* Patch "md/raid5: make use of spin_lock_irq over local_irq_disable + spin_lock" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
@ 2018-04-10 9:04 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2018-04-10 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: julia, alexander.levin, gq, gregkh, shli; +Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
md/raid5: make use of spin_lock_irq over local_irq_disable + spin_lock
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
md-raid5-make-use-of-spin_lock_irq-over-local_irq_disable-spin_lock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Apr 10 10:31:53 CEST 2018
From: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:41:02 -0500
Subject: md/raid5: make use of spin_lock_irq over local_irq_disable + spin_lock
From: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
[ Upstream commit 3d05f3aed5d721c2c77d20288c29ab26c6193ed5 ]
On mainline, there is no functional difference, just less code, and
symmetric lock/unlock paths.
On PREEMPT_RT builds, this fixes the following warning, seen by
Alexander GQ Gerasiov, due to the sleeping nature of spinlocks.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:993
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 58, name: kworker/u12:1
CPU: 5 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/u12:1 Tainted: G W 4.9.20-rt16-stand6-686 #1
Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5027R-WRF/X9SRW-F, BIOS 3.2a 10/28/2015
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0)
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x47/0x68
? migrate_enable+0x4a/0xf0
___might_sleep+0x101/0x180
rt_spin_lock+0x17/0x40
add_stripe_bio+0x4e3/0x6c0 [raid456]
? preempt_count_add+0x42/0xb0
raid5_make_request+0x737/0xdd0 [raid456]
Reported-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@redlab-i.ru>
Tested-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@redlab-i.ru>
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -110,8 +110,7 @@ static inline void unlock_device_hash_lo
static inline void lock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(struct r5conf *conf)
{
int i;
- local_irq_disable();
- spin_lock(conf->hash_locks);
+ spin_lock_irq(conf->hash_locks);
for (i = 1; i < NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS; i++)
spin_lock_nest_lock(conf->hash_locks + i, conf->hash_locks);
spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
@@ -121,9 +120,9 @@ static inline void unlock_all_device_has
{
int i;
spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
- for (i = NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS; i; i--)
- spin_unlock(conf->hash_locks + i - 1);
- local_irq_enable();
+ for (i = NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS - 1; i; i--)
+ spin_unlock(conf->hash_locks + i);
+ spin_unlock_irq(conf->hash_locks);
}
/* bio's attached to a stripe+device for I/O are linked together in bi_sector
@@ -726,12 +725,11 @@ static bool is_full_stripe_write(struct
static void lock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
{
- local_irq_disable();
if (sh1 > sh2) {
- spin_lock(&sh2->stripe_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sh2->stripe_lock);
spin_lock_nested(&sh1->stripe_lock, 1);
} else {
- spin_lock(&sh1->stripe_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sh1->stripe_lock);
spin_lock_nested(&sh2->stripe_lock, 1);
}
}
@@ -739,8 +737,7 @@ static void lock_two_stripes(struct stri
static void unlock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
{
spin_unlock(&sh1->stripe_lock);
- spin_unlock(&sh2->stripe_lock);
- local_irq_enable();
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sh2->stripe_lock);
}
/* Only freshly new full stripe normal write stripe can be added to a batch list */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from julia@ni.com are
queue-4.4/md-raid5-make-use-of-spin_lock_irq-over-local_irq_disable-spin_lock.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-04-10 9:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-10 9:04 Patch "md/raid5: make use of spin_lock_irq over local_irq_disable + spin_lock" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.