From: shawn <shawnanastasio@yahoo.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1824744] [NEW] ivshmem device PCI device exposes wrong endianness on ppc64le Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 01:33:43 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <155529202334.8409.17401063591999151604.malonedeb@wampee.canonical.com> (raw) Public bug reported: On a ppc64le host with a ppc64le guest running on QEMU 3.1.0 when an ivshmem device is used, the ivshmem device appears to expose the wrong endianness for the values in BAR 0. For example, when the guest is assigned an ivshmem device ID of 1, the IVPosition register (u32, offset 8 in BAR 0) returns 0x1000000 instead of 0x1. I tested on an x86_64 machine and the IVPosition reads 0x1 as expected. It seems possible that there's a ppc64*==bigendian assumption somewhere that is erroneously affecting ppc64le. ** Affects: qemu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ppc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824744 Title: ivshmem device PCI device exposes wrong endianness on ppc64le Status in QEMU: New Bug description: On a ppc64le host with a ppc64le guest running on QEMU 3.1.0 when an ivshmem device is used, the ivshmem device appears to expose the wrong endianness for the values in BAR 0. For example, when the guest is assigned an ivshmem device ID of 1, the IVPosition register (u32, offset 8 in BAR 0) returns 0x1000000 instead of 0x1. I tested on an x86_64 machine and the IVPosition reads 0x1 as expected. It seems possible that there's a ppc64*==bigendian assumption somewhere that is erroneously affecting ppc64le. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1824744/+subscriptions
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shawn via Qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: shawn <shawnanastasio@yahoo.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1824744] [NEW] ivshmem device PCI device exposes wrong endianness on ppc64le Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 01:33:43 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <155529202334.8409.17401063591999151604.malonedeb@wampee.canonical.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190415013343.91YyjnepvslDL_y7lGDCqss1mEaWjURWqLSqixgueYY@z> (raw) Public bug reported: On a ppc64le host with a ppc64le guest running on QEMU 3.1.0 when an ivshmem device is used, the ivshmem device appears to expose the wrong endianness for the values in BAR 0. For example, when the guest is assigned an ivshmem device ID of 1, the IVPosition register (u32, offset 8 in BAR 0) returns 0x1000000 instead of 0x1. I tested on an x86_64 machine and the IVPosition reads 0x1 as expected. It seems possible that there's a ppc64*==bigendian assumption somewhere that is erroneously affecting ppc64le. ** Affects: qemu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ppc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824744 Title: ivshmem device PCI device exposes wrong endianness on ppc64le Status in QEMU: New Bug description: On a ppc64le host with a ppc64le guest running on QEMU 3.1.0 when an ivshmem device is used, the ivshmem device appears to expose the wrong endianness for the values in BAR 0. For example, when the guest is assigned an ivshmem device ID of 1, the IVPosition register (u32, offset 8 in BAR 0) returns 0x1000000 instead of 0x1. I tested on an x86_64 machine and the IVPosition reads 0x1 as expected. It seems possible that there's a ppc64*==bigendian assumption somewhere that is erroneously affecting ppc64le. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1824744/+subscriptions
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 1:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-15 1:33 shawn [this message] 2019-04-15 1:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1824744] [NEW] ivshmem device PCI device exposes wrong endianness on ppc64le shawn via Qemu-devel 2019-04-15 2:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1824744] Re: ivshmem " shawn 2019-04-15 2:00 ` shawn via Qemu-devel 2021-05-05 11:27 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=155529202334.8409.17401063591999151604.malonedeb@wampee.canonical.com \ --to=shawnanastasio@yahoo.com \ --cc=1824744@bugs.launchpad.net \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.