All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip v4 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:00:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152749084456.15132.1510513501798498714.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152749074878.15132.16693721906742461289.stgit@devbox>

Remove arch dependent setjump/longjump functions
and unused fields in kprobe_ctlblk for jprobes
from arch/x86.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h |    3 -
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c |   96 +---------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 367d99cff426..06782c2efa04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -111,9 +111,6 @@ struct kprobe_ctlblk {
 	unsigned long kprobe_status;
 	unsigned long kprobe_old_flags;
 	unsigned long kprobe_saved_flags;
-	unsigned long *jprobe_saved_sp;
-	struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
-	kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
 	struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 6f4d42377fe5..1b2d1acba810 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@
 
 #include "common.h"
 
-void jprobe_return_end(void);
-
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
 
@@ -690,10 +688,9 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			/*
 			 * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
 			 * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
-			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
-			 * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry
-			 * for jprobe processing, so get out doing nothing
-			 * more here.
+			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, that means
+			 * user handler setup registers to exit to another
+			 * instruction, we must skip the single stepping.
 			 */
 			if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
 				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
@@ -1083,93 +1080,6 @@ int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
 
-int setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
-	unsigned long addr;
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-
-	kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
-	kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = stack_addr(regs);
-	addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
-
-	/*
-	 * As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
-	 * owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g.
-	 * tailcall optimization. So, to be absolutely safe
-	 * we also save and restore enough stack bytes to cover
-	 * the argument area.
-	 * Use __memcpy() to avoid KASAN stack out-of-bounds reports as we copy
-	 * raw stack chunk with redzones:
-	 */
-	__memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (kprobe_opcode_t *)addr, MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr));
-	regs->ip = (unsigned long)(jp->entry);
-
-	/*
-	 * jprobes use jprobe_return() which skips the normal return
-	 * path of the function, and this messes up the accounting of the
-	 * function graph tracer to get messed up.
-	 *
-	 * Pause function graph tracing while performing the jprobe function.
-	 */
-	pause_graph_tracing();
-	return 1;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(setjmp_pre_handler);
-
-void jprobe_return(void)
-{
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-
-	/* Unpoison stack redzones in the frames we are going to jump over. */
-	kasan_unpoison_stack_above_sp_to(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
-
-	asm volatile (
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-			"       xchg   %%rbx,%%rsp	\n"
-#else
-			"       xchgl   %%ebx,%%esp	\n"
-#endif
-			"       int3			\n"
-			"       .globl jprobe_return_end\n"
-			"       jprobe_return_end:	\n"
-			"       nop			\n"::"b"
-			(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return);
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return_end);
-
-int longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-	u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
-	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
-	void *saved_sp = kcb->jprobe_saved_sp;
-
-	if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) &&
-	    (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
-		if (stack_addr(regs) != saved_sp) {
-			struct pt_regs *saved_regs = &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
-			printk(KERN_ERR
-			       "current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
-			       stack_addr(regs), saved_sp);
-			printk(KERN_ERR "Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
-			show_regs(saved_regs);
-			printk(KERN_ERR "Current registers\n");
-			show_regs(regs);
-			BUG();
-		}
-		/* It's OK to start function graph tracing again */
-		unpause_graph_tracing();
-		*regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
-		__memcpy(saved_sp, kcb->jprobes_stack, MIN_STACK_SIZE(saved_sp));
-		preempt_enable_no_resched();
-		return 1;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(longjmp_break_handler);
-
 bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
 {
 	bool is_in_entry_trampoline_section = false;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -tip v4 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:00:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152749084456.15132.1510513501798498714.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152749074878.15132.16693721906742461289.stgit@devbox>

Remove arch dependent setjump/longjump functions
and unused fields in kprobe_ctlblk for jprobes
from arch/x86.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h |    3 -
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c |   96 +---------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 367d99cff426..06782c2efa04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -111,9 +111,6 @@ struct kprobe_ctlblk {
 	unsigned long kprobe_status;
 	unsigned long kprobe_old_flags;
 	unsigned long kprobe_saved_flags;
-	unsigned long *jprobe_saved_sp;
-	struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
-	kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
 	struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 6f4d42377fe5..1b2d1acba810 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@
 
 #include "common.h"
 
-void jprobe_return_end(void);
-
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
 
@@ -690,10 +688,9 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			/*
 			 * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
 			 * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
-			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
-			 * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry
-			 * for jprobe processing, so get out doing nothing
-			 * more here.
+			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, that means
+			 * user handler setup registers to exit to another
+			 * instruction, we must skip the single stepping.
 			 */
 			if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
 				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
@@ -1083,93 +1080,6 @@ int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
 
-int setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
-	unsigned long addr;
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-
-	kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs;
-	kcb->jprobe_saved_sp = stack_addr(regs);
-	addr = (unsigned long)(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
-
-	/*
-	 * As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee
-	 * owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g.
-	 * tailcall optimization. So, to be absolutely safe
-	 * we also save and restore enough stack bytes to cover
-	 * the argument area.
-	 * Use __memcpy() to avoid KASAN stack out-of-bounds reports as we copy
-	 * raw stack chunk with redzones:
-	 */
-	__memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (kprobe_opcode_t *)addr, MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr));
-	regs->ip = (unsigned long)(jp->entry);
-
-	/*
-	 * jprobes use jprobe_return() which skips the normal return
-	 * path of the function, and this messes up the accounting of the
-	 * function graph tracer to get messed up.
-	 *
-	 * Pause function graph tracing while performing the jprobe function.
-	 */
-	pause_graph_tracing();
-	return 1;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(setjmp_pre_handler);
-
-void jprobe_return(void)
-{
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-
-	/* Unpoison stack redzones in the frames we are going to jump over. */
-	kasan_unpoison_stack_above_sp_to(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp);
-
-	asm volatile (
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-			"       xchg   %%rbx,%%rsp	\n"
-#else
-			"       xchgl   %%ebx,%%esp	\n"
-#endif
-			"       int3			\n"
-			"       .globl jprobe_return_end\n"
-			"       jprobe_return_end:	\n"
-			"       nop			\n"::"b"
-			(kcb->jprobe_saved_sp):"memory");
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return);
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return_end);
-
-int longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-	u8 *addr = (u8 *) (regs->ip - 1);
-	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
-	void *saved_sp = kcb->jprobe_saved_sp;
-
-	if ((addr > (u8 *) jprobe_return) &&
-	    (addr < (u8 *) jprobe_return_end)) {
-		if (stack_addr(regs) != saved_sp) {
-			struct pt_regs *saved_regs = &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
-			printk(KERN_ERR
-			       "current sp %p does not match saved sp %p\n",
-			       stack_addr(regs), saved_sp);
-			printk(KERN_ERR "Saved registers for jprobe %p\n", jp);
-			show_regs(saved_regs);
-			printk(KERN_ERR "Current registers\n");
-			show_regs(regs);
-			BUG();
-		}
-		/* It's OK to start function graph tracing again */
-		unpause_graph_tracing();
-		*regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs;
-		__memcpy(saved_sp, kcb->jprobes_stack, MIN_STACK_SIZE(saved_sp));
-		preempt_enable_no_resched();
-		return 1;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(longjmp_break_handler);
-
 bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
 {
 	bool is_in_entry_trampoline_section = false;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-28  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-28  6:59 [PATCH -tip v4 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  6:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  6:59 ` [PATCH -tip v4 01/27] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  6:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:00 ` [PATCH -tip v4 02/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:00   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-05-28  7:00   ` [PATCH -tip v4 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:01 ` [PATCH -tip v4 04/27] ARC: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:01 ` [PATCH -tip v4 05/27] ARM: kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:02 ` [PATCH -tip v4 06/27] arm64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:02 ` [PATCH -tip v4 07/27] powerpc/kprobes: Remove jprobe powerpc implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:03 ` [PATCH -tip v4 08/27] ia64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:03   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:03 ` [PATCH -tip v4 09/27] MIPS: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:03   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:04 ` [PATCH -tip v4 10/27] s390/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:04   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:04 ` [PATCH -tip v4 11/27] sh: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:04   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v4 12/27] sparc64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v4 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v4 14/27] kprobes/x86: Don't call ->break_handler() in x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:06   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v4 15/27] ARC: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ARC kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:06   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:07 ` [PATCH -tip v4 16/27] ARM: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:07   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:08 ` [PATCH -tip v4 17/27] arm64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:08   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:08 ` [PATCH -tip v4 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:08   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:09 ` [PATCH -tip v4 19/27] ia64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ia64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:09   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:09 ` [PATCH -tip v4 20/27] MIPS: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in MIPS " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:09   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:10 ` [PATCH -tip v4 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:10   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:10 ` [PATCH -tip v4 22/27] sh: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in SH " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:10   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:11 ` [PATCH -tip v4 23/27] sparc64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in sparc64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:11   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:11 ` [PATCH -tip v4 24/27] bpf: error-inject: kprobes: Clear current_kprobe and enable preempt in kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:11   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-31 10:55   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-01 23:36     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-02 11:58       ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-04  9:08         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -tip v4 25/27] x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:12   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -tip v4 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:12   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -tip v4 27/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe stub API Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-28  7:13   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-30  9:01 ` [PATCH -tip v4 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-30  9:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-31 10:43   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-05-31 10:43     ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152749084456.15132.1510513501798498714.stgit@devbox \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.