Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

I am trying to backport from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108 with 
backports.

These are my commands.
----
$ cd ~/git
$ git clone 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git

$ cd ~/git
$ git clone 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
$ cd linux-stable
$ git checkout v3.10.108

$ cd ~/git
$ git clone 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/backports/backports.git
$ cd backports
$ git checkout linux-4.4.y
$ ./gentree.py --copy-list ./copy-list --integrate --clean 
--git-revision v4.4 ~/git/linux-next ~/git/linux-stable
----

The gentree.py command resulted in these messages.
----
Get original source files from git ...
Applying patches from patches to /home/honma/git/linux-stable/backports/ ...
Failed to process SmPL patch 
collateral-evolutions/network/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "./gentree.py", line 1091, in <module>
     ret = _main()
   File "./gentree.py", line 724, in _main
     logwrite=logwrite)
   File "./gentree.py", line 906, in process
     apply_patches(args, "backport", source_dir, 'patches', 
bpid.target_dir, logwrite)
   File "./gentree.py", line 605, in apply_patches
     raise Exception('SmPL patch failed')
Exception: SmPL patch failed
----

Is this caused by my invalid procedure ?
If so, please tell me right way.

Regards,
Masashi Honma.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

On 2018/05/08 18:09, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 12:05 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
>> I am trying to backport from Linux 4.4
> 
> This will probably not work unless you use an old backports git tree
> snapshot.

Thank you.

I am using linux-4.4.y branch of backports.
Do you mean older branch (like linux-4.2.y or linux-3.19.y or something) 
should be used ?

> No, looks fine - perhaps your spatch version isn't right? What version
> do you have,

I am using a spatch binary build with latest git source because the 
package is not enough fresh to build the backports. The version is this.

commit f9d474787c57f1d3cc3a73217e0f5d14ed958631
Author: julia <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Date:   Mon Apr 30 08:10:06 2018 +0200

     make pragmas more flexible, improve positioning of eoln when pragma 
at the end of a file

> and what does it say if you run
> 
> mkdir /tmp/xyz && spatch --sp-file .../genl-const.cocci --dir /tmp/xyz
> 
> or something like that?

This is the result.

------------------
$ mkdir /tmp/xyz && spatch --sp-file 
./patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci 
--dir /tmp/xyz
init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/bin/../lib/coccinelle/standard.h
meta: parse error:
   File 
"./patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci", 
line 2, column 10, charpos = 13
   around = '__genl_const',
   whole content = attribute __genl_const;
------------------

Regards,
Masashi Honma.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 17:53 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:

> I am using linux-4.4.y branch of backports.
> Do you mean older branch (like linux-4.2.y or linux-3.19.y or something) 
> should be used ?

No, that should be OK then.

> > No, looks fine - perhaps your spatch version isn't right? What version
> > do you have,
> 
> I am using a spatch binary build with latest git source because the 
> package is not enough fresh to build the backports. The version is this.
> 
> commit f9d474787c57f1d3cc3a73217e0f5d14ed958631
> Author: julia <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
> Date:   Mon Apr 30 08:10:06 2018 +0200
> 
>      make pragmas more flexible, improve positioning of eoln when pragma 
> at the end of a file
> 
> > and what does it say if you run
> > 
> > mkdir /tmp/xyz && spatch --sp-file .../genl-const.cocci --dir /tmp/xyz
> > 
> > or something like that?
> 
> This is the result.
> 
> ------------------
> $ mkdir /tmp/xyz && spatch --sp-file 
> ./patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci 
> --dir /tmp/xyz
> init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/bin/../lib/coccinelle/standard.h
> meta: parse error:
>    File 
> "./patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci", 
> line 2, column 10, charpos = 13
>    around = '__genl_const',
>    whole content = attribute __genl_const;
> ------------------

Yeah, thought so. You actually need to change the syntax here a bit, I
don't remember but you can search the mailing list here for the details.
Look for "Parse error with genl-const.cocci".

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 12:05 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> I am trying to backport from Linux 4.4

This will probably not work unless you use an old backports git tree
snapshot.

> The gentree.py command resulted in these messages.
> ----
> Get original source files from git ...
> Applying patches from patches to /home/honma/git/linux-stable/backports/ ...
> Failed to process SmPL patch 
> collateral-evolutions/network/0027-genl-const/genl-const.cocci
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>    File "./gentree.py", line 1091, in <module>
>      ret = _main()
>    File "./gentree.py", line 724, in _main
>      logwrite=logwrite)
>    File "./gentree.py", line 906, in process
>      apply_patches(args, "backport", source_dir, 'patches', 
> bpid.target_dir, logwrite)
>    File "./gentree.py", line 605, in apply_patches
>      raise Exception('SmPL patch failed')
> Exception: SmPL patch failed

Then again, this shouldn't happen.

> Is this caused by my invalid procedure ?
> If so, please tell me right way.

No, looks fine - perhaps your spatch version isn't right? What version
do you have, and what does it say if you run

mkdir /tmp/xyz && spatch --sp-file .../genl-const.cocci --dir /tmp/xyz

or something like that?

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

On 2018/05/08 18:08, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Yeah, thought so. You actually need to change the syntax here a bit, I
> don't remember but you can search the mailing list here for the details.
> Look for "Parse error with genl-const.cocci".

Thank you.

It looks regression of latest(1.0.6+) coccinelle.
This works with coccinelle 1.0.4.

Regards,
Masashi Honma.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

On 2018/05/09 06:42, Masashi Honma wrote:> It looks regression of 
latest(1.0.6+) coccinelle.
> This works with coccinelle 1.0.4.

I asked about this to coccinelle.

https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/135

julia says this notation is deprecated from 1.0.6.

@@
attribute __genl_const;
@@

from 1.0.6, "name" field is required.

@@
attribute name __genl_const;
@@

The coccinelle made a backward incompatible change...

Regards,
Masashi Honma.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 16:21 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2018/05/09 06:42, Masashi Honma wrote:> It looks regression of 
> latest(1.0.6+) coccinelle.
> > This works with coccinelle 1.0.4.
> 
> I asked about this to coccinelle.
> 
> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/135
> 
> julia says this notation is deprecated from 1.0.6.
> 
> @@
> attribute __genl_const;
> @@
> 
> from 1.0.6, "name" field is required.
> 
> @@
> attribute name __genl_const;
> @@
> 
> The coccinelle made a backward incompatible change...

Yes, I'm aware.

Just don't know how to solve it :)

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 09:24 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 16:21 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> > On 2018/05/09 06:42, Masashi Honma wrote:> It looks regression of 
> > latest(1.0.6+) coccinelle.
> > > This works with coccinelle 1.0.4.
> > 
> > I asked about this to coccinelle.
> > 
> > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/135
> > 
> > julia says this notation is deprecated from 1.0.6.
> > 
> > @@
> > attribute __genl_const;
> > @@
> > 
> > from 1.0.6, "name" field is required.
> > 
> > @@
> > attribute name __genl_const;
> > @@
> > 
> > The coccinelle made a backward incompatible change...
> 
> Yes, I'm aware.
> 
> Just don't know how to solve it :)

Actually, since 1.0.6 has hit the distros, I'll just solve it by
requiring 1.0.6 and changing the spatch.

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

On 2018/05/09 16:54, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Actually, since 1.0.6 has hit the distros, I'll just solve it by
> requiring 1.0.6 and changing the spatch.

Great !

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 17:07 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2018/05/09 16:54, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Actually, since 1.0.6 has hit the distros, I'll just solve it by
> > requiring 1.0.6 and changing the spatch.

Though of course this doesn't apply to the older branches :)

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 199 bytes --]

On 2018/05/09 17:12, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Though of course this doesn't apply to the older branches :)

How about setting upper limitation to the older branches by attached patch ?

Masashi Honma.

[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1127 bytes --]

diff --git a/lib/bpreqs.py b/lib/bpreqs.py
index 1325fd2..feef444 100644
--- a/lib/bpreqs.py
+++ b/lib/bpreqs.py
@@ -190,10 +190,11 @@ class Req:
         sys.stdout.write("Try installing the package: %s\n" % package_hint)
         return False
     def coccinelle(self, version):
-        if self.require_version('spatch', '--version', version, 2, self.linux_version_cmp):
+        if self.linux_version_cmp('1.0.6', self.req_get_prog_version('spatch', '--version', 2)) == -1 and \
+           self.require_version('spatch', '--version', version, 2, self.linux_version_cmp):
             return True
         sys.stdout.write("Try installing the package: coccinelle\n")
-        sys.stdout.write("If that is too old go grab the code from source:\n\n")
+        sys.stdout.write("If that is less than " + version + " or more than 1.0.6 go grab the code from source:\n\n")
         sys.stdout.write("git clone https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle.git\n\n")
         sys.stdout.write("To build you will need: ocaml ncurses-devel\n\n")
         sys.stdout.write("If on SUSE / OpenSUSE you will also need: ocaml-ocamldoc\n\n")

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 17:51 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2018/05/09 17:12, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Though of course this doesn't apply to the older branches :)
> 
> How about setting upper limitation to the older branches by attached patch ?

We could also cherry-pick my trivial patch to the older branches I
guess. That'd still be simpler?

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 232 bytes --]

2018/5/9 18:03 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>:

>
> We could also cherry-pick my trivial patch to the older branches I
> guess. That'd still be simpler?
>
> Oh, you already have a plan.
Then drop my plan.

Masashi Honma.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 541 bytes --]

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Masashi Honma]

On 2018/05/09 18:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
> We could also cherry-pick my trivial patch to the older branches I
> guess. That'd still be simpler?

Oh, you already have a plan.
Then drop my plan.

Masashi Honma.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 18:24 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> On 2018/05/09 18:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > We could also cherry-pick my trivial patch to the older branches I
> > guess. That'd still be simpler?
> 
> Oh, you already have a plan.
> Then drop my plan.

Well, I wasn't really planning on doing it, but I could? :)

I guess it's easy enough though.

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Steve deRosier]

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:25 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 18:24 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> > On 2018/05/09 18:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > We could also cherry-pick my trivial patch to the older branches I
> > > guess. That'd still be simpler?
> >
> > Oh, you already have a plan.
> > Then drop my plan.

> Well, I wasn't really planning on doing it, but I could? :)

> I guess it's easy enough though.


That'd be my vote.

I haven't looked at the docs in a long time - do we note a minimum required
version of coccinelle?

- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Arend van Spriel]

On 5/9/2018 4:19 PM, Steve deRosier wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:25 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 18:24 +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
>>> On 2018/05/09 18:03, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>>> We could also cherry-pick my trivial patch to the older branches I
>>>> guess. That'd still be simpler?
>>>
>>> Oh, you already have a plan.
>>> Then drop my plan.
>
>> Well, I wasn't really planning on doing it, but I could? :)
>
>> I guess it's easy enough though.
>
>
> That'd be my vote.
>
> I haven't looked at the docs in a long time - do we note a minimum required
> version of coccinelle?

Do we have docs :-p Anyway, the gentree script checks the spatch version 
and seems Johannes already took care of the script as well [1]

Gr. AvS

[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/backports/backports.git/commit/?id=98272f479c2126a135dfcb12484e93d5888164ab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

Re: Failed to backport from from Linux 4.4 drivers to Linux 3.10.108

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 20:49 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> 
> Do we have docs :-p Anyway, the gentree script checks the spatch version 
> and seems Johannes already took care of the script as well [1]

Yeah I didn't apply it to any other branches though.

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in