All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Fix calculation of sub-channel count
@ 2019-03-31 23:57 ` Michael Kelley
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Kelley @ 2019-03-31 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KY Srinivasan, martin.petersen, Long Li, James.Bottomley, emilne,
	linux-hyperv, linux-kernel, linux-scsi
  Cc: Michael Kelley

When the number of sub-channels offered by Hyper-V is >= the number
of CPUs in the VM, calculate the correct number of sub-channels.
The current code produces one too many.

This scenario arises only when the number of CPUs is artificially
restricted (for example, with maxcpus=<n> on the kernel boot line),
because Hyper-V normally offers a sub-channel count < number of CPUs.
While the current code doesn't break, the extra sub-channel is
unbalanced across the CPUs (for example, a total of 5 channels on
a VM with 4 CPUs).

Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index 84380ba..fbaa11a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -674,7 +674,17 @@ static void  handle_multichannel_storage(struct hv_device *device, int max_chns)
 	struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet;
 	int ret, t;
 
-	num_sc = ((max_chns > num_cpus) ? num_cpus : max_chns);
+	/*
+	 * If the number of CPUs is artificially restricted, such as
+	 * with maxcpus=1 on the kernel boot line, Hyper-V could offer
+	 * sub-channels >= the number of CPUs. These sub-channels
+	 * should not be created. The primary channel is already created
+	 * and assigned to one CPU, so check against # CPUs - 1.
+	 */
+	num_sc = min((num_cpus - 1), max_chns);
+	if (!num_sc)
+		return;
+
 	stor_device = get_out_stor_device(device);
 	if (!stor_device)
 		return;
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Fix calculation of sub-channel count
@ 2019-03-31 23:57 ` Michael Kelley
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Kelley @ 2019-03-31 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KY Srinivasan, martin.petersen, Long Li, James.Bottomley, emilne,
	linux-hyperv, linux-kernel, linux-scsi
  Cc: Michael Kelley

When the number of sub-channels offered by Hyper-V is >= the number
of CPUs in the VM, calculate the correct number of sub-channels.
The current code produces one too many.

This scenario arises only when the number of CPUs is artificially
restricted (for example, with maxcpus=<n> on the kernel boot line),
because Hyper-V normally offers a sub-channel count < number of CPUs.
While the current code doesn't break, the extra sub-channel is
unbalanced across the CPUs (for example, a total of 5 channels on
a VM with 4 CPUs).

Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index 84380ba..fbaa11a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -674,7 +674,17 @@ static void  handle_multichannel_storage(struct hv_device *device, int max_chns)
 	struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet;
 	int ret, t;
 
-	num_sc = ((max_chns > num_cpus) ? num_cpus : max_chns);
+	/*
+	 * If the number of CPUs is artificially restricted, such as
+	 * with maxcpus=1 on the kernel boot line, Hyper-V could offer
+	 * sub-channels >= the number of CPUs. These sub-channels
+	 * should not be created. The primary channel is already created
+	 * and assigned to one CPU, so check against # CPUs - 1.
+	 */
+	num_sc = min((num_cpus - 1), max_chns);
+	if (!num_sc)
+		return;
+
 	stor_device = get_out_stor_device(device);
 	if (!stor_device)
 		return;
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Fix calculation of sub-channel count
  2019-03-31 23:57 ` Michael Kelley
@ 2019-04-01 13:45   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov @ 2019-04-01 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Kelley
  Cc: KY Srinivasan, martin.petersen, Long Li, James.Bottomley, emilne,
	linux-hyperv, linux-kernel, linux-scsi

Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> writes:

> When the number of sub-channels offered by Hyper-V is >= the number
> of CPUs in the VM, calculate the correct number of sub-channels.
> The current code produces one too many.
>
> This scenario arises only when the number of CPUs is artificially
> restricted (for example, with maxcpus=<n> on the kernel boot line),
> because Hyper-V normally offers a sub-channel count < number of CPUs.
> While the current code doesn't break, the extra sub-channel is
> unbalanced across the CPUs (for example, a total of 5 channels on
> a VM with 4 CPUs).
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 84380ba..fbaa11a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -674,7 +674,17 @@ static void  handle_multichannel_storage(struct hv_device *device, int max_chns)
>  	struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet;
>  	int ret, t;
>  
> -	num_sc = ((max_chns > num_cpus) ? num_cpus : max_chns);
> +	/*
> +	 * If the number of CPUs is artificially restricted, such as
> +	 * with maxcpus=1 on the kernel boot line, Hyper-V could offer
> +	 * sub-channels >= the number of CPUs. These sub-channels
> +	 * should not be created. The primary channel is already created
> +	 * and assigned to one CPU, so check against # CPUs - 1.
> +	 */

Indeed.

> +	num_sc = min((num_cpus - 1), max_chns);

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

(nit: you could've written

num_sc = min((num_online_cpus() - 1), max_chns);

and got rid of the now-unneeded num_cpus variable).

> +	if (!num_sc)
> +		return;
> +
>  	stor_device = get_out_stor_device(device);
>  	if (!stor_device)
>  		return;

-- 
Vitaly

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Fix calculation of sub-channel count
@ 2019-04-01 13:45   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov @ 2019-04-01 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Kelley
  Cc: KY Srinivasan, martin.petersen, Long Li, James.Bottomley, emilne,
	linux-hyperv, linux-kernel, linux-scsi

Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> writes:

> When the number of sub-channels offered by Hyper-V is >= the number
> of CPUs in the VM, calculate the correct number of sub-channels.
> The current code produces one too many.
>
> This scenario arises only when the number of CPUs is artificially
> restricted (for example, with maxcpus=<n> on the kernel boot line),
> because Hyper-V normally offers a sub-channel count < number of CPUs.
> While the current code doesn't break, the extra sub-channel is
> unbalanced across the CPUs (for example, a total of 5 channels on
> a VM with 4 CPUs).
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 84380ba..fbaa11a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -674,7 +674,17 @@ static void  handle_multichannel_storage(struct hv_device *device, int max_chns)
>  	struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet;
>  	int ret, t;
>  
> -	num_sc = ((max_chns > num_cpus) ? num_cpus : max_chns);
> +	/*
> +	 * If the number of CPUs is artificially restricted, such as
> +	 * with maxcpus=1 on the kernel boot line, Hyper-V could offer
> +	 * sub-channels >= the number of CPUs. These sub-channels
> +	 * should not be created. The primary channel is already created
> +	 * and assigned to one CPU, so check against # CPUs - 1.
> +	 */

Indeed.

> +	num_sc = min((num_cpus - 1), max_chns);

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

(nit: you could've written

num_sc = min((num_online_cpus() - 1), max_chns);

and got rid of the now-unneeded num_cpus variable).

> +	if (!num_sc)
> +		return;
> +
>  	stor_device = get_out_stor_device(device);
>  	if (!stor_device)
>  		return;

-- 
Vitaly

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-01 13:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-31 23:57 [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Fix calculation of sub-channel count Michael Kelley
2019-03-31 23:57 ` Michael Kelley
2019-04-01 13:45 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-04-01 13:45   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.