All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/pp/smu7: use a local variable for toc indexing" failed to apply to 4.17-stable tree
@ 2018-07-22 16:35 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2018-07-22 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, kugel; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 4.17-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 02ce6ce2e1d07e31e8314c761a2caa087ea094ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:38:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/pp/smu7: use a local variable for toc indexing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Rather than using the index variable stored in vram.  If
the device fails to come back online after a resume cycle,
reads from vram will return all 1s which will cause a
segfault. Based on a patch from Thomas Martitz <kugel@rockbox.org>.
This avoids the segfault, but we still need to sort out
why the GPU does not come back online after a resume.

Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105760
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c
index d644a9bb9078..9f407c48d4f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ int smu7_request_smu_load_fw(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
 	uint32_t fw_to_load;
 	int result = 0;
 	struct SMU_DRAMData_TOC *toc;
+	uint32_t num_entries = 0;
 
 	if (!hwmgr->reload_fw) {
 		pr_info("skip reloading...\n");
@@ -422,41 +423,41 @@ int smu7_request_smu_load_fw(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
 	}
 
 	toc = (struct SMU_DRAMData_TOC *)smu_data->header;
-	toc->num_entries = 0;
 	toc->structure_version = 1;
 
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_RLC_G, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_RLC_G, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_CP_CE, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_CP_CE, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_CP_PFP, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_CP_PFP, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_CP_ME, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_CP_ME, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_CP_MEC, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_CP_MEC, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT1, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT1, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT2, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT2, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_SDMA0, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_SDMA0, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_SDMA1, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_SDMA1, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 	if (!hwmgr->not_vf)
 		PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
-				UCODE_ID_MEC_STORAGE, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+				UCODE_ID_MEC_STORAGE, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
 				"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
 
+	toc->num_entries = num_entries;
 	smu7_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_DRV_DRAM_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(smu_data->header_buffer.mc_addr));
 	smu7_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_DRV_DRAM_ADDR_LO, lower_32_bits(smu_data->header_buffer.mc_addr));
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-07-22 17:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-22 16:35 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/pp/smu7: use a local variable for toc indexing" failed to apply to 4.17-stable tree gregkh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.