All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:00:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504198860-12951-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504198860-12951-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

The EFI runtime services ABI allows EFI to make free use of the
FPSIMD registers during EFI runtime service calls, subject to the
callee-save requirements of the AArch64 procedure call standard.

However, the SVE architecture allows upper bits of the SVE vector
registers to be zeroed as a side-effect of FPSIMD V-register
writes.  This means that the SVE vector registers must be saved in
their entirety in order to avoid data loss: non-SVE-aware EFI
implementations cannot restore them correctly.

The non-IRQ case is already handled gracefully by
kernel_neon_begin().  For the IRQ case, this patch allocates a
suitable per-CPU stash buffer for the full SVE register state and
uses it to preserve the affected registers around EFI calls.  It is
currently unclear how the EFI runtime services ABI will be
clarified with respect to SVE, so it safest to assume that the
predicate registers and FFR must be saved and restored too.

No attempt is made to restore the restore the vector length after
a call, for now.  It is deemed rather insane for EFI to change it,
and contemporary EFI implementations certainly won't.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

---

Changes since v1
----------------

Requested by Ard Biesheuvel:

* Fix unbalanced ifelse bracing to conform to the kernel coding style.

* Make efi_sve_state_used static.

Changes related to Alex Bennée's comments:

* Migrate away from magic numbers for SVE_VQ_BYTES.

Other:

* Rename sve_kernel_mode_neon_setup() to sve_efi_setup().
The EFI FPSIMD code is something semi-independent from kernel-mode NEON
now, so the "neon" in the names no longer really makes sense.

* Make the EFI FPSIMD setup code dependent on CONFIG_EFI (it's not
supposed to work with CONFIG_EFI=n anyway).
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index dd89acf..fff9fcf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -118,11 +118,13 @@ static int sve_default_vl = -1;
 int __ro_after_init sve_max_vl = -1;
 /* Set of available vector lengths, as vq_to_bit(vq): */
 static __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
+static void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
 
 #else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
 /* Dummy declaration for code that will be optimised out: */
 extern __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
+extern void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
 
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
@@ -447,6 +449,23 @@ int sve_verify_vq_map(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void __init sve_efi_setup(void)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * alloc_percpu() warns and prints a backtrace if this goes wrong.
+	 * This is evidence of a crippled system and we are returning void,
+	 * so no attempt is made to handle this situation here.
+	 */
+	BUG_ON(!sve_vl_valid(sve_max_vl));
+	efi_sve_state = __alloc_percpu(
+		SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(sve_max_vl)), SVE_VQ_BYTES);
+	if (!efi_sve_state)
+		panic("Cannot allocate percpu memory for EFI SVE save/restore");
+}
+
 void __init sve_setup(void)
 {
 	u64 zcr;
@@ -482,6 +501,8 @@ void __init sve_setup(void)
 		sve_max_vl);
 	pr_info("SVE: default vector length %u bytes per vector\n",
 		sve_default_vl);
+
+	sve_efi_setup();
 }
 
 void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
@@ -783,6 +804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_neon_end);
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpsimd_state, efi_fpsimd_state);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_fpsimd_state_used);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_sve_state_used);
 
 /*
  * EFI runtime services support functions
@@ -808,10 +830,24 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void)
 
 	WARN_ON(preemptible());
 
-	if (may_use_simd())
+	if (may_use_simd()) {
 		kernel_neon_begin();
-	else {
-		fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * If !efi_sve_state, SVE can't be in use yet and doesn't need
+		 * preserving:
+		 */
+		if (system_supports_sve() && likely(efi_sve_state)) {
+			char *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
+
+			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, true);
+
+			sve_save_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
+				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr);
+		} else {
+			fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+		}
+
 		__this_cpu_write(efi_fpsimd_state_used, true);
 	}
 }
@@ -824,10 +860,22 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_end(void)
 	if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
 		return;
 
-	if (__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false))
-		fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
-	else
+	if (!__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false)) {
 		kernel_neon_end();
+	} else {
+		if (system_supports_sve() &&
+		    likely(__this_cpu_read(efi_sve_state_used))) {
+			char const *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
+
+			sve_load_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
+				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr,
+				       sve_vq_from_vl(sve_get_vl()) - 1);
+
+			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, false);
+		} else {
+			fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+		}
+	}
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON */
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	"Richard Sandiford" <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:00:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504198860-12951-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170831170050.1VcY7CrJ72XaQ33UbY0fqIVJym3HDM_sMZKoANV9cCc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504198860-12951-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

The EFI runtime services ABI allows EFI to make free use of the
FPSIMD registers during EFI runtime service calls, subject to the
callee-save requirements of the AArch64 procedure call standard.

However, the SVE architecture allows upper bits of the SVE vector
registers to be zeroed as a side-effect of FPSIMD V-register
writes.  This means that the SVE vector registers must be saved in
their entirety in order to avoid data loss: non-SVE-aware EFI
implementations cannot restore them correctly.

The non-IRQ case is already handled gracefully by
kernel_neon_begin().  For the IRQ case, this patch allocates a
suitable per-CPU stash buffer for the full SVE register state and
uses it to preserve the affected registers around EFI calls.  It is
currently unclear how the EFI runtime services ABI will be
clarified with respect to SVE, so it safest to assume that the
predicate registers and FFR must be saved and restored too.

No attempt is made to restore the restore the vector length after
a call, for now.  It is deemed rather insane for EFI to change it,
and contemporary EFI implementations certainly won't.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

---

Changes since v1
----------------

Requested by Ard Biesheuvel:

* Fix unbalanced ifelse bracing to conform to the kernel coding style.

* Make efi_sve_state_used static.

Changes related to Alex Bennée's comments:

* Migrate away from magic numbers for SVE_VQ_BYTES.

Other:

* Rename sve_kernel_mode_neon_setup() to sve_efi_setup().
The EFI FPSIMD code is something semi-independent from kernel-mode NEON
now, so the "neon" in the names no longer really makes sense.

* Make the EFI FPSIMD setup code dependent on CONFIG_EFI (it's not
supposed to work with CONFIG_EFI=n anyway).
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index dd89acf..fff9fcf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -118,11 +118,13 @@ static int sve_default_vl = -1;
 int __ro_after_init sve_max_vl = -1;
 /* Set of available vector lengths, as vq_to_bit(vq): */
 static __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
+static void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
 
 #else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
 /* Dummy declaration for code that will be optimised out: */
 extern __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
+extern void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
 
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
@@ -447,6 +449,23 @@ int sve_verify_vq_map(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void __init sve_efi_setup(void)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * alloc_percpu() warns and prints a backtrace if this goes wrong.
+	 * This is evidence of a crippled system and we are returning void,
+	 * so no attempt is made to handle this situation here.
+	 */
+	BUG_ON(!sve_vl_valid(sve_max_vl));
+	efi_sve_state = __alloc_percpu(
+		SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(sve_max_vl)), SVE_VQ_BYTES);
+	if (!efi_sve_state)
+		panic("Cannot allocate percpu memory for EFI SVE save/restore");
+}
+
 void __init sve_setup(void)
 {
 	u64 zcr;
@@ -482,6 +501,8 @@ void __init sve_setup(void)
 		sve_max_vl);
 	pr_info("SVE: default vector length %u bytes per vector\n",
 		sve_default_vl);
+
+	sve_efi_setup();
 }
 
 void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
@@ -783,6 +804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_neon_end);
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpsimd_state, efi_fpsimd_state);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_fpsimd_state_used);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_sve_state_used);
 
 /*
  * EFI runtime services support functions
@@ -808,10 +830,24 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void)
 
 	WARN_ON(preemptible());
 
-	if (may_use_simd())
+	if (may_use_simd()) {
 		kernel_neon_begin();
-	else {
-		fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * If !efi_sve_state, SVE can't be in use yet and doesn't need
+		 * preserving:
+		 */
+		if (system_supports_sve() && likely(efi_sve_state)) {
+			char *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
+
+			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, true);
+
+			sve_save_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
+				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr);
+		} else {
+			fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+		}
+
 		__this_cpu_write(efi_fpsimd_state_used, true);
 	}
 }
@@ -824,10 +860,22 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_end(void)
 	if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
 		return;
 
-	if (__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false))
-		fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
-	else
+	if (!__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false)) {
 		kernel_neon_end();
+	} else {
+		if (system_supports_sve() &&
+		    likely(__this_cpu_read(efi_sve_state_used))) {
+			char const *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
+
+			sve_load_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
+				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr,
+				       sve_vq_from_vl(sve_get_vl()) - 1);
+
+			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, false);
+		} else {
+			fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+		}
+	}
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON */
-- 
2.1.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:00:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504198860-12951-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504198860-12951-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

The EFI runtime services ABI allows EFI to make free use of the
FPSIMD registers during EFI runtime service calls, subject to the
callee-save requirements of the AArch64 procedure call standard.

However, the SVE architecture allows upper bits of the SVE vector
registers to be zeroed as a side-effect of FPSIMD V-register
writes.  This means that the SVE vector registers must be saved in
their entirety in order to avoid data loss: non-SVE-aware EFI
implementations cannot restore them correctly.

The non-IRQ case is already handled gracefully by
kernel_neon_begin().  For the IRQ case, this patch allocates a
suitable per-CPU stash buffer for the full SVE register state and
uses it to preserve the affected registers around EFI calls.  It is
currently unclear how the EFI runtime services ABI will be
clarified with respect to SVE, so it safest to assume that the
predicate registers and FFR must be saved and restored too.

No attempt is made to restore the restore the vector length after
a call, for now.  It is deemed rather insane for EFI to change it,
and contemporary EFI implementations certainly won't.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

---

Changes since v1
----------------

Requested by Ard Biesheuvel:

* Fix unbalanced ifelse bracing to conform to the kernel coding style.

* Make efi_sve_state_used static.

Changes related to Alex Benn?e's comments:

* Migrate away from magic numbers for SVE_VQ_BYTES.

Other:

* Rename sve_kernel_mode_neon_setup() to sve_efi_setup().
The EFI FPSIMD code is something semi-independent from kernel-mode NEON
now, so the "neon" in the names no longer really makes sense.

* Make the EFI FPSIMD setup code dependent on CONFIG_EFI (it's not
supposed to work with CONFIG_EFI=n anyway).
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index dd89acf..fff9fcf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -118,11 +118,13 @@ static int sve_default_vl = -1;
 int __ro_after_init sve_max_vl = -1;
 /* Set of available vector lengths, as vq_to_bit(vq): */
 static __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
+static void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
 
 #else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
 /* Dummy declaration for code that will be optimised out: */
 extern __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
+extern void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
 
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
@@ -447,6 +449,23 @@ int sve_verify_vq_map(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void __init sve_efi_setup(void)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * alloc_percpu() warns and prints a backtrace if this goes wrong.
+	 * This is evidence of a crippled system and we are returning void,
+	 * so no attempt is made to handle this situation here.
+	 */
+	BUG_ON(!sve_vl_valid(sve_max_vl));
+	efi_sve_state = __alloc_percpu(
+		SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(sve_max_vl)), SVE_VQ_BYTES);
+	if (!efi_sve_state)
+		panic("Cannot allocate percpu memory for EFI SVE save/restore");
+}
+
 void __init sve_setup(void)
 {
 	u64 zcr;
@@ -482,6 +501,8 @@ void __init sve_setup(void)
 		sve_max_vl);
 	pr_info("SVE: default vector length %u bytes per vector\n",
 		sve_default_vl);
+
+	sve_efi_setup();
 }
 
 void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
@@ -783,6 +804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_neon_end);
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpsimd_state, efi_fpsimd_state);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_fpsimd_state_used);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_sve_state_used);
 
 /*
  * EFI runtime services support functions
@@ -808,10 +830,24 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void)
 
 	WARN_ON(preemptible());
 
-	if (may_use_simd())
+	if (may_use_simd()) {
 		kernel_neon_begin();
-	else {
-		fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * If !efi_sve_state, SVE can't be in use yet and doesn't need
+		 * preserving:
+		 */
+		if (system_supports_sve() && likely(efi_sve_state)) {
+			char *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
+
+			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, true);
+
+			sve_save_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
+				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr);
+		} else {
+			fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+		}
+
 		__this_cpu_write(efi_fpsimd_state_used, true);
 	}
 }
@@ -824,10 +860,22 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_end(void)
 	if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
 		return;
 
-	if (__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false))
-		fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
-	else
+	if (!__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false)) {
 		kernel_neon_end();
+	} else {
+		if (system_supports_sve() &&
+		    likely(__this_cpu_read(efi_sve_state_used))) {
+			char const *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
+
+			sve_load_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
+				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr,
+				       sve_vq_from_vl(sve_get_vl()) - 1);
+
+			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, false);
+		} else {
+			fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
+		}
+	}
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON */
-- 
2.1.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-31 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 224+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-31 17:00 [PATCH v2 00/28] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:37   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 14:37     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 14:37     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-15  0:04     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-15  0:04       ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set,clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` [PATCH v2 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:48   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 14:48     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 14:48     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 15:39   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 15:39     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 15:39     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 13:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 13:36     ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 21:33     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 21:33       ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 13:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 13:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:21     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 19:21       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 19:21       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 10:47       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 10:47         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:04         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-05 11:04           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-05 11:22           ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:22             ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:33   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 14:33     ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:55     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 19:55       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 13:58       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-20 13:58         ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-03 11:11         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-03 11:11           ` Dave Martin
2017-10-04 17:29           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-04 17:29             ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-03 11:33     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-03 11:33       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:28       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 11:28         ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 13:10         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 13:10           ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 13:36           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 13:36             ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 15:15             ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:15               ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:33               ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 15:33                 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 17:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 17:26     ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:17     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 19:17       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 22:21       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 22:21         ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:40         ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 19:40           ` Dave Martin
2017-09-19 17:13           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-19 17:13             ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14  8:47   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  8:47     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  8:47     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14  9:30   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:30     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:30     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 17:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 17:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:06     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 19:06       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 22:11       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 22:11         ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 16:42         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:42           ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:53           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 16:53             ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 17:04             ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 17:04               ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 10:57   ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 10:57     ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 10:59   ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 10:59     ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 11:09     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 11:09       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 18:08       ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 18:08         ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-21 11:19         ` Dave Martin
2017-09-21 11:19           ` Dave Martin
2017-09-21 11:57           ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-21 11:57             ` Alan Hayward
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14  9:33   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:33     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:33     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:35   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-09-14  9:35     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14  9:45   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:45     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:45     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 14:22     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-28 14:22       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-28 17:32       ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 17:32         ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 17:32         ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 10:52   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 10:52     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 10:52     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2017-08-31 17:00   ` [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 11:01   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 11:01     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 11:01     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-06 16:21   ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-06 16:21     ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-06 18:16     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-06 18:16       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-07  5:11       ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-07  5:11         ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-07  5:11         ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-08 13:11         ` Dave Martin
2017-09-08 13:11           ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 12:57   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 12:57     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 12:57     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 14:57     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-28 14:57       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 12:46     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 12:46       ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:02   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:02     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:02     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:05   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:05     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:05     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:28   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:28     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:28     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:30   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:30     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:30     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:31   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:31     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:31     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-29 13:00     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 13:00       ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 14:43       ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-29 14:43         ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-29 14:43         ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:32   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:32     ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:32     ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:39   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-05 16:39     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-05 17:02     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 17:02       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:43   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-06 15:43     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-06 17:37     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 17:37       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09  9:34       ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09  9:34         ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09  9:34         ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09  9:49         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09  9:49           ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09 14:07           ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 14:07             ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 14:07             ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 16:20             ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09 16:20               ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00   ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/28] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:01   ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1504198860-12951-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.