -305,8 +343,13 @@ static void setup(void)
 
 	pagesize = getpagesize();
 
-	sprintf(testfile, "%s/testfile", mntpoint);
-	create_testfile();
+	setup_overlay();
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (ovl_mounted)
+		SAFE_UMOUNT(OVL_MNT);
 }
 
 static struct tst_test test = {
@@ -315,8 +358,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.mount_device = 1,
 	.mntpoint = mntpoint,
 	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.options = options,
-	.test_all = test_readahead,
+	.test = test_readahead,
+	.tcnt = 2, /* Repeat with overlayfs */
 };
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/5] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Repeat the test case on an overlayfs file.

The new test case is a regression test for kernel commit b833a3660394
("ovl: add ovl_fadvise()") which fixes a regression of readahead() on
an overlay file that was introduced by kernel commit 5b910bd615ba
("ovl: fix GPF in swapfile_activate of file from overlayfs over xfs").

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 61 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index c739d3ba2..158bfc955 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <sys/mount.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/time.h>
@@ -34,8 +35,14 @@ static const char meminfo_fname[] = "/proc/meminfo";
 static size_t testfile_size = 64 * 1024 * 1024;
 static char *opt_fsizestr;
 static int pagesize;
+static unsigned long cached_max;
+static int ovl_mounted;
 
 #define MNTPOINT        "mntpoint"
+#define OVL_LOWER	MNTPOINT"/lower"
+#define OVL_UPPER	MNTPOINT"/upper"
+#define OVL_WORK	MNTPOINT"/work"
+#define OVL_MNT		MNTPOINT"/ovl"
 #define MIN_SANE_READAHEAD (4u * 1024u)
 
 static const char mntpoint[] = MNTPOINT;
@@ -111,12 +118,13 @@ static unsigned long get_cached_size(void)
 	return parse_entry(meminfo_fname, entry);
 }
 
-static void create_testfile(void)
+static void create_testfile(int use_overlay)
 {
 	int fd;
 	char *tmp;
 	size_t i;
 
+	sprintf(testfile, "%s/testfile", use_overlay ? OVL_MNT : MNTPOINT);
 	tst_res(TINFO, "creating test file of size: %zu", testfile_size);
 	tmp = SAFE_MALLOC(pagesize);
 
@@ -223,21 +231,29 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 }
 
-static void test_readahead(void)
+static void test_readahead(unsigned int use_overlay)
 {
 	unsigned long read_bytes, read_bytes_ra;
 	long usec, usec_ra;
-	unsigned long cached_max, cached_low, cached, cached_ra;
+	unsigned long cached_high, cached_low, cached, cached_ra;
 	char proc_io_fname[128];
 	sprintf(proc_io_fname, "/proc/%u/io", getpid());
 
+	if (use_overlay && !ovl_mounted) {
+		tst_res(TCONF,
+			"overlayfs is not configured in this kernel.");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	create_testfile(use_overlay);
+
 	/* find out how much can cache hold if we read whole file */
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
-	cached_max = get_cached_size();
+	cached_high = get_cached_size();
 	sync();
 	drop_caches();
 	cached_low = get_cached_size();
-	cached_max = cached_max - cached_low;
+	cached_max = MAX(cached_max, cached_high - cached_low);
 
 	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(0)");
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
@@ -292,6 +308,28 @@ static void test_readahead(void)
 	}
 }
 
+static void setup_overlay(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Setup an overlay mount with lower dir and file */
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_LOWER, 0755);
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_UPPER, 0755);
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_WORK, 0755);
+	SAFE_MKDIR(OVL_MNT, 0755);
+	ret = mount("overlay", OVL_MNT, "overlay", 0, "lowerdir="OVL_LOWER
+		    ",upperdir="OVL_UPPER",workdir="OVL_WORK);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		if (errno == ENODEV) {
+			tst_res(TINFO,
+				"overlayfs is not configured in this kernel.");
+			return;
+		}
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "overlayfs mount failed");
+	}
+	ovl_mounted = 1;
+}
+
 static void setup(void)
 {
 	if (opt_fsizestr)
@@ -305,8 +343,13 @@ static void setup(void)
 
 	pagesize = getpagesize();
 
-	sprintf(testfile, "%s/testfile", mntpoint);
-	create_testfile();
+	setup_overlay();
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (ovl_mounted)
+		SAFE_UMOUNT(OVL_MNT);
 }
 
 static struct tst_test test = {
@@ -315,8 +358,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.mount_device = 1,
 	.mntpoint = mntpoint,
 	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.options = options,
-	.test_all = test_readahead,
+	.test = test_readahead,
+	.tcnt = 2, /* Repeat with overlayfs */
 };
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/5] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
  2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp, Jan Stancek, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs

The call to posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) should have the same
effect as the call to readahead() syscall.

Repeat the test cases for local file and overlayfs file with
posix_fadvise().

The new test case is a regression test for kernel commit b833a3660394
("ovl: add ovl_fadvise()") which fixes a regression of fadvise() on
an overlay file that was introduced by kernel commit 5b910bd615ba
("ovl: fix GPF in swapfile_activate of file from overlayfs over xfs").

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 58 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index 158bfc955..ea73f8566 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -52,6 +52,46 @@ static struct tst_option options[] = {
 	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
 };
 
+/*
+ * Check this system has fadvise64 syscall which is used in posix_fadvise.
+ * This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests,
+ * so use posix_fadvise in this test only with this system configuration.
+ */
+#ifdef __NR_fadvise64
+#define READAHEAD_WITH_FADVISE
+#else
+#if defined(_FILE_OFFSET_BITS) && (_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64)
+#define READAHEAD_WITH_FADVISE
+#endif
+#endif
+
+static struct tcase {
+	const char *tname;
+	int use_overlay;
+	int use_fadvise;
+} tcases[] = {
+	{ "readahead on file", 0, 0 },
+	{ "readahead on overlayfs file", 1, 0 },
+#ifdef READAHEAD_WITH_FADVISE
+	{ "POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED on file", 0, 1 },
+	{ "POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED on overlayfs file", 1, 1 },
+#endif
+};
+
+static int fadvise_willneed(int fd, off_t offset, size_t len)
+{
+	/* Should have the same effect as readahead() syscall */
+	return posix_fadvise(fd, offset, len, POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED);
+}
+
+static int libc_readahead(int fd, off_t offset, size_t len)
+{
+	return readahead(fd, offset, len);
+}
+
+typedef int (*readahead_func_t)(int, off_t, size_t);
+static readahead_func_t readahead_func = libc_readahead;
+
 static int check_ret(long expected_ret)
 {
 	if (expected_ret == TST_RET) {
@@ -139,7 +179,6 @@ static void create_testfile(int use_overlay)
 	free(tmp);
 }
 
-
 /* read_testfile - mmap testfile and read every page.
  * This functions measures how many I/O and time it takes to fully
  * read contents of test file.
@@ -169,7 +208,7 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	if (do_readahead) {
 		cached_start = get_cached_size();
 		do {
-			TEST(readahead(fd, offset, fsize - offset));
+			TEST(readahead_func(fd, offset, fsize - offset));
 			if (TST_RET != 0) {
 				check_ret(0);
 				break;
@@ -231,21 +270,28 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 }
 
-static void test_readahead(unsigned int use_overlay)
+static void test_readahead(unsigned int n)
 {
 	unsigned long read_bytes, read_bytes_ra;
 	long usec, usec_ra;
 	unsigned long cached_high, cached_low, cached, cached_ra;
 	char proc_io_fname[128];
+	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
+
+	tst_res(TINFO, "Test #%d: %s", n, tc->tname);
+
 	sprintf(proc_io_fname, "/proc/%u/io", getpid());
 
-	if (use_overlay && !ovl_mounted) {
+	if (tc->use_overlay && !ovl_mounted) {
 		tst_res(TCONF,
 			"overlayfs is not configured in this kernel.");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	create_testfile(use_overlay);
+	create_testfile(tc->use_overlay);
+
+	/* Use either readahead() syscall or POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED */
+	readahead_func = tc->use_fadvise ? fadvise_willneed : libc_readahead;
 
 	/* find out how much can cache hold if we read whole file */
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
@@ -361,7 +407,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.options = options,
 	.test = test_readahead,
-	.tcnt = 2, /* Repeat with overlayfs */
+	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
 };
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 4/5] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

The call to posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) should have the same
effect as the call to readahead() syscall.

Repeat the test cases for local file and overlayfs file with
posix_fadvise().

The new test case is a regression test for kernel commit b833a3660394
("ovl: add ovl_fadvise()") which fixes a regression of fadvise() on
an overlay file that was introduced by kernel commit 5b910bd615ba
("ovl: fix GPF in swapfile_activate of file from overlayfs over xfs").

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 58 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index 158bfc955..ea73f8566 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -52,6 +52,46 @@ static struct tst_option options[] = {
 	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
 };
 
+/*
+ * Check this system has fadvise64 syscall which is used in posix_fadvise.
+ * This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests,
+ * so use posix_fadvise in this test only with this system configuration.
+ */
+#ifdef __NR_fadvise64
+#define READAHEAD_WITH_FADVISE
+#else
+#if defined(_FILE_OFFSET_BITS) && (_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64)
+#define READAHEAD_WITH_FADVISE
+#endif
+#endif
+
+static struct tcase {
+	const char *tname;
+	int use_overlay;
+	int use_fadvise;
+} tcases[] = {
+	{ "readahead on file", 0, 0 },
+	{ "readahead on overlayfs file", 1, 0 },
+#ifdef READAHEAD_WITH_FADVISE
+	{ "POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED on file", 0, 1 },
+	{ "POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED on overlayfs file", 1, 1 },
+#endif
+};
+
+static int fadvise_willneed(int fd, off_t offset, size_t len)
+{
+	/* Should have the same effect as readahead() syscall */
+	return posix_fadvise(fd, offset, len, POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED);
+}
+
+static int libc_readahead(int fd, off_t offset, size_t len)
+{
+	return readahead(fd, offset, len);
+}
+
+typedef int (*readahead_func_t)(int, off_t, size_t);
+static readahead_func_t readahead_func = libc_readahead;
+
 static int check_ret(long expected_ret)
 {
 	if (expected_ret == TST_RET) {
@@ -139,7 +179,6 @@ static void create_testfile(int use_overlay)
 	free(tmp);
 }
 
-
 /* read_testfile - mmap testfile and read every page.
  * This functions measures how many I/O and time it takes to fully
  * read contents of test file.
@@ -169,7 +208,7 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	if (do_readahead) {
 		cached_start = get_cached_size();
 		do {
-			TEST(readahead(fd, offset, fsize - offset));
+			TEST(readahead_func(fd, offset, fsize - offset));
 			if (TST_RET != 0) {
 				check_ret(0);
 				break;
@@ -231,21 +270,28 @@ static void read_testfile(int do_readahead, const char *fname, size_t fsize,
 	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
 }
 
-static void test_readahead(unsigned int use_overlay)
+static void test_readahead(unsigned int n)
 {
 	unsigned long read_bytes, read_bytes_ra;
 	long usec, usec_ra;
 	unsigned long cached_high, cached_low, cached, cached_ra;
 	char proc_io_fname[128];
+	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
+
+	tst_res(TINFO, "Test #%d: %s", n, tc->tname);
+
 	sprintf(proc_io_fname, "/proc/%u/io", getpid());
 
-	if (use_overlay && !ovl_mounted) {
+	if (tc->use_overlay && !ovl_mounted) {
 		tst_res(TCONF,
 			"overlayfs is not configured in this kernel.");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	create_testfile(use_overlay);
+	create_testfile(tc->use_overlay);
+
+	/* Use either readahead() syscall or POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED */
+	readahead_func = tc->use_fadvise ? fadvise_willneed : libc_readahead;
 
 	/* find out how much can cache hold if we read whole file */
 	read_testfile(0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec, &cached);
@@ -361,7 +407,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.options = options,
 	.test = test_readahead,
-	.tcnt = 2, /* Repeat with overlayfs */
+	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
 };
 
 #else /* __NR_readahead */
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 5/5] syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache
  2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp, Jan Stancek, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs

The heuristic of failing the test only if not saving any io has false
negatives with overlayfs readahead() bug, but readahead() with overlayfs
always warns on "using less cache then expected", when actually, it is
using no cache at all.

Add another condition to fail the test if readahead did not use any
cache at all, which always detected the overlayfs bug.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index ea73f8566..918a694c1 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ static void test_readahead(unsigned int n)
 		 */
 		if (cached_ra * 1024 > testfile_size / 2)
 			tst_res(TPASS, "using cache as expected");
+		else if (!cached_ra)
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "readahead failed to use any cache");
 		else
 			tst_res(TWARN, "using less cache than expected");
 	} else {
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 5/5] syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache
@ 2018-10-04  6:26   ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-04  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

The heuristic of failing the test only if not saving any io has false
negatives with overlayfs readahead() bug, but readahead() with overlayfs
always warns on "using less cache then expected", when actually, it is
using no cache at all.

Add another condition to fail the test if readahead did not use any
cache at all, which always detected the overlayfs bug.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
index ea73f8566..918a694c1 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
@@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ static void test_readahead(unsigned int n)
 		 */
 		if (cached_ra * 1024 > testfile_size / 2)
 			tst_res(TPASS, "using cache as expected");
+		else if (!cached_ra)
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "readahead failed to use any cache");
 		else
 			tst_res(TWARN, "using less cache than expected");
 	} else {
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
  2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-08  7:11   ` Jan Stancek
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2018-10-08  7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: Cyril Hrubis, ltp, Miklos Szeredi, linux-unionfs



----- Original Message -----
> Cyril,
> 
> The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
> 
> So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> conditions, but not functionality.
> 
> The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
> to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> also bound together.
> 
> To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure

Looks good to me.

When you say "This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests",
are you talking about glibc?

Regards,
Jan

> 
> Amir Goldstein (5):
>   syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
>   syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
>   syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
>   syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
>   syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache
> 
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 ++-----
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 333 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.17.1
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
@ 2018-10-08  7:11   ` Jan Stancek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2018-10-08  7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp



----- Original Message -----
> Cyril,
> 
> The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
> 
> So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> conditions, but not functionality.
> 
> The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
> to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> also bound together.
> 
> To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure

Looks good to me.

When you say "This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests",
are you talking about glibc?

Regards,
Jan

> 
> Amir Goldstein (5):
>   syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib
>   syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup
>   syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file
>   syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise()
>   syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache
> 
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead01.c   | 119 ++-----
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c   | 333 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.17.1
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
  2018-10-08  7:11   ` [LTP] " Jan Stancek
@ 2018-10-08 11:26     ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-08 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Stancek; +Cc: Cyril Hrubis, ltp, Miklos Szeredi, overlayfs

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Cyril,
> >
> > The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> > over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> > posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
> >
> > So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> > conditions, but not functionality.
> >
> > The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
> > to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> > readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> > also bound together.
> >
> > To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> > to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> > readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> > - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> > - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> > - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> When you say "This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests",
> are you talking about glibc?
>

I was trying to mimic the check in posix_fadvise tests:

        /* Check this system has fadvise64 system which is used
           in posix_fadvise. */
        if ((_FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64) && (__NR_fadvise64 == 0)) {
                tst_resm(TWARN,
                         "This test can only run on kernels that implements ");
                tst_resm(TWARN, "fadvise64 which is used from posix_fadvise");
                exit(0);
        }

If my understanding of man posix_fadvise(2) is correct, this wants to make sure
that the glibc wrapper posix_fadvise calls the syscall fadvise64 and not some
architecture specific syscall (e.g. arm_fadvise64_64).

I am not really sure why that matters to those tests at all.
and it's probably better just return TCONF if the call fails with ENOSYS?
If someone has ideas, let me know.

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
@ 2018-10-08 11:26     ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-08 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Cyril,
> >
> > The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> > over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> > posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
> >
> > So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> > conditions, but not functionality.
> >
> > The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
> > to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> > readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> > also bound together.
> >
> > To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> > to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> > readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> > - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> > - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> > - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> When you say "This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests",
> are you talking about glibc?
>

I was trying to mimic the check in posix_fadvise tests:

        /* Check this system has fadvise64 system which is used
           in posix_fadvise. */
        if ((_FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64) && (__NR_fadvise64 == 0)) {
                tst_resm(TWARN,
                         "This test can only run on kernels that implements ");
                tst_resm(TWARN, "fadvise64 which is used from posix_fadvise");
                exit(0);
        }

If my understanding of man posix_fadvise(2) is correct, this wants to make sure
that the glibc wrapper posix_fadvise calls the syscall fadvise64 and not some
architecture specific syscall (e.g. arm_fadvise64_64).

I am not really sure why that matters to those tests at all.
and it's probably better just return TCONF if the call fails with ENOSYS?
If someone has ideas, let me know.

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
  2018-10-08 11:26     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
@ 2018-10-09 20:10       ` Amir Goldstein
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-09 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Stancek; +Cc: Cyril Hrubis, ltp, Miklos Szeredi, overlayfs

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:26 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Cyril,
> > >
> > > The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> > > over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> > > posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
> > >
> > > So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> > > conditions, but not functionality.
> > >
> > > The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
> > > to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> > > readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> > > also bound together.
> > >
> > > To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> > > to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> > > readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Amir.
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> > > - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> > > - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> > > - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > When you say "This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests",
> > are you talking about glibc?
> >
>
> I was trying to mimic the check in posix_fadvise tests:
>
>         /* Check this system has fadvise64 system which is used
>            in posix_fadvise. */
>         if ((_FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64) && (__NR_fadvise64 == 0)) {
>                 tst_resm(TWARN,
>                          "This test can only run on kernels that implements ");
>                 tst_resm(TWARN, "fadvise64 which is used from posix_fadvise");
>                 exit(0);
>         }
>
> If my understanding of man posix_fadvise(2) is correct, this wants to make sure
> that the glibc wrapper posix_fadvise calls the syscall fadvise64 and not some
> architecture specific syscall (e.g. arm_fadvise64_64).
>
> I am not really sure why that matters to those tests at all.
> and it's probably better just return TCONF if the call fails with ENOSYS?
> If someone has ideas, let me know.
>

FYI, I removed the build time checks from my test and added runtime checks
for both readahead and posix_fadvise kernel support:
https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/overlayfs-devel

I will post v3 tomorrow.

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs
@ 2018-10-09 20:10       ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2018-10-09 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:26 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Cyril,
> > >
> > > The following series adds test covergae for readahead() syscall
> > > over overlayfs file and adds test coverage for a specific
> > > posix_fadvise() syscall advice (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
> > >
> > > So far, the posix_fadvise syscall tests in LTP only test for error
> > > conditions, but not functionality.
> > >
> > > The functionality of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is indentical
> > > to readahead() and since kernel commit 3d8f7615319b ("vfs: implement
> > > readahead(2) using POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED"), the implementations are
> > > also bound together.
> > >
> > > To add test coverage of the advice POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, I decided not
> > > to duplicate the readahead() functional test and add test cases to
> > > readahead02 that use the POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED implementation.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Amir.
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - Fix bugs in loop invocation of test (i.e. -i 2)
> > > - Address review comments from Jan Stancek
> > > - Make cached_max a global maximum over all test cases
> > > - Improve reliability of overlayfs readahead test case failure
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > When you say "This is the only system configuration supported by the posix_fadvise tests",
> > are you talking about glibc?
> >
>
> I was trying to mimic the check in posix_fadvise tests:
>
>         /* Check this system has fadvise64 system which is used
>            in posix_fadvise. */
>         if ((_FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64) && (__NR_fadvise64 == 0)) {
>                 tst_resm(TWARN,
>                          "This test can only run on kernels that implements ");
>                 tst_resm(TWARN, "fadvise64 which is used from posix_fadvise");
>                 exit(0);
>         }
>
> If my understanding of man posix_fadvise(2) is correct, this wants to make sure
> that the glibc wrapper posix_fadvise calls the syscall fadvise64 and not some
> architecture specific syscall (e.g. arm_fadvise64_64).
>
> I am not really sure why that matters to those tests at all.
> and it's probably better just return TCONF if the call fails with ENOSYS?
> If someone has ideas, let me know.
>

FYI, I removed the build time checks from my test and added runtime checks
for both readahead and posix_fadvise kernel support:
https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/overlayfs-devel

I will post v3 tomorrow.

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-09 20:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-04  6:26 [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] syscalls/readahead01: Convert to newlib Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26   ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] syscalls/readahead02: Convert to newlib and cleanup Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26   ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead() on an overlayfs file Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26   ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] syscalls/readahead02: test readahead using posix_fadvise() Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26   ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] syscalls/readahead02: fail test if readahead did not use any cache Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  6:26   ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Tests for readahead() and fadvise() on overlayfs Jan Stancek
2018-10-08  7:11   ` [LTP] " Jan Stancek
2018-10-08 11:26   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-08 11:26     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2018-10-09 20:10     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-09 20:10       ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.