All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse
@ 2017-07-28 12:56 Elia Geretto
  2017-07-28 14:17 ` Dan Carpenter
  2017-07-29 13:36 ` kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elia Geretto @ 2017-07-28 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel; +Cc: Elia Geretto

This patch corrects some visibility issues regarding some functions and
solves a warning related to a non-matching union. After this patch,
sparse produces only one other warning regarding a bitwise operator;
however, this behaviour seems to be intended.

Signed-off-by: Elia Geretto <elia.f.geretto@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c     |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
index d9328ce5ec1d..f8219a53ce60 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
@@ -208,7 +208,10 @@ rf69_set_rx_cfg(struct pi433_device *dev, struct pi433_rx_cfg *rx_cfg)
 	{
 		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_fifo_fill_condition(dev->spi, always));
 	}
-	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format  (dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_length_byte));
+	if (rx_cfg->enable_length_byte == optionOn)
+		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthVar));
+	else
+		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthFix));
 	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_adressFiltering(dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_address_filtering));
 	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_crc_enable	    (dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_crc));
 
@@ -264,8 +267,11 @@ rf69_set_tx_cfg(struct pi433_device *dev, struct pi433_tx_cfg *tx_cfg)
 	{
 		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_preamble_length(dev->spi, 0));
 	}
+	if (tx_cfg->enable_length_byte == optionOn)
+		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthVar));
+	else
+		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthFix));
 	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_sync_enable  (dev->spi, tx_cfg->enable_sync));
-	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, tx_cfg->enable_length_byte));
 	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_crc_enable	  (dev->spi, tx_cfg->enable_crc));
 
 	/* configure sync, if enabled */
@@ -313,7 +319,7 @@ pi433_start_rx(struct pi433_device *dev)
 
 /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
-int
+static int
 pi433_receive(void *data)
 {
 	struct pi433_device *dev = data;
@@ -463,7 +469,7 @@ pi433_receive(void *data)
 		return bytes_total;
 }
 
-int
+static int
 pi433_tx_thread(void *data)
 {
 	struct pi433_device *device = data;
@@ -1152,8 +1158,7 @@ static int pi433_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	device->tx_task_struct = kthread_run(pi433_tx_thread,
 					     device,
 					     "pi433_tx_task");
-	if (device->tx_task_struct < 0)
-	{
+	if (IS_ERR(device->tx_task_struct)) {
 		dev_dbg(device->dev, "start of send thread failed");
 		goto send_thread_failed;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
index e391ce777bc7..52521fa18c9b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
@@ -433,7 +433,9 @@ int rf69_set_dc_cut_off_frequency_during_afc(struct spi_device *spi, enum dccPer
 	return rf69_set_dc_cut_off_frequency_intern(spi, REG_AFCBW, dccPercent);
 }
 
-int rf69_set_bandwidth_intern(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg, enum mantisse mantisse, u8 exponent)
+static int
+rf69_set_bandwidth_intern(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg,
+			  enum mantisse mantisse, u8 exponent)
 {
 	u8 newValue;
 
-- 
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse
  2017-07-28 12:56 [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse Elia Geretto
@ 2017-07-28 14:17 ` Dan Carpenter
  2017-07-29  8:30   ` Elia Geretto
  2017-07-29 13:36 ` kbuild test robot
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-07-28 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elia Geretto; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:56:26PM +0200, Elia Geretto wrote:
> This patch corrects some visibility issues regarding some functions and
> solves a warning related to a non-matching union. After this patch,
> sparse produces only one other warning regarding a bitwise operator;
> however, this behaviour seems to be intended.

I can't understand this changelog at all....  :/  What are we fixing
exactly?  It seems like we're fixing something about bitwise
operators...  I guess let me check the Sparse warnings...  Here they are
from the latest linux-next:

drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9: warning: mixing different enum types
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum optionOnOff  versus
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum packetFormat 
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9: warning: mixing different enum types
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum optionOnOff  versus
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum packetFormat 
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9: warning: mixing different enum types
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum optionOnOff  versus
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum packetFormat 
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9: warning: mixing different enum types
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum optionOnOff  versus
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum packetFormat 
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:317:1: warning: symbol 'pi433_receive' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:467:1: warning: symbol 'pi433_tx_thread' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:1155:36: error: incompatible types for operation (<)
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:1155:36:    left side has type struct task_struct *tx_task_struct
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:1155:36:    right side has type int
drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c:206:17: warning: dubious: x & !y
drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c:436:5: warning: symbol 'rf69_set_bandwidth_intern' was not declared. Should it be static?

Each type of fix should be sent as a separate fix with a better
changelog.  People have already done the "static" fixes and IS_ERR()
fixes, so don't worry about those.  But I don't think anyway has fixed
the enum issues so resend that.  Also the bitwise thing is a real bug,
but there is already a fix for that, it just hasn't been merged yet.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Elia Geretto <elia.f.geretto@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c     |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> index d9328ce5ec1d..f8219a53ce60 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,10 @@ rf69_set_rx_cfg(struct pi433_device *dev, struct pi433_rx_cfg *rx_cfg)
>  	{
>  		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_fifo_fill_condition(dev->spi, always));
>  	}
> -	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format  (dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_length_byte));
> +	if (rx_cfg->enable_length_byte == optionOn)
> +		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthVar));
> +	else
> +		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthFix));

The SET_CHECKED() macro is total garbage.  It has a hidden return and
it calls the rf69_set_packet_format() twice on error it expands to:

	if (rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_length_byte)) < 0)
		return rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_length_byte);

Mega turbo barf!  Kill it with fire!

regards,
dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse
  2017-07-28 14:17 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-07-29  8:30   ` Elia Geretto
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elia Geretto @ 2017-07-29  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 17:17 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:56:26PM +0200, Elia Geretto wrote:
> > This patch corrects some visibility issues regarding some functions
> > and
> > solves a warning related to a non-matching union. After this patch,
> > sparse produces only one other warning regarding a bitwise
> > operator;
> > however, this behaviour seems to be intended.
> 
> I can't understand this changelog at all....  :/  What are we fixing
> exactly?  It seems like we're fixing something about bitwise
> operators...  I guess let me check the Sparse warnings...  Here they
> are
> from the latest linux-next:
> 
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9: warning: mixing different
> enum types
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum
> optionOnOff  versus
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum packetFormat 
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9: warning: mixing different
> enum types
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum
> optionOnOff  versus
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:211:9:     int enum packetFormat 
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9: warning: mixing different
> enum types
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum
> optionOnOff  versus
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum packetFormat 
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9: warning: mixing different
> enum types
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum
> optionOnOff  versus
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:268:9:     int enum packetFormat 
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:317:1: warning: symbol
> 'pi433_receive' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:467:1: warning: symbol
> 'pi433_tx_thread' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:1155:36: error: incompatible types
> for operation (<)
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:1155:36:    left side has type
> struct task_struct *tx_task_struct
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c:1155:36:    right side has type int
> drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c:206:17: warning: dubious: x & !y
> drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c:436:5: warning: symbol
> 'rf69_set_bandwidth_intern' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Each type of fix should be sent as a separate fix with a better
> changelog.  People have already done the "static" fixes and IS_ERR()
> fixes, so don't worry about those.  But I don't think anyway has
> fixed
> the enum issues so resend that.  Also the bitwise thing is a real
> bug,
> but there is already a fix for that, it just hasn't been merged yet.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Elia Geretto <elia.f.geretto@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> >  drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c     |  4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> > b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> > index d9328ce5ec1d..f8219a53ce60 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> > @@ -208,7 +208,10 @@ rf69_set_rx_cfg(struct pi433_device *dev,
> > struct pi433_rx_cfg *rx_cfg)
> >  	{
> >  		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_fifo_fill_condition(dev->spi, 
> > always));
> >  	}
> > -	SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format  (dev->spi, rx_cfg-
> > >enable_length_byte));
> > +	if (rx_cfg->enable_length_byte == optionOn)
> > +		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi,
> > packetLengthVar));
> > +	else
> > +		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi,
> > packetLengthFix));
> 
> The SET_CHECKED() macro is total garbage.  It has a hidden return and
> it calls the rf69_set_packet_format() twice on error it expands to:
> 
> 	if (rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, rx_cfg-
> >enable_length_byte)) < 0)
> 		return rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, rx_cfg-
> >enable_length_byte);
> 
> Mega turbo barf!  Kill it with fire!
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

I will resend a separate patch containing the enum work; I apologize
for the unclear changelog, I am still trying to understand how much in
detail I should go. Next time I will be more precise.

Regards,
Elia Geretto

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse
  2017-07-28 12:56 [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse Elia Geretto
  2017-07-28 14:17 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2017-07-29 13:36 ` kbuild test robot
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2017-07-29 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elia Geretto
  Cc: kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel, Elia Geretto

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4169 bytes --]

Hi Elia,

[auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
[also build test ERROR on next-20170728]
[cannot apply to v4.13-rc2]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Elia-Geretto/Staging-pi433-fix-some-warnings-detected-using-sparse/20170729-205713
config: blackfin-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: bfin-uclinux-gcc (GCC) 6.2.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=blackfin 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/staging//pi433/pi433_if.c: In function 'rf69_set_rx_cfg':
>> drivers/staging//pi433/pi433_if.c:213:2: error: 'else' without a previous 'if'
     else
     ^~~~
   drivers/staging//pi433/pi433_if.c: In function 'rf69_set_tx_cfg':
   drivers/staging//pi433/pi433_if.c:272:2: error: 'else' without a previous 'if'
     else
     ^~~~

vim +213 drivers/staging//pi433/pi433_if.c

   181	
   182	static int
   183	rf69_set_rx_cfg(struct pi433_device *dev, struct pi433_rx_cfg *rx_cfg)
   184	{
   185		int payload_length;
   186	
   187		/* receiver config */
   188		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_frequency	(dev->spi, rx_cfg->frequency));
   189		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_bit_rate	(dev->spi, rx_cfg->bit_rate));
   190		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_modulation	(dev->spi, rx_cfg->modulation));
   191		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_antenna_impedance	 (dev->spi, rx_cfg->antenna_impedance));
   192		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_rssi_threshold	 (dev->spi, rx_cfg->rssi_threshold));
   193		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_ook_threshold_dec	 (dev->spi, rx_cfg->thresholdDecrement));
   194		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_bandwidth 		 (dev->spi, rx_cfg->bw_mantisse, rx_cfg->bw_exponent));
   195		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_bandwidth_during_afc(dev->spi, rx_cfg->bw_mantisse, rx_cfg->bw_exponent));
   196		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_dagc 		 (dev->spi, rx_cfg->dagc));
   197	
   198		dev->rx_bytes_to_drop = rx_cfg->bytes_to_drop;
   199	
   200		/* packet config */
   201		/* enable */
   202		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_sync_enable(dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_sync));
   203		if (rx_cfg->enable_sync == optionOn)
   204		{
   205			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_fifo_fill_condition(dev->spi, afterSyncInterrupt));
   206		}
   207		else
   208		{
   209			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_fifo_fill_condition(dev->spi, always));
   210		}
   211		if (rx_cfg->enable_length_byte == optionOn)
   212			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthVar));
 > 213		else
   214			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_packet_format(dev->spi, packetLengthFix));
   215		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_adressFiltering(dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_address_filtering));
   216		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_crc_enable	    (dev->spi, rx_cfg->enable_crc));
   217	
   218		/* lengths */
   219		SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_sync_size(dev->spi, rx_cfg->sync_length));
   220		if (rx_cfg->enable_length_byte == optionOn)
   221		{
   222			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_payload_length(dev->spi, 0xff));
   223		}
   224		else if (rx_cfg->fixed_message_length != 0)
   225		{
   226			payload_length = rx_cfg->fixed_message_length;
   227			if (rx_cfg->enable_length_byte  == optionOn) payload_length++;
   228			if (rx_cfg->enable_address_filtering != filteringOff) payload_length++;
   229			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_payload_length(dev->spi, payload_length));
   230		}
   231		else
   232		{
   233			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_payload_length(dev->spi, 0));
   234		}
   235	
   236		/* values */
   237		if (rx_cfg->enable_sync == optionOn)
   238		{
   239			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_sync_values(dev->spi, rx_cfg->sync_pattern));
   240		}
   241		if (rx_cfg->enable_address_filtering != filteringOff)
   242		{
   243			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_node_address     (dev->spi, rx_cfg->node_address));
   244			SET_CHECKED(rf69_set_broadcast_address(dev->spi, rx_cfg->broadcast_address));
   245		}
   246	
   247		return 0;
   248	}
   249	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 45670 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-29 13:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-28 12:56 [PATCH] Staging: pi433: fix some warnings detected using sparse Elia Geretto
2017-07-28 14:17 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-07-29  8:30   ` Elia Geretto
2017-07-29 13:36 ` kbuild test robot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.