All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:39:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152053079645.18139.17582007008375507046@mail.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da0d0b28-8abf-4cdf-951f-94f043c6a292@intel.com>

Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-03-08 17:33:11)
> 
> 
> On 07/03/18 17:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-03-08 00:55:47)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/03/18 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>> +     gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> >>
> >> Check frequency has gone back to ~min.
> > 
> > It's not that interesting a test (covered already by pmu) as we
> > essentially lie anyway over idle.
> 
> Agreed.

I should mention somewhere the reason for all the gem_quiescent_gpu()
spam here is because I want to make sure that no stray waitboosts affect
the measurements.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:39:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152053079645.18139.17582007008375507046@mail.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da0d0b28-8abf-4cdf-951f-94f043c6a292@intel.com>

Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-03-08 17:33:11)
> 
> 
> On 07/03/18 17:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-03-08 00:55:47)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/03/18 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>> +     gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> >>
> >> Check frequency has gone back to ~min.
> > 
> > It's not that interesting a test (covered already by pmu) as we
> > essentially lie anyway over idle.
> 
> Agreed.

I should mention somewhere the reason for all the gem_quiescent_gpu()
spam here is because I want to make sure that no stray waitboosts affect
the measurements.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-08 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-07 22:49 [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Chris Wilson
2018-03-07 22:49 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-07 23:00 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2018-03-08  0:13 ` [PATCH igt] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-08  0:13   ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-08  0:42 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx (rev2) Patchwork
2018-03-08  0:55 ` [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-08  0:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-08  1:18   ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-08  1:18     ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 17:33     ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-08 17:33       ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-08 17:39       ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2018-03-08 17:39         ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-08  1:49 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx (rev2) Patchwork
2018-03-08  1:59 ` [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx Chris Wilson
2018-03-08  2:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-03-08  3:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-03-08  9:02 ` [PATCH igt v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 17:13 [PATCH igt] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-09  0:45 ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-09  1:03   ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 19:15     ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-09 20:37       ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 13:46 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 17:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-03-09 17:24     ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-09 21:35 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-12 21:13   ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-03-13 12:38   ` Sagar Arun Kamble
2018-03-13 12:50     ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-13 13:26 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-13 13:58 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-14  8:15   ` Sagar Arun Kamble
2018-03-14  9:03     ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-14  9:49       ` Sagar Arun Kamble

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152053079645.18139.17582007008375507046@mail.alporthouse.com \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=antonio.argenziano@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.