* [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
@ 2018-01-15 16:00 Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 16:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-01-15 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
index ea01d0fe3ace..599063fc3b37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
#include "../i915_selftest.h"
+#include "../i915_utils.h"
static int __i915_sw_fence_call
fence_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
@@ -606,6 +607,143 @@ static int test_timer(void *arg)
return -EINVAL;
}
+static const char *mock_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+ return "mock";
+}
+
+static bool mock_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static const struct dma_fence_ops mock_fence_ops = {
+ .get_driver_name = mock_name,
+ .get_timeline_name = mock_name,
+ .enable_signaling = mock_enable_signaling,
+ .wait = dma_fence_default_wait,
+ .release = dma_fence_free,
+};
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mock_fence_lock);
+
+static struct dma_fence *alloc_dma_fence(void)
+{
+ struct dma_fence *dma;
+
+ dma = kmalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (dma)
+ dma_fence_init(dma, &mock_fence_ops, &mock_fence_lock, 0, 0);
+
+ return dma;
+}
+
+static struct i915_sw_fence *
+wrap_dma_fence(struct dma_fence *dma, unsigned long delay)
+{
+ struct i915_sw_fence *fence;
+ int err;
+
+ fence = alloc_fence();
+ if (!fence)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ err = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(fence, dma, delay, GFP_NOWAIT);
+ i915_sw_fence_commit(fence);
+ if (err) {
+ free_fence(fence);
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+ }
+
+ return fence;
+}
+
+static int test_dma_fence(void *arg)
+{
+ struct i915_sw_fence *timeout = NULL, *not = NULL;
+ struct dma_fence *dma;
+ unsigned long delay;
+ int err;
+
+ for_each_prime_number(delay, i915_selftest.timeout_jiffies/2) {
+ unsigned long end = jiffies + delay;
+ unsigned long sleep;
+
+ dma = alloc_dma_fence();
+ if (!dma)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ timeout = wrap_dma_fence(dma, delay);
+ if (IS_ERR(timeout)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(timeout);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ not = wrap_dma_fence(dma, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(not)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(not);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ if (i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("Fences immediately signaled\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(delay) / 2;
+ usleep_range(sleep, sleep);
+ if (time_after(jiffies, end)) {
+ pr_debug("Slept too long skipping pass, delay=%lu\n",
+ delay);
+ goto skip;
+ }
+
+ if (i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("Fences signaled too early\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ do {
+ sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(end - jiffies + 1);
+ usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
+ } while (time_before(jiffies, end));
+
+ if (i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("No tiemout fence signaled!\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout)) {
+ pr_err("Tiemout fence unsignaled!\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+skip:
+ dma_fence_signal(dma);
+
+ if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || !i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("Fences unsignaled\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ free_fence(fetch_and_zero(¬));
+ free_fence(fetch_and_zero(&timeout));
+ dma_fence_put(dma);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err:
+ dma_fence_signal(dma);
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(timeout))
+ free_fence(timeout);
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(not))
+ free_fence(not);
+ dma_fence_put(dma);
+ return err;
+}
+
int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
{
static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
@@ -618,6 +756,7 @@ int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
SUBTEST(test_chain),
SUBTEST(test_ipc),
SUBTEST(test_timer),
+ SUBTEST(test_dma_fence),
};
return i915_subtests(tests, NULL);
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-15 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop Chris Wilson
@ 2018-01-15 16:45 ` Patchwork
2018-01-15 19:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-01-15 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36493/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 36493v1 drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/36493/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_mmap_gtt:
Subgroup basic-small-bo-tiledx:
fail -> PASS (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102575
fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:416s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:427s
fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:371s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:483s
fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:280s
fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:484s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:484s
fi-byt-j1900 total:288 pass:253 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:475s
fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:456s
fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:168 dwarn:9 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:45
fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:108 time:276s
fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:514s
fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:390s
fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:400s
fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:463s
fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:255 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 time:416s
fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:457s
fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:494s
fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:451s
fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:502s
fi-pnv-d510 total:288 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:578s
fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:439s
fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:509s
fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:530s
fi-skl-6700k2 total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:489s
fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:496s
fi-snb-2520m total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:527s
fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:405s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:571s
fi-glk-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:469s
37eb04c6fe0cb220563d14430cd9cdec7be0138e drm-tip: 2018y-01m-15d-14h-18m-36s UTC integration manifest
6155b7b95f8b drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7675/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-15 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 16:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2018-01-15 19:31 ` Patchwork
2018-01-15 20:25 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-01-15 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36493/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Test drv_selftest:
Subgroup mock_fence:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (shard-snb)
pass -> INCOMPLETE (shard-hsw)
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible:
pass -> FAIL (shard-snb) fdo#100368
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
shard-hsw total:2682 pass:1505 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:10 skip:1166 time:9014s
shard-snb total:2682 pass:1275 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:11 skip:1395 time:7853s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl total:2682 pass:1655 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:23 skip:1003 time:13218s
shard-kbl total:2672 pass:1776 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:23 skip:871 time:10159s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7675/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-15 19:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2018-01-15 20:25 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-01-15 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patchwork; +Cc: intel-gfx
Quoting Patchwork (2018-01-15 19:31:14)
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36493/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Test drv_selftest:
> Subgroup mock_fence:
> pass -> INCOMPLETE (shard-snb)
> pass -> INCOMPLETE (shard-hsw)
When testing, I didn't apply the patch!
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-15 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 16:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-01-15 19:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2018-01-15 20:43 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-15 21:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2) Patchwork
2018-01-15 21:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-01-15 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
v2: Account for the rounding up of the timeout to the next second.
Unfortunately, the minimum delay is then 1 second.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
index ea01d0fe3ace..b51319677110 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
#include "../i915_selftest.h"
+#include "../i915_utils.h"
static int __i915_sw_fence_call
fence_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
@@ -606,6 +607,141 @@ static int test_timer(void *arg)
return -EINVAL;
}
+static const char *mock_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+ return "mock";
+}
+
+static bool mock_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static const struct dma_fence_ops mock_fence_ops = {
+ .get_driver_name = mock_name,
+ .get_timeline_name = mock_name,
+ .enable_signaling = mock_enable_signaling,
+ .wait = dma_fence_default_wait,
+ .release = dma_fence_free,
+};
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mock_fence_lock);
+
+static struct dma_fence *alloc_dma_fence(void)
+{
+ struct dma_fence *dma;
+
+ dma = kmalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (dma)
+ dma_fence_init(dma, &mock_fence_ops, &mock_fence_lock, 0, 0);
+
+ return dma;
+}
+
+static struct i915_sw_fence *
+wrap_dma_fence(struct dma_fence *dma, unsigned long delay)
+{
+ struct i915_sw_fence *fence;
+ int err;
+
+ fence = alloc_fence();
+ if (!fence)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ err = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(fence, dma, delay, GFP_NOWAIT);
+ i915_sw_fence_commit(fence);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ free_fence(fence);
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+ }
+
+ return fence;
+}
+
+static int test_dma_fence(void *arg)
+{
+ struct i915_sw_fence *timeout = NULL, *not = NULL;
+ unsigned long delay = i915_selftest.timeout_jiffies;
+ unsigned long end, sleep;
+ struct dma_fence *dma;
+ int err;
+
+ dma = alloc_dma_fence();
+ if (!dma)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ timeout = wrap_dma_fence(dma, delay);
+ if (IS_ERR(timeout)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(timeout);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ not = wrap_dma_fence(dma, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(not)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(not);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ if (i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("Fences immediately signaled\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* We round the timeout for the fence up to the next second */
+ end = round_jiffies_up(jiffies + delay);
+
+ sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(delay) / 3;
+ usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
+ if (time_after(jiffies, end)) {
+ pr_debug("Slept too long, delay=%lu, skipping!\n", delay);
+ goto skip;
+ }
+
+ if (i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("Fences signaled too early\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ do {
+ sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(end - jiffies + 1);
+ usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
+ } while (!time_after(jiffies, end));
+
+ if (i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("No tiemout fence signaled!\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout)) {
+ pr_err("Timeout fence unsignaled!\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+skip:
+ dma_fence_signal(dma);
+
+ if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || !i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
+ pr_err("Fences unsignaled\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ free_fence(fetch_and_zero(¬));
+ free_fence(fetch_and_zero(&timeout));
+ dma_fence_put(dma);
+
+ return 0;
+
+err:
+ dma_fence_signal(dma);
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(timeout))
+ free_fence(timeout);
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(not))
+ free_fence(not);
+ dma_fence_put(dma);
+ return err;
+}
+
int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
{
static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
@@ -618,6 +754,7 @@ int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
SUBTEST(test_chain),
SUBTEST(test_ipc),
SUBTEST(test_timer),
+ SUBTEST(test_dma_fence),
};
return i915_subtests(tests, NULL);
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2)
2018-01-15 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-01-15 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-01-15 21:05 ` Patchwork
2018-01-15 21:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-01-15 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36493/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 36493v2 drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/36493/revisions/2/mbox/
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-kbl-r) fdo#104172 +1
fdo#104172 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:423s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:424s
fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:373s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:492s
fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:281s
fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:483s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:490s
fi-byt-j1900 total:288 pass:253 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:476s
fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:460s
fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:168 dwarn:9 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:45
fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:179 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:108 time:279s
fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:517s
fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:393s
fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:410s
fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:453s
fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:255 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 time:412s
fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:460s
fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:500s
fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:451s
fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:505s
fi-pnv-d510 total:288 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:579s
fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:428s
fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:509s
fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:533s
fi-skl-6700k2 total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:486s
fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:499s
fi-snb-2520m total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:533s
fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:401s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:572s
fi-glk-dsi total:288 pass:257 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30 time:471s
37eb04c6fe0cb220563d14430cd9cdec7be0138e drm-tip: 2018y-01m-15d-14h-18m-36s UTC integration manifest
9595f1e7c0d3 drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7676/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2)
2018-01-15 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop Chris Wilson
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-01-15 21:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2018-01-15 21:50 ` Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-01-15 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36493/
State : success
== Summary ==
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-render:
pass -> FAIL (shard-snb) fdo#101623
Test gem_softpin:
Subgroup noreloc-s4:
fail -> SKIP (shard-snb) fdo#103375
Test kms_setmode:
Subgroup basic:
fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
fdo#103375 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
shard-hsw total:2723 pass:1547 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:9 skip:1166 time:9195s
shard-snb total:2723 pass:1316 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:10 skip:1396 time:8020s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl total:2646 pass:1648 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:22 skip:974 time:13157s
shard-kbl total:2713 pass:1799 dwarn:15 dfail:0 fail:23 skip:875 time:10345s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7676/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-15 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-01-16 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:05 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 10:50 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2018-01-16 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On 15/01/2018 20:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
> i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
>
> v2: Account for the rounding up of the timeout to the next second.
> Unfortunately, the minimum delay is then 1 second.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
> index ea01d0fe3ace..b51319677110 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
>
> #include "../i915_selftest.h"
> +#include "../i915_utils.h"
>
> static int __i915_sw_fence_call
> fence_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
> @@ -606,6 +607,141 @@ static int test_timer(void *arg)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static const char *mock_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> + return "mock";
> +}
> +
> +static bool mock_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dma_fence_ops mock_fence_ops = {
> + .get_driver_name = mock_name,
> + .get_timeline_name = mock_name,
> + .enable_signaling = mock_enable_signaling,
> + .wait = dma_fence_default_wait,
> + .release = dma_fence_free,
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mock_fence_lock);
> +
> +static struct dma_fence *alloc_dma_fence(void)
> +{
> + struct dma_fence *dma;
> +
> + dma = kmalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (dma)
> + dma_fence_init(dma, &mock_fence_ops, &mock_fence_lock, 0, 0);
> +
> + return dma;
> +}
> +
> +static struct i915_sw_fence *
> +wrap_dma_fence(struct dma_fence *dma, unsigned long delay)
await_dma_fence?
> +{
> + struct i915_sw_fence *fence;
> + int err;
> +
> + fence = alloc_fence();
> + if (!fence)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + err = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(fence, dma, delay, GFP_NOWAIT);
> + i915_sw_fence_commit(fence);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + free_fence(fence);
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + }
> +
> + return fence;
> +}
> +
> +static int test_dma_fence(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct i915_sw_fence *timeout = NULL, *not = NULL;
> + unsigned long delay = i915_selftest.timeout_jiffies;
> + unsigned long end, sleep;
> + struct dma_fence *dma;
> + int err;
> +
> + dma = alloc_dma_fence();
> + if (!dma)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + timeout = wrap_dma_fence(dma, delay);
> + if (IS_ERR(timeout)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(timeout);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + not = wrap_dma_fence(dma, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(not)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(not);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + if (i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> + pr_err("Fences immediately signaled\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* We round the timeout for the fence up to the next second */
> + end = round_jiffies_up(jiffies + delay);
> +
> + sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(delay) / 3;
> + usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
> + if (time_after(jiffies, end)) {
> + pr_debug("Slept too long, delay=%lu, skipping!\n", delay);
> + goto skip;
> + }
> +
> + if (i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> + pr_err("Fences signaled too early\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + do {
> + sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(end - jiffies + 1);
> + usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
> + } while (!time_after(jiffies, end));
> +
> + if (i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> + pr_err("No tiemout fence signaled!\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout)) {
> + pr_err("Timeout fence unsignaled!\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> +skip:
> + dma_fence_signal(dma);
> +
> + if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || !i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> + pr_err("Fences unsignaled\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + free_fence(fetch_and_zero(¬));
> + free_fence(fetch_and_zero(&timeout));
A bit of an overkill with fetch_and_zero.
> + dma_fence_put(dma);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + dma_fence_signal(dma);
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(timeout))
> + free_fence(timeout);
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(not))
> + free_fence(not);
> + dma_fence_put(dma);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
> {
> static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> @@ -618,6 +754,7 @@ int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
> SUBTEST(test_chain),
> SUBTEST(test_ipc),
> SUBTEST(test_timer),
> + SUBTEST(test_dma_fence),
> };
>
> return i915_subtests(tests, NULL);
>
Looks OK anyway.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-16 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
@ 2018-01-16 10:05 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 10:50 ` Chris Wilson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-01-16 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-16 09:48:48)
>
> On 15/01/2018 20:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > +static struct dma_fence *alloc_dma_fence(void)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_fence *dma;
> > +
> > + dma = kmalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (dma)
> > + dma_fence_init(dma, &mock_fence_ops, &mock_fence_lock, 0, 0);
> > +
> > + return dma;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct i915_sw_fence *
> > +wrap_dma_fence(struct dma_fence *dma, unsigned long delay)
>
> await_dma_fence?
Hmm, but no, I think I prefer having the distinction that this is
creating a i915_sw_fence rather than attaching it to an existing fence,
which is what the await routines do.
[snip]
> > +skip:
> > + dma_fence_signal(dma);
> > +
> > + if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout) || !i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> > + pr_err("Fences unsignaled\n");
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + free_fence(fetch_and_zero(¬));
> > + free_fence(fetch_and_zero(&timeout));
>
> A bit of an overkill with fetch_and_zero.
'Twas forgotten leftovers.
> > + dma_fence_put(dma);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err:
> > + dma_fence_signal(dma);
> > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(timeout))
> > + free_fence(timeout);
> > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(not))
> > + free_fence(not);
> > + dma_fence_put(dma);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
> > {
> > static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> > @@ -618,6 +754,7 @@ int i915_sw_fence_mock_selftests(void)
> > SUBTEST(test_chain),
> > SUBTEST(test_ipc),
> > SUBTEST(test_timer),
> > + SUBTEST(test_dma_fence),
> > };
> >
> > return i915_subtests(tests, NULL);
> >
>
> Looks OK anyway.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Ta,
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop
2018-01-16 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:05 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2018-01-16 10:50 ` Chris Wilson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-01-16 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-16 09:48:48)
>
> On 15/01/2018 20:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Check that we can successfully wait upon a dma_fence using the
> > i915_sw_fence, including the optional timeout mechanism.
> >
> > v2: Account for the rounding up of the timeout to the next second.
> > Unfortunately, the minimum delay is then 1 second.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> > ---
> Looks OK anyway.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixed up the overkill, and pushed. Thanks for the suggestion and
reviewing, (Also included the comment rewrite in the push as a bonus.)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-16 10:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-15 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 16:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-01-15 19:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-01-15 20:25 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-16 10:05 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-16 10:50 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-15 21:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Test i915_sw_fence/dma_fence interop (rev2) Patchwork
2018-01-15 21:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.