All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com>,
	Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update ASPEED entry with details
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:41:07 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519344667.1024159.1280347184.36AD3FEC@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23b668f1-ab4b-7ef3-ba1e-f252fbba4d1b@linux.intel.com>

Hi Haiyue,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Wang, Haiyue wrote:
> Dear Andrew & Joel,
> 
> Since you are ASPEED BMC experts, any time and interest in eSPI code 
> review ? I've sent
> 
> it before, but no more response. Intel recommends eSPI bus than LPC as I 
> know. I just kept
> 
> the minimal eSPI code which is approved to work well in our real server 
> boards for two more
> 
> years. Other part of eSPI driver from ASPEED's SDK  has been removed, 
> because ePSI is a new
> 
> thing, we only use a small feature set like booting host.
> 
> We Intel submit this eSPI patch for openbmc upstreaming, hope for your 
> response. :-)
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10166577/
> 

There are some comments against the v1 that you linked to above, is there a v2 on the lists?

Separately it's better to ping us by replying to the patch itself and putting us in To/Cc, that way we keep discussions focused on the patch at hand here.

Cheers,

Andrew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: andrew@aj.id.au (Andrew Jeffery)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update ASPEED entry with details
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:41:07 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519344667.1024159.1280347184.36AD3FEC@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23b668f1-ab4b-7ef3-ba1e-f252fbba4d1b@linux.intel.com>

Hi Haiyue,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Wang, Haiyue wrote:
> Dear Andrew & Joel,
> 
> Since you are ASPEED BMC experts, any time and interest in eSPI code 
> review ? I've sent
> 
> it before, but no more response. Intel recommends eSPI bus than LPC as I 
> know. I just kept
> 
> the minimal eSPI code which is approved to work well in our real server 
> boards for two more
> 
> years. Other part of eSPI driver from ASPEED's SDK? has been removed, 
> because ePSI is a new
> 
> thing, we only use a small feature set like booting host.
> 
> We Intel submit this eSPI patch for openbmc upstreaming, hope for your 
> response. :-)
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10166577/
> 

There are some comments against the v1 that you linked to above, is there a v2 on the lists?

Separately it's better to ping us by replying to the patch itself and putting us in To/Cc, that way we keep discussions focused on the patch at hand here.

Cheers,

Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-23  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22  5:03 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update ASPEED entry with details Joel Stanley
2018-02-22  5:03 ` Joel Stanley
2018-02-22  8:39 ` Andrew Jeffery
2018-02-22  8:39   ` Andrew Jeffery
2018-02-22  8:50   ` Wang, Haiyue
2018-02-22  8:50     ` Wang, Haiyue
2018-02-23  0:11     ` Andrew Jeffery [this message]
2018-02-23  0:11       ` Andrew Jeffery
2018-02-23  1:44       ` Wang, Haiyue
2018-02-23  1:44         ` Wang, Haiyue
2018-04-11  4:06 ` Joel Stanley
2018-04-11  4:06   ` Joel Stanley
2018-04-11  8:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11  8:51     ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11  9:24     ` Joel Stanley
2018-04-11  9:24       ` Joel Stanley
2018-04-11 12:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11 12:05         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1519344667.1024159.1280347184.36AD3FEC@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.