From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next()
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 13:37:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567584434.0m0xodpunl.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830164706.453a119e@gandalf.local.home>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 20:04:41 +0530
> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index 7b037295a1f1..0791eafb693d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -3093,6 +3093,10 @@ t_probe_next(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>> hnd = &iter->probe_entry->hlist;
>>
>> hash = iter->probe->ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
>> +
>> + if (!hash)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> size = 1 << hash->size_bits;
>>
>> retry:
>
> OK, I added this, but I'm also adding this on top:
Thanks, the additional comments do make this much clearer.
Regards,
Naveen
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next()
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 13:37:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567584434.0m0xodpunl.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830164706.453a119e@gandalf.local.home>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 20:04:41 +0530
> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index 7b037295a1f1..0791eafb693d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -3093,6 +3093,10 @@ t_probe_next(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>> hnd = &iter->probe_entry->hlist;
>>
>> hash = iter->probe->ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
>> +
>> + if (!hash)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> size = 1 << hash->size_bits;
>>
>> retry:
>
> OK, I added this, but I'm also adding this on top:
Thanks, the additional comments do make this much clearer.
Regards,
Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 14:34 [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling Naveen N. Rao
2019-07-04 14:34 ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-07-04 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in t_probe_next() Naveen N. Rao
2019-07-04 14:34 ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-30 20:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-30 20:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-30 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-30 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-04 8:07 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2019-09-04 8:07 ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-07-04 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: Check for successful allocation of hash Naveen N. Rao
2019-07-04 14:34 ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-08 15:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: two fixes with func_probes handling Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-08 15:15 ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-08 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-08 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-30 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-30 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1567584434.0m0xodpunl.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.