From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>, Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Subject: [v4 PATCH 3/8] RISC-V: Remove NR_CPUs check during hartid search from DT Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:10:07 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1549969812-22502-4-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1549969812-22502-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> In non-smp configuration, hartid can be higher that NR_CPUS. riscv_of_processor_hartid should not be compared to hartid to NR_CPUS in that case. Moreover, this function checks all the DT properties of a hart node. NR_CPUS comparison seems out of place. Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> --- arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c index d1d9bfd5..cf2fca12 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ int riscv_of_processor_hartid(struct device_node *node) pr_warn("Found CPU without hart ID\n"); return -ENODEV; } - if (hart >= NR_CPUS) { - pr_info("Found hart ID %d, which is above NR_CPUs. Disabling this hart\n", hart); - return -ENODEV; - } if (!of_device_is_available(node)) { pr_info("CPU with hartid=%d is not available\n", hart); -- 2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>, Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Subject: [v4 PATCH 3/8] RISC-V: Remove NR_CPUs check during hartid search from DT Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:10:07 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1549969812-22502-4-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1549969812-22502-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> In non-smp configuration, hartid can be higher that NR_CPUS. riscv_of_processor_hartid should not be compared to hartid to NR_CPUS in that case. Moreover, this function checks all the DT properties of a hart node. NR_CPUS comparison seems out of place. Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> --- arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c index d1d9bfd5..cf2fca12 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ int riscv_of_processor_hartid(struct device_node *node) pr_warn("Found CPU without hart ID\n"); return -ENODEV; } - if (hart >= NR_CPUS) { - pr_info("Found hart ID %d, which is above NR_CPUs. Disabling this hart\n", hart); - return -ENODEV; - } if (!of_device_is_available(node)) { pr_info("CPU with hartid=%d is not available\n", hart); -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 11:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-02-12 11:10 [v4 PATCH 0/8] Various SMP related fixes Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 1/8] RISC-V: Do not wait indefinitely in __cpu_up Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 2/8] RISC-V: Move cpuid to hartid mapping to SMP Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra [this message] 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 3/8] RISC-V: Remove NR_CPUs check during hartid search from DT Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 4/8] RISC-V: Allow hartid-to-cpuid function to fail Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 5/8] RISC-V: Compare cpuid with NR_CPUS before mapping Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 6/8] clocksource/drivers/riscv: Add required checks during clock source init Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-13 6:43 ` Anup Patel 2019-02-13 6:43 ` Anup Patel 2019-02-13 8:48 ` Daniel Lezcano 2019-02-13 8:48 ` Daniel Lezcano 2019-02-14 0:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2019-02-14 0:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 7/8] irqchip/irq-sifive-plic: Check and continue in case of an invalid cpuid Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-14 12:24 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-02-14 12:24 ` Marc Zyngier 2019-02-12 11:10 ` [v4 PATCH 8/8] RISC-V: Assign hwcap as per comman capabilities Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:10 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 11:25 ` Johan Hovold 2019-02-12 11:25 ` Johan Hovold 2019-02-12 19:58 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-12 19:58 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-13 8:44 ` Johan Hovold 2019-02-13 8:44 ` Johan Hovold 2019-02-13 19:59 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-13 19:59 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-14 0:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2019-02-14 0:37 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2019-02-14 23:49 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-14 23:49 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-22 19:21 ` Atish Patra 2019-02-22 19:21 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1549969812-22502-4-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com \ --to=atish.patra@wdc.com \ --cc=alankao@andestech.com \ --cc=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=dmitriy@oss-tech.org \ --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \ --cc=johan@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=palmer@sifive.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=schwab@suse.de \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.