All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
@ 2018-12-14  4:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2018-12-14  4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Masahiro Yamada, linux-kernel

Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
same.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
---

 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 583334c..b4e4f7e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_insn.o = -pg
 CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
 
 # Object file lists.
-arm64-obj-y		:= debug-monitors.o entry.o irq.o fpsimd.o		\
+obj-y			:= debug-monitors.o entry.o irq.o fpsimd.o		\
 			   entry-fpsimd.o process.o ptrace.o setup.o signal.o	\
 			   sys.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o io.o vdso.o	\
 			   hyp-stub.o psci.o cpu_ops.o insn.o	\
@@ -27,40 +27,39 @@ OBJCOPYFLAGS := --prefix-symbols=__efistub_
 $(obj)/%.stub.o: $(obj)/%.o FORCE
 	$(call if_changed,objcopy)
 
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= sys32.o kuser32.o signal32.o 	\
+obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)			+= sys32.o kuser32.o signal32.o 	\
 					   sys_compat.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER)	+= ftrace.o entry-ftrace.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= module.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS)	+= module-plts.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS)		+= perf_regs.o perf_callchain.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS)	+= perf_event.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT)	+= hw_breakpoint.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)		+= sleep.o suspend.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)		+= cpuidle.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)		+= kgdb.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-entry.stub.o		\
+obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER)		+= ftrace.o entry-ftrace.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)			+= module.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS)		+= module-plts.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS)		+= perf_regs.o perf_callchain.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS)		+= perf_event.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT)	+= hw_breakpoint.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)			+= sleep.o suspend.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)			+= cpuidle.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)			+= kgdb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-entry.stub.o		\
 					   efi-rt-wrapper.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)			+= pci.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)	+= armv8_deprecated.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)		+= acpi_numa.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL)	+= acpi_parking_protocol.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)		+= paravirt.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)	+= kaslr.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)		+= hibernate.o hibernate-asm.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)		+= machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o	\
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)			+= pci.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)		+= armv8_deprecated.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)			+= acpi.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)			+= acpi_numa.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL) += acpi_parking_protocol.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)			+= paravirt.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)		+= kaslr.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)		+= hibernate.o hibernate-asm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)		+= machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o	\
 					   cpu-reset.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)		+= machine_kexec_file.o kexec_image.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_RELOC_TEST)	+= arm64-reloc-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)		+= machine_kexec_file.o kexec_image.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_RELOC_TEST)		+= arm64-reloc-test.o
 arm64-reloc-test-y := reloc_test_core.o reloc_test_syms.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)		+= crash_dump.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)		+= crash_core.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE)	+= sdei.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)		+= ssbd.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)		+= crash_dump.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)		+= crash_core.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE)		+= sdei.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)		+= ssbd.o
 
-obj-y					+= $(arm64-obj-y) vdso/ probes/
-obj-m					+= $(arm64-obj-m)
+obj-y					+= vdso/ probes/
 head-y					:= head.o
 extra-y					+= $(head-y) vmlinux.lds
 
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
@ 2018-12-14  4:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2018-12-14  4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Masahiro Yamada, linux-kernel

Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
same.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
---

 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 583334c..b4e4f7e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_insn.o = -pg
 CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
 
 # Object file lists.
-arm64-obj-y		:= debug-monitors.o entry.o irq.o fpsimd.o		\
+obj-y			:= debug-monitors.o entry.o irq.o fpsimd.o		\
 			   entry-fpsimd.o process.o ptrace.o setup.o signal.o	\
 			   sys.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o io.o vdso.o	\
 			   hyp-stub.o psci.o cpu_ops.o insn.o	\
@@ -27,40 +27,39 @@ OBJCOPYFLAGS := --prefix-symbols=__efistub_
 $(obj)/%.stub.o: $(obj)/%.o FORCE
 	$(call if_changed,objcopy)
 
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= sys32.o kuser32.o signal32.o 	\
+obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)			+= sys32.o kuser32.o signal32.o 	\
 					   sys_compat.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER)	+= ftrace.o entry-ftrace.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= module.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS)	+= module-plts.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS)		+= perf_regs.o perf_callchain.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS)	+= perf_event.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT)	+= hw_breakpoint.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)		+= sleep.o suspend.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)		+= cpuidle.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)		+= kgdb.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-entry.stub.o		\
+obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER)		+= ftrace.o entry-ftrace.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)			+= module.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS)		+= module-plts.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS)		+= perf_regs.o perf_callchain.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS)		+= perf_event.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT)	+= hw_breakpoint.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM)			+= sleep.o suspend.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)			+= cpuidle.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)		+= jump_label.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)			+= kgdb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o efi-entry.stub.o		\
 					   efi-rt-wrapper.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)			+= pci.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)	+= armv8_deprecated.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)		+= acpi_numa.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL)	+= acpi_parking_protocol.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)		+= paravirt.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)	+= kaslr.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)		+= hibernate.o hibernate-asm.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)		+= machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o	\
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)			+= pci.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARMV8_DEPRECATED)		+= armv8_deprecated.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)			+= acpi.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)			+= acpi_numa.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL) += acpi_parking_protocol.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)			+= paravirt.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)		+= kaslr.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)		+= hibernate.o hibernate-asm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)		+= machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o	\
 					   cpu-reset.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)		+= machine_kexec_file.o kexec_image.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_RELOC_TEST)	+= arm64-reloc-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)		+= machine_kexec_file.o kexec_image.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_RELOC_TEST)		+= arm64-reloc-test.o
 arm64-reloc-test-y := reloc_test_core.o reloc_test_syms.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)		+= crash_dump.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)		+= crash_core.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE)	+= sdei.o
-arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)		+= ssbd.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)		+= crash_dump.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)		+= crash_core.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE)		+= sdei.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)		+= ssbd.o
 
-obj-y					+= $(arm64-obj-y) vdso/ probes/
-obj-m					+= $(arm64-obj-m)
+obj-y					+= vdso/ probes/
 head-y					:= head.o
 extra-y					+= $(head-y) vmlinux.lds
 
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
  2018-12-14  4:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
@ 2018-12-14  9:51   ` Will Deacon
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2018-12-14  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masahiro Yamada; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

Hi Masahiro,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
files added during the merge window.

Is that ok with you?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
@ 2018-12-14  9:51   ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2018-12-14  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masahiro Yamada; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Masahiro,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
files added during the merge window.

Is that ok with you?

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
  2018-12-14  9:51   ` Will Deacon
@ 2018-12-14 10:35     ` Masahiro Yamada
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2018-12-14 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List

Hi Will,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:54 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> > same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
> we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
> files added during the merge window.
>
> Is that ok with you?

Sure!



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
@ 2018-12-14 10:35     ` Masahiro Yamada
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2018-12-14 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Will,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:54 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> > same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
> we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
> files added during the merge window.
>
> Is that ok with you?

Sure!



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
  2018-12-14 10:35     ` Masahiro Yamada
@ 2018-12-14 10:37       ` Will Deacon
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2018-12-14 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masahiro Yamada
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:35:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Will,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:54 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> > > same.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
> > we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
> > files added during the merge window.
> >
> > Is that ok with you?
> 
> Sure!

Brill. Please poke me again in January if it hasn't landed by then ;)

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
@ 2018-12-14 10:37       ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2018-12-14 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masahiro Yamada
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:35:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Will,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:54 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> > > same.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
> > we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
> > files added during the merge window.
> >
> > Is that ok with you?
> 
> Sure!

Brill. Please poke me again in January if it hasn't landed by then ;)

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
  2018-12-14 10:37       ` Will Deacon
@ 2019-01-04  0:24         ` Masahiro Yamada
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2019-01-04  0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List

Hi Will,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:40 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:35:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:54 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Masahiro,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> > > > same.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
> > > we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
> > > files added during the merge window.
> > >
> > > Is that ok with you?
> >
> > Sure!
>
> Brill. Please poke me again in January if it hasn't landed by then ;)
>
> Will


I just sent v2.

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1028882/


Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-*
@ 2019-01-04  0:24         ` Masahiro Yamada
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2019-01-04  0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Will,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:40 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:35:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:54 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Masahiro,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:01:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > Use the standard obj-$(CONFIG_...) syntex. The behavior is still the
> > > > same.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > I'm fine with this patch, but I think I'd prefer to apply it at -rc1 so
> > > we don't end up with lots of silly conflicts in the Makefile for any new
> > > files added during the merge window.
> > >
> > > Is that ok with you?
> >
> > Sure!
>
> Brill. Please poke me again in January if it hasn't landed by then ;)
>
> Will


I just sent v2.

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1028882/


Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-04  0:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-14  4:01 [PATCH] arm64: replace arm64-obj-* in Makefile with obj-* Masahiro Yamada
2018-12-14  4:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-12-14  9:51 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-14  9:51   ` Will Deacon
2018-12-14 10:35   ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-12-14 10:35     ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-12-14 10:37     ` Will Deacon
2018-12-14 10:37       ` Will Deacon
2019-01-04  0:24       ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-01-04  0:24         ` Masahiro Yamada

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.