[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
in case where a ref_tag check was needed.

Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
index fff40b0..d8b6bde 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@
 
 	sig_attrs->check_mask =
 	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_GUARD  ? 0xc0 : 0) |
-	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_REFTAG ? 0x30 : 0) |
+	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_APPTAG ? 0x30 : 0) |
 	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_REFTAG ? 0x0f : 0);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Sagi Grimberg]

btw, please CC target-devel for isert patches in the future. Also the
subject prefix is usually iser-target (not a must though)

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Sagi Grimberg]

btw, please CC target-devel for isert patches in the future. Also the
subject prefix is usually iser-target (not a must though)

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Sagi Grimberg]

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Sagi Grimberg]

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:07:17AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>
> >>Jason,
> >>
> >>>>we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
> >>>
> >>>Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> >>>case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> >>>this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> >>>to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> >>>series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> >>>dependencies!
> >>
> >>I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
> >>funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
> >
> >Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
> >tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.
> 
> Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the cover
> letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches goes
> through which tree.

Just in general don't send such a jumble of patches for multiple
maintainers under one cover letter. It is error prone to sort it out.

Jason

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, May 30, 2018@11:07:17AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2018@06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>
> >>Jason,
> >>
> >>>>we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
> >>>
> >>>Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> >>>case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> >>>this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> >>>to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> >>>series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> >>>dependencies!
> >>
> >>I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
> >>funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
> >
> >Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
> >tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.
> 
> Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the cover
> letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches goes
> through which tree.

Just in general don't send such a jumble of patches for multiple
maintainers under one cover letter. It is error prone to sort it out.

Jason

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>>>> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
>>>
>>> Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
>>> case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
>>> this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
>>> to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
>>> series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
>>> dependencies!
>>
>> I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
>> funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
> 
> Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
> tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.

Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the 
cover letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches 
goes through which tree.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/30/2018 1:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018@06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>>>> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
>>>
>>> Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
>>> case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
>>> this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
>>> to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
>>> series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
>>> dependencies!
>>
>> I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
>> funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
> 
> Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
> tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.

Yes sure. I'm sorry for the ping-pong, I've tried to cover this in the 
cover letter but I guess I should've mentioned specifically what patches 
goes through which tree.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Martin K. Petersen]

Jason,

>> I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
>> funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
>
> Sure, if you can still do that..

No problem. Done.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Martin K. Petersen]

Jason,

>> I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
>> funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.
>
> Sure, if you can still do that..

No problem. Done.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
> >> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
> >
> > Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> > case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> > this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> > to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> > series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> > dependencies!
> 
> I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
> funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.

Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.

Thanks,
Jason

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, May 29, 2018@06:11:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
> >> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
> >
> > Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> > case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> > this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> > to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> > series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> > dependencies!
> 
> I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
> funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.

Sure, if you can still do that.. Max can you send me all four patches
tomorrow and I'll route them through rdma.

Thanks,
Jason

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Martin K. Petersen]

Jason,

>> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
>
> Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> dependencies!

I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Martin K. Petersen]

Jason,

>> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
>
> Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> dependencies!

I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:08:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/29/2018 6:01 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >
> >Jason,
> >
> >>I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer we do
> >>it through RDMA.
> >
> >Applied to 4.17/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
> >
> 
> Thanks Martin.
> 
> Jason,
> how do you suggest to proceed with patches 2/3/4 that were reviewed by
> Christoph ?

If you want RDMA to take any patches send them to
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, updated to include the tags that Christoph
included.. Otherwise they are not in the RDMA patchworks.

> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...

Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
dependencies!

So, send the patches you want to the rdma list around rc1

Thanks,
Jason

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, May 29, 2018@03:08:21PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/29/2018 6:01 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >
> >Jason,
> >
> >>I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer we do
> >>it through RDMA.
> >
> >Applied to 4.17/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
> >
> 
> Thanks Martin.
> 
> Jason,
> how do you suggest to proceed with patches 2/3/4 that were reviewed by
> Christoph ?

If you want RDMA to take any patches send them to
linux-rdma at vger.kernel.org, updated to include the tags that Christoph
included.. Otherwise they are not in the RDMA patchworks.

> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...

Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
dependencies!

So, send the patches you want to the rdma list around rc1

Thanks,
Jason

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/29/2018 6:01 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
>> I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer we do
>> it through RDMA.
> 
> Applied to 4.17/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
> 

Thanks Martin.

Jason,
how do you suggest to proceed with patches 2/3/4 that were reviewed by 
Christoph ?

we must wait until Martin PR for sure...

-Max.

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/29/2018 6:01 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
>> I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer we do
>> it through RDMA.
> 
> Applied to 4.17/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
> 

Thanks Martin.

Jason,
how do you suggest to proceed with patches 2/3/4 that were reviewed by 
Christoph ?

we must wait until Martin PR for sure...

-Max.

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Martin K. Petersen]

Jason,

> I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer we do
> it through RDMA.

Applied to 4.17/scsi-fixes. Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Martin K. Petersen]

Jason,

> I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer we do
> it through RDMA.

Applied to 4.17/scsi-fixes. Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 03:04:38PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> Hi Martin/Jason,
> 
> can you please coordinate on taking this fix through your PR (RDMA or SCSi)
> ?

Martin, I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer
we do it through RDMA.

Thanks,
Jason

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Mon, May 28, 2018@03:04:38PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> Hi Martin/Jason,
> 
> can you please coordinate on taking this fix through your PR (RDMA or SCSi)
> ?

Martin, I see no problem for you to take it. Let me know if you prefer
we do it through RDMA.

Thanks,
Jason

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

Hi Martin/Jason,

can you please coordinate on taking this fix through your PR (RDMA or 
SCSi) ?

On 5/28/2018 3:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 02:54:48PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/28/2018 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
>>>> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
>>>> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
>>>
>>> Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.
>>
>> Yes, there are few patches that can be pushed "as is".
>>
>> Should it go through Nicholas PR ?
> 
> Nic has been non-responsive for a while and Martin has queued up
> target fixes when needed.
> 

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

Hi Martin/Jason,

can you please coordinate on taking this fix through your PR (RDMA or 
SCSi) ?

On 5/28/2018 3:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018@02:54:48PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/28/2018 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 27, 2018@06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
>>>> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
>>>> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
>>>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg at mellanox.com>
>>>
>>> Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.
>>
>> Yes, there are few patches that can be pushed "as is".
>>
>> Should it go through Nicholas PR ?
> 
> Nic has been non-responsive for a while and Martin has queued up
> target fixes when needed.
> 

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 02:54:48PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/2018 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
>>> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
>>> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.
>
> Yes, there are few patches that can be pushed "as is".
>
> Should it go through Nicholas PR ?

Nic has been non-responsive for a while and Martin has queued up
target fixes when needed.

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, May 28, 2018@02:54:48PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/2018 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sun, May 27, 2018@06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
>>> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
>>> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
>>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg at mellanox.com>
>>
>> Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.
>
> Yes, there are few patches that can be pushed "as is".
>
> Should it go through Nicholas PR ?

Nic has been non-responsive for a while and Martin has queued up
target fixes when needed.

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/28/2018 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
>> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
>>
>> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
>> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
> 
> Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.

Yes, there are few patches that can be pushed "as is".

Should it go through Nicholas PR ?

> 
> Btw, please don't cc stable@ for the whole series.
> 

The cc stable@ is only for this patch and not for the series.

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 5/28/2018 10:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2018@06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
>> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
>>
>> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
>> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg at mellanox.com>
> 
> Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.

Yes, there are few patches that can be pushed "as is".

Should it go through Nicholas PR ?

> 
> Btw, please don't cc stable@ for the whole series.
> 

The cc stable@ is only for this patch and not for the series.

Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
> 
> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>

Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.

Btw, please don't cc stable@ for the whole series.

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sun, May 27, 2018@06:50:06PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
> in case where a ref_tag check was needed.
> 
> Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
> Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg at mellanox.com>

Looks good, and should probably got into the scsi tree ASAP.

Btw, please don't cc stable@ for the whole series.

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
in case where a ref_tag check was needed.

Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
index fff40b0..d8b6bde 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@
 
 	sig_attrs->check_mask =
 	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_GUARD  ? 0xc0 : 0) |
-	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_REFTAG ? 0x30 : 0) |
+	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_APPTAG ? 0x30 : 0) |
 	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_REFTAG ? 0x0f : 0);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting

[Max Gurtovoy]

A copy/paste bug (probably) caused setting of an app_tag check mask
in case where a ref_tag check was needed.

Fixes: 38a2d0d429f1 ("IB/isert: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
Fixes: 9e961ae73c2c ("IB/isert: Support T10-PI protected transactions")
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg at mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
index fff40b0..d8b6bde 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@
 
 	sig_attrs->check_mask =
 	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_GUARD  ? 0xc0 : 0) |
-	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_REFTAG ? 0x30 : 0) |
+	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_APPTAG ? 0x30 : 0) |
 	       (se_cmd->prot_checks & TARGET_DIF_CHECK_REFTAG ? 0x0f : 0);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1