[PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.

For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6

Tonghao Zhang (6):
  net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
  net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
  net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
  net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
  net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
  net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate

 drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 1/6] net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

This patch changes the way that lock all vqs
at the same, to lock them one by one. It will
be used for next patch to avoid the deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index a502f1a..a1c06e7 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -294,8 +294,11 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_reset(struct vhost_dev *d)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) {
+		mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
 		__vhost_vq_meta_reset(d->vqs[i]);
+		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
+	}
 }
 
 static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
@@ -890,20 +893,6 @@ static inline void __user *__vhost_get_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 #define vhost_get_used(vq, x, ptr) \
 	vhost_get_user(vq, x, ptr, VHOST_ADDR_USED)
 
-static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
-		mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i);
-}
-
-static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
-		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
-}
-
 static int vhost_new_umem_range(struct vhost_umem *umem,
 				u64 start, u64 size, u64 end,
 				u64 userspace_addr, int perm)
@@ -953,7 +942,10 @@ static void vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(struct vhost_dev *d,
 		if (msg->iova <= vq_msg->iova &&
 		    msg->iova + msg->size - 1 > vq_msg->iova &&
 		    vq_msg->type == VHOST_IOTLB_MISS) {
+			mutex_lock(&node->vq->mutex);
 			vhost_poll_queue(&node->vq->poll);
+			mutex_unlock(&node->vq->mutex);
+
 			list_del(&node->node);
 			kfree(node);
 		}
@@ -985,7 +977,6 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
-	vhost_dev_lock_vqs(dev);
 	switch (msg->type) {
 	case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
 		if (!dev->iotlb) {
@@ -1019,7 +1010,6 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 1/6] net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

This patch changes the way that lock all vqs
at the same, to lock them one by one. It will
be used for next patch to avoid the deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index a502f1a..a1c06e7 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -294,8 +294,11 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_reset(struct vhost_dev *d)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) {
+		mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
 		__vhost_vq_meta_reset(d->vqs[i]);
+		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
+	}
 }
 
 static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
@@ -890,20 +893,6 @@ static inline void __user *__vhost_get_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 #define vhost_get_used(vq, x, ptr) \
 	vhost_get_user(vq, x, ptr, VHOST_ADDR_USED)
 
-static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
-		mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i);
-}
-
-static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
-		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
-}
-
 static int vhost_new_umem_range(struct vhost_umem *umem,
 				u64 start, u64 size, u64 end,
 				u64 userspace_addr, int perm)
@@ -953,7 +942,10 @@ static void vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(struct vhost_dev *d,
 		if (msg->iova <= vq_msg->iova &&
 		    msg->iova + msg->size - 1 > vq_msg->iova &&
 		    vq_msg->type == VHOST_IOTLB_MISS) {
+			mutex_lock(&node->vq->mutex);
 			vhost_poll_queue(&node->vq->poll);
+			mutex_unlock(&node->vq->mutex);
+
 			list_del(&node->node);
 			kfree(node);
 		}
@@ -985,7 +977,6 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
-	vhost_dev_lock_vqs(dev);
 	switch (msg->type) {
 	case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
 		if (!dev->iotlb) {
@@ -1019,7 +1010,6 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 2/6] net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

Use the VHOST_NET_VQ_XXX as a subclass for mutex_lock_nested.

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 367d802..32c1b52 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
 	struct socket *sock;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
 	sock = vq->private_data;
 	if (!sock)
 		goto out;
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
 		/* Flush batched heads first */
 		vhost_net_signal_used(rnvq);
 		/* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
-		mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, 1);
+		mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
 		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
 
 		preempt_disable();
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	__virtio16 num_buffers;
 	int recv_pkts = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, 0);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
 	sock = vq->private_data;
 	if (!sock)
 		goto out;
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 2/6] net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

Use the VHOST_NET_VQ_XXX as a subclass for mutex_lock_nested.

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 367d802..32c1b52 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
 	struct socket *sock;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
 	sock = vq->private_data;
 	if (!sock)
 		goto out;
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
 		/* Flush batched heads first */
 		vhost_net_signal_used(rnvq);
 		/* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
-		mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, 1);
+		mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
 		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
 
 		preempt_disable();
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	__virtio16 num_buffers;
 	int recv_pkts = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, 0);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
 	sock = vq->private_data;
 	if (!sock)
 		goto out;
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 3/6] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.

To avoid duplicate codes, introduce the helper functions:
* sock_has_rx_data(changed from sk_has_rx_data)
* vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 32c1b52..3f68265 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -440,6 +440,73 @@ static void vhost_net_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
 	nvq->done_idx = 0;
 }
 
+static int sock_has_rx_data(struct socket *sock)
+{
+	if (unlikely(!sock))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (sock->ops->peek_len)
+		return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
+
+	return skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue);
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(struct vhost_net *net,
+					  struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
+{
+	if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq)) {
+		vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+	} else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
+		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+		vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+	}
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
+				struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
+				struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
+				bool *busyloop_intr,
+				bool poll_rx)
+{
+	unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
+	unsigned long endtime;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = poll_rx ? tvq : rvq;
+
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, poll_rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
+	vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+	sock = rvq->private_data;
+
+	busyloop_timeout = poll_rx ? rvq->busyloop_timeout:
+				     tvq->busyloop_timeout;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
+
+	while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
+		if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev)) {
+			*busyloop_intr = true;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if ((sock_has_rx_data(sock) &&
+		     !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, rvq)) ||
+		    !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq))
+			break;
+
+		cpu_relax();
+	}
+
+	preempt_enable();
+
+	if (poll_rx || sock_has_rx_data(sock))
+		vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, vq);
+	else if (!poll_rx) /* On tx here, sock has no rx data. */
+		vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, rvq);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
+}
+
 static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
 				    struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
 				    unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
@@ -753,16 +820,6 @@ static int peek_head_len(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq, struct sock *sk)
 	return len;
 }
 
-static int sk_has_rx_data(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
-
-	if (sock->ops->peek_len)
-		return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
-
-	return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
-}
-
 static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
 				      bool *busyloop_intr)
 {
@@ -770,41 +827,13 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
 	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq = &rnvq->vq;
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
-	unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
 	int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
 
-	if (!len && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
+	if (!len && rvq->busyloop_timeout) {
 		/* Flush batched heads first */
 		vhost_net_signal_used(rnvq);
 		/* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
-		mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
-		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
-
-		preempt_disable();
-		endtime = busy_clock() + tvq->busyloop_timeout;
-
-		while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
-			if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev)) {
-				*busyloop_intr = true;
-				break;
-			}
-			if ((sk_has_rx_data(sk) &&
-			     !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, rvq)) ||
-			    !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq))
-				break;
-			cpu_relax();
-		}
-
-		preempt_enable();
-
-		if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq)) {
-			vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
-		} else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, tvq))) {
-			vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
-			vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
-		}
-
-		mutex_unlock(&tvq->mutex);
+		vhost_net_busy_poll(net, rvq, tvq, busyloop_intr, true);
 
 		len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 3/6] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.

To avoid duplicate codes, introduce the helper functions:
* sock_has_rx_data(changed from sk_has_rx_data)
* vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 32c1b52..3f68265 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -440,6 +440,73 @@ static void vhost_net_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
 	nvq->done_idx = 0;
 }
 
+static int sock_has_rx_data(struct socket *sock)
+{
+	if (unlikely(!sock))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (sock->ops->peek_len)
+		return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
+
+	return skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue);
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(struct vhost_net *net,
+					  struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
+{
+	if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq)) {
+		vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+	} else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
+		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+		vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+	}
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
+				struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
+				struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
+				bool *busyloop_intr,
+				bool poll_rx)
+{
+	unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
+	unsigned long endtime;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = poll_rx ? tvq : rvq;
+
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, poll_rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
+	vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+	sock = rvq->private_data;
+
+	busyloop_timeout = poll_rx ? rvq->busyloop_timeout:
+				     tvq->busyloop_timeout;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
+
+	while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
+		if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev)) {
+			*busyloop_intr = true;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if ((sock_has_rx_data(sock) &&
+		     !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, rvq)) ||
+		    !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq))
+			break;
+
+		cpu_relax();
+	}
+
+	preempt_enable();
+
+	if (poll_rx || sock_has_rx_data(sock))
+		vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, vq);
+	else if (!poll_rx) /* On tx here, sock has no rx data. */
+		vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, rvq);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
+}
+
 static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
 				    struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
 				    unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
@@ -753,16 +820,6 @@ static int peek_head_len(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq, struct sock *sk)
 	return len;
 }
 
-static int sk_has_rx_data(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
-
-	if (sock->ops->peek_len)
-		return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
-
-	return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
-}
-
 static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
 				      bool *busyloop_intr)
 {
@@ -770,41 +827,13 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
 	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq = &rnvq->vq;
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
-	unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
 	int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
 
-	if (!len && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
+	if (!len && rvq->busyloop_timeout) {
 		/* Flush batched heads first */
 		vhost_net_signal_used(rnvq);
 		/* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
-		mutex_lock_nested(&tvq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
-		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
-
-		preempt_disable();
-		endtime = busy_clock() + tvq->busyloop_timeout;
-
-		while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
-			if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev)) {
-				*busyloop_intr = true;
-				break;
-			}
-			if ((sk_has_rx_data(sk) &&
-			     !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, rvq)) ||
-			    !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq))
-				break;
-			cpu_relax();
-		}
-
-		preempt_enable();
-
-		if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq)) {
-			vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
-		} else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, tvq))) {
-			vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
-			vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
-		}
-
-		mutex_unlock(&tvq->mutex);
+		vhost_net_busy_poll(net, rvq, tvq, busyloop_intr, true);
 
 		len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 4/6] net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

This patch improves the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the
same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.

We set the poll-us=100us and use the netperf to test throughput
and mean latency. When running the tests, the vhost-net kthread
of that VM, is alway 100% CPU. The commands are shown as below.

Rx performance is greatly improved by this patch. There is not
notable performance change on tx with this series though. This
patch is useful for bi-directional traffic.

netperf -H IP -t TCP_STREAM -l 20 -- -O "THROUGHPUT, THROUGHPUT_UNITS, MEAN_LATENCY"

Topology:
[Host] ->linux bridge -> tap vhost-net ->[Guest]

TCP_STREAM:
* Without the patch:  19842.95 Mbps, 6.50 us mean latency
* With the patch:     37598.20 Mbps, 3.43 us mean latency

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 3f68265..d372c14 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -508,31 +508,24 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
 }
 
 static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
-				    struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
+				    struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq,
 				    unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
 				    bool *busyloop_intr)
 {
-	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
-	unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
-	int r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
+	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq = &rnvq->vq;
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
+
+	int r = vhost_get_vq_desc(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
 				  out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
 
-	if (r == vq->num && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
-		if (!vhost_sock_zcopy(vq->private_data))
-			vhost_net_signal_used(nvq);
-		preempt_disable();
-		endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
-		while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
-			if (vhost_has_work(vq->dev)) {
-				*busyloop_intr = true;
-				break;
-			}
-			if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(vq->dev, vq))
-				break;
-			cpu_relax();
-		}
-		preempt_enable();
-		r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
+	if (r == tvq->num && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
+		if (!vhost_sock_zcopy(tvq->private_data))
+			vhost_net_signal_used(tnvq);
+
+		vhost_net_busy_poll(net, rvq, tvq, busyloop_intr, false);
+
+		r = vhost_get_vq_desc(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
 				      out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH net-next v9 4/6] net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path

[xiangxia.m.yue]

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>

This patch improves the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the
same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.

We set the poll-us=100us and use the netperf to test throughput
and mean latency. When running the tests, the vhost-net kthread
of that VM, is alway 100% CPU. The commands are shown as below.

Rx performance is greatly improved by this patch. There is not
notable performance change on tx with this series though. This
patch is useful for bi-directional traffic.

netperf -H IP -t TCP_STREAM -l 20 -- -O "THROUGHPUT, THROUGHPUT_UNITS, MEAN_LATENCY"

Topology:
[Host] ->linux bridge -> tap vhost-net ->[Guest]

TCP_STREAM:
* Without the patch:  19842.95 Mbps, 6.50 us mean latency
* With the patch:     37598.20 Mbps, 3.43 us mean latency

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 3f68265..d372c14 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -508,31 +508,24 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
 }
 
 static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
-				    struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
+				    struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq,
 				    unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
 				    bool *busyloop_intr)
 {
-	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
-	unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
-	int r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
+	struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq = &rnvq->vq;
+	struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
+
+	int r = vhost_get_vq_desc(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
 				  out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
 
-	if (r == vq->num && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
-		if (!vhost_sock_zcopy(vq->private_data))
-			vhost_net_signal_used(nvq);
-		preempt_disable();
-		endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
-		while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
-			if (vhost_has_work(vq->dev)) {
-				*busyloop_intr = true;
-				break;
-			}
-			if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(vq->dev, vq))
-				break;
-			cpu_relax();
-		}
-		preempt_enable();
-		r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
+	if (r == tvq->num && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
+		if (!vhost_sock_zcopy(tvq->private_data))
+			vhost_net_signal_used(tnvq);
+
+		vhost_net_busy_poll(net, rvq, tvq, busyloop_intr, false);
+
+		r = vhost_get_vq_desc(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
 				      out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[David Miller]

From: xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com
Date: Sun,  9 Sep 2018 04:51:21 -0700

> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> 
> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
> 
> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6

I only see patches 1-4.

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[Tonghao Zhang]

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
>
> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
>
> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
>
> Tonghao Zhang (6):
>   net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
>   net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
>   net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
>   net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
>   net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
>   net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
>
>  drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
>  2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
ping ?

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[Tonghao Zhang]

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
>
> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
>
> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
>
> Tonghao Zhang (6):
>   net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
>   net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
>   net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
>   net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
>   net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
>   net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
>
>  drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
>  2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
ping ?

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[Jason Wang]

On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
>> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
>> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
>>
>> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
>>
>> Tonghao Zhang (6):
>>    net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
>>    net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
>>    net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
>>    net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
>>    net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
>>    net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
>>
>>   drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
>>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
> ping ?

HI Tonghao:

As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need 
to resend the series.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[Jason Wang]

On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
>> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
>> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
>>
>> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
>>
>> Tonghao Zhang (6):
>>    net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
>>    net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
>>    net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
>>    net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
>>    net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
>>    net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
>>
>>   drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
>>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
> ping ?

HI Tonghao:

As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need 
to resend the series.

Thanks

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[Tonghao Zhang]

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
> >> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
> >> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
> >>
> >> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
> >>
> >> Tonghao Zhang (6):
> >>    net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
> >>    net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
> >>    net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
> >>    net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
> >>    net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
> >>    net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
> >>
> >>   drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
> >>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
> > ping ?
>
> HI Tonghao:
>
> As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need
> to resend the series.
OK
> Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop

[Tonghao Zhang]

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> This patches improve the guest receive performance.
> >> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
> >> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
> >>
> >> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
> >>
> >> Tonghao Zhang (6):
> >>    net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
> >>    net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
> >>    net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
> >>    net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path
> >>    net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll
> >>    net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate
> >>
> >>   drivers/vhost/net.c   | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  24 +++-----
> >>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
> > ping ?
>
> HI Tonghao:
>
> As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need
> to resend the series.
OK
> Thanks