All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>, <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 01/12] pwm: mediatek: add a property "num-pwms"
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 22:32:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1569421957-20765-2-git-send-email-sam.shih@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569421957-20765-1-git-send-email-sam.shih@mediatek.com>

From: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>

This adds a property "num-pwms" to avoid having an endless
list of compatibles with no differences for the same driver.

Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Changes since v6:
Add a Reviewed-by tag

Changes since v5:
Check num-pwms value is no more than MTK_CLK_MAX - 2 (MAIN + TOP)

Changes since v4:
Follow reviewer's comments:
Move the changes of droping the check for of_device_get_match_data returning non-NULL to next patch

---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index eb6674ce995f..e214f4f57107 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static const char * const mtk_pwm_clk_name[MTK_CLK_MAX] = {
 };
 
 struct mtk_pwm_platform_data {
-	unsigned int num_pwms;
+	unsigned int fallback_npwms;
 	bool pwm45_fixup;
 	bool has_clks;
 };
@@ -227,9 +227,10 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_pwm_ops = {
 static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data *data;
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int i, npwms;
 	int ret;
 
 	pc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -246,7 +247,26 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(pc->regs))
 		return PTR_ERR(pc->regs);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < data->num_pwms + 2 && pc->soc->has_clks; i++) {
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-pwms", &npwms);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		/* It's deprecated, we should specify num_pwms via DT now. */
+		if (pc->soc->fallback_npwms) {
+			npwms = pc->soc->fallback_npwms;
+			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DT is outdated, please update it\n");
+		} else {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get number of PWMs\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* MAIN + TOP + NPWM < MTK_CLK_MAX */
+	if ((npwms + 2) > MTK_CLK_MAX) {
+		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "number of PWMs is larger than %d\n",
+			 MTK_CLK_MAX - 2);
+		npwms = MTK_CLK_MAX - 2;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < npwms + 2 && pc->soc->has_clks; i++) {
 		pc->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, mtk_pwm_clk_name[i]);
 		if (IS_ERR(pc->clks[i])) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clock: %s fail: %ld\n",
@@ -260,7 +280,7 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	pc->chip.ops = &mtk_pwm_ops;
 	pc->chip.base = -1;
-	pc->chip.npwm = data->num_pwms;
+	pc->chip.npwm = npwms;
 
 	ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -279,25 +299,25 @@ static int mtk_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt2712_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 8,
+	.fallback_npwms = 8,
 	.pwm45_fixup = false,
 	.has_clks = true,
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7622_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 6,
+	.fallback_npwms = 6,
 	.pwm45_fixup = false,
 	.has_clks = true,
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7623_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 5,
+	.fallback_npwms = 5,
 	.pwm45_fixup = true,
 	.has_clks = true,
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7628_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 4,
+	.fallback_npwms = 4,
 	.pwm45_fixup = true,
 	.has_clks = false,
 };
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 01/12] pwm: mediatek: add a property "num-pwms"
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 22:32:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1569421957-20765-2-git-send-email-sam.shih@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569421957-20765-1-git-send-email-sam.shih@mediatek.com>

From: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>

This adds a property "num-pwms" to avoid having an endless
list of compatibles with no differences for the same driver.

Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Changes since v6:
Add a Reviewed-by tag

Changes since v5:
Check num-pwms value is no more than MTK_CLK_MAX - 2 (MAIN + TOP)

Changes since v4:
Follow reviewer's comments:
Move the changes of droping the check for of_device_get_match_data returning non-NULL to next patch

---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index eb6674ce995f..e214f4f57107 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static const char * const mtk_pwm_clk_name[MTK_CLK_MAX] = {
 };
 
 struct mtk_pwm_platform_data {
-	unsigned int num_pwms;
+	unsigned int fallback_npwms;
 	bool pwm45_fixup;
 	bool has_clks;
 };
@@ -227,9 +227,10 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_pwm_ops = {
 static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data *data;
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int i, npwms;
 	int ret;
 
 	pc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -246,7 +247,26 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(pc->regs))
 		return PTR_ERR(pc->regs);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < data->num_pwms + 2 && pc->soc->has_clks; i++) {
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-pwms", &npwms);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		/* It's deprecated, we should specify num_pwms via DT now. */
+		if (pc->soc->fallback_npwms) {
+			npwms = pc->soc->fallback_npwms;
+			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DT is outdated, please update it\n");
+		} else {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get number of PWMs\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* MAIN + TOP + NPWM < MTK_CLK_MAX */
+	if ((npwms + 2) > MTK_CLK_MAX) {
+		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "number of PWMs is larger than %d\n",
+			 MTK_CLK_MAX - 2);
+		npwms = MTK_CLK_MAX - 2;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < npwms + 2 && pc->soc->has_clks; i++) {
 		pc->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, mtk_pwm_clk_name[i]);
 		if (IS_ERR(pc->clks[i])) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clock: %s fail: %ld\n",
@@ -260,7 +280,7 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	pc->chip.ops = &mtk_pwm_ops;
 	pc->chip.base = -1;
-	pc->chip.npwm = data->num_pwms;
+	pc->chip.npwm = npwms;
 
 	ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -279,25 +299,25 @@ static int mtk_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt2712_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 8,
+	.fallback_npwms = 8,
 	.pwm45_fixup = false,
 	.has_clks = true,
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7622_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 6,
+	.fallback_npwms = 6,
 	.pwm45_fixup = false,
 	.has_clks = true,
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7623_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 5,
+	.fallback_npwms = 5,
 	.pwm45_fixup = true,
 	.has_clks = true,
 };
 
 static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7628_pwm_data = {
-	.num_pwms = 4,
+	.fallback_npwms = 4,
 	.pwm45_fixup = true,
 	.has_clks = false,
 };
-- 
2.17.1

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-25 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-25 14:32 [PATCH v10 0/12] Add mt7629 and fix mt7628 pwm Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` Sam Shih [this message]
2019-09-25 14:32   ` [PATCH v10 01/12] pwm: mediatek: add a property "num-pwms" Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 02/12] pwm: mediatek: droping the check for of_device_get_match_data Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 03/12] pwm: mediatek: remove a property "has-clks" Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 04/12] pwm: mediatek: allocate the clks array dynamically Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 05/12] pwm: mediatek: use pwm_mediatek as common prefix Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 06/12] pwm: mediatek: update license and switch to SPDX tag Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 07/12] dt-bindings: pwm: pwm-mediatek: add a property "num-pwms" Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 22:50   ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 08/12] pwm: mediatek: Add MT7629 compatible string Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-27 11:28   ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-27 11:28     ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-30  8:51     ` Sam Shih
2019-09-30  8:51       ` Sam Shih
2019-09-30  9:36       ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-30  9:51         ` Sam Shih
2019-09-30  9:51           ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 09/12] arm64: dts: mt7622: add a property "num-pwms" for PWM Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 10/12] arm: dts: mt7623: " Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 11/12] dt-bindings: pwm: update bindings for MT7629 SoC Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v10 12/12] arm: dts: mediatek: add mt7629 pwm support Sam Shih
2019-09-25 14:32   ` Sam Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1569421957-20765-2-git-send-email-sam.shih@mediatek.com \
    --to=sam.shih@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.