All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: bartosz.dunajski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] drm/i915: Add IOCTL Param to control data port coherency.
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:59:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <153969839500.12914.5426508577471057367@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539356576-31837-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com>

Quoting Tomasz Lis (2018-10-12 18:02:56)
> The patch adds a parameter to control the data port coherency functionality
> on a per-context level. When the IOCTL is called, a command to switch data
> port coherency state is added to the ordered list. All prior requests are
> executed on old coherency settings, and all exec requests after the IOCTL
> will use new settings.
> 
> Rationale:
> 
> The OpenCL driver develpers requested a functionality to control cache
> coherency at data port level. Keeping the coherency at that level is disabled
> by default due to its performance costs. OpenCL driver is planning to
> enable it for a small subset of submissions, when such functionality is
> required. Below are answers to basic question explaining background
> of the functionality and reasoning for the proposed implementation:
> 
> 1. Why do we need a coherency enable/disable switch for memory that is shared
> between CPU and GEN (GPU)?
> 
> Memory coherency between CPU and GEN, while being a great feature that enables
> CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER OCL capability on Intel GEN architecture, adds
> overhead related to tracking (snooping) memory inside different cache units
> (L1$, L2$, L3$, LLC$, etc.). At the same time, minority of modern OCL
> applications actually use CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER (and hence require
> memory coherency between CPU and GPU). The goal of coherency enable/disable
> switch is to remove overhead of memory coherency when memory coherency is not
> needed.
> 
> 2. Why do we need a global coherency switch?
> 
> In order to support I/O commands from within EUs (Execution Units), Intel GEN
> ISA (GEN Instruction Set Assembly) contains dedicated "send" instructions.
> These send instructions provide several addressing models. One of these
> addressing models (named "stateless") provides most flexible I/O using plain
> virtual addresses (as opposed to buffer_handle+offset models). This "stateless"
> model is similar to regular memory load/store operations available on typical
> CPUs. Since this model provides I/O using arbitrary virtual addresses, it
> enables algorithmic designs that are based on pointer-to-pointer (e.g. buffer
> of pointers) concepts. For instance, it allows creating tree-like data
> structures such as:
>                    ________________
>                   |      NODE1     |
>                   | uint64_t data  |
>                   +----------------|
>                   | NODE*  |  NODE*|
>                   +--------+-------+
>                     /              \
>    ________________/                \________________
>   |      NODE2     |                |      NODE3     |
>   | uint64_t data  |                | uint64_t data  |
>   +----------------|                +----------------|
>   | NODE*  |  NODE*|                | NODE*  |  NODE*|
>   +--------+-------+                +--------+-------+
> 
> Please note that pointers inside such structures can point to memory locations
> in different OCL allocations  - e.g. NODE1 and NODE2 can reside in one OCL
> allocation while NODE3 resides in a completely separate OCL allocation.
> Additionally, such pointers can be shared with CPU (i.e. using SVM - Shared
> Virtual Memory feature). Using pointers from different allocations doesn't
> affect the stateless addressing model which even allows scattered reading from
> different allocations at the same time (i.e. by utilizing SIMD-nature of send
> instructions).
> 
> When it comes to coherency programming, send instructions in stateless model
> can be encoded (at ISA level) to either use or disable coherency. However, for
> generic OCL applications (such as example with tree-like data structure), OCL
> compiler is not able to determine origin of memory pointed to by an arbitrary
> pointer - i.e. is not able to track given pointer back to a specific
> allocation. As such, it's not able to decide whether coherency is needed or not
> for specific pointer (or for specific I/O instruction). As a result, compiler
> encodes all stateless sends as coherent (doing otherwise would lead to
> functional issues resulting from data corruption). Please note that it would be
> possible to workaround this (e.g. based on allocations map and pointer bounds
> checking prior to each I/O instruction) but the performance cost of such
> workaround would be many times greater than the cost of keeping coherency
> always enabled. As such, enabling/disabling memory coherency at GEN ISA level
> is not feasible and alternative method is needed.
> 
> Such alternative solution is to have a global coherency switch that allows
> disabling coherency for single (though entire) GPU submission. This is
> beneficial because this way we:
> * can enable (and pay for) coherency only in submissions that actually need
> coherency (submissions that use CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER resources)
> * don't care about coherency at GEN ISA granularity (no performance impact)

Might be worthy mentioning that this address space compatibility can be
achieved with userptr + soft-pinning allocations to their process space
addresses.

Anyway, this is;

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

But as mentioned previously, getting this merged needs the test to be
finished and clarity from the userspace project side.

Regards, Joonas

> 3. Will coherency switch be used frequently?
> 
> There are scenarios that will require frequent toggling of the coherency
> switch.
> E.g. an application has two OCL compute kernels: kern_master and kern_worker.
> kern_master uses, concurrently with CPU, some fine grain SVM resources
> (CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER). These resources contain descriptors of
> computational work that needs to be executed. kern_master analyzes incoming
> work descriptors and populates a plain OCL buffer (non-fine-grain) with payload
> for kern_worker. Once kern_master is done, kern_worker kicks-in and processes
> the payload that kern_master produced. These two kernels work in a loop, one
> after another. Since only kern_master requires coherency, kern_worker should
> not be forced to pay for it. This means that we need to have the ability to
> toggle coherency switch on or off per each GPU submission:
> (ENABLE COHERENCY) kern_master -> (DISABLE COHERENCY)kern_worker -> (ENABLE
> COHERENCY) kern_master -> (DISABLE COHERENCY)kern_worker -> ...
> 
> v2: Fixed compilation warning.
> v3: Refactored the patch to add IOCTL instead of exec flag.
> v4: Renamed and documented the API flag. Used strict values.
>     Removed redundant GEM_WARN_ON()s. Improved to coding standard.
>     Introduced a macro for checking whether hardware supports the feature.
> v5: Renamed some locals. Made the flag write to be lazy.
>     Updated comments to remove misconceptions. Added gen11 support.
> v6: Moved the flag write to gen8_enit_flush_render(). Renamed some functions.
>     Moved all flags checking to one place. Added mutex check.
> v7: Removed 2 comments, improved API comment. (Joonas)
> v8: Use non-GEM WARN_ON when in statements. (Tvrtko)
> 
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> 
> Bspec: 11419
> Bspec: 19175
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 29 ++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h | 17 +++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c        | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h             | 10 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 3017ef0..90b3a0ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2588,6 +2588,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  #define HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv)    (!!((dev_priv)->edram_cap & EDRAM_ENABLED))
>  #define HAS_WT(dev_priv)       ((IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || \
>                                  IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) && HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv))
> +#define HAS_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY(dev_priv)      (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>  
>  #define HWS_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev_priv)   ((dev_priv)->info.hws_needs_physical)
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index 8cbe580..718ede9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_destroy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                                     struct drm_file *file)
>  {
> +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dev);
>         struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
>         struct drm_i915_gem_context_param *args = data;
>         struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> @@ -867,10 +868,10 @@ int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_GTT_SIZE:
>                 if (ctx->ppgtt)
>                         args->value = ctx->ppgtt->vm.total;
> -               else if (to_i915(dev)->mm.aliasing_ppgtt)
> -                       args->value = to_i915(dev)->mm.aliasing_ppgtt->vm.total;
> +               else if (i915->mm.aliasing_ppgtt)
> +                       args->value = i915->mm.aliasing_ppgtt->vm.total;
>                 else
> -                       args->value = to_i915(dev)->ggtt.vm.total;
> +                       args->value = i915->ggtt.vm.total;
>                 break;
>         case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ERROR_CAPTURE:
>                 args->value = i915_gem_context_no_error_capture(ctx);
> @@ -881,6 +882,12 @@ int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY:
>                 args->value = ctx->sched.priority >> I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
>                 break;
> +       case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY:
> +               if (!HAS_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY(i915))
> +                       ret = -ENODEV;
> +               else
> +                       args->value = i915_gem_context_is_data_port_coherent(ctx);
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>                 break;
> @@ -893,6 +900,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  int i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                                     struct drm_file *file)
>  {
> +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dev);
>         struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
>         struct drm_i915_gem_context_param *args = data;
>         struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> @@ -939,7 +947,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  
>                         if (args->size)
>                                 ret = -EINVAL;
> -                       else if (!(to_i915(dev)->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY))
> +                       else if (!(i915->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY))
>                                 ret = -ENODEV;
>                         else if (priority > I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY ||
>                                  priority < I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY)
> @@ -953,6 +961,19 @@ int i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                 }
>                 break;
>  
> +       case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY:
> +               if (args->size)
> +                       ret = -EINVAL;
> +               else if (!HAS_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY(i915))
> +                       ret = -ENODEV;
> +               else if (args->value == 1)
> +                       i915_gem_context_set_data_port_coherent(ctx);
> +               else if (args->value == 0)
> +                       i915_gem_context_clear_data_port_coherent(ctx);
> +               else
> +                       ret = -EINVAL;
> +               break;
> +
>         default:
>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>                 break;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
> index f6d870b..69f9247 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
> @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ struct i915_gem_context {
>  #define CONTEXT_BANNED                 0
>  #define CONTEXT_CLOSED                 1
>  #define CONTEXT_FORCE_SINGLE_SUBMISSION        2
> +#define CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED   3
> +#define CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE      4
>  
>         /**
>          * @hw_id: - unique identifier for the context
> @@ -283,6 +285,21 @@ static inline void i915_gem_context_unpin_hw_id(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
>         atomic_dec(&ctx->hw_id_pin_count);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool i915_gem_context_is_data_port_coherent(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> +{
> +       return test_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void i915_gem_context_set_data_port_coherent(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> +{
> +       __set_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void i915_gem_context_clear_data_port_coherent(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> +{
> +       __clear_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool i915_gem_context_is_default(const struct i915_gem_context *c)
>  {
>         return c->user_handle == DEFAULT_CONTEXT_HANDLE;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index ff0e2b3..8680bc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,62 @@ intel_lr_context_descriptor_update(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>         ce->lrc_desc = desc;
>  }
>  
> +static int emit_set_data_port_coherency(struct i915_request *rq, bool enable)
> +{
> +       u32 *cs;
> +       i915_reg_t reg;
> +
> +       GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine->class != RENDER_CLASS);
> +       GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) < 9);
> +
> +       cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 4);
> +       if (IS_ERR(cs))
> +               return PTR_ERR(cs);
> +
> +       if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 11)
> +               reg = ICL_HDC_MODE;
> +       else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 10)
> +               reg = CNL_HDC_CHICKEN0;
> +       else
> +               reg = HDC_CHICKEN0;
> +
> +       *cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1);
> +       *cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
> +       if (enable)
> +               *cs++ = _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(HDC_FORCE_NON_COHERENT);
> +       else
> +               *cs++ = _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(HDC_FORCE_NON_COHERENT);
> +       *cs++ = MI_NOOP;
> +
> +       intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +intel_lr_context_update_data_port_coherency(struct i915_request *rq)
> +{
> +       struct i915_gem_context *ctx = rq->gem_context;
> +       bool enable = test_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       lockdep_assert_held(&rq->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +
> +       if (test_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE, &ctx->flags) == enable)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       ret = emit_set_data_port_coherency(rq, enable);
> +
> +       if (!ret) {
> +               if (enable)
> +                       __set_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE, &ctx->flags);
> +               else
> +                       __clear_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE, &ctx->flags);
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static void unwind_wa_tail(struct i915_request *rq)
>  {
>         rq->tail = intel_ring_wrap(rq->ring, rq->wa_tail - WA_TAIL_BYTES);
> @@ -1965,7 +2021,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request,
>                 i915_ggtt_offset(engine->scratch) + 2 * CACHELINE_BYTES;
>         bool vf_flush_wa = false, dc_flush_wa = false;
>         u32 *cs, flags = 0;
> -       int len;
> +       int err, len;
>  
>         flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL;
>  
> @@ -1996,6 +2052,12 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request,
>                 /* WaForGAMHang:kbl */
>                 if (IS_KBL_REVID(request->i915, 0, KBL_REVID_B0))
>                         dc_flush_wa = true;
> +
> +               err = intel_lr_context_update_data_port_coherency(request);
> +               if (WARN_ON(err)) {
> +                       DRM_DEBUG("Data Port Coherency toggle failed.\n");
> +                       return err;
> +               }
>         }
>  
>         len = 6;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 298b2e1..7c9e153 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -1486,6 +1486,16 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param {
>  #define   I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY       1023 /* inclusive */
>  #define   I915_CONTEXT_DEFAULT_PRIORITY                0
>  #define   I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY       -1023 /* inclusive */
> +/*
> + * When data port level coherency is enabled, the GPU and CPU will both keep
> + * changes to memory content visible to each other as fast as possible, by
> + * forcing internal cache units to send memory writes to higher level caches
> + * immediately after writes. Only buffers with coherency requested within
> + * surface state, or specific stateless accesses will be affected by this
> + * option. Keeping data port coherency has a performance cost, and therefore
> + * it is by default disabled (see WaForceEnableNonCoherent).
> + */
> +#define I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY 0x7
>         __u64 value;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-16 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-19 12:37 [RFC v1] Data port coherency control for UMDs Tomasz Lis
2018-03-19 12:37 ` [RFC v1] drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency Tomasz Lis
2018-03-19 12:43   ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-19 14:14     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-19 14:26       ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-20 17:23         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-05-04  9:24           ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-03-20 18:43       ` Oscar Mateo
2018-03-21 10:16         ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-21 19:42           ` Oscar Mateo
2018-03-27 17:41             ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-30 17:29   ` [PATCH " Tomasz Lis
2018-03-31 19:07     ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-11 15:46   ` [PATCH v2] " Tomasz Lis
2018-06-20 15:03   ` [PATCH v1] Second implementation of Data Port Coherency Tomasz Lis
2018-06-20 15:03     ` [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Add IOCTL Param to control data port coherency Tomasz Lis
2018-06-21  6:39       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-06-21 13:47         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-18 13:03           ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-06-21  7:05       ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-21 13:47         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-06-21  7:31       ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-06-21  8:48         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-06-22 16:40           ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-07-18 13:12             ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-07-18 13:27               ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-07-09 13:20   ` [PATCH v4] " Tomasz Lis
2018-07-09 13:48     ` Lionel Landwerlin
2018-07-09 14:03       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-09 14:24         ` Lionel Landwerlin
2018-07-09 15:21           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-09 16:28     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-09 16:37       ` Chris Wilson
2018-07-10 17:32         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-11  9:28           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-10 18:03       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-11 11:20         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-12 15:10   ` [PATCH v5] " Tomasz Lis
2018-07-13 10:40     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-13 17:44       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-10-09 18:06   ` [PATCH v6] " Tomasz Lis
2018-10-10  7:29     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-10-12 15:02   ` [PATCH v8] " Tomasz Lis
2018-10-15 12:52     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-10-16 13:59     ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2018-03-19 13:53 ` [RFC v1] Data port coherency control for UMDs Joonas Lahtinen
2018-03-19 16:09   ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-20 15:15   ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-03-21 10:02     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-03-26  9:46       ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-03-29  7:42         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-03-30  9:00           ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-04-04  9:18             ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-04-11  9:15               ` Dunajski, Bartosz
2018-03-19 14:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency Patchwork
2018-03-19 14:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-03-19 16:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-03-30 18:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev2) Patchwork
2018-03-30 18:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-03-30 19:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-04-11 16:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev3) Patchwork
2018-04-11 16:29 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-04-11 20:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-06-20 15:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev4) Patchwork
2018-06-20 16:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-06-20 21:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-07-09 13:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev5) Patchwork
2018-07-09 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-07-09 14:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-07-09 20:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-07-12 15:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev6) Patchwork
2018-07-12 15:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-07-12 15:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-09 18:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev7) Patchwork
2018-10-09 18:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-09 18:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-09 21:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-12 15:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency. (rev8) Patchwork
2018-10-12 15:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-12 15:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-12 18:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=153969839500.12914.5426508577471057367@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.dunajski@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.