All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	Peter.Chen-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org,
	Neil Armstrong
	<narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org,
	felipe.balbi-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
	jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org,
	Martin Blumenstingl
	<martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>,
	yixun.lan-LpR1jeaWuhtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-amlogic-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	"Gerlach, Dave" <d-gerlach-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	mathias.nyman-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] usb: core: add a wrapper for the USB PHYs on the HCD
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:10:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521706245.3717.139.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <613ebb74-6167-56bc-6fa0-2b3c9876ccaa-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>

Hi,
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 13:30 +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Martin,
> 
> On 21/03/18 00:01, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Roger, Hi Chunfeng,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> Hi Martin & Roger:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 17:12 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>> Hi Roger,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19/03/18 00:29, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Roger,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> +some TI folks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Martin,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 18/02/18 20:44, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>>>> Many SoC platforms have separate devices for the USB PHY which are
> >>>>>>> registered through the generic PHY framework. These PHYs have to be
> >>>>>>> enabled to make the USB controller actually work. They also have to be
> >>>>>>> disabled again on shutdown/suspend.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Currently (at least) the following HCI platform drivers are using custom
> >>>>>>> code to obtain all PHYs via devicetree for the roothub/controller and
> >>>>>>> disable/enable them when required:
> >>>>>>> - ehci-platform.c has ehci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>> - xhci-mtk.c has xhci_mtk_phy_{init,exit,power_on,power_off}
> >>>>>>> - ohci-platform.c has ohci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> With this new wrapper the USB PHYs can be specified directly in the
> >>>>>>> USB controller's devicetree node (just like on the drivers listed
> >>>>>>> above). This allows SoCs like the Amlogic Meson GXL family to operate
> >>>>>>> correctly once this is wired up correctly. These SoCs use a dwc3
> >>>>>>> controller and require all USB PHYs to be initialized (if one of the USB
> >>>>>>> PHYs it not initialized then none of USB port works at all).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>>> Tested-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan-LpR1jeaWuhtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch is breaking low power cases on TI SoCs when USB is in host mode.
> >>>>>> I'll explain why below.
> >>>>> based on your explanation and reading the TI PHY drivers I am assuming
> >>>>> that the affected SoCs are using the "phy-omap-usb2" driver
> >>>>>
> >>>> yes and phy-ti-pipe3 as well i.e. "ti,phy-usb3" and "ti,omap-usb3"
> >>> I missed that, thanks
> >>>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/Makefile |   2 +-
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c    | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.h    |   7 ++
> >>>>>>>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> index 92c9cefb4317..18e874b0441e 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y := usb.o hub.o hcd.o urb.o message.o driver.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += config.o file.o buffer.o sysfs.o endpoint.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += devio.o notify.o generic.o quirks.o devices.o
> >>>>>>> -usbcore-y += port.o
> >>>>>>> +usbcore-y += phy.o port.o
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_OF)         += of.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_USB_PCI)            += hcd-pci.o
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..09b7c43c0ea4
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> >>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * A wrapper for multiple PHYs which passes all phy_* function calls to
> >>>>>>> + * multiple (actual) PHY devices. This is comes handy when initializing
> >>>>>>> + * all PHYs on a HCD and to keep them all in the same state.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include "phy.h"
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub {
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy              *phy;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head        list;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_alloc(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> +     if (!roothub_entry)
> >>>>>>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&roothub_entry->list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
> >>>>>>> +                                struct list_head *list)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> >>>>>>> +             if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> >>>>>>> +                     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +             else
> >>>>>>> +                     return PTR_ERR(phy);
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> >>>>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry->phy = phy;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_add_tail(&roothub_entry->list, list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int i, num_phys, err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     num_phys = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "phys",
> >>>>>>> +                                           "#phy-cells");
> >>>>>>> +     if (num_phys <= 0)
> >>>>>>> +             return NULL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     phy_roothub = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(phy_roothub))
> >>>>>>> +             return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_phys; i++) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(dev, i, &phy_roothub->list);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_init(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The phy_init() function actually enables the PHY clocks.
> >>>>>> It should be moved to the usb_phy_roothub_exit() routine just before calling phy_power_on().
> >>>>> do you mean that phy_init should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_power_on
> >>>>> (just before phy_power_on is called within usb_phy_roothub_power_on)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>>
> >>>>> an earlier version of my patch did exactly this, but it caused
> >>>>> problems during a suspend/resume cycle on Mediatek devices
> >>>>> Chunfeng Yun reported that issue here [0], quote from that mail for
> >>>>> easier reading:
> >>>>> "In order to keep link state on mt8173, we just power off all phys(not
> >>>>> exit) when system enter suspend, then power on them again (needn't
> >>>>> init, otherwise device will be disconnected) when system resume, this
> >>>>> can avoid re-enumerating device."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_exit_phys;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_exit_phys:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     return ERR_PTR(err);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_init);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err, ret = 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     ret = ret;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> phy_exit() should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_poweroff() just after calling phy_power_off().
> >>>>> if I understood Chunfeng Yun correctly this will require
> >>>>> re-enumeration of the USB devices after a suspend/resume cycle on
> >>>>> Mediatek SoCs
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> OK. I suppose that there are 2 cases
> >>>> 1) Mediatek's case: USB controller context retained across suspend/resume.
> >>>> Remote wakeup probably required.
> >>>> No re-enumeration preferred after resume. phy_exit()/phy_init() must not be called
> >>>> during suspend/resume to keep PHY link active.
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtu3.txt indeed shows
> >>> that the parent of the USB controller can be marked as "wakeup-source"
> >>>
> >>>> 2) TI's case: low power important: USB context is lost, OK to re-enumerate.
> >>>> phy_exit()/phy_init() must be called during suspend/resume.
> >>> ACK
> >>>
> >>>>>> With that there is nothing else being done here. Shouldn't we be doing the equivalent of
> >>>>>> usb_phy_roothub_del_phy() and usb_phy_roothub_free() here?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return ret;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_exit);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_power_on(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return err;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_on);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_reverse(roothub_entry, &phy_roothub->list, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not doing the phy_exit() here leaves the clocks enabled on our SoC and
> >>>>>> we're no longer able to reach low power states on system suspend.
> >>>>> I'm not sure where this problem should be solved:
> >>>>> - set skip_phy_initialization in struct usb_hcd to 1 for the affected
> >>>>> TI platforms
> >>>>
> >>>> Many TI platforms are affected, omap5*, dra7*, am43*
> >>>>
> >>>>> - fix this in the usb_phy_roothub code
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd vote for fixing it in the usb_phy_roothub code. How?
> >>>> How about using the device_can_wakeup() to decide if we should call phy_exit()/init() or not?
> >>>> If the USB device can't wakeup the system there is no point in keeping it powered/clocked right?
> >>> @Chunfeng: can you confirm Roger's idea that we could call phy_exit if
> >>> the controller is *NOT* marked as "wakeup-source"?
> >>> I am also not sure if it would work, since the "wakeup-source"
> >>> property is defined on the USB controller's parent node in case of the
> >>> Mediatek MTU3 (Mediatek USB3.0 DRD) controller
> >>>
> >> Very sorry, I forgot that MTU3 & xHCI drivers always set them as wakeup
> >> devices by device_init_wakeup(dev, true),but not dependent on
> >> "wakeup-source" property, so maybe we can use device_can_wakeup() to
> >> decide whether call phy_exit()/init() or not.
> > the 64-bit Amlogic Meson GXL/GXM SoCs don't support suspend/resume
> > yet, so I cannot test this
> > based on this suggestion I threw up two patches which are *compile
> > tested only* based on Greg's usb-next branch
> > you can find them here: [0] (as well as attached to this mail)
> > 
> > @Chunfeng: can you please test this on one of your Mediatek SoCs?
> > @Roger: can you please test this on a TI SoC?
> > 
> > (apologies in advance if these patches don't work)
> > 
> > please note that I won't have access to my computer until Saturday.
> > if these patches need to be rewritten/replaced/etc. then feel free to
> > send your own version to the list
> 
> Had to do the following to build
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> index 6d4a419..2884607 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> @@ -2262,7 +2262,7 @@ int hcd_bus_suspend(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		hcd->state = HC_STATE_SUSPENDED;
>  
>  		if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
> -			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);

Try to use hcd->self.controller instead of &rhdev->dev;

>  
>  		/* Did we race with a root-hub wakeup event? */
>  		if (rhdev->do_remote_wakeup) {
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
> -		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		if (status)
>  			return status;
>  	}
> @@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		hcd->state = old_state;
> -		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		dev_dbg(&rhdev->dev, "bus %s fail, err %d\n",
>  				"resume", status);
>  		if (status != -ESHUTDOWN)
> 
> 
> And the following to fix runtime issues
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 2eca371..8598906 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);
>  	}
>  
> -	roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> -	if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> -		return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> +	roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!roothub_entry)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	roothub_entry->phy = phy;
>  
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int usb_phy_roothub_suspend(struct device *dev,
>  	usb_phy_roothub_power_off(phy_roothub);
>  
>  	/* keep the PHYs initialized so the device can wake up the system */
> -	if (device_can_wakeup(dev))
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
It's ok
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return usb_phy_roothub_exit(phy_roothub);
> 
> 
> Here are my obervations
> - if wakeup is disabled it works fine as expected, phy_exit() is called and I'm able to reach
> low power states.
> 
> - if wakeup is enabled (/sys/bus/usb/device/usb2/power/wakeup), then hcd_bus_suspend() is never called
> and so phy_power_off won't be called either.
> 
> This means that the device_may_wakeup() check is redundant. Sorry for suggesting this.
You maybe use a wrong device.
> 
> This also means that wakeup is not enabled on Chunfeng's platform. Chunfeng, can you confirm this?
> What does /sys/bus/usb/device/usb<?>/power/wakeup say?
They are also "disabled" state;
I think we should use wakeup state of hcd controller, but not
usb_device's, please test it, thanks.

> 
> Chunfeng sent a patch [1] to set shared_hcd->skip_phy_initialization for the mtk platform.
> Chunfeng, why did you need this patch?
> 
> [1] - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10298641/
> 
> What options do we have now to fix the original issue?
> 
> Chungfeng, can you set skip_phy_initialization for the hcd that has PHY's linked to it?
> Then usb_phy_roothub_*() driver will be a no-op for you. And we could revert to the original approach
> of doing phy_power_off() as well as phy_exit() during suspend.
> 
> Alternatively, Martin, how about not relying on skip_phy_initialization flag but having default behaviour
> of no-op for the usb_phy_roothub_*() driver. As platforms migrate to it they can set a new
> flag in hcd to use it?

> 
> > 
> >>>>> - fix this in the PHY driver
> >>>>
> >>>> There is nothing to fix in the PHY driver. It is doing what it is supposed to do.
> >>> I actually wonder if phy_ops should have explicit suspend/resume support:
> >>> - assuming we define two new callbacks: .suspend and .resume
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_off by default if .suspend is not defined
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_on by default if .resume is not defined
> >>> - drivers could set .suspend and .resume on their own, allowing more
> >>> fine-grained control by for example *only* stopping the clock (but not
> >>> re-initializing the registers, etc.)
> >>>
> >>> @Roger: what do you think about this?
> >>> Kishon (the PHY framework maintainer) is also CC'ed - I would like to
> >>> hear his opinion too
> >>>
> >>>>> - somewhere else
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_off);
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.h b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..6fde59bfbff8
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev);
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> 
> > 
> > [0] https://github.com/xdarklight/linux/commits/usb-phy-roothub-suspend-rfc-v1
> > 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux@prisktech.co.nz,
	Peter.Chen@nxp.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, yixun.lan@amlogic.com,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, "Gerlach, Dave" <d-gerlach@ti.com>,
	KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: [usb-next,v10,3/8] usb: core: add a wrapper for the USB PHYs on the HCD
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:10:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521706245.3717.139.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)

Hi,
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 13:30 +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Martin,
> 
> On 21/03/18 00:01, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Roger, Hi Chunfeng,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Martin & Roger:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 17:12 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>> Hi Roger,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19/03/18 00:29, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Roger,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> +some TI folks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Martin,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 18/02/18 20:44, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>>>> Many SoC platforms have separate devices for the USB PHY which are
> >>>>>>> registered through the generic PHY framework. These PHYs have to be
> >>>>>>> enabled to make the USB controller actually work. They also have to be
> >>>>>>> disabled again on shutdown/suspend.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Currently (at least) the following HCI platform drivers are using custom
> >>>>>>> code to obtain all PHYs via devicetree for the roothub/controller and
> >>>>>>> disable/enable them when required:
> >>>>>>> - ehci-platform.c has ehci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>> - xhci-mtk.c has xhci_mtk_phy_{init,exit,power_on,power_off}
> >>>>>>> - ohci-platform.c has ohci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> With this new wrapper the USB PHYs can be specified directly in the
> >>>>>>> USB controller's devicetree node (just like on the drivers listed
> >>>>>>> above). This allows SoCs like the Amlogic Meson GXL family to operate
> >>>>>>> correctly once this is wired up correctly. These SoCs use a dwc3
> >>>>>>> controller and require all USB PHYs to be initialized (if one of the USB
> >>>>>>> PHYs it not initialized then none of USB port works at all).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> >>>>>>> Tested-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch is breaking low power cases on TI SoCs when USB is in host mode.
> >>>>>> I'll explain why below.
> >>>>> based on your explanation and reading the TI PHY drivers I am assuming
> >>>>> that the affected SoCs are using the "phy-omap-usb2" driver
> >>>>>
> >>>> yes and phy-ti-pipe3 as well i.e. "ti,phy-usb3" and "ti,omap-usb3"
> >>> I missed that, thanks
> >>>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/Makefile |   2 +-
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c    | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.h    |   7 ++
> >>>>>>>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> index 92c9cefb4317..18e874b0441e 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y := usb.o hub.o hcd.o urb.o message.o driver.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += config.o file.o buffer.o sysfs.o endpoint.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += devio.o notify.o generic.o quirks.o devices.o
> >>>>>>> -usbcore-y += port.o
> >>>>>>> +usbcore-y += phy.o port.o
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_OF)         += of.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_USB_PCI)            += hcd-pci.o
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..09b7c43c0ea4
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> >>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * A wrapper for multiple PHYs which passes all phy_* function calls to
> >>>>>>> + * multiple (actual) PHY devices. This is comes handy when initializing
> >>>>>>> + * all PHYs on a HCD and to keep them all in the same state.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include "phy.h"
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub {
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy              *phy;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head        list;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_alloc(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> +     if (!roothub_entry)
> >>>>>>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&roothub_entry->list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
> >>>>>>> +                                struct list_head *list)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> >>>>>>> +             if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> >>>>>>> +                     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +             else
> >>>>>>> +                     return PTR_ERR(phy);
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> >>>>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry->phy = phy;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_add_tail(&roothub_entry->list, list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int i, num_phys, err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     num_phys = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "phys",
> >>>>>>> +                                           "#phy-cells");
> >>>>>>> +     if (num_phys <= 0)
> >>>>>>> +             return NULL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     phy_roothub = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(phy_roothub))
> >>>>>>> +             return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_phys; i++) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(dev, i, &phy_roothub->list);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_init(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The phy_init() function actually enables the PHY clocks.
> >>>>>> It should be moved to the usb_phy_roothub_exit() routine just before calling phy_power_on().
> >>>>> do you mean that phy_init should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_power_on
> >>>>> (just before phy_power_on is called within usb_phy_roothub_power_on)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>>
> >>>>> an earlier version of my patch did exactly this, but it caused
> >>>>> problems during a suspend/resume cycle on Mediatek devices
> >>>>> Chunfeng Yun reported that issue here [0], quote from that mail for
> >>>>> easier reading:
> >>>>> "In order to keep link state on mt8173, we just power off all phys(not
> >>>>> exit) when system enter suspend, then power on them again (needn't
> >>>>> init, otherwise device will be disconnected) when system resume, this
> >>>>> can avoid re-enumerating device."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_exit_phys;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_exit_phys:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     return ERR_PTR(err);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_init);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err, ret = 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     ret = ret;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> phy_exit() should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_poweroff() just after calling phy_power_off().
> >>>>> if I understood Chunfeng Yun correctly this will require
> >>>>> re-enumeration of the USB devices after a suspend/resume cycle on
> >>>>> Mediatek SoCs
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> OK. I suppose that there are 2 cases
> >>>> 1) Mediatek's case: USB controller context retained across suspend/resume.
> >>>> Remote wakeup probably required.
> >>>> No re-enumeration preferred after resume. phy_exit()/phy_init() must not be called
> >>>> during suspend/resume to keep PHY link active.
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtu3.txt indeed shows
> >>> that the parent of the USB controller can be marked as "wakeup-source"
> >>>
> >>>> 2) TI's case: low power important: USB context is lost, OK to re-enumerate.
> >>>> phy_exit()/phy_init() must be called during suspend/resume.
> >>> ACK
> >>>
> >>>>>> With that there is nothing else being done here. Shouldn't we be doing the equivalent of
> >>>>>> usb_phy_roothub_del_phy() and usb_phy_roothub_free() here?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return ret;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_exit);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_power_on(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return err;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_on);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_reverse(roothub_entry, &phy_roothub->list, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not doing the phy_exit() here leaves the clocks enabled on our SoC and
> >>>>>> we're no longer able to reach low power states on system suspend.
> >>>>> I'm not sure where this problem should be solved:
> >>>>> - set skip_phy_initialization in struct usb_hcd to 1 for the affected
> >>>>> TI platforms
> >>>>
> >>>> Many TI platforms are affected, omap5*, dra7*, am43*
> >>>>
> >>>>> - fix this in the usb_phy_roothub code
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd vote for fixing it in the usb_phy_roothub code. How?
> >>>> How about using the device_can_wakeup() to decide if we should call phy_exit()/init() or not?
> >>>> If the USB device can't wakeup the system there is no point in keeping it powered/clocked right?
> >>> @Chunfeng: can you confirm Roger's idea that we could call phy_exit if
> >>> the controller is *NOT* marked as "wakeup-source"?
> >>> I am also not sure if it would work, since the "wakeup-source"
> >>> property is defined on the USB controller's parent node in case of the
> >>> Mediatek MTU3 (Mediatek USB3.0 DRD) controller
> >>>
> >> Very sorry, I forgot that MTU3 & xHCI drivers always set them as wakeup
> >> devices by device_init_wakeup(dev, true),but not dependent on
> >> "wakeup-source" property, so maybe we can use device_can_wakeup() to
> >> decide whether call phy_exit()/init() or not.
> > the 64-bit Amlogic Meson GXL/GXM SoCs don't support suspend/resume
> > yet, so I cannot test this
> > based on this suggestion I threw up two patches which are *compile
> > tested only* based on Greg's usb-next branch
> > you can find them here: [0] (as well as attached to this mail)
> > 
> > @Chunfeng: can you please test this on one of your Mediatek SoCs?
> > @Roger: can you please test this on a TI SoC?
> > 
> > (apologies in advance if these patches don't work)
> > 
> > please note that I won't have access to my computer until Saturday.
> > if these patches need to be rewritten/replaced/etc. then feel free to
> > send your own version to the list
> 
> Had to do the following to build
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> index 6d4a419..2884607 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> @@ -2262,7 +2262,7 @@ int hcd_bus_suspend(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		hcd->state = HC_STATE_SUSPENDED;
>  
>  		if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
> -			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);

Try to use hcd->self.controller instead of &rhdev->dev;

>  
>  		/* Did we race with a root-hub wakeup event? */
>  		if (rhdev->do_remote_wakeup) {
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
> -		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		if (status)
>  			return status;
>  	}
> @@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		hcd->state = old_state;
> -		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		dev_dbg(&rhdev->dev, "bus %s fail, err %d\n",
>  				"resume", status);
>  		if (status != -ESHUTDOWN)
> 
> 
> And the following to fix runtime issues
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 2eca371..8598906 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);
>  	}
>  
> -	roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> -	if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> -		return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> +	roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!roothub_entry)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	roothub_entry->phy = phy;
>  
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int usb_phy_roothub_suspend(struct device *dev,
>  	usb_phy_roothub_power_off(phy_roothub);
>  
>  	/* keep the PHYs initialized so the device can wake up the system */
> -	if (device_can_wakeup(dev))
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
It's ok
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return usb_phy_roothub_exit(phy_roothub);
> 
> 
> Here are my obervations
> - if wakeup is disabled it works fine as expected, phy_exit() is called and I'm able to reach
> low power states.
> 
> - if wakeup is enabled (/sys/bus/usb/device/usb2/power/wakeup), then hcd_bus_suspend() is never called
> and so phy_power_off won't be called either.
> 
> This means that the device_may_wakeup() check is redundant. Sorry for suggesting this.
You maybe use a wrong device.
> 
> This also means that wakeup is not enabled on Chunfeng's platform. Chunfeng, can you confirm this?
> What does /sys/bus/usb/device/usb<?>/power/wakeup say?
They are also "disabled" state;
I think we should use wakeup state of hcd controller, but not
usb_device's, please test it, thanks.

> 
> Chunfeng sent a patch [1] to set shared_hcd->skip_phy_initialization for the mtk platform.
> Chunfeng, why did you need this patch?
> 
> [1] - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10298641/
> 
> What options do we have now to fix the original issue?
> 
> Chungfeng, can you set skip_phy_initialization for the hcd that has PHY's linked to it?
> Then usb_phy_roothub_*() driver will be a no-op for you. And we could revert to the original approach
> of doing phy_power_off() as well as phy_exit() during suspend.
> 
> Alternatively, Martin, how about not relying on skip_phy_initialization flag but having default behaviour
> of no-op for the usb_phy_roothub_*() driver. As platforms migrate to it they can set a new
> flag in hcd to use it?

> 
> > 
> >>>>> - fix this in the PHY driver
> >>>>
> >>>> There is nothing to fix in the PHY driver. It is doing what it is supposed to do.
> >>> I actually wonder if phy_ops should have explicit suspend/resume support:
> >>> - assuming we define two new callbacks: .suspend and .resume
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_off by default if .suspend is not defined
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_on by default if .resume is not defined
> >>> - drivers could set .suspend and .resume on their own, allowing more
> >>> fine-grained control by for example *only* stopping the clock (but not
> >>> re-initializing the registers, etc.)
> >>>
> >>> @Roger: what do you think about this?
> >>> Kishon (the PHY framework maintainer) is also CC'ed - I would like to
> >>> hear his opinion too
> >>>
> >>>>> - somewhere else
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_off);
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.h b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..6fde59bfbff8
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev);
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> 
> > 
> > [0] https://github.com/xdarklight/linux/commits/usb-phy-roothub-suspend-rfc-v1
> > 
>
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com (Chunfeng Yun)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] usb: core: add a wrapper for the USB PHYs on the HCD
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:10:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521706245.3717.139.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <613ebb74-6167-56bc-6fa0-2b3c9876ccaa@ti.com>

Hi,
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 13:30 +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Martin,
> 
> On 21/03/18 00:01, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Roger, Hi Chunfeng,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Martin & Roger:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 17:12 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>> Hi Roger,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19/03/18 00:29, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Roger,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> +some TI folks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Martin,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 18/02/18 20:44, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>>>> Many SoC platforms have separate devices for the USB PHY which are
> >>>>>>> registered through the generic PHY framework. These PHYs have to be
> >>>>>>> enabled to make the USB controller actually work. They also have to be
> >>>>>>> disabled again on shutdown/suspend.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Currently (at least) the following HCI platform drivers are using custom
> >>>>>>> code to obtain all PHYs via devicetree for the roothub/controller and
> >>>>>>> disable/enable them when required:
> >>>>>>> - ehci-platform.c has ehci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>> - xhci-mtk.c has xhci_mtk_phy_{init,exit,power_on,power_off}
> >>>>>>> - ohci-platform.c has ohci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> With this new wrapper the USB PHYs can be specified directly in the
> >>>>>>> USB controller's devicetree node (just like on the drivers listed
> >>>>>>> above). This allows SoCs like the Amlogic Meson GXL family to operate
> >>>>>>> correctly once this is wired up correctly. These SoCs use a dwc3
> >>>>>>> controller and require all USB PHYs to be initialized (if one of the USB
> >>>>>>> PHYs it not initialized then none of USB port works at all).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> >>>>>>> Tested-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch is breaking low power cases on TI SoCs when USB is in host mode.
> >>>>>> I'll explain why below.
> >>>>> based on your explanation and reading the TI PHY drivers I am assuming
> >>>>> that the affected SoCs are using the "phy-omap-usb2" driver
> >>>>>
> >>>> yes and phy-ti-pipe3 as well i.e. "ti,phy-usb3" and "ti,omap-usb3"
> >>> I missed that, thanks
> >>>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/Makefile |   2 +-
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c    | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.h    |   7 ++
> >>>>>>>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> index 92c9cefb4317..18e874b0441e 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y := usb.o hub.o hcd.o urb.o message.o driver.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += config.o file.o buffer.o sysfs.o endpoint.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += devio.o notify.o generic.o quirks.o devices.o
> >>>>>>> -usbcore-y += port.o
> >>>>>>> +usbcore-y += phy.o port.o
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_OF)         += of.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_USB_PCI)            += hcd-pci.o
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..09b7c43c0ea4
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> >>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * A wrapper for multiple PHYs which passes all phy_* function calls to
> >>>>>>> + * multiple (actual) PHY devices. This is comes handy when initializing
> >>>>>>> + * all PHYs on a HCD and to keep them all in the same state.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include "phy.h"
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub {
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy              *phy;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head        list;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_alloc(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> +     if (!roothub_entry)
> >>>>>>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&roothub_entry->list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
> >>>>>>> +                                struct list_head *list)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> >>>>>>> +             if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> >>>>>>> +                     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +             else
> >>>>>>> +                     return PTR_ERR(phy);
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> >>>>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry->phy = phy;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_add_tail(&roothub_entry->list, list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int i, num_phys, err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     num_phys = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "phys",
> >>>>>>> +                                           "#phy-cells");
> >>>>>>> +     if (num_phys <= 0)
> >>>>>>> +             return NULL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     phy_roothub = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(phy_roothub))
> >>>>>>> +             return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_phys; i++) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(dev, i, &phy_roothub->list);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_init(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The phy_init() function actually enables the PHY clocks.
> >>>>>> It should be moved to the usb_phy_roothub_exit() routine just before calling phy_power_on().
> >>>>> do you mean that phy_init should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_power_on
> >>>>> (just before phy_power_on is called within usb_phy_roothub_power_on)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>>
> >>>>> an earlier version of my patch did exactly this, but it caused
> >>>>> problems during a suspend/resume cycle on Mediatek devices
> >>>>> Chunfeng Yun reported that issue here [0], quote from that mail for
> >>>>> easier reading:
> >>>>> "In order to keep link state on mt8173, we just power off all phys(not
> >>>>> exit) when system enter suspend, then power on them again (needn't
> >>>>> init, otherwise device will be disconnected) when system resume, this
> >>>>> can avoid re-enumerating device."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_exit_phys;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_exit_phys:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     return ERR_PTR(err);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_init);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err, ret = 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     ret = ret;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> phy_exit() should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_poweroff() just after calling phy_power_off().
> >>>>> if I understood Chunfeng Yun correctly this will require
> >>>>> re-enumeration of the USB devices after a suspend/resume cycle on
> >>>>> Mediatek SoCs
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> OK. I suppose that there are 2 cases
> >>>> 1) Mediatek's case: USB controller context retained across suspend/resume.
> >>>> Remote wakeup probably required.
> >>>> No re-enumeration preferred after resume. phy_exit()/phy_init() must not be called
> >>>> during suspend/resume to keep PHY link active.
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtu3.txt indeed shows
> >>> that the parent of the USB controller can be marked as "wakeup-source"
> >>>
> >>>> 2) TI's case: low power important: USB context is lost, OK to re-enumerate.
> >>>> phy_exit()/phy_init() must be called during suspend/resume.
> >>> ACK
> >>>
> >>>>>> With that there is nothing else being done here. Shouldn't we be doing the equivalent of
> >>>>>> usb_phy_roothub_del_phy() and usb_phy_roothub_free() here?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return ret;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_exit);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_power_on(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return err;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_on);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_reverse(roothub_entry, &phy_roothub->list, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not doing the phy_exit() here leaves the clocks enabled on our SoC and
> >>>>>> we're no longer able to reach low power states on system suspend.
> >>>>> I'm not sure where this problem should be solved:
> >>>>> - set skip_phy_initialization in struct usb_hcd to 1 for the affected
> >>>>> TI platforms
> >>>>
> >>>> Many TI platforms are affected, omap5*, dra7*, am43*
> >>>>
> >>>>> - fix this in the usb_phy_roothub code
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd vote for fixing it in the usb_phy_roothub code. How?
> >>>> How about using the device_can_wakeup() to decide if we should call phy_exit()/init() or not?
> >>>> If the USB device can't wakeup the system there is no point in keeping it powered/clocked right?
> >>> @Chunfeng: can you confirm Roger's idea that we could call phy_exit if
> >>> the controller is *NOT* marked as "wakeup-source"?
> >>> I am also not sure if it would work, since the "wakeup-source"
> >>> property is defined on the USB controller's parent node in case of the
> >>> Mediatek MTU3 (Mediatek USB3.0 DRD) controller
> >>>
> >> Very sorry, I forgot that MTU3 & xHCI drivers always set them as wakeup
> >> devices by device_init_wakeup(dev, true),but not dependent on
> >> "wakeup-source" property, so maybe we can use device_can_wakeup() to
> >> decide whether call phy_exit()/init() or not.
> > the 64-bit Amlogic Meson GXL/GXM SoCs don't support suspend/resume
> > yet, so I cannot test this
> > based on this suggestion I threw up two patches which are *compile
> > tested only* based on Greg's usb-next branch
> > you can find them here: [0] (as well as attached to this mail)
> > 
> > @Chunfeng: can you please test this on one of your Mediatek SoCs?
> > @Roger: can you please test this on a TI SoC?
> > 
> > (apologies in advance if these patches don't work)
> > 
> > please note that I won't have access to my computer until Saturday.
> > if these patches need to be rewritten/replaced/etc. then feel free to
> > send your own version to the list
> 
> Had to do the following to build
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> index 6d4a419..2884607 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> @@ -2262,7 +2262,7 @@ int hcd_bus_suspend(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		hcd->state = HC_STATE_SUSPENDED;
>  
>  		if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
> -			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);

Try to use hcd->self.controller instead of &rhdev->dev;

>  
>  		/* Did we race with a root-hub wakeup event? */
>  		if (rhdev->do_remote_wakeup) {
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
> -		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		if (status)
>  			return status;
>  	}
> @@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		hcd->state = old_state;
> -		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		dev_dbg(&rhdev->dev, "bus %s fail, err %d\n",
>  				"resume", status);
>  		if (status != -ESHUTDOWN)
> 
> 
> And the following to fix runtime issues
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 2eca371..8598906 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);
>  	}
>  
> -	roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> -	if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> -		return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> +	roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!roothub_entry)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	roothub_entry->phy = phy;
>  
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int usb_phy_roothub_suspend(struct device *dev,
>  	usb_phy_roothub_power_off(phy_roothub);
>  
>  	/* keep the PHYs initialized so the device can wake up the system */
> -	if (device_can_wakeup(dev))
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
It's ok
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return usb_phy_roothub_exit(phy_roothub);
> 
> 
> Here are my obervations
> - if wakeup is disabled it works fine as expected, phy_exit() is called and I'm able to reach
> low power states.
> 
> - if wakeup is enabled (/sys/bus/usb/device/usb2/power/wakeup), then hcd_bus_suspend() is never called
> and so phy_power_off won't be called either.
> 
> This means that the device_may_wakeup() check is redundant. Sorry for suggesting this.
You maybe use a wrong device.
> 
> This also means that wakeup is not enabled on Chunfeng's platform. Chunfeng, can you confirm this?
> What does /sys/bus/usb/device/usb<?>/power/wakeup say?
They are also "disabled" state;
I think we should use wakeup state of hcd controller, but not
usb_device's, please test it, thanks.

> 
> Chunfeng sent a patch [1] to set shared_hcd->skip_phy_initialization for the mtk platform.
> Chunfeng, why did you need this patch?
> 
> [1] - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10298641/
> 
> What options do we have now to fix the original issue?
> 
> Chungfeng, can you set skip_phy_initialization for the hcd that has PHY's linked to it?
> Then usb_phy_roothub_*() driver will be a no-op for you. And we could revert to the original approach
> of doing phy_power_off() as well as phy_exit() during suspend.
> 
> Alternatively, Martin, how about not relying on skip_phy_initialization flag but having default behaviour
> of no-op for the usb_phy_roothub_*() driver. As platforms migrate to it they can set a new
> flag in hcd to use it?

> 
> > 
> >>>>> - fix this in the PHY driver
> >>>>
> >>>> There is nothing to fix in the PHY driver. It is doing what it is supposed to do.
> >>> I actually wonder if phy_ops should have explicit suspend/resume support:
> >>> - assuming we define two new callbacks: .suspend and .resume
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_off by default if .suspend is not defined
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_on by default if .resume is not defined
> >>> - drivers could set .suspend and .resume on their own, allowing more
> >>> fine-grained control by for example *only* stopping the clock (but not
> >>> re-initializing the registers, etc.)
> >>>
> >>> @Roger: what do you think about this?
> >>> Kishon (the PHY framework maintainer) is also CC'ed - I would like to
> >>> hear his opinion too
> >>>
> >>>>> - somewhere else
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_off);
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.h b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..6fde59bfbff8
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev);
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> 
> > 
> > [0] https://github.com/xdarklight/linux/commits/usb-phy-roothub-suspend-rfc-v1
> > 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com (Chunfeng Yun)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] usb: core: add a wrapper for the USB PHYs on the HCD
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:10:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521706245.3717.139.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <613ebb74-6167-56bc-6fa0-2b3c9876ccaa@ti.com>

Hi,
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 13:30 +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Martin,
> 
> On 21/03/18 00:01, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Roger, Hi Chunfeng,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Martin & Roger:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 17:12 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>> Hi Roger,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19/03/18 00:29, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Roger,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> +some TI folks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Martin,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 18/02/18 20:44, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> >>>>>>> Many SoC platforms have separate devices for the USB PHY which are
> >>>>>>> registered through the generic PHY framework. These PHYs have to be
> >>>>>>> enabled to make the USB controller actually work. They also have to be
> >>>>>>> disabled again on shutdown/suspend.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Currently (at least) the following HCI platform drivers are using custom
> >>>>>>> code to obtain all PHYs via devicetree for the roothub/controller and
> >>>>>>> disable/enable them when required:
> >>>>>>> - ehci-platform.c has ehci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>> - xhci-mtk.c has xhci_mtk_phy_{init,exit,power_on,power_off}
> >>>>>>> - ohci-platform.c has ohci_platform_power_{on,off}
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> With this new wrapper the USB PHYs can be specified directly in the
> >>>>>>> USB controller's devicetree node (just like on the drivers listed
> >>>>>>> above). This allows SoCs like the Amlogic Meson GXL family to operate
> >>>>>>> correctly once this is wired up correctly. These SoCs use a dwc3
> >>>>>>> controller and require all USB PHYs to be initialized (if one of the USB
> >>>>>>> PHYs it not initialized then none of USB port works at all).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> >>>>>>> Tested-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch is breaking low power cases on TI SoCs when USB is in host mode.
> >>>>>> I'll explain why below.
> >>>>> based on your explanation and reading the TI PHY drivers I am assuming
> >>>>> that the affected SoCs are using the "phy-omap-usb2" driver
> >>>>>
> >>>> yes and phy-ti-pipe3 as well i.e. "ti,phy-usb3" and "ti,omap-usb3"
> >>> I missed that, thanks
> >>>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/Makefile |   2 +-
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c    | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>  drivers/usb/core/phy.h    |   7 ++
> >>>>>>>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> index 92c9cefb4317..18e874b0441e 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
> >>>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y := usb.o hub.o hcd.o urb.o message.o driver.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += config.o file.o buffer.o sysfs.o endpoint.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-y += devio.o notify.o generic.o quirks.o devices.o
> >>>>>>> -usbcore-y += port.o
> >>>>>>> +usbcore-y += phy.o port.o
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_OF)         += of.o
> >>>>>>>  usbcore-$(CONFIG_USB_PCI)            += hcd-pci.o
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..09b7c43c0ea4
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> >>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * A wrapper for multiple PHYs which passes all phy_* function calls to
> >>>>>>> + * multiple (actual) PHY devices. This is comes handy when initializing
> >>>>>>> + * all PHYs on a HCD and to keep them all in the same state.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include "phy.h"
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub {
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy              *phy;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head        list;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_alloc(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> +     if (!roothub_entry)
> >>>>>>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&roothub_entry->list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
> >>>>>>> +                                struct list_head *list)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> >>>>>>> +             if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> >>>>>>> +                     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +             else
> >>>>>>> +                     return PTR_ERR(phy);
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> >>>>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     roothub_entry->phy = phy;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_add_tail(&roothub_entry->list, list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int i, num_phys, err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     num_phys = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "phys",
> >>>>>>> +                                           "#phy-cells");
> >>>>>>> +     if (num_phys <= 0)
> >>>>>>> +             return NULL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     phy_roothub = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> >>>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(phy_roothub))
> >>>>>>> +             return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_phys; i++) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(dev, i, &phy_roothub->list);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_init(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The phy_init() function actually enables the PHY clocks.
> >>>>>> It should be moved to the usb_phy_roothub_exit() routine just before calling phy_power_on().
> >>>>> do you mean that phy_init should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_power_on
> >>>>> (just before phy_power_on is called within usb_phy_roothub_power_on)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>>
> >>>>> an earlier version of my patch did exactly this, but it caused
> >>>>> problems during a suspend/resume cycle on Mediatek devices
> >>>>> Chunfeng Yun reported that issue here [0], quote from that mail for
> >>>>> easier reading:
> >>>>> "In order to keep link state on mt8173, we just power off all phys(not
> >>>>> exit) when system enter suspend, then power on them again (needn't
> >>>>> init, otherwise device will be disconnected) when system resume, this
> >>>>> can avoid re-enumerating device."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_exit_phys;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_exit_phys:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     return ERR_PTR(err);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_init);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err, ret = 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_exit(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     ret = ret;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> phy_exit() should be moved to usb_phy_roothub_poweroff() just after calling phy_power_off().
> >>>>> if I understood Chunfeng Yun correctly this will require
> >>>>> re-enumeration of the USB devices after a suspend/resume cycle on
> >>>>> Mediatek SoCs
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> OK. I suppose that there are 2 cases
> >>>> 1) Mediatek's case: USB controller context retained across suspend/resume.
> >>>> Remote wakeup probably required.
> >>>> No re-enumeration preferred after resume. phy_exit()/phy_init() must not be called
> >>>> during suspend/resume to keep PHY link active.
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtu3.txt indeed shows
> >>> that the parent of the USB controller can be marked as "wakeup-source"
> >>>
> >>>> 2) TI's case: low power important: USB context is lost, OK to re-enumerate.
> >>>> phy_exit()/phy_init() must be called during suspend/resume.
> >>> ACK
> >>>
> >>>>>> With that there is nothing else being done here. Shouldn't we be doing the equivalent of
> >>>>>> usb_phy_roothub_del_phy() and usb_phy_roothub_free() here?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return ret;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_exit);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +     struct list_head *head;
> >>>>>>> +     int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     head = &phy_roothub->list;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(roothub_entry, head, list) {
> >>>>>>> +             err = phy_power_on(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +             if (err)
> >>>>>>> +                     goto err_out;
> >>>>>>> +     }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +err_out:
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(roothub_entry, head, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     return err;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_on);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +     struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     if (!phy_roothub)
> >>>>>>> +             return;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +     list_for_each_entry_reverse(roothub_entry, &phy_roothub->list, list)
> >>>>>>> +             phy_power_off(roothub_entry->phy);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not doing the phy_exit() here leaves the clocks enabled on our SoC and
> >>>>>> we're no longer able to reach low power states on system suspend.
> >>>>> I'm not sure where this problem should be solved:
> >>>>> - set skip_phy_initialization in struct usb_hcd to 1 for the affected
> >>>>> TI platforms
> >>>>
> >>>> Many TI platforms are affected, omap5*, dra7*, am43*
> >>>>
> >>>>> - fix this in the usb_phy_roothub code
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd vote for fixing it in the usb_phy_roothub code. How?
> >>>> How about using the device_can_wakeup() to decide if we should call phy_exit()/init() or not?
> >>>> If the USB device can't wakeup the system there is no point in keeping it powered/clocked right?
> >>> @Chunfeng: can you confirm Roger's idea that we could call phy_exit if
> >>> the controller is *NOT* marked as "wakeup-source"?
> >>> I am also not sure if it would work, since the "wakeup-source"
> >>> property is defined on the USB controller's parent node in case of the
> >>> Mediatek MTU3 (Mediatek USB3.0 DRD) controller
> >>>
> >> Very sorry, I forgot that MTU3 & xHCI drivers always set them as wakeup
> >> devices by device_init_wakeup(dev, true),but not dependent on
> >> "wakeup-source" property, so maybe we can use device_can_wakeup() to
> >> decide whether call phy_exit()/init() or not.
> > the 64-bit Amlogic Meson GXL/GXM SoCs don't support suspend/resume
> > yet, so I cannot test this
> > based on this suggestion I threw up two patches which are *compile
> > tested only* based on Greg's usb-next branch
> > you can find them here: [0] (as well as attached to this mail)
> > 
> > @Chunfeng: can you please test this on one of your Mediatek SoCs?
> > @Roger: can you please test this on a TI SoC?
> > 
> > (apologies in advance if these patches don't work)
> > 
> > please note that I won't have access to my computer until Saturday.
> > if these patches need to be rewritten/replaced/etc. then feel free to
> > send your own version to the list
> 
> Had to do the following to build
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> index 6d4a419..2884607 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> @@ -2262,7 +2262,7 @@ int hcd_bus_suspend(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		hcd->state = HC_STATE_SUSPENDED;
>  
>  		if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
> -			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +			usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);

Try to use hcd->self.controller instead of &rhdev->dev;

>  
>  		/* Did we race with a root-hub wakeup event? */
>  		if (rhdev->do_remote_wakeup) {
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
> -		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		status = usb_phy_roothub_resume(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		if (status)
>  			return status;
>  	}
> @@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		hcd->state = old_state;
> -		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(hcd->phy_roothub);
> +		usb_phy_roothub_suspend(&rhdev->dev, hcd->phy_roothub);
ditto
>  		dev_dbg(&rhdev->dev, "bus %s fail, err %d\n",
>  				"resume", status);
>  		if (status != -ESHUTDOWN)
> 
> 
> And the following to fix runtime issues
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 2eca371..8598906 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);
>  	}
>  
> -	roothub_entry = usb_phy_roothub_alloc(dev);
> -	if (IS_ERR(roothub_entry))
> -		return PTR_ERR(roothub_entry);
> +	roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!roothub_entry)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	roothub_entry->phy = phy;
>  
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int usb_phy_roothub_suspend(struct device *dev,
>  	usb_phy_roothub_power_off(phy_roothub);
>  
>  	/* keep the PHYs initialized so the device can wake up the system */
> -	if (device_can_wakeup(dev))
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
It's ok
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return usb_phy_roothub_exit(phy_roothub);
> 
> 
> Here are my obervations
> - if wakeup is disabled it works fine as expected, phy_exit() is called and I'm able to reach
> low power states.
> 
> - if wakeup is enabled (/sys/bus/usb/device/usb2/power/wakeup), then hcd_bus_suspend() is never called
> and so phy_power_off won't be called either.
> 
> This means that the device_may_wakeup() check is redundant. Sorry for suggesting this.
You maybe use a wrong device.
> 
> This also means that wakeup is not enabled on Chunfeng's platform. Chunfeng, can you confirm this?
> What does /sys/bus/usb/device/usb<?>/power/wakeup say?
They are also "disabled" state;
I think we should use wakeup state of hcd controller, but not
usb_device's, please test it, thanks.

> 
> Chunfeng sent a patch [1] to set shared_hcd->skip_phy_initialization for the mtk platform.
> Chunfeng, why did you need this patch?
> 
> [1] - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10298641/
> 
> What options do we have now to fix the original issue?
> 
> Chungfeng, can you set skip_phy_initialization for the hcd that has PHY's linked to it?
> Then usb_phy_roothub_*() driver will be a no-op for you. And we could revert to the original approach
> of doing phy_power_off() as well as phy_exit() during suspend.
> 
> Alternatively, Martin, how about not relying on skip_phy_initialization flag but having default behaviour
> of no-op for the usb_phy_roothub_*() driver. As platforms migrate to it they can set a new
> flag in hcd to use it?

> 
> > 
> >>>>> - fix this in the PHY driver
> >>>>
> >>>> There is nothing to fix in the PHY driver. It is doing what it is supposed to do.
> >>> I actually wonder if phy_ops should have explicit suspend/resume support:
> >>> - assuming we define two new callbacks: .suspend and .resume
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_off by default if .suspend is not defined
> >>> - the PHY framework could call .power_on by default if .resume is not defined
> >>> - drivers could set .suspend and .resume on their own, allowing more
> >>> fine-grained control by for example *only* stopping the clock (but not
> >>> re-initializing the registers, etc.)
> >>>
> >>> @Roger: what do you think about this?
> >>> Kishon (the PHY framework maintainer) is also CC'ed - I would like to
> >>> hear his opinion too
> >>>
> >>>>> - somewhere else
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_phy_roothub_power_off);
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.h b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..6fde59bfbff8
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct usb_phy_roothub *usb_phy_roothub_init(struct device *dev);
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_exit(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int usb_phy_roothub_power_on(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>> +void usb_phy_roothub_power_off(struct usb_phy_roothub *phy_roothub);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> 
> > 
> > [0] https://github.com/xdarklight/linux/commits/usb-phy-roothub-suspend-rfc-v1
> > 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-18 18:44 [PATCH usb-next v10 0/8] initialize (multiple) PHYs for a HCD Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44 ` Martin Blumenstingl
     [not found] ` <20180218184504.3331-1-martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-18 18:44   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 1/8] dt-bindings: usb: add the documentation for USB HCDs Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` [usb-next,v10,1/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 2/8] usb: add a flag to skip PHY initialization to struct usb_hcd Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` [usb-next,v10,2/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-26  3:26     ` [PATCH usb-next v10 2/8] " Peter Chen
2018-02-26  3:26       ` Peter Chen
2018-02-26  3:26       ` Peter Chen
2018-02-26  3:26       ` [usb-next,v10,2/8] " Peter Chen
2018-02-18 18:44   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] usb: core: add a wrapper for the USB PHYs on the HCD Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:44     ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-16 14:32     ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 14:32       ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 14:32       ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 14:32       ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Roger Quadros
     [not found]       ` <7f511a6f-f3a2-2002-f601-5ce1742f4539-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-18 22:29         ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-18 22:29           ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-18 22:29           ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-18 22:29           ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
     [not found]           ` <CAFBinCAOG9Yj5PQo4wsxH2Ev6WOwFge+jBMprRiOgxKuA_z8wA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-19  6:02             ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  6:02               ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  6:02               ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  6:02               ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  8:49             ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-19  8:49               ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-19  8:49               ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-19  8:49               ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Roger Quadros
     [not found]               ` <e723fe80-1ff3-6f47-fbbd-699dfcd0be4f-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-19 16:12                 ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-19 16:12                   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-19 16:12                   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-19 16:12                   ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 11:27                   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-20 11:27                     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-20 11:27                     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-03-20 11:27                     ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
     [not found]                     ` <e5dcaf32-7001-d647-1a36-359a9728fa9a-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-20 21:57                       ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 21:57                         ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 21:57                         ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 21:57                         ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 23:47                         ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 23:47                           ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 23:47                           ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 23:47                           ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
     [not found]                   ` <CAFBinCBB2eqHC-k9wN67ZehKb9eun=mPaLuqhrbR-J1C0Ldqtw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-20  7:54                     ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20  7:54                       ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20  7:54                       ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20  7:54                       ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 10:55                     ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 10:55                       ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 10:55                       ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 10:55                       ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Roger Quadros
     [not found]                       ` <8812bba8-bd2e-85dd-9506-a2e856db4f14-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-20 11:02                         ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 11:02                           ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 11:02                           ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 11:02                           ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-20 12:04                     ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 12:04                       ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 12:04                       ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 12:04                       ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-20 22:01                       ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 22:01                         ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 22:01                         ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-20 22:01                         ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
     [not found]                         ` <CAFBinCC7X08oVt223FeZHSqmbCry9aKA8JXz+WmLuDRwwtr+gQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-21 11:30                           ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-21 11:30                             ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-21 11:30                             ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-21 11:30                             ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Roger Quadros
     [not found]                             ` <613ebb74-6167-56bc-6fa0-2b3c9876ccaa-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-22  8:10                               ` Chunfeng Yun [this message]
2018-03-22  8:10                                 ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-22  8:10                                 ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-22  8:10                                 ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-22 12:41                                 ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-22 12:41                                   ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-22 12:41                                   ` Roger Quadros
2018-03-22 12:41                                   ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Roger Quadros
     [not found]                                   ` <e9ef724f-0a62-cd35-9e0a-82643bde4a16-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2018-03-23  3:19                                     ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-23  3:19                                       ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-23  3:19                                       ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-23  3:19                                       ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-24 11:23                               ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-24 11:23                                 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-24 11:23                                 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-24 11:23                                 ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-03-19  5:43         ` [PATCH usb-next v10 3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  5:43           ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  5:43           ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-03-19  5:43           ` [usb-next,v10,3/8] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-02-18 18:45   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 4/8] usb: core: hcd: integrate the PHY wrapper into the HCD core Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` [usb-next,v10,4/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 5/8] usb: host: xhci-mtk: remove custom USB PHY handling Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` [usb-next,v10,5/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` [PATCH usb-next v10 6/8] usb: host: ehci-platform: " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45     ` [usb-next,v10,6/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45 ` [PATCH usb-next v10 7/8] usb: host: ohci-platform: " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` [usb-next,v10,7/8] " Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45 ` [PATCH usb-next v10 8/8] usb: core: hcd: remove support for initializing a single PHY Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-02-18 18:45   ` [usb-next,v10,8/8] " Martin Blumenstingl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1521706245.3717.139.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=chunfeng.yun-nus5lvnupcjwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Peter.Chen-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=felipe.balbi-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yixun.lan-LpR1jeaWuhtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.