[PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.

Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
index 7f3b83e..51a8fa3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_TEGRA
 	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
 	select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
 	select PINCTRL
+	select PM
 	select PM_OPP
 	select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
 	select RESET_CONTROLLER
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.

Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
index 7f3b83e..51a8fa3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_TEGRA
 	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
 	select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
 	select PINCTRL
+	select PM
 	select PM_OPP
 	select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
 	select RESET_CONTROLLER
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.

Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
index 7f3b83e..51a8fa3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_TEGRA
 	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
 	select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
 	select PINCTRL
+	select PM
 	select PM_OPP
 	select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
 	select RESET_CONTROLLER
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Dmitry Osipenko]

27.02.2019 11:20, Sameer Pujar пишет:
> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
> 
> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---

The commit message is okay to me this time, thanks! I'm still not super-happy to lose the !PM option because of its value in regards to the PM debugging, but again we can just do something better in that regards later on if will be really needed.   

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Dmitry Osipenko]

27.02.2019 11:20, Sameer Pujar пишет:
> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
> 
> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---

The commit message is okay to me this time, thanks! I'm still not super-happy to lose the !PM option because of its value in regards to the PM debugging, but again we can just do something better in that regards later on if will be really needed.   

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

On 2/27/2019 7:01 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 27.02.2019 11:20, Sameer Pujar пишет:
>> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
>> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
>> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
>> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
>> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
>> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
>> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
>>
>> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
>> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> ---
> The commit message is okay to me this time, thanks! I'm still not super-happy to lose the !PM option because of its value in regards to the PM debugging, but again we can just do something better in that regards later on if will be really needed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Do we have any further concerns over the patch? Request maintainers for 
merge otherwise.

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

On 2/27/2019 7:01 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 27.02.2019 11:20, Sameer Pujar пишет:
>> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
>> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
>> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
>> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
>> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
>> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
>> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
>>
>> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
>> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> ---
> The commit message is okay to me this time, thanks! I'm still not super-happy to lose the !PM option because of its value in regards to the PM debugging, but again we can just do something better in that regards later on if will be really needed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Do we have any further concerns over the patch? Request maintainers for 
merge otherwise.

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

On 2/27/2019 7:01 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 27.02.2019 11:20, Sameer Pujar пишет:
>> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
>> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
>> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
>> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
>> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
>> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
>> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
>>
>> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
>> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> ---
> The commit message is okay to me this time, thanks! I'm still not super-happy to lose the !PM option because of its value in regards to the PM debugging, but again we can just do something better in that regards later on if will be really needed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Do we have any further concerns over the patch? Request maintainers for 
merge otherwise.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1069 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:50:28PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
> 
> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Applied to for-5.2/arm/soc, thanks.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1069 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:50:28PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Currently runtime PM is enabled for Tegra HDA driver. One of the concern
> raised was about handling !PM case in HDA driver. In this case, there is
> a need to manage clocks and power explicitly in the driver and reviewers
> were not really convinced about this. The consensus at the end was to
> enforce PM requirement to keep things simple, rather driver mentioning a
> dependency on PM. This is how it is done for ARM 64-bit Tegra platforms
> and the same can be done for 32-bit Tegra platforms too.
> 
> Finally the objective is to remove dependency on PM availability for all
> Tegra drivers. The detailed discussion can be found in following patch,
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Applied to for-5.2/arm/soc, thanks.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel