* [PATCH 2/2] HAX Enable GuC Submission for CI
2017-11-24 13:37 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
@ 2017-11-24 13:37 ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-11-24 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Also:
Revert "drm/i915/guc: Assert that we switch between known ggtt->invalidate functions"
This reverts commit 04f7b24eccdfae680a36e9825fe0d61dcd5ed528.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 8 ++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 41a203e0c160..5e8614fd390b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -3590,17 +3590,13 @@ int i915_ggtt_enable_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
void i915_ggtt_enable_guc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915->ggtt.invalidate != gen6_ggtt_invalidate);
-
i915->ggtt.invalidate = guc_ggtt_invalidate;
}
void i915_ggtt_disable_guc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
- /* We should only be called after i915_ggtt_enable_guc() */
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915->ggtt.invalidate != guc_ggtt_invalidate);
-
- i915->ggtt.invalidate = gen6_ggtt_invalidate;
+ if (i915->ggtt.invalidate == guc_ggtt_invalidate)
+ i915->ggtt.invalidate = gen6_ggtt_invalidate;
}
void i915_gem_restore_gtt_mappings(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
index 8321bd86cba5..69ee2484c6bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
param(int, disable_power_well, -1) \
param(int, enable_ips, 1) \
param(int, invert_brightness, 0) \
- param(int, enable_guc_loading, 0) \
- param(int, enable_guc_submission, 0) \
+ param(int, enable_guc_loading, 1) \
+ param(int, enable_guc_submission, 1) \
param(int, guc_log_level, -1) \
param(char *, guc_firmware_path, NULL) \
param(char *, huc_firmware_path, NULL) \
--
2.15.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
2017-11-24 13:37 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
2017-11-24 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] HAX Enable GuC Submission for CI Chris Wilson
@ 2017-11-24 13:43 ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-24 13:50 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-24 13:48 ` Mika Kuoppala
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-11-24 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-11-24 13:37:44)
> Our execlist emulation is intended to only use a maximum of 2 ports per
> engine, so as to not overflow the wq. (By knowing the limits, we can
> avoid having to handle the wq exhaustion.) However, upon adding
> preemption, we lost the skip over the first port if set for the
> non-preemption path. Restore it.
>
> Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: c41937fd994a ("drm/i915/guc: Preemption! With GuC")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> index cbf5a96f5806..70e64bdb73dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -743,23 +743,26 @@ static void guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (!rb)
> goto unlock;
>
> - if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915) && port_isset(port)) {
> - struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> - &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
> -
> - if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
> - max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
> - execlists_set_active(execlists,
> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> - queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
> - &preempt_work->work);
> - goto unlock;
> - } else if (port_isset(last_port)) {
> - goto unlock;
> + if (port_isset(port)) {
> + if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915)) {
> + struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> + &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
> +
> + if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
> + max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
> + execlists_set_active(execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> + queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
> + &preempt_work->work);
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> }
>
> port++;
> + if (port_isset(port))
You probably want to stick with last_port, or at least Mika will want to
make it last_port again after he expands ELSP[] and propagates all the
changes.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
2017-11-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
@ 2017-11-24 13:50 ` Mika Kuoppala
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-11-24 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-11-24 13:37:44)
>> Our execlist emulation is intended to only use a maximum of 2 ports per
>> engine, so as to not overflow the wq. (By knowing the limits, we can
>> avoid having to handle the wq exhaustion.) However, upon adding
>> preemption, we lost the skip over the first port if set for the
>> non-preemption path. Restore it.
>>
>> Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>> Fixes: c41937fd994a ("drm/i915/guc: Preemption! With GuC")
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
>> index cbf5a96f5806..70e64bdb73dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -743,23 +743,26 @@ static void guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>> if (!rb)
>> goto unlock;
>>
>> - if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915) && port_isset(port)) {
>> - struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
>> - &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
>> -
>> - if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
>> - max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
>> - execlists_set_active(execlists,
>> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
>> - queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
>> - &preempt_work->work);
>> - goto unlock;
>> - } else if (port_isset(last_port)) {
>> - goto unlock;
>> + if (port_isset(port)) {
>> + if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915)) {
>> + struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
>> + &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
>> +
>> + if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
>> + max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
>> + execlists_set_active(execlists,
>> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
>> + queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
>> + &preempt_work->work);
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> port++;
>> + if (port_isset(port))
>
> You probably want to stick with last_port, or at least Mika will want to
> make it last_port again after he expands ELSP[] and propagates all the
> changes.
This looks cleaner this way. We can always bring it back if it truely
helps readability. There has been too much last_port == port[1]
assumptions to tackle with.
-Mika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
2017-11-24 13:37 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
2017-11-24 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] HAX Enable GuC Submission for CI Chris Wilson
2017-11-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
@ 2017-11-24 13:48 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-11-24 14:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-11-24 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Our execlist emulation is intended to only use a maximum of 2 ports per
> engine, so as to not overflow the wq. (By knowing the limits, we can
> avoid having to handle the wq exhaustion.) However, upon adding
> preemption, we lost the skip over the first port if set for the
> non-preemption path. Restore it.
>
> Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: c41937fd994a ("drm/i915/guc: Preemption! With GuC")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Now it makes sense to me. You might want a stamp from Michał too.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> index cbf5a96f5806..70e64bdb73dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -743,23 +743,26 @@ static void guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (!rb)
> goto unlock;
>
> - if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915) && port_isset(port)) {
> - struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> - &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
> -
> - if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
> - max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
> - execlists_set_active(execlists,
> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> - queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
> - &preempt_work->work);
> - goto unlock;
> - } else if (port_isset(last_port)) {
> - goto unlock;
> + if (port_isset(port)) {
> + if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915)) {
> + struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> + &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
> +
> + if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
> + max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
> + execlists_set_active(execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> + queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
> + &preempt_work->work);
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> }
>
> port++;
> + if (port_isset(port))
> + goto unlock;
> }
> + GEM_BUG_ON(port_isset(port));
>
> do {
> struct i915_priolist *p = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*p), node);
> --
> 2.15.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
2017-11-24 13:37 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-11-24 13:48 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-11-24 14:16 ` Patchwork
2017-11-24 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Michał Winiarski
2017-11-24 17:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-11-24 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34361/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 34361v1 series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/34361/revisions/1/mbox/
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-snb-2520m) fdo#103713
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:445s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:455s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:382s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:541s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:277s
fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:504s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:510s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:502s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:491s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:428s
fi-gdg-551 total:289 pass:178 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:109 time:265s
fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:543s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:428s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:438s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:425s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:473s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:462s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:481s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:520s
fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:478s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:527s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:576s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:456s
fi-skl-6600u total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:539s
fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:563s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:524s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:494s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:457s
fi-snb-2520m total:246 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:422s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:610s
fi-glk-dsi total:289 pass:156 dwarn:0 dfail:10 fail:2 skip:121 time:373s
fi-cnl-y failed to connect after reboot
99e3e01d35c95de2392d7f5796f3086cb13b441a drm-tip: 2017y-11m-24d-13h-20m-57s UTC integration manifest
b9f468eb29d4 HAX Enable GuC Submission for CI
927a4b8c8c74 drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7281/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
2017-11-24 13:37 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-11-24 14:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
@ 2017-11-24 15:11 ` Michał Winiarski
2017-11-24 17:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michał Winiarski @ 2017-11-24 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:37:44PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Our execlist emulation is intended to only use a maximum of 2 ports per
> engine, so as to not overflow the wq. (By knowing the limits, we can
> avoid having to handle the wq exhaustion.) However, upon adding
> preemption, we lost the skip over the first port if set for the
> non-preemption path. Restore it.
>
> Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: c41937fd994a ("drm/i915/guc: Preemption! With GuC")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
-Michał
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> index cbf5a96f5806..70e64bdb73dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -743,23 +743,26 @@ static void guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (!rb)
> goto unlock;
>
> - if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915) && port_isset(port)) {
> - struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> - &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
> -
> - if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
> - max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
> - execlists_set_active(execlists,
> - EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> - queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
> - &preempt_work->work);
> - goto unlock;
> - } else if (port_isset(last_port)) {
> - goto unlock;
> + if (port_isset(port)) {
> + if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(engine->i915)) {
> + struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> + &engine->i915->guc.preempt_work[engine->id];
> +
> + if (rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node)->priority >
> + max(port_request(port)->priotree.priority, 0)) {
> + execlists_set_active(execlists,
> + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
> + queue_work(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq,
> + &preempt_work->work);
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> }
>
> port++;
> + if (port_isset(port))
> + goto unlock;
> }
> + GEM_BUG_ON(port_isset(port));
>
> do {
> struct i915_priolist *p = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*p), node);
> --
> 2.15.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
2017-11-24 13:37 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting Chris Wilson
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-11-24 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Michał Winiarski
@ 2017-11-24 17:02 ` Patchwork
2017-11-24 17:11 ` Chris Wilson
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-11-24 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/guc: Advance over port[0] if set and not preempting
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34361/
State : success
== Summary ==
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-render:
fail -> PASS (shard-snb) fdo#101623 +1
Test gem_busy:
Subgroup close-race:
fail -> PASS (shard-snb) fdo#103829
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
fdo#103829 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103829
shard-hsw total:2667 pass:1535 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:10 skip:1121 time:9535s
shard-snb total:2667 pass:1311 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:13 skip:1342 time:8031s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl total:2667 pass:1660 dwarn:6 dfail:3 fail:43 skip:955 time:12343s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7281/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread